http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...ine_in_ho.html

In Honduras, Mr. Obama is intervening on the wrong side. But if you
take him at his word (a dangerous thing to do), the wonder is that he
is intervening at all. This is the guy, you'll remember, who was so
concerned about being perceived as "meddling" in Iran's internal
affairs that he, alone among Western leaders, refused to denounce the
blatantly stolen election in Iran, or to express support for those who
protested the theft.

Mr. Obama is now doing with regard to Honduras what he has refused to
do with regard to Iran: organizing an international coalition to
pressure the country to reverse course.

There is a disturbing consistency to Mr. Obama's apparent
inconsistency on Honduras and Iran. In both the case where he has
intervened, and in the case where he hasn't, he has taken the side of
anti-American dictators (in Mr. Zelaya's case, a wannabe dictator)
over the vast majority of their people.

http://www.tothepointnews.com/