http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...ine_in_ho.html

In Honduras, Mr. Obama is intervening on the wrong side. But if you
take him at his word (a dangerous thing to do), the wonder is that he
is intervening at all. This is the guy, you'll remember, who was so
concerned about being perceived as "meddling" in Iran's internal
affairs that he, alone among Western leaders, refused to denounce the
blatantly stolen election in Iran, or to express support for those who
protested the theft.

Mr. Obama is now doing with regard to Honduras what he has refused to
do with regard to Iran: organizing an international coalition to
pressure the country to reverse course.

There is a disturbing consistency to Mr. Obama's apparent
inconsistency on Honduras and Iran. In both the case where he has
intervened, and in the case where he hasn't, he has taken the side of
anti-American dictators (in Mr. Zelaya's case, a wannabe dictator)
over the vast majority of their people.

http://www.tothepointnews.com/

On Jul 1, 7:25*pm, 0baMa0 Tse Dung wrote:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...rs_shine_in_ho...

In Honduras, Mr. Obama is intervening on the wrong side. *But if you
take him at his word (a dangerous thing to do), the wonder is that he
is intervening at all. *This is the guy, you'll remember, who was so
concerned about being perceived as "meddling" in Iran's internal
affairs that he, alone among Western leaders, refused to denounce the
blatantly stolen election in Iran, or to express support for those who
protested the theft.

Mr. Obama is now doing with regard to Honduras what he has refused to
do with regard to Iran: organizing an international coalition to
pressure the country to reverse course.

There is a disturbing consistency to Mr. Obama's apparent
inconsistency on Honduras and Iran. *In both the case where he has
intervened, and in the case where he hasn't, he has taken the side of
anti-American dictators (in Mr. Zelaya's case, a wannabe dictator)
over the vast majority of their people.

http://www.tothepointnews.com/


Can you name a single gov't in the world - right or left - that
supports the new government in Honduras? Why do you think every
government in the world is condemning the new gov't?

Just wondering,

Mike

The Communist Party USA (CPUSA) joins with the world in denouncing the
coup d’etat

http://cpusa.org/article/view/1052/

Constitutional Succession

What happened in Honduras was not a Military Coup, it was the
equivalent of Impeachment proceedings, executed by the two branches of
the government, in favor of the people of Honduras that they
Represent. The reason for impeachment of the president is the
following:

1.The Constitution of Honduras does not allow for reelection

2.The Constitution of Honduras states that any intention to change
term of the presidency, or the non-relection clause is considered a
crime

3.Treason by any citizen of the country is punishable by law

4.The president of the country is a Citizen, and not above the law

5.Manuel Zelaya, by promoting to establish a public survey to change
the constitution to permit for reelection is in fact engaging in a
crime

6.The legislative and judicial branches of government are in their
complete jurisdiction to impeach the president if he is guilty of
treason

7.The Military executes orders based on the constitution, and the
constution gives them the power to arrest and bring the president to
the law, to be tried and convicted of his crimes.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/...043&page=1

Honduras Defends Its Democracy - Fidel Castro and Hillary Clinton
object.

It seems that President Mel Zelaya miscalculated when he tried to
emulate the success of his good friend Hugo Chavez in reshaping the
Honduran Constitution to his liking. 0baMa0 may be thinking he to can
circumvent the Constitution of the United States.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124623220955866301.html

There should be no wonder in the fact that all the Liberal Fascist,
Socialist/Communist organizations, countries and diktators of the
world support ObaMa0 Tse Dung and his anti-Freedom, anti-American
Sovereignty agenda.

"Barry" wrote in message
...

The Communist Party USA (CPUSA) joins with the world in denouncing the
coup d’etat

And you care why?

Jim

Michael W. Bryant, the Marxist dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:

On Jul 1, 7:25 pm, 0baMa0 Tse Dung wrote:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...rs_shine_in_ho...

In Honduras, Mr. Obama is intervening on the wrong side. But if you
take him at his word (a dangerous thing to do), the wonder is that he
is intervening at all. This is the guy, you'll remember, who was so
concerned about being perceived as "meddling" in Iran's internal
affairs that he, alone among Western leaders, refused to denounce the
blatantly stolen election in Iran, or to express support for those who
protested the theft.

Mr. Obama is now doing with regard to Honduras what he has refused to
do with regard to Iran: organizing an international coalition to
pressure the country to reverse course.

There is a disturbing consistency to Mr. Obama's apparent
inconsistency on Honduras and Iran. In both the case where he has
intervened, and in the case where he hasn't, he has taken the side of
anti-American dictators (in Mr. Zelaya's case, a wannabe dictator)
over the vast majority of their people.

http://www.tothepointnews.com/

Can you name a single gov't in the world - right or left - that
supports the new government in Honduras? Why do you think every
government in the world is condemning the new gov't?

Just wondering,

Stop wondering and get to work on that PhD.

Mike wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:25 pm, 0baMa0 Tse Dung wrote:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...rs_shine_in_ho...

In Honduras, Mr. Obama is intervening on the wrong side. But if you
take him at his word (a dangerous thing to do), the wonder is that he
is intervening at all. This is the guy, you'll remember, who was so
concerned about being perceived as "meddling" in Iran's internal
affairs that he, alone among Western leaders, refused to denounce the
blatantly stolen election in Iran, or to express support for those who
protested the theft.

Mr. Obama is now doing with regard to Honduras what he has refused to
do with regard to Iran: organizing an international coalition to
pressure the country to reverse course.

There is a disturbing consistency to Mr. Obama's apparent
inconsistency on Honduras and Iran. In both the case where he has
intervened, and in the case where he hasn't, he has taken the side of
anti-American dictators (in Mr. Zelaya's case, a wannabe dictator)
over the vast majority of their people.

http://www.tothepointnews.com/


Can you name a single gov't in the world - right or left - that
supports the new government in Honduras? Why do you think every
government in the world is condemning the new gov't?

Just wondering,

Mike

If money is being made on drugs, chances are the CIA's getting a cut.

On Jul 1, 7:02*pm, Barry wrote:
The Communist Party USA (CPUSA) joins with the world in denouncing the
coup d’etat

http://cpusa.org/article/view/1052/

Constitutional Succession

What happened in Honduras was not a Military Coup, it was the
equivalent of Impeachment proceedings, executed by the two branches of
the government, in favor of the people of Honduras that they
Represent. The reason for impeachment of the president is the
following:

1.The Constitution of Honduras does not allow for reelection

2.The Constitution of Honduras states that any intention to change
term of the presidency, or the non-relection clause is considered a
crime

3.Treason by any citizen of the country is punishable by law

4.The president of the country is a Citizen, and not above the law

5.Manuel Zelaya, by promoting to establish a public survey to change
the constitution to permit for reelection is in fact engaging in a
crime

6.The legislative and judicial branches of government are in their
complete jurisdiction to impeach the president if he is guilty of
treason

7.The Military executes orders based on the constitution, and the
constution gives them the power to arrest and bring the president to
the law, to be tried and convicted of his crimes.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/...7973043&page=1

Honduras Defends Its Democracy - Fidel Castro and Hillary Clinton
object.

It seems that President Mel Zelaya miscalculated when he tried to
emulate the success of his good friend Hugo Chavez in reshaping the
Honduran Constitution to his liking. *0baMa0 may be thinking he to can
circumvent the Constitution of the United States.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124623220955866301.html

There should be no wonder in the fact that all the Liberal Fascist,
Socialist/Communist organizations, countries and diktators of the
world support ObaMa0 Tse Dung and his anti-Freedom, anti-American
Sovereignty agenda.

The OAS says the overthrow of an elected leader violates the Inter-
American Democratic Charter, signed in 2001 and ratified by all
members, including Honduras. Suspension from the OAS would be in line
with the charter’s articles 20 and 21, which deal with interruption of
democratic and constitutional order.
[...]

[A senior Obama administration official] called the OAS’s invoking of
the articles for the first time a “dramatic move” that “underscores
its commitment to democracy.”

Ironically, Zelaya just a month ago led a push by the OAS to lift a 47-
year-old resolution expelling communist Cuba from the regional
organization, a move which critics argued flew in the face of the 2001
charter.

The Obama administration joined the consensus, and sought to portray
the decision as a victory for diplomacy, given that some countries had
wanted to allow Cuba to return automatically and without conditions,
while the measure adopted envisages a “process of dialogue.”

Latin American scholars of various political hues generally agree that
the Honduran military’s actions on Sunday were illegal, but many also
stress that Zelaya’s own conduct played a key role in the crisis. Some
note that the OAS had little to say on Zelaya’s recent actions.

Since his election in 2006, Zelaya has moved to the left, and aligned
himself with the nine-nation Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas
(ALBA), a bloc led by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.

In an echo of earlier maneuvering by Chavez and others, Zelaya sought
to amend the constitution to extend presidential term limits. He
defied both the Supreme Court and the Honduran legislature in pressing
for a referendum on the subject. When the head of the army last week
refused to help him carry out the illegal voting exercise, Zelaya
fired him – and then refused a Supreme Court order to reinstate him.

The court said Sunday it had ordered the army to remove the president
“to defend the rule of law,” and the National Assembly later in the
day appointed a new acting president to serve until January 2010, when
Zelaya’s term was to have ended.
[...]

http://www.cnsnews.com/public/conten...x?RsrcID=50455

Honduras' ambassador to Washington returned home and said he was
recognizing Micheletti's government. "This is not a coup d'etat, but
rather a process in which a judicial order has been carried out,"
envoy Roberto Flores Bermudez said.

On Jul 2, 7:41*am, dave wrote:
Mike wrote:
On Jul 1, 7:25 pm, 0baMa0 Tse Dung wrote:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...rs_shine_in_ho....

In Honduras, Mr. Obama is intervening on the wrong side. *But if you
take him at his word (a dangerous thing to do), the wonder is that he
is intervening at all. *This is the guy, you'll remember, who was so
concerned about being perceived as "meddling" in Iran's internal
affairs that he, alone among Western leaders, refused to denounce the
blatantly stolen election in Iran, or to express support for those who
protested the theft.

Mr. Obama is now doing with regard to Honduras what he has refused to
do with regard to Iran: organizing an international coalition to
pressure the country to reverse course.

There is a disturbing consistency to Mr. Obama's apparent
inconsistency on Honduras and Iran. *In both the case where he has
intervened, and in the case where he hasn't, he has taken the side of
anti-American dictators (in Mr. Zelaya's case, a wannabe dictator)
over the vast majority of their people.

http://www.tothepointnews.com/


If money is being made on drugs, chances are the CIA's getting a cut.- Hide quoted text -


The 0baMa0ist CIA is obviously and most certainly supporting Marxism.

Lsten to the Silence of the Liberal Fascists.

On Jul 3, 7:49*am, dave wrote:
~ RHF wrote:
- If money is being made on drugs, chances are the CIA's getting a
cut.

Dave - Al Qaeda = Al C-I-A-da
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze25x9n/id14.html
http://whatreallyhappened.wikia.com/wiki/Al_Qaeda

The CIA is an Agency of the US Federal Government

dave - are you saying that the 'usa' in invloved in the
war on drugs -a- yes {but on who's side} ~ RHF
*.

IRAN-CONTRA ERA

C.I.A. & DRUGS FACT SHEET

* "Without the Honduran military there would have been no Contras. $14
million [to finance arms] came from drugs." [through Honduras.] - Oliver
North's diary 7/5/85.- Oliver North then intervened to get an absurdly
lenient sentence for General Jose Bueso-Rosa, convicted of smuggling
tons of cocaine into the U.S.

* "We don't need to investigate [C.I.A.'s role in drug dealing]. We
already know. The evidence is there." - Jack Blum, former Chief Counsel
to John Kerry's Subcommittee on Narcotics and Terrorism in 1996 Senate
Hearings. - The Medellin Cartel gave more than $10 million to the contras..

* *"In my 30 year history in DEA, the major targets of my investigations
almost invariably turned out to be working for the CIA." - Dennis Dayle,
Chief of an elite DEA unit in Central America.

* "With respect to [drug trafficking by] the resistance forces... it is
not a couple of people. It is a lot of people." - Alan Fiers former CIA
deputy for Central American ops.

* FOUR FIRMS LISTED BY DEA AS MAJOR SMUGGLING OPERATIONS WERE ON CIA's
LIST OF APPROVED VENDORS AND EACH RECEIVED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF
DOLLARS IN STATE DEPARTMENT SUBSIDIES WHILE THEY WERE DEALING DRUGS:
DIACSA - SETCO - VORTEX - FRIGORIFICOS DE PUNTARENAS.

* Miguel Felix Gallardo and Rafael Caro-Quintero supplied the contras
with guns and money. Caro ran a Contra training camp in Veracruz.
Together they smuggled 4 tons of cocaine a month into the U.S. Both were
later tied to the murder of DEA agent Kiki Camarena.

* THESE ARE SOME OF THE PILOTS WHO FLEW DRUGS ON CIA PROTECTED FLIGHTS
INTO THE U.S.:

* Michael Palmer * Werner Stoltz * Floyd Carlton * Bill Cooper * Tosh
Plumley * Marcos Aguado * Bo Abbott * Gerardo Duran * Pat Foley * Frank
Moss * Tito Carrasco * Barry Seal * John Allen * Cesar Rodriguez *
Teofilo Watson * Alfredo Caballero * Gary Betzner

* CIA FUNDED AIRLINES CONNECTED WITH DRUG OR WEAPONS SMUGGLING:

* So. Air Transport * SETCO * EVERGREEN * Hondu Carib * Arrow Air

* IN A COURT OF LAW THE STRONGEST FORM OF DIRECT EVIDENCE IS TESTIMONY
BY EYEWITNESSES. THE FOLLOWING ARE EYEWITNESSES TO CIA DRUG TRAFFICKING
WHO HAVE NEVER BEEN ALLOWED TO TESTIFY:

* Celerino Castillo (DEA) * Michael Ruppert (LAPD)* Mike Levine (DEA) *
Bill Tyree (Spl forces) * John Mattes (Fed. Pub Defender) * Dee
Ferdinand * Jack Terrell (Contra supporter) * Anabelle Grimm (DEA) Brad
Ayers (DEA) * Bo Abbott (Air America) * Tosh Plumley (CIA) * Ralph
McGehee (CIA) * Lt Col. Bo Gritz (ret.) (US Army Spl. Forces) * Dr.
David Sabow, MD (brother of murdered Marine Col. Jim Sabow) *Dois G.
(Chip) Tatum (CIA) * Gene Wheaton (Army CID)

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/fre...factsheet.html

Prez Obama Cuts Off US Aid to Honduras
to Force Return of Marxist Leader
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...6ec01139f364ec

On Jul 3, 9:49*am, dave wrote:


http://www.fromthewilderness.com

LMFAO yet another Liberal Fascist propaganda sight.

Hey Professor DaviD! When will your Komrads publish an updated
0baMa0ist - CIA - Marxist - Drug story?
C'mon Professor DaviD, yes you can! ROTFLMAO!