LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old July 12th 09, 10:19 AM posted to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,rec.radio.shortwave,alt.news-media,alt.religion.christian,alt.politics.economics
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,817
Default The "Progressive" Promised Land


"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
...

And analysis of millions of listener weeks of recorded listening over
nearly a decade shows that there is very little listening outside the 64
dbu of FMs at work or at home, and much of that is because the radios of
the last few decades can't pick up much of anything less than that with
acceptable quality. When I see nearly no exceptions that would validate
your contention, I must conclude that you are imagining things.


How many of those studies were done outside huge metros?


Almost every county in the US is part of some metro. The non-measured
counties are only a couple of percrent of the total US population... and
they are not measured because the ability to get a sample is very hard.

For example, in Washington only Asotin county is not measured, and in Oregon
only Curry and Lake are not in. In some states like Ohio, every county is
measured. In Michigan, only a couple of very sparsely populated UP counties
are not in the sample of some metro, plus tiny Alcona County in NE Michigan.

The studies essentially looked at all diary returns. FM showed 95% of
listening in the 64 dbu for attributable in home and at work listening, no
matter what market... and it comes down to the ability of radios to pick up
acceptably anything less, not desire to listen.

I've lived in towns with their own FM's where the 64 dBu contour didn't
cover the transmitter site parking lot. One example was KLER-FM in
Orofino, ID. Their tower was BELOW average terrain, and they were running
100 watts, and couldn't cover a significant portion of the very small town
they are located in. Since then, they have raised their tower height and
power, but given the terrain, probably don't have a much better coverage.
It may be an exaggeration, but not much of one, to say that some
educational stations wouldn't have a 64 dBu signal if you connected the
meter directly to the transmitter..


And it would not be an exaggeration to say nobody listens, but finding out
if it is because the station has lousy programming or no coverage is a
different and subjective issue.

The 64 of KLER covers less than 9000 people, but it does cover the market...
such as it is.

I've seen plenty of stations with negative HAATs that did marvelously, but
it was due to the height averaging working in their favor.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For the Newbie Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) : Check-Out "PopularCommunications" and "Monitoring Times" Magazines RHF Shortwave 0 February 1st 08 12:26 PM
"Sirius wins "Fastest Growing Company" in Deloitte's 2007 Technology Fast 500" [email protected] Shortwave 15 October 28th 07 10:02 AM
"Sirius wins "Fastest Growing Company" in Deloitte's 2007 Technology Fast 500" [email protected] Shortwave 0 October 24th 07 12:48 AM
"meltdown in progress"..."is amy fireproof"...The Actions Of A "Man" With Three College Degrees? K4YZ Policy 6 August 28th 06 11:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017