Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old August 11th 09, 02:26 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.news-media,alt.religion.christian,alt.politics.republican
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default (OT) : Prez Obama calls-up the Obama-Ratsİ to "Report" {Rat-Out} their fellow American Citizens for saying anything bad about BHO

Gary Forbis wrote:
It cannot be the
case that the same acts are moral or immoral
depending upon one's cause.


Tell that to the evangelicals trying to take over the government and the
military. We are screwed. America is over.
  #22   Report Post  
Old August 12th 09, 02:19 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default (OT) : Prez Obama calls-up the Obama-Ratsİto "Report" {Rat-Out...

HEALTH CARE REFORM: CONGRESS HAS NO AUTHORITY TO LEGISLATE.
www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd461.htm
cuhulin

  #23   Report Post  
Old August 15th 09, 02:50 AM posted to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,rec.radio.shortwave,alt.news-media,alt.religion.christian,alt.politics.economics
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 5
Default Nancy Pelosi's Nazis

"HankG" wrote:
"Spartakus" wrote...


(There's no such thing as a "liberal fascist". *Anyone with
a connection to reality would tell you that.)


REALLY! *What the hell do you call the white house trying to eliminate
dissent?


You're delusional.

How about all of the conservatives receiving pies in the face (Ann
Coulter) at Columbia,


Street theatre.

while Ahmedinajad was welcomed with open arms.


He was given a forum and those who listened did not agree with him.

I won't even mention all of the nasty surprises awaiting you
in health care reform. *Opps, it's now health insurance reform.

Hitler was a proud member of the SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY.


Better brush up on your history. There was no "Socialist Democrat
Party" in Germany back then. There was a "Social Democratic Party",
and I can assure you, Hitler was *not* a member. In fact, Hitler
*banned* the Social Democrat Party in 1933.

I could go on and on.


And be just as wrong.
  #24   Report Post  
Old August 15th 09, 03:33 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default Nancy Pelosi's Nazis

www.worldwar2database.com/html/nazis.htm

Cuzz, if y'all wants to get in a real Good newsgroper abouts World War
Two stuff, head on over to the soc.history.war.world-war-ii newsgroper.
cuhulin

  #25   Report Post  
Old August 15th 09, 03:59 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default Nancy Pelosi's Nazis

Lilies of the Field, TCM channel.

AMEN.Nobody could sing it like Sidney Poitier, and those five Sisters.
cuhulin



  #26   Report Post  
Old August 15th 09, 06:51 PM
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 155
Angry

Quote:
Originally Posted by No ObaMao View Post
Nancy Pelosi has a very florid imagination. In her mind's eye she is
seeing people "carrying swastikas" at Town Hall meetings to protest
Obama's Central Plan for American medicine. Which makes me wonder why
all the swastika-carrying nutsies -- or Nazis? or just nasties? -- in
Ms. Pelosi's imagination are not in favor of Obama's plan to control
US medicine. It's a control freak's dream, after all, and the Nazis
were totalitarian control freaks.

Can we get serious? One of the painful things today is the massive
failure of history teaching in the schools and colleges, so that kids
confuse Hitler's Nazis with the people who fought for freedom against
them. Stalin and Hitler forged an alliance in 1938. Had Hitler not
gone mad and invaded Stalin's Soviet Union, the Nazis and Soviets
would have gone to war against the West together. And they would have
won.

The Nazis were totalitarian romantics. That is why Hitler imitated and
glorified Richard Wagner, the Siegfried mythographer who marked the
very height of German Romanticism. That is also why the Nazis hated
both Jews and Christians, and promoted a neo-pagan religion based on
the Nordic gods and the glorification of killing and war. The Nazis
were romantics -- just like the hippies in the Sixties. They loved
going "back to nature," "the noble Savage," nudism, and the
destruction of marriage and traditional families.

Obama's former good buds Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn

[ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2169
]
[ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2190
]

are prototypical anarchist Romantics, people who are quite willing to
kill for their cause. Hitler's Nazis were emotional revolutionaries
with an endless craving to attack, subvert, control and co-opt all the
existing structures of society. Oh, and yes, they had a Mass Cult of
the Leader not unlike the idolatry whipped up for Barack Obama today.
Obama's "Citizens of the World!" speech in front of 200,000 cheering
Berliners had that very familiar look to it. That was not an accident,
but a deliberate PR stunt.

The best explanation of Nazism ever written is Peter Viereck's
Metapolitics: The roots of the Nazi mind. If you only give your kids
one book this year, that should be the one. Viereck's Metapolitics was
written in great fear and passion during the early days of Hitler's
rise, when the author was still a graduate student of German history,
and then revised two decades later. But it's one of those books that
remains relevant because it hits the nail on the head. You can't get
more accurate than Viereck did. A few years later Thomas Mann wrote an
Epilogue to Viereck's book, endorsing its main conclusions. They both
understood how deeply the Nazis were rooted in German history.

"Metapolitics" is the name the Nazis gave to their brand of politics,
because in their minds they were trying to change the entire world,
not just be another political party. Marxism is metapolitics; Nazism
is metapolitics. And yes, some of today's political fantasists dream
the same dreams. (Hint: Who do you think wants to revolutionize the
world today?)

Metapolitics was very controversial even after World War Two, because
it criticized European Romanticism, beloved by European and American
scholars and writers. But Peter Viereck was right and his critics were
wrong. German Romanticism of the totalitarian variety survived the
Nazis, and just re-emerged as the [Socialist] Green movement in
Europe. Nazism was always a "back to nature" movement anyway. After
the Nazis were defeated, all the Wagnerian Romantics turned into
Socialist Romantics. Often they were the very same people, like Martin
Heidegger, Paul de Man, and even Jean-Paul Sartre. The 1968 student
riots in Europe, which ultimately brought the Greens to power, were
run by anarchists identical to the Nazi rioters of the Munich beer
halls. Some of them have realized as much since that time.

Post-modernism is an attack on Western rationalism, democracy,
capitalism, free speech and free thought. It's called "Post-Modernism"
because it wants to kill modernism. Modernism stands for science,
technology, democracy, medicine and yes, bourgeois capitalism: The
keys to modern prosperity and well-being. That is why "Post-Modernism"
became so popular in our college English and History departments. That
is also why we have the "global warming" fraud, the anti-science
movements, the anti-nuclear power campaigns, the "post-modern" media
-- run by propaganda artists who were taught in college that lying for
a "good cause" was better than telling the truth. Those are the
mediots who are running our media today.

Culturally, the Nazis would have felt right at home with that attack
on Western rationalism, capitalism, and freedom of thought. It was
exactly what they wanted. The Nazis were Post-Modernists. Modernity
was their enemy. Hitler characteristically called Albert Einstein's
relativity theory "Jewish science." Back in Moscow, Jozef Stalin
promoted an attack on science by peddling fraudulent agricultural
genetics. Stalin thought he could discipline his marching ranks of
wheat stalks to grow taller by force, encouraged by his fraudulent
"geneticist" Trofim Lysenko. Both Hitler and Stalin hated real
science. They had real scientists sent to concentration camps.

The reason is of course that real science is about telling the truth.
That is why "global warming" is also a totalitarian scheme; it's
fraudulent science. It is also why the Left cannot openly debate the
pros and cons of Central Planning in American medicine. They are not
happy with searching out the truth.

And I'm afraid, that is also why Nancy Pelosi has to imagine "people
with swastikas" flooding the Town Hall meetings in America, to fight
against all the Good and Noble people like herself. Nancy is a
certifiable airhead, but the beliefs echoing in her head come from
decades of ideological indoctrination -- of the Totalitarian Romantic
kind. People like Ms. Pelosi have been given all the answers by the
ideologues of the Left. That is why their minds are shut so air
tight.

Let's not call them names, our Totalitarian Romantics [Liberal
Fascists] of today.

But let's not forget their historical antecedents either.

Hint: It's not Washington, Madison, Jefferson or Lincoln.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...cys_nazis.html

HEIL HITLER! [get used to it.]
Who really cares? Babble,babble!!! WHAT does any of this crap have to do with amateur radio??? Stay on topic,huh?
N9ZAS.
  #27   Report Post  
Old August 17th 09, 10:08 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,243
Default Amateur Radio Group?



n9zas wrote:

No ObaMao;685430 Wrote:
Nancy Pelosi has a very florid imagination. In her mind's eye she is
seeing people "carrying swastikas" at Town Hall meetings to protest
Obama's Central Plan for American medicine. Which makes me wonder why
all the swastika-carrying nutsies -- or Nazis? or just nasties? -- in
Ms. Pelosi's imagination are not in favor of Obama's plan to control
US medicine. It's a control freak's dream, after all, and the Nazis
were totalitarian control freaks.

Can we get serious? One of the painful things today is the massive
failure of history teaching in the schools and colleges, so that kids
confuse Hitler's Nazis with the people who fought for freedom against
them. Stalin and Hitler forged an alliance in 1938. Had Hitler not
gone mad and invaded Stalin's Soviet Union, the Nazis and Soviets
would have gone to war against the West together. And they would have
won.

The Nazis were totalitarian romantics. That is why Hitler imitated and
glorified Richard Wagner, the Siegfried mythographer who marked the
very height of German Romanticism. That is also why the Nazis hated
both Jews and Christians, and promoted a neo-pagan religion based on
the Nordic gods and the glorification of killing and war. The Nazis
were romantics -- just like the hippies in the Sixties. They loved
going "back to nature," "the noble Savage," nudism, and the
destruction of marriage and traditional families.

Obama's former good buds Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn

[ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2169
]
[ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2190
]

are prototypical anarchist Romantics, people who are quite willing to
kill for their cause. Hitler's Nazis were emotional revolutionaries
with an endless craving to attack, subvert, control and co-opt all the
existing structures of society. Oh, and yes, they had a Mass Cult of
the Leader not unlike the idolatry whipped up for Barack Obama today.
Obama's "Citizens of the World!" speech in front of 200,000 cheering
Berliners had that very familiar look to it. That was not an accident,
but a deliberate PR stunt.

The best explanation of Nazism ever written is Peter Viereck's
Metapolitics: The roots of the Nazi mind. If you only give your kids
one book this year, that should be the one. Viereck's Metapolitics was
written in great fear and passion during the early days of Hitler's
rise, when the author was still a graduate student of German history,
and then revised two decades later. But it's one of those books that
remains relevant because it hits the nail on the head. You can't get
more accurate than Viereck did. A few years later Thomas Mann wrote an
Epilogue to Viereck's book, endorsing its main conclusions. They both
understood how deeply the Nazis were rooted in German history.

"Metapolitics" is the name the Nazis gave to their brand of politics,
because in their minds they were trying to change the entire world,
not just be another political party. Marxism is metapolitics; Nazism
is metapolitics. And yes, some of today's political fantasists dream
the same dreams. (Hint: Who do you think wants to revolutionize the
world today?)

Metapolitics was very controversial even after World War Two, because
it criticized European Romanticism, beloved by European and American
scholars and writers. But Peter Viereck was right and his critics were
wrong. German Romanticism of the totalitarian variety survived the
Nazis, and just re-emerged as the [Socialist] Green movement in
Europe. Nazism was always a "back to nature" movement anyway. After
the Nazis were defeated, all the Wagnerian Romantics turned into
Socialist Romantics. Often they were the very same people, like Martin
Heidegger, Paul de Man, and even Jean-Paul Sartre. The 1968 student
riots in Europe, which ultimately brought the Greens to power, were
run by anarchists identical to the Nazi rioters of the Munich beer
halls. Some of them have realized as much since that time.

Post-modernism is an attack on Western rationalism, democracy,
capitalism, free speech and free thought. It's called "Post-Modernism"
because it wants to kill modernism. Modernism stands for science,
technology, democracy, medicine and yes, bourgeois capitalism: The
keys to modern prosperity and well-being. That is why "Post-Modernism"
became so popular in our college English and History departments. That
is also why we have the "global warming" fraud, the anti-science
movements, the anti-nuclear power campaigns, the "post-modern" media
-- run by propaganda artists who were taught in college that lying for
a "good cause" was better than telling the truth. Those are the
mediots who are running our media today.

Culturally, the Nazis would have felt right at home with that attack
on Western rationalism, capitalism, and freedom of thought. It was
exactly what they wanted. The Nazis were Post-Modernists. Modernity
was their enemy. Hitler characteristically called Albert Einstein's
relativity theory "Jewish science." Back in Moscow, Jozef Stalin
promoted an attack on science by peddling fraudulent agricultural
genetics. Stalin thought he could discipline his marching ranks of
wheat stalks to grow taller by force, encouraged by his fraudulent
"geneticist" Trofim Lysenko. Both Hitler and Stalin hated real
science. They had real scientists sent to concentration camps.

The reason is of course that real science is about telling the truth.
That is why "global warming" is also a totalitarian scheme; it's
fraudulent science. It is also why the Left cannot openly debate the
pros and cons of Central Planning in American medicine. They are not
happy with searching out the truth.

And I'm afraid, that is also why Nancy Pelosi has to imagine "people
with swastikas" flooding the Town Hall meetings in America, to fight
against all the Good and Noble people like herself. Nancy is a
certifiable airhead, but the beliefs echoing in her head come from
decades of ideological indoctrination -- of the Totalitarian Romantic
kind. People like Ms. Pelosi have been given all the answers by the
ideologues of the Left. That is why their minds are shut so air
tight.

Let's not call them names, our Totalitarian Romantics [Liberal
Fascists] of today.

But let's not forget their historical antecedents either.

Hint: It's not Washington, Madison, Jefferson or Lincoln.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...cys_nazis.html

HEIL HITLER! [get used to it.]


Who really cares? Babble,babble!!! WHAT does any of this crap have to
do with amateur radio??? Stay on topic,huh?
N9ZAS.


I wasn't aware that this was an 'amateur radio' group.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #28   Report Post  
Old August 17th 09, 02:01 PM
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 155
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by dxAce View Post
n9zas wrote:

No ObaMao;685430 Wrote:
Nancy Pelosi has a very florid imagination. In her mind's eye she is
seeing people "carrying swastikas" at Town Hall meetings to protest
Obama's Central Plan for American medicine. Which makes me wonder why
all the swastika-carrying nutsies -- or Nazis? or just nasties? -- in
Ms. Pelosi's imagination are not in favor of Obama's plan to control
US medicine. It's a control freak's dream, after all, and the Nazis
were totalitarian control freaks.

Can we get serious? One of the painful things today is the massive
failure of history teaching in the schools and colleges, so that kids
confuse Hitler's Nazis with the people who fought for freedom against
them. Stalin and Hitler forged an alliance in 1938. Had Hitler not
gone mad and invaded Stalin's Soviet Union, the Nazis and Soviets
would have gone to war against the West together. And they would have
won.

The Nazis were totalitarian romantics. That is why Hitler imitated and
glorified Richard Wagner, the Siegfried mythographer who marked the
very height of German Romanticism. That is also why the Nazis hated
both Jews and Christians, and promoted a neo-pagan religion based on
the Nordic gods and the glorification of killing and war. The Nazis
were romantics -- just like the hippies in the Sixties. They loved
going "back to nature," "the noble Savage," nudism, and the
destruction of marriage and traditional families.

Obama's former good buds Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn

[ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2169
]
[ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2190
]

are prototypical anarchist Romantics, people who are quite willing to
kill for their cause. Hitler's Nazis were emotional revolutionaries
with an endless craving to attack, subvert, control and co-opt all the
existing structures of society. Oh, and yes, they had a Mass Cult of
the Leader not unlike the idolatry whipped up for Barack Obama today.
Obama's "Citizens of the World!" speech in front of 200,000 cheering
Berliners had that very familiar look to it. That was not an accident,
but a deliberate PR stunt.

The best explanation of Nazism ever written is Peter Viereck's
Metapolitics: The roots of the Nazi mind. If you only give your kids
one book this year, that should be the one. Viereck's Metapolitics was
written in great fear and passion during the early days of Hitler's
rise, when the author was still a graduate student of German history,
and then revised two decades later. But it's one of those books that
remains relevant because it hits the nail on the head. You can't get
more accurate than Viereck did. A few years later Thomas Mann wrote an
Epilogue to Viereck's book, endorsing its main conclusions. They both
understood how deeply the Nazis were rooted in German history.

"Metapolitics" is the name the Nazis gave to their brand of politics,
because in their minds they were trying to change the entire world,
not just be another political party. Marxism is metapolitics; Nazism
is metapolitics. And yes, some of today's political fantasists dream
the same dreams. (Hint: Who do you think wants to revolutionize the
world today?)

Metapolitics was very controversial even after World War Two, because
it criticized European Romanticism, beloved by European and American
scholars and writers. But Peter Viereck was right and his critics were
wrong. German Romanticism of the totalitarian variety survived the
Nazis, and just re-emerged as the [Socialist] Green movement in
Europe. Nazism was always a "back to nature" movement anyway. After
the Nazis were defeated, all the Wagnerian Romantics turned into
Socialist Romantics. Often they were the very same people, like Martin
Heidegger, Paul de Man, and even Jean-Paul Sartre. The 1968 student
riots in Europe, which ultimately brought the Greens to power, were
run by anarchists identical to the Nazi rioters of the Munich beer
halls. Some of them have realized as much since that time.

Post-modernism is an attack on Western rationalism, democracy,
capitalism, free speech and free thought. It's called "Post-Modernism"
because it wants to kill modernism. Modernism stands for science,
technology, democracy, medicine and yes, bourgeois capitalism: The
keys to modern prosperity and well-being. That is why "Post-Modernism"
became so popular in our college English and History departments. That
is also why we have the "global warming" fraud, the anti-science
movements, the anti-nuclear power campaigns, the "post-modern" media
-- run by propaganda artists who were taught in college that lying for
a "good cause" was better than telling the truth. Those are the
mediots who are running our media today.

Culturally, the Nazis would have felt right at home with that attack
on Western rationalism, capitalism, and freedom of thought. It was
exactly what they wanted. The Nazis were Post-Modernists. Modernity
was their enemy. Hitler characteristically called Albert Einstein's
relativity theory "Jewish science." Back in Moscow, Jozef Stalin
promoted an attack on science by peddling fraudulent agricultural
genetics. Stalin thought he could discipline his marching ranks of
wheat stalks to grow taller by force, encouraged by his fraudulent
"geneticist" Trofim Lysenko. Both Hitler and Stalin hated real
science. They had real scientists sent to concentration camps.

The reason is of course that real science is about telling the truth.
That is why "global warming" is also a totalitarian scheme; it's
fraudulent science. It is also why the Left cannot openly debate the
pros and cons of Central Planning in American medicine. They are not
happy with searching out the truth.

And I'm afraid, that is also why Nancy Pelosi has to imagine "people
with swastikas" flooding the Town Hall meetings in America, to fight
against all the Good and Noble people like herself. Nancy is a
certifiable airhead, but the beliefs echoing in her head come from
decades of ideological indoctrination -- of the Totalitarian Romantic
kind. People like Ms. Pelosi have been given all the answers by the
ideologues of the Left. That is why their minds are shut so air
tight.

Let's not call them names, our Totalitarian Romantics [Liberal
Fascists] of today.

But let's not forget their historical antecedents either.

Hint: It's not Washington, Madison, Jefferson or Lincoln.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...cys_nazis.html

HEIL HITLER! [get used to it.]


Who really cares? Babble,babble!!! WHAT does any of this crap have to
do with amateur radio??? Stay on topic,huh?
N9ZAS.


I wasn't aware that this was an 'amateur radio' group.

dxAce
Michigan
USA
Maybe you should read what thread you're on ACE! It does NOT say political CRAP thread.
Enough already! You are in the SHORTWAVE forum,FYI!
N9ZAS.

Last edited by n9zas : August 17th 09 at 02:04 PM
  #29   Report Post  
Old August 17th 09, 02:26 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 11
Default Amateur Radio Group?

On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:08:14 -0400, dxAce wrote:

n9zas wrote:

No ObaMao;685430 Wrote:
Nancy Pelosi has a very florid imagination. In her mind's eye she is
seeing people "carrying swastikas" at Town Hall meetings to protest
Obama's Central Plan for American medicine. Which makes me wonder why
all the swastika-carrying nutsies -- or Nazis? or just nasties? --
in Ms. Pelosi's imagination are not in favor of Obama's plan to
control US medicine. It's a control freak's dream, after all, and the
Nazis were totalitarian control freaks.

Can we get serious? One of the painful things today is the massive
failure of history teaching in the schools and colleges, so that kids
confuse Hitler's Nazis with the people who fought for freedom against
them. Stalin and Hitler forged an alliance in 1938. Had Hitler not
gone mad and invaded Stalin's Soviet Union, the Nazis and Soviets
would have gone to war against the West together. And they would have
won.

The Nazis were totalitarian romantics. That is why Hitler imitated
and glorified Richard Wagner, the Siegfried mythographer who marked
the very height of German Romanticism. That is also why the Nazis
hated both Jews and Christians, and promoted a neo-pagan religion
based on the Nordic gods and the glorification of killing and war.
The Nazis were romantics -- just like the hippies in the Sixties.
They loved going "back to nature," "the noble Savage," nudism, and
the destruction of marriage and traditional families.

Obama's former good buds Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn

[ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2169
]
[ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2190
]

are prototypical anarchist Romantics, people who are quite willing to
kill for their cause. Hitler's Nazis were emotional revolutionaries
with an endless craving to attack, subvert, control and co-opt all
the existing structures of society. Oh, and yes, they had a Mass Cult
of the Leader not unlike the idolatry whipped up for Barack Obama
today. Obama's "Citizens of the World!" speech in front of 200,000
cheering Berliners had that very familiar look to it. That was not an
accident, but a deliberate PR stunt.

The best explanation of Nazism ever written is Peter Viereck's
Metapolitics: The roots of the Nazi mind. If you only give your kids
one book this year, that should be the one. Viereck's Metapolitics
was written in great fear and passion during the early days of
Hitler's rise, when the author was still a graduate student of German
history, and then revised two decades later. But it's one of those
books that remains relevant because it hits the nail on the head. You
can't get more accurate than Viereck did. A few years later Thomas
Mann wrote an Epilogue to Viereck's book, endorsing its main
conclusions. They both understood how deeply the Nazis were rooted in
German history.

"Metapolitics" is the name the Nazis gave to their brand of politics,
because in their minds they were trying to change the entire world,
not just be another political party. Marxism is metapolitics; Nazism
is metapolitics. And yes, some of today's political fantasists dream
the same dreams. (Hint: Who do you think wants to revolutionize the
world today?)

Metapolitics was very controversial even after World War Two, because
it criticized European Romanticism, beloved by European and American
scholars and writers. But Peter Viereck was right and his critics
were wrong. German Romanticism of the totalitarian variety survived
the Nazis, and just re-emerged as the [Socialist] Green movement in
Europe. Nazism was always a "back to nature" movement anyway. After
the Nazis were defeated, all the Wagnerian Romantics turned into
Socialist Romantics. Often they were the very same people, like
Martin Heidegger, Paul de Man, and even Jean-Paul Sartre. The 1968
student riots in Europe, which ultimately brought the Greens to
power, were run by anarchists identical to the Nazi rioters of the
Munich beer halls. Some of them have realized as much since that
time.

Post-modernism is an attack on Western rationalism, democracy,
capitalism, free speech and free thought. It's called
"Post-Modernism" because it wants to kill modernism. Modernism stands
for science, technology, democracy, medicine and yes, bourgeois
capitalism: The keys to modern prosperity and well-being. That is why
"Post-Modernism" became so popular in our college English and History
departments. That is also why we have the "global warming" fraud, the
anti-science movements, the anti-nuclear power campaigns, the
"post-modern" media -- run by propaganda artists who were taught in
college that lying for a "good cause" was better than telling the
truth. Those are the mediots who are running our media today.

Culturally, the Nazis would have felt right at home with that attack
on Western rationalism, capitalism, and freedom of thought. It was
exactly what they wanted. The Nazis were Post-Modernists. Modernity
was their enemy. Hitler characteristically called Albert Einstein's
relativity theory "Jewish science." Back in Moscow, Jozef Stalin
promoted an attack on science by peddling fraudulent agricultural
genetics. Stalin thought he could discipline his marching ranks of
wheat stalks to grow taller by force, encouraged by his fraudulent
"geneticist" Trofim Lysenko. Both Hitler and Stalin hated real
science. They had real scientists sent to concentration camps.

The reason is of course that real science is about telling the truth.
That is why "global warming" is also a totalitarian scheme; it's
fraudulent science. It is also why the Left cannot openly debate the
pros and cons of Central Planning in American medicine. They are not
happy with searching out the truth.

And I'm afraid, that is also why Nancy Pelosi has to imagine "people
with swastikas" flooding the Town Hall meetings in America, to fight
against all the Good and Noble people like herself. Nancy is a
certifiable airhead, but the beliefs echoing in her head come from
decades of ideological indoctrination -- of the Totalitarian Romantic
kind. People like Ms. Pelosi have been given all the answers by the
ideologues of the Left. That is why their minds are shut so air
tight.

Let's not call them names, our Totalitarian Romantics [Liberal
Fascists] of today.

But let's not forget their historical antecedents either.

Hint: It's not Washington, Madison, Jefferson or Lincoln.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...cys_nazis.html

HEIL HITLER! [get used to it.]


Who really cares? Babble,babble!!! WHAT does any of this crap have to
do with amateur radio??? Stay on topic,huh? N9ZAS.


I wasn't aware that this was an 'amateur radio' group.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


About as much as it is a 'shortwave radio' group anymore. If it weren't for John Plimmer, Brenda Ann, and sometimes
you Steve, there wouldn't even be an on topic post in this wasteland.



--
"What do you mean there's no movie?"
  #30   Report Post  
Old August 17th 09, 02:42 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default Amateur Radio Group?

CountFloyd wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:08:14 -0400, dxAce wrote:


About as much as it is a 'shortwave radio' group anymore. If it weren't for John Plimmer, Brenda Ann, and sometimes
you Steve, there wouldn't even be an on topic post in this wasteland.



Didja get any onya?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pelosi's culture of corruption is growing [email protected] Shortwave 0 April 23rd 09 01:14 AM
(OT) : Nancy Pelosi's Liberal Democrat TRASH TALK TorpedoestheBi-Partisan Vote on the 2008 Financial Recovery Bill RHF Shortwave 0 October 3rd 08 08:16 PM
(OT) : Russia's Neo-NAZIs candy rosa Shortwave 0 November 27th 07 01:40 AM
Hooray for Nancy Pelosi's trip over to the Middle East! David Eduardo[_3_] Shortwave 20 April 8th 07 07:12 PM
George and Nancy U Know Who CB 1 October 2nd 04 05:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright İ2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017