In Nick Danger
wrote:

The point was, that no matter what Obama does, no matter what awards
he wins, the closet racists will STILL find fault.

So you're another whose own racism has so throughly permeated his being
that the only reason you can possibly imagine for someone to be opposed
to Obama's policies is that he's a racist like you?

There can be no other reason for opposition?

None at all?

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN

Nick Danger wrote:

The point was, that no matter what Obama does, no matter what awards
he wins, the closet racists will STILL find fault.

Bert Hyman wrote:

So you're another whose own racism has so throughly permeated his being
that the only reason you can possibly imagine for someone to be opposed
to Obama's policies is that he's a racist like you?
There can be no other reason for opposition?

None at all?

Opposition to his *policies*? Certainly that's allowed.

Ridiculing someone for receiving the high honor of a Nobel Prize?

In Nick Danger
wrote:

Ridiculing someone for receiving the high honor of a Nobel Prize?

Well no; they're ridiculing the Nobel Committee for giving the prize,
which is supposed to awarded "to those who, during the preceding year,
shall have conferred the greatest benefit to mankind", to someone who
was nominated after having been in office for two weeks or less.

The Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 was supposed to be awarded for deeds
performed in 2008, although the nominating period didn't end until
February 1, 2009.

http://nobelprize.org/nobelfoundation/statutes.html

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN