|
President Doofus: "Don't jump to conclusions..."
On Nov 7, 12:08*am, 1-20-2013 wrote:
Oh the irony of President Doofus instructing us to "not jump to conclusions" about the muslim terrorist that attacked America on US soil yesterday. Isn't this the same idiot that came to his good friend Professor Gate's side and called the actions of the Cambridge police dept "stupid" before he knew any of the fact of the case???? Any thoughts on when Obama might starting acting like the President of the United States???? * Let us know. You mean jump to conclusions why President Obama has ingnored members of Congress who happen to be Republicans, in his new "era of post- partisanship" and have officially asked three times since July to have an appointment with the President to discuss heath care, yet has managed to play more golf than any president in history, can campaign for governor races, play basketball, pitch the olympics to a city, while ignoring those requests, when those members represent the equivalent of several football stadiums full of voters? You see Mr. Axlerod, we don't have to bug the White House like Nixon to figure out what you people are up to, God explains it to us, on a level that even a 5th grader can understand? OMG! Checkout Rep. Gingrey's presentation (11-6-2009 late pm)! AWESOME! LOL. Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct 10th, 2009 a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all electronic forms of communication are not representative of advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved, including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function of the website, and may or may not be archived. No personal information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and, or, individuals concerned. b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to any third parties to share or provide private personal information who may operate as part of the internet communications system, including all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and physical control, unless those communications represent violations of the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to pursue any legal remedies. c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical, grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on the actions, character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of people, and not the general public, however no distribution restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to remain the sole possesion of the original author. d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store, transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not condone). e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be a representation of others, including God. f) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer scripts (web page programs) may be licensed by www.google.com, for bandwidth verification or potential advertisement opportunities or incorporation of web master tools in the future. g) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are related links, that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the purpose of giving copy right credit referal information under the terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use" regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law. h) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009, the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business Bureau, which have free consumer information. i)Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to version 1.3 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the author that blogging is another definition for a potentially infinite number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will retroactively apply this version, 1.4 to all forms of previous communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barack Hussein Obama has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm, mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic emphasis)). j) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken Chaser! |
(OT) : Should the US Congress sit-silently-by and Do Nothing to GetSkin-Heads Out to the US Military ?
On Nov 6, 5:24*pm, MagneticEnergy wrote:
On Nov 7, 12:08*am, 1-20-2013 wrote: Oh the irony of President Doofus instructing us to "not jump to conclusions" about the muslim terrorist that attacked America on US soil yesterday. Isn't this the same idiot that came to his good friend Professor Gate's side and called the actions of the Cambridge police dept "stupid" before he knew any of the fact of the case???? Any thoughts on when Obama might starting acting like the President of the United States???? * Let us know. You mean jump to conclusions why President Obama has ingnored members of Congress who happen to be Republicans, in his new "era of post- partisanship" and have officially asked three times since July to have an appointment with the President to discuss heath care, yet has managed to play more golf than any president in history, can campaign for governor races, play basketball, pitch the olympics to a city, while ignoring those requests, when those members represent the equivalent of several football stadiums full of voters? You see Mr. Axlerod, we don't have to bug the White House like Nixon to figure out what you people are up to, God explains it to us, on a level that even a 5th grader can understand? OMG! *Checkout Rep. Gingrey's presentation (11-6-2009 late pm)! AWESOME! *LOL. Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct 10th, 2009 a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all electronic forms of communication are not representative of advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved, including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function of the website, and may or may not be archived. No personal information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and, or, individuals concerned. b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to any third parties to share or provide private personal information who may operate as part of the internet communications system, including all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and physical control, unless those communications represent violations of the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to pursue any legal remedies. c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical, grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on the actions, character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of people, and not the general public, however no distribution restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to remain the sole possesion of the original author. d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store, transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not condone). e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be a representation of others, including God. f) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer scripts (web page programs) may be licensed bywww.google.com, for bandwidth verification or potential advertisement opportunities or incorporation of web master tools in the future. g) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are related links, that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the purpose of giving copy right credit referal information under the terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use" regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law. h) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009, the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business Bureau, which have free consumer information. i)Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to version 1.3 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the author that blogging is another definition for a potentially infinite number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will retroactively apply this version, 1.4 to all forms of previous communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barack Hussein Obama has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm, mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic emphasis)). j) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken Chaser! You should have heard Bill Cunningham on KEX-AM 1190 kHz last night. http://www.1190kex.com/pages/pages/lineup.php Comparing Neo-Nazi Skin-Head Aryan Racist -wrt- Islamic Fascist Terrorist -aka- Muslim Extremists -if- the Major was a Skin-Head would Prez Obama be Talking about Tolerance and Understanding for Skin-Heads ? -if- Skin-Heads were known to be in the Enlisted Ranks of the US Military would they be allowed to Serve . . . -if- The Skin-Head-Brotherhood were known to be in the Officer Ranks of the US Military would they be allowed to Stay in . . . -if- Any and All the above was 'True' : Would the US Congress sit-silently-by and Do Nothing to Get Skin-Heads Out to the US Military ? -if- Skin-Heads were on US Navy Nuclear Submarines -if- Skin-Heads were in US Airforce Missile Silos -if- Skin-Heads controlled US Army Tactical Nukes ? Would Prez Obama Be Preaching Tolerance and Understanding ? - WAKE-UP AMERICA ! Reality Check : Only Senator Joe Lieberman has stood-up and called for a Congressional Investigation of Islamic Extremists in the Ranks of the US Military and the possibility that the Muslim Brotherhood has Infiltrated the Officer Corps of the US Military. http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2009/11...nd-islamic-ext... |
(OT) : ...Get Skin-Heads Out to the US Military ?
RHF wrote:
-if- Skin-Heads were on US Navy Nuclear Submarines -if- Skin-Heads were in US Airforce Missile Silos -if- Skin-Heads controlled US Army Tactical Nukes ? Would Prez Obama Be Preaching Tolerance and Understanding ? - WAKE-UP AMERICA ! The Dominionists in the military are way scarier than the skins. |
(OT) : ...Get Skin-Heads Out to the US Military ?
On Nov 10, 4:16*am, dave wrote:
RHF wrote: -if- Skin-Heads were on US Navy Nuclear Submarines -if- Skin-Heads were in US Airforce Missile Silos -if- Skin-Heads controlled US Army Tactical Nukes ? Would Prez Obama Be Preaching Tolerance and Understanding ? - WAKE-UP AMERICA ! - The Dominionists in the military are way scarier than the skins. Dave clearly you love your 'skin-heads' |
(OT) : ...Get Skin-Heads Out to the US Military ?
RHF wrote:
On Nov 10, 4:16 am, dave wrote: - The Dominionists in the military are way scarier than the skins. Dave clearly you love your 'skin-heads' I have my head every other day. "Take the skinheads bowling". |
President Doofus: "Don't jump to conclusions..."
On Nov 6, 8:24*pm, MagneticEnergy wrote:
You mean jump to conclusions why President Obama has ingnored members of Congress who happen to be Republicans, in his new "era of post- partisanship" and have officially asked three times since July to have an appointment with the President to discuss heath care, You need to pay attention. Between his inauguration and late April the President had several meetings with Republikkkon members of Congress regardihg health care and after every meeting, they have trooped out of the White House, stood in front of the microphones, and announced their opposition. Faced with this response from the Party of No, he had no recourse but to push ahead. |
President Doofus: "Don't jump to conclusions..."
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
On Nov 6, 8:24 pm, MagneticEnergy wrote: You mean jump to conclusions why President Obama has ingnored members of Congress who happen to be Republicans, in his new "era of post- partisanship" and have officially asked three times since July to have an appointment with the President to discuss heath care, You need to pay attention. Between his inauguration and late April the President had several meetings with Republikkkon members of Congress regardihg health care and after every meeting, they have trooped out of the White House, stood in front of the microphones, and announced their opposition. Faced with this response from the Party of No, he had no recourse but to push ahead. Why would they want to talk to Obama about legislation that he has not been personally involved in? The insurance reform has been a Legislative situation, not Executive. |
President Doofus: "Don't jump to conclusions..."
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:40:01 -0800, dave puked:
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote: On Nov 6, 8:24 pm, MagneticEnergy wrote: You mean jump to conclusions why President Obama has ingnored members of Congress who happen to be Republicans, in his new "era of post- partisanship" and have officially asked three times since July to have an appointment with the President to discuss heath care, You need to pay attention. Between his inauguration and late April the President had several meetings with Republikkkon members of Congress regardihg health care and after every meeting, they have trooped out of the White House, stood in front of the microphones, and announced their opposition. Faced with this response from the Party of No, he had no recourse but to push ahead. Why would they want to talk to Obama about legislation that he has not been personally involved in? The insurance reform has been a Legislative situation, not Executive. Then Obama lied when around three months ago he was going to take a proactive role in the bill. And why would Obama **** away millions of dollars in hard earned taxpayer money jetting across the country to campaign for a bill that he hasn't been personally involved in? I can understand you positioning yourself to start distancing Obama from this ridiculous bill, but it will never happen. -- lab~rat :-) Do you want polite or do you want sincere? |
President Doofus: "Don't jump to conclusions..."
lab~rat :-) wrote:
And why would Obama **** away millions of dollars in hard earned taxpayer money jetting across the country to campaign for a bill that he hasn't been personally involved in? I can understand you positioning yourself to start distancing Obama from this ridiculous bill, but it will never happen. -- lab~rat :-) Do you want polite or do you want sincere? His "distance" (until very recently) from this legislation has been widely decried by the progressives. The president doesn't need me to help him with his image. I speak from a position of journalistic neutrality on this one. A supposedly insured family losing their life savings and home due to an illness is ridiculous. Trying to do something about that is not. |
President Doofus: "Don't jump to conclusions..."
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:31:42 -0800, dave puked:
lab~rat :-) wrote: And why would Obama **** away millions of dollars in hard earned taxpayer money jetting across the country to campaign for a bill that he hasn't been personally involved in? I can understand you positioning yourself to start distancing Obama from this ridiculous bill, but it will never happen. -- lab~rat :-) Do you want polite or do you want sincere? His "distance" (until very recently) from this legislation has been widely decried by the progressives. The president doesn't need me to help him with his image. I speak from a position of journalistic neutrality on this one. A supposedly insured family losing their life savings and home due to an illness is ridiculous. Are you saying that there should be a law that people have medical insurance before they have a flat screen, an X-Box and a host of other goofy toys? Trying to do something about that is not. -- lab~rat :-) Do you want polite or do you want sincere? |
(OT) : Obama-Care© Killing the Patient [Taxpayer] is NOT the Answer
On Nov 11, 7:31*am, dave wrote:
lab~rat :-) wrote: And why would Obama **** away millions of dollars in hard earned taxpayer money jetting across the country to campaign for a bill that he hasn't been personally involved in? I can understand you positioning yourself to start distancing Obama from this ridiculous bill, but it will never happen. -- lab~rat *:-) Do you want polite or do you want sincere? His "distance" (until very recently) from this legislation has been widely decried by the progressives. The president doesn't need me to help him with his image. *I speak from a position of journalistic neutrality on this one. - A supposedly insured family losing their - life savings and home due to an illness is - ridiculous. - Trying to do something about that is not. -but- Killing the Patient [Taxpayer] is NOT the Answer [.] "Sick Around the World" hosted by T.R. Reid on PBS for Health Care That Really Cares© http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...8cbbeb31a6e20f |
President Doofus: "Don't jump to conclusions..."
lab~rat :-) wrote:
A supposedly insured family losing their life savings and home due to an illness is ridiculous. Are you saying that there should be a law that people have medical insurance before they have a flat screen, an X-Box and a host of other goofy toys? People with insurance are still getting wiped-out by disease. Blame the victim; great strategy. It's that kind of thinking that made us what we are today. Health freedom for all Americans! |
President Doofus: "Don't jump to conclusions..."
RHF wrote:
People usually react badly when they are being Preached-At and DICTATED TO and 'Herr' Obama tends to do that a lot. ~ RHF . He's the president. You elected him to preside. I know he doesn't tell you to do cool stuff like go to the mall and coexist with fish, but he is our president. |
(OT) : Obama-Care© Killing the Patient [Taxpayer] is NOT the Answer
RHF wrote:
. The "Costs" of Nancy Pelosi's Obama-Care© Bill : 45% Top Tax Rates Coming & More Taxes Too http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...b85834a0d690b7 . 45% is fair for people who make millions. |
President Doofus: "Don't jump to conclusions..."
On Nov 11, 5:20*pm, RHF wrote:
On Nov 11, 3:45*am, "Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names" wrote: On Nov 6, 8:24*pm, MagneticEnergy wrote: You mean jump to conclusions why President Obama has ingnored members of Congress who happen to be Republicans, in his new "era of post- partisanship" and have officially asked three times since July to have an appointment with the President to discuss heath care, You need to pay attention. Between his inauguration and late April the President had several meetings with Republikkkon members of Congress regardihg health care and after every meeting, they have trooped out of the White House, stood in front of the microphones, and announced their opposition. Faced with this response from the Party of No, he had no recourse but to push ahead. People usually react badly when they are being Preached-At and DICTATED TO and 'Herr' Obama tends to do that a lot. ~ RHF *.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How right you are. And, as we all know, Rev. George Bush -- remember him? He told an Amish audience he was chosen by God -- never, ever preached to us. |
President Doofus: "Don't jump to conclusions..."
On Nov 11, 3:38*pm, "Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names"
wrote: On Nov 11, 5:20*pm, RHF wrote: On Nov 11, 3:45*am, "Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names" wrote: On Nov 6, 8:24*pm, MagneticEnergy wrote: You mean jump to conclusions why President Obama has ingnored members of Congress who happen to be Republicans, in his new "era of post- partisanship" and have officially asked three times since July to have an appointment with the President to discuss heath care, You need to pay attention. Between his inauguration and late April the President had several meetings with Republikkkon members of Congress regardihg health care and after every meeting, they have trooped out of the White House, stood in front of the microphones, and announced their opposition. Faced with this response from the Party of No, he had no recourse but to push ahead. - - People usually react badly when they are being - - Preached-At and DICTATED TO and 'Herr' Obama - - tends to do that a lot. ~ RHF Herr Obama has 'promised' Health Care In Our Time .. . . coming to a Death panel near you . . . |
(OT) : Dave -proclaims- {Higher} Taxes Are The Cost of Freedom!
RHF wrote:
Dave -proclaims- {Higher} Taxes Are The Cost of Freedom ! Taxes are NOT Freedom : There are a form of Government Imposed Economic Servitude. it boggles {over taxes} the 'free' american mind ~ RHF . Who pays for the military? Who pays for highways? Who pays for flood control and reclamation? |
(OT) : Dave -proclaims- {Higher} Taxes Are The Cost of Freedom !
On Nov 12, 10:24*am, dave wrote:
RHF wrote: Dave -proclaims- {Higher} Taxes Are The Cost of Freedom ! Taxes are NOT Freedom : There are a form of Government Imposed Economic Servitude. it boggles {over taxes} the 'free' american mind ~ RHF *. - Who pays for the military? Is Prez Obama going to give the US Military a Pay Increase and above poverty Living Wage ? - - - Great I Will Pay Those Taxes. -but- NO Billions in new Higher Taxes for Wall Street and Friends of Obama Bail-Outs - Who pays for highways? Is Nancy Pelosi going to build new Highways and Bridges ? - - - Great I Will Pay Those Road Taxes. -but- NO Billions in new Higher Taxes for ACORN and Friends of Pelosi Bail-Outs - Who pays for flood control and reclamation? Is Harry Reid going to build new Dams, Levees and Waterways ? - - - Great I Will Pay Those Water Taxes. -but- NO Billions in new Higher Taxes for the UAW & SEIU Union Bosses & Bail-Outs |
(OT) : Dave -proclaims- {Higher} Taxes Are The Cost of Freedom !
On Nov 12, 4:32*pm, dave wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote: "dave" wrote in message m... RHF wrote: Dave -proclaims- {Higher} Taxes Are The Cost of Freedom ! Taxes are NOT Freedom : There are a form of Government Imposed Economic Servitude. it boggles {over taxes} the 'free' american mind ~ RHF *. Who pays for the military? Who pays for highways? Who pays for flood control and reclamation? Who pays for our representatives and Senators? Who pays for police and fire protection? Who pays for clean water? Who pays for hydro power? On the flip side of the coin... Who pays for eminant domain seizures? . - Nobody's perfect. Speak for yourself Dave ;-} We Live in the Age-of-Obama-R-Us -*But to pretend that the government is an entity separate from the people Some governments {little 'g' goverments} do 'reflect' the "Values" of the People that they serve -while- Other Governments {Big "G" Goverments} 'impose' "Values" of the People that they control - is to betray a total lack of understanding of - basic civics. That's a basic reality of this world. -while- 'basic civics' are simple abstract ideas and concepts without actions that support the assertions. -*We get the exact government we deserve. We "Get" the government that we will 'tolerate'. We Earn the Rights We Exercise and Stand-Up For. We Make the Government Happen That We Fight For. - 28 years of Reaganomics Dave there you go again blaming Reagan who left office in 1989 {20 Years Ago} and Died in 2004 {5 Years Ago} -time-check- It's Now 2009 and Prez Obama is the US President and we are now living under Obama-Nomics© Excessive spending, Spending. SPENDING ! Higher taxes, Taxes. TAXES ! - got us totally robbed to the bone by the piggish - rich ****s. Dave to the World All Americans are "rich". -*They literally looted empty the treasury during that time The Wall Street Bail-Out with Billions going to the Friends of the Obama-Regime© - and now we have nothing but trillions of notes - owed to the Chinese. Obama-Nomics© Prez Obama Spent in 8-Months as much or more than fromer president Bush did in 8 Years -that's-a- Obama $12 to Bush $1 ratio. - Reagan et al borrowed money from the Chinese - to finance his "tax cuts". 1 - We the American People 'bought' Things from the Chinese. -thus- Giving the Chinese American Dollars {Holding-the-Bag} 2 - Next the US Government Sold the Chinese US Treasury Notes [IOUs] and Redeemed the US Dollars from the Chinese -thus- Giving the Chinese America's IOUs {Holding-the-Bag} 3 - Now the Chinese Have Us [the USA] In-the-Bag. {Double Bagged and Tagged} China - I be O'ing U'oo ~ RHF - They then transferred all the liability to wage earners. D'Oh ! - In the Year 1913 the 16th Amendment was 'Ratified' and the US Government was Officially Funded mainly by an Income Tax -making- All US Government 'Liabilities' the Due Debt of American Wage Earners. -note- The Full Faith and {Paper} Credit of the US Federal Government is the US Economy and each and every American Worker/Tax Payer individually and Collectively "The US Economy". *** We Have Meant The GDP -and- It Is Us *** Drafted in 1909 by Prez Taft [R] Signed in to Law in 1913 by Prez Wilson [D] - We got ****ed. NO WE GOT TAXED [.] = Gang Tax {Gang Rape} by : Higher Taxes & More Taxes & Lots-of-Taxes - I don't care, because this always happens and - there is no reason why this time should be any - different. * Prez Obama 'promised' HOPE and we got excessive spending, Spending. SPENDING ! Prez Obama 'promised' CHANGE and we got higher taxes, More Taxes. LOTS-OF-TAXES ! - (Did you really think that absurd 1775 rebellion - was going to go unanswered. What Comes Around Goes Around -ps- If You Let It. -*Look up British East India Company; -*the Goldman Sacks of the 18th century). Only time will tell 'if' that analogy is true. - I am just frustrated as hell when theoretically - intelligent people can't see what happened. Ah Yes . . . In Theory . . . Intelligent People Exist . . . -but-mostly- People are simply People. -and- Vote With Their Pocket Books -thus- Vote Their Pocket Books So Dave 'you' are Preaching Revolution {Open Rebellion} Against the combined Reagan-Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama Regime-A-Thon ! - Eat the rich. Dave on a World-Wide Global Scale : That would make 'you' a Cannibal ~ RHF |
(OT) : The Three Principles of Obama-Nomics© : Higher Taxes & More Taxes & Lot's of Taxes
On Nov 12, 5:00*pm, Bob Dobbs wrote:
dave wrote: Reagan et al borrowed money from the Chinese to finance his "tax cuts". *They then transferred all the liability to wage earners. We got ****ed. - Even back during the campaign for his first term - when he read the tax plan off his teleprompter - (he was already alzheimered by then) his opponent - GHWB rightly called it "Voodoo" economics. - -- - Operator Bob - Echo Charlie 42 Now we can it Obama-Nomics© cause it makes Zombies out of Hard Working Americans who have to Pay Higher Taxes & More Taxes & Lot's of Taxes The Three Principles of Obama-Nomics© : Higher Taxes & More Taxes & Lot's of Taxes |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com