On Nov 7, 12:08*am, 1-20-2013 wrote:
Oh the irony of President Doofus instructing us to "not jump to
conclusions" about the muslim terrorist that attacked America on US soil
yesterday.

Isn't this the same idiot that came to his good friend Professor Gate's
side and called the actions of the Cambridge police dept "stupid" before
he knew any of the fact of the case????

Any thoughts on when Obama might starting acting like the President of
the United States???? * Let us know.

You mean jump to conclusions why President Obama has ingnored members
of Congress who happen to be Republicans, in his new "era of post-
partisanship" and have officially asked three times since July to have
an appointment with the President to discuss heath care, yet has
managed to play more golf than any president in history, can campaign
for governor races, play basketball, pitch the olympics to a city,
while ignoring those requests, when those members represent the
equivalent of several football stadiums full of voters?

You see Mr. Axlerod, we don't have to bug the White House like Nixon
to figure out what you people are up to, God explains it to us, on a
level that even a 5th grader can understand?

OMG! Checkout Rep. Gingrey's presentation (11-6-2009 late pm)!
AWESOME! LOL.

Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct
10th, 2009

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of the internet communications system, including
all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the
nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and
physical control, unless those communications represent violations of
the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to
pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possesion of the original author.

d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).

e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.

f) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) may be licensed by www.google.com, for
bandwidth verification or potential advertisement opportunities or
incorporation of web master tools in the future.

g) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are related links,
that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown
purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the
purpose of giving copy right credit referal information under the
terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use"
regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law.

h) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which have free consumer information.

i)Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the
author that blogging is another definition for a potentially infinite
number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will
retroactively apply this version, 1.4 to all forms of previous
communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order
to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an
enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue
getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barack Hussein Obama
has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm,
mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic
emphasis)).

j) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken
Chaser!

On Nov 6, 5:24*pm, MagneticEnergy wrote:
On Nov 7, 12:08*am, 1-20-2013 wrote:

Oh the irony of President Doofus instructing us to "not jump to
conclusions" about the muslim terrorist that attacked America on US soil
yesterday.

Isn't this the same idiot that came to his good friend Professor Gate's
side and called the actions of the Cambridge police dept "stupid" before
he knew any of the fact of the case????

Any thoughts on when Obama might starting acting like the President of
the United States???? * Let us know.

You mean jump to conclusions why President Obama has ingnored members
of Congress who happen to be Republicans, in his new "era of post-
partisanship" and have officially asked three times since July to have
an appointment with the President to discuss heath care, yet has
managed to play more golf than any president in history, can campaign
for governor races, play basketball, pitch the olympics to a city,
while ignoring those requests, when those members represent the
equivalent of several football stadiums full of voters?

You see Mr. Axlerod, we don't have to bug the White House like Nixon
to figure out what you people are up to, God explains it to us, on a
level that even a 5th grader can understand?

OMG! *Checkout Rep. Gingrey's presentation (11-6-2009 late pm)!
AWESOME! *LOL.

Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct
10th, 2009

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of the internet communications system, including
all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the
nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and
physical control, unless those communications represent violations of
the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to
pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possesion of the original author.

d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).

e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.

f) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) may be licensed bywww.google.com, for
bandwidth verification or potential advertisement opportunities or
incorporation of web master tools in the future.

g) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are related links,
that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown
purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the
purpose of giving copy right credit referal information under the
terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use"
regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law.

h) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which have free consumer information.

i)Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the
author that blogging is another definition for a potentially infinite
number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will
retroactively apply this version, 1.4 to all forms of previous
communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order
to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an
enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue
getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barack Hussein Obama
has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm,
mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic
emphasis)).

j) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken
Chaser!

You should have heard Bill Cunningham on
KEX-AM 1190 kHz last night.
http://www.1190kex.com/pages/pages/lineup.php

Comparing Neo-Nazi Skin-Head Aryan Racist
-wrt- Islamic Fascist Terrorist -aka- Muslim Extremists

-if- the Major was a Skin-Head would Prez Obama
be Talking about Tolerance and Understanding for
Skin-Heads ?

-if- Skin-Heads were known to be in the Enlisted
Ranks of the US Military would they be allowed
to Serve . . .

-if- The Skin-Head-Brotherhood were known to be
in the Officer Ranks of the US Military would they
be allowed to Stay in . . .

-if- Any and All the above was 'True' : Would the
US Congress sit-silently-by and Do Nothing to
Get Skin-Heads Out to the US Military ?

-if- Skin-Heads were on US Navy Nuclear Submarines

-if- Skin-Heads were in US Airforce Missile Silos

-if- Skin-Heads controlled US Army Tactical Nukes

? Would Prez Obama Be Preaching Tolerance
and Understanding ? - WAKE-UP AMERICA !

Reality Check :
Only Senator Joe Lieberman has stood-up and
called for a Congressional Investigation of Islamic
Extremists in the Ranks of the US Military and
the possibility that the Muslim Brotherhood has
Infiltrated the Officer Corps of the US Military.
http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2009/11...nd-islamic-ext...

RHF wrote:


-if- Skin-Heads were on US Navy Nuclear Submarines

-if- Skin-Heads were in US Airforce Missile Silos

-if- Skin-Heads controlled US Army Tactical Nukes

? Would Prez Obama Be Preaching Tolerance
and Understanding ? - WAKE-UP AMERICA !

The Dominionists in the military are way scarier than the skins.

On Nov 10, 4:16*am, dave wrote:
RHF wrote:

-if- Skin-Heads were on US Navy Nuclear Submarines

-if- Skin-Heads were in US Airforce Missile Silos

-if- Skin-Heads controlled US Army Tactical Nukes

? Would Prez Obama Be Preaching Tolerance
and Understanding ? - WAKE-UP AMERICA !

- The Dominionists in the military are way scarier than the skins.

Dave clearly you love your 'skin-heads'

RHF wrote:
On Nov 10, 4:16 am, dave wrote:


- The Dominionists in the military are way scarier than the skins.

Dave clearly you love your 'skin-heads'

I have my head every other day.

"Take the skinheads bowling".

On Nov 6, 8:24*pm, MagneticEnergy wrote:

You mean jump to conclusions why President Obama has ingnored members
of Congress who happen to be Republicans, in his new "era of post-
partisanship" and have officially asked three times since July to have
an appointment with the President to discuss heath care,




You need to pay attention.

Between his inauguration and late April the President had several
meetings with Republikkkon members of Congress regardihg health care
and after every meeting, they have trooped out of the White House,
stood in front of the microphones, and announced their opposition.

Faced with this response from the Party of No, he had no recourse but
to push ahead.

Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
On Nov 6, 8:24 pm, MagneticEnergy wrote:
You mean jump to conclusions why President Obama has ingnored members
of Congress who happen to be Republicans, in his new "era of post-
partisanship" and have officially asked three times since July to have
an appointment with the President to discuss heath care,




You need to pay attention.

Between his inauguration and late April the President had several
meetings with Republikkkon members of Congress regardihg health care
and after every meeting, they have trooped out of the White House,
stood in front of the microphones, and announced their opposition.

Faced with this response from the Party of No, he had no recourse but
to push ahead.



Why would they want to talk to Obama about legislation that he has not
been personally involved in? The insurance reform has been a
Legislative situation, not Executive.

On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:40:01 -0800, dave puked:

Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
On Nov 6, 8:24 pm, MagneticEnergy wrote:
You mean jump to conclusions why President Obama has ingnored members
of Congress who happen to be Republicans, in his new "era of post-
partisanship" and have officially asked three times since July to have
an appointment with the President to discuss heath care,




You need to pay attention.

Between his inauguration and late April the President had several
meetings with Republikkkon members of Congress regardihg health care
and after every meeting, they have trooped out of the White House,
stood in front of the microphones, and announced their opposition.

Faced with this response from the Party of No, he had no recourse but
to push ahead.



Why would they want to talk to Obama about legislation that he has not
been personally involved in? The insurance reform has been a
Legislative situation, not Executive.

Then Obama lied when around three months ago he was going to take a
proactive role in the bill.

And why would Obama **** away millions of dollars in hard earned
taxpayer money jetting across the country to campaign for a bill that
he hasn't been personally involved in?

I can understand you positioning yourself to start distancing Obama
from this ridiculous bill, but it will never happen.
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

lab~rat :-) wrote:

And why would Obama **** away millions of dollars in hard earned
taxpayer money jetting across the country to campaign for a bill that
he hasn't been personally involved in?

I can understand you positioning yourself to start distancing Obama
from this ridiculous bill, but it will never happen.
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

His "distance" (until very recently) from this legislation has been
widely decried by the progressives. The president doesn't need me to
help him with his image. I speak from a position of journalistic
neutrality on this one.

A supposedly insured family losing their life savings and home due to an
illness is ridiculous. Trying to do something about that is not.

On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:31:42 -0800, dave puked:

lab~rat :-) wrote:

And why would Obama **** away millions of dollars in hard earned
taxpayer money jetting across the country to campaign for a bill that
he hasn't been personally involved in?

I can understand you positioning yourself to start distancing Obama
from this ridiculous bill, but it will never happen.
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

His "distance" (until very recently) from this legislation has been
widely decried by the progressives. The president doesn't need me to
help him with his image. I speak from a position of journalistic
neutrality on this one.

A supposedly insured family losing their life savings and home due to an
illness is ridiculous.

Are you saying that there should be a law that people have medical
insurance before they have a flat screen, an X-Box and a host of other
goofy toys?

Trying to do something about that is not.


--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?