Palin/Dobbs 2012
 

wrote:

On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:59:40 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

dave wrote:
Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:


Maybe I think you can share your tooth brush and so I'll just take it
use it to clean the toilet and put it back.... we just shared it, no
harm done, right? Besides you don't really own it...

Are you serious?

Do you seriously think you can get government to take peoples money
because you want?

Not because "I" want, Traffi****

Because society has deemed it necessary, proper, legal,
moral, ethical and constitutional

Rickmers, you're a total dumbass!

Palin/Dobbs 2012
 

I dun drankid four cups of Folger's coffee thi mawnin.I mytez asz wel
gitz bak tu woikin en mah attic now.Doggy wud clymb that ladder iffen
shee cud.
cuhulin

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

RHF wrote:
On Nov 21, 11:49 am, dave wrote:
Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:



Does that tell you anything? Socialists are the root of damn near all
our problems

- Sharing and caring is the root of all evil?

Dave 'sharing' your STDs with minors is Evil
* Be good enough to "Care" and
say 'no' to unprotected sex.

Dave 'sharing' your Poison {Drugs} with minors is Evil
* Be good enough to "Care" and
just say 'no' to illegal drugs.

Dave it all begins and ends with 'you' ~ RHF
-ps- please learn to say 'no'
.


Sharing his life of theft from others is is evil....
Instead of teaching people how to use government to steal, he needs to
teach the people how to create their own.

Remember

It's better to "give" than to receive and better to "earn" than to
steal. I gave what can NOT be taken and earned what I have.

A parasite can only live as long as there is a host.

--

Palin/Dobbs 2012 OR If society tries to ignore theconstitution,the individual has the right and duty to stop society.
 

Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

Palin/Dobbs 2012 OR If society tries to ignore the
constitution, the individual has the right and duty to stop society.

dxAce wrote:

wrote:

On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:59:40 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

dave wrote:
Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

Maybe I think you can share your tooth brush and so I'll just take it
use it to clean the toilet and put it back.... we just shared it, no
harm done, right? Besides you don't really own it...
Are you serious?

Do you seriously think you can get government to take peoples money
because you want?
Not because "I" want, Traffi****

Because society has deemed it necessary, proper, legal,
moral, ethical and constitutional

Rickmers, you're a total dumbass!

Society can't "deem" it constitutional, they can either change the
constitution or obey it, society can't simply ignore the constitution.

If society tries that then the individual has the right and duty to stop
society.

I still maintain that Rickmers is a total dumbass!

Palin/Dobbs 2012 OR If society tries to ignore the constitution,the individual has the right and duty to stop society.
 

Palin/Dobbs 2012 OR If society tries to ignore the
constitution, the individual has the right and duty to stop society.


dxAce wrote:

wrote:

On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:59:40 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

dave wrote:
Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

Maybe I think you can share your tooth brush and so I'll just take it
use it to clean the toilet and put it back.... we just shared it, no
harm done, right? Besides you don't really own it...
Are you serious?

Do you seriously think you can get government to take peoples money
because you want?
Not because "I" want, Traffi****

Because society has deemed it necessary, proper, legal,
moral, ethical and constitutional

Rickmers, you're a total dumbass!


Society can't "deem" it constitutional, they can either change the
constitution or obey it, society can't simply ignore the constitution.

If society tries that then the individual has the right and duty to stop
society.


--

Palin/Dobbs 2012 OR If society tries to ignore the constitution,theindividual has the right and duty to stop society.
 

dxAce wrote:

Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

Palin/Dobbs 2012 OR If society tries to ignore the
constitution, the individual has the right and duty to stop society.

dxAce wrote:
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:59:40 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

dave wrote:
Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

Maybe I think you can share your tooth brush and so I'll just take it
use it to clean the toilet and put it back.... we just shared it, no
harm done, right? Besides you don't really own it...
Are you serious?

Do you seriously think you can get government to take peoples money
because you want?
Not because "I" want, Traffi****

Because society has deemed it necessary, proper, legal,
moral, ethical and constitutional
Rickmers, you're a total dumbass!
Society can't "deem" it constitutional, they can either change the
constitution or obey it, society can't simply ignore the constitution.

If society tries that then the individual has the right and duty to stop
society.

I still maintain that Rickmers is a total dumbass!


And it's our duty to point it out!
--

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

RHF wrote:
On Nov 21, 11:49 am, dave wrote:
Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:



Does that tell you anything? Socialists are the root of damn near all
our problems

- Sharing and caring is the root of all evil?

Caring Without common sense and....


*Sharing IGNORANCE* does no one any favor.




















--

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

That arrr tu opininz uppa to mah aytick, wun uv dem izza largar dan teh
uddar wun.Ever mawnin, ah tys ahh rope tu mah laddar anna to wun uv teh
vertykul tu bah fos enna uppa thar enema mah atytik, en case doggy gitz
tu runnin ahrond lykez shee duz sumtyms anna noks mah laddar ober,
thatta wayz, ahh kin pul mah ladder bak uppaz en strytin it outch soss
ahh kin clymb downa.
cuhulin
..........................................
Ahh bin toldid befo bye sum smarty payntz, ahh talykz lika uh embullcul
..........................................

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:



Sharing his life of theft from others is is evil....

I don't steal. I help make TV shows, which is far more evil.

Instead of teaching people how to use government to steal, he needs to
teach the people how to create their own.

Create their own what?

Remember

It's better to "give" than to receive and better to "earn" than to
steal. I gave what can NOT be taken and earned what I have.

No one should take more than they give.

A parasite can only live as long as there is a host.

A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

On Nov 22, 9:13*am, wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:18:00 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty

wrote:
Remember

It's better to "give" than to receive and better to "earn" than to
steal. *I gave what can NOT be taken and earned what I have.

- You earn in a society that allows you to do so.

Citizens Create {Tolerate} a Society That Benefits
Them : To Reap The Benefits of That Society.

- It's better to "earn" a million and keep most, than
- live in a system where you simply cannot earn anything

It's better to "earn" a million and keep 'something',
{have something - a reasonable portion}

than live in a system where you simply cannot
earn anything {and have nothing}

1 - Did the man that worked hard for a year
and earned $50K earn his money; because
he simply work hard for it ?
# A 15% Income Tax on this Man leaves
him with $42.5K to Spend. [1X]

2 - Did the man that worked hard for a year
and earn $250K earn his money; because
he worked so many more hours and so much
harder ? -or- Did He simply Benefit from the
Hard Work of many $25K a Year Workers ?
? Does That Man Have A Social Responsibility*
To Those Who's Support Benefited Him ?
* Including the Consumers of His Produces
and Services.
# A 30% Income Tax on this Man leaves
him with $175K to Spend. [4X]

3 - Did the man that worked hard for a year
and earn $1.25M earn his money; because
he worked so many many more hours and
so much much harder ? -or- Did He simply
Benefit from the Hard Work of many $25K
and $250K a Year Workers ?
? Does That Man Have A Social Responsibility
To Those Who's Support Benefited Him ?
* Including the Consumers of His Produces
and Services.
# A 45% Income Tax on this Man leaves
him with $687.5KM to Spend. [16X]

All Three Men are equally necessary for a
Society to Function; and All Three Men are
Dependent on each other in Society for it
to Function. All Three Men have a Social
Responsibility to Society {Obligation} to
Contribute Proportionally to Society based
upon their Proportional Benefits from the
Society. - yada, Yada. YADA ! ~ RHF

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
dave wrote:
Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:


Sharing his life of theft from others is is evil....
I don't steal. I help make TV shows, which is far more evil.


You belong to a collective of thieves.... if you vote to take money from
people for no need other than redistribution, it's not even
constitutional. It's just stealing.

If you belong to a lynch mob you are a murderer, if you belong to a
redistribution mob, then you are a thief.

No matter who you think is right or wrong or how many agree, the
constitution lays out the laws and using a mob to break the law is not a
way to hide from the laws.


Some of the Founders (notably Jefferson) advocated taxing the **** out
of rich people to prevent the establishment of a permanent aristocracy
in the USA. They were quite radical in this regard. You tax rich
people to prevent them from becoming too powerful. "Redistribution" is
an end result, but not the motivation, (which is the preservation of our
style of government.)

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

dave wrote:
Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
dave wrote:
Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:


Sharing his life of theft from others is is evil....
I don't steal. I help make TV shows, which is far more evil.


You belong to a collective of thieves.... if you vote to take money from
people for no need other than redistribution, it's not even
constitutional. It's just stealing.

If you belong to a lynch mob you are a murderer, if you belong to a
redistribution mob, then you are a thief.

No matter who you think is right or wrong or how many agree, the
constitution lays out the laws and using a mob to break the law is not a
way to hide from the laws.


Some of the Founders (notably Jefferson) advocated taxing the **** out
of rich people to prevent the establishment of a permanent aristocracy
in the USA. They were quite radical in this regard. You tax rich
people to prevent them from becoming too powerful. "Redistribution" is
an end result, but not the motivation, (which is the preservation of our
style of government.)


The constitution says what limits government has by giving it a few
powers and the rest are for the State and the people.

There is no power for the Federal Government to spend on anything but
Federal Government, there is no provision to give money to "the people".
When spending is out of jurisdiction, it is the same as taxing out of
the Federal governments jurisdiction, it's unconstitutional.

The constitution doesn't say congress may spend on what ever they want,
it prescribes the limits.

There is no Constitutional redistribution.... what ever they "talked
about" it is irrelevant if it's not in the constitution as a power
prescribed to the United States which in the constitution is actually
"the United States Government" known today as the Federal government.

--

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

Are they eating out of trucks nowadays?

CHOWWWWWW! Go and get them vittles, y'all.
Soylent Green!
http://cruftbox.com/cruft/docs/lafoodtrucks.html

Aw Haw Haw Haw,,,,,,
cuhulin

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

RHF wrote:
On Nov 22, 9:13 am, wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:18:00 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty

wrote:
Remember
It's better to "give" than to receive and better to "earn" than to
steal. I gave what can NOT be taken and earned what I have.


- You earn in a society that allows you to do so.


To start with, the government doesn't allow me to earn..... the
government has no power to stop me from earning.



















--

(OT) : GOP Swampland dealers
 

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:55:46 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

dave wrote:
Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

Sharing his life of theft from others is is evil....

I don't steal. I help make TV shows, which is far more evil.

You belong to a collective of thieves.... if you vote to take money from
people for no need other than redistribution, it's not even
constitutional. It's just stealing.

but, you seem to think it's OK for a wall street investor to "invest" a
retiree's money into a system that leaves the wall street investor with
earnings of several $$million$$ of tax free money at the expense of the
retiree's account because the retiree is incapable of understanding the
sophistication of the investment created by the banking system?

There is nothing that your limpballs GOP leader of the do-nothing-party-
of-NO can say that will make me (or anybody of reason) believe this is OK
for our country. Remember, he is one of them with $$millions$$ and your
not.

I have an investment for you! what's your phone number?

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:


There is no power for the Federal Government to spend on anything but
Federal Government, there is no provision to give money to "the people".
When spending is out of jurisdiction, it is the same as taxing out of
the Federal governments jurisdiction, it's unconstitutional.

The constitution doesn't say congress may spend on what ever they want,
it prescribes the limits.

There is no Constitutional redistribution.... what ever they "talked
about" it is irrelevant if it's not in the constitution as a power
prescribed to the United States which in the constitution is actually
"the United States Government" known today as the Federal government.


The power of taxation has traditionally been used to limit corporate
wealth and to encourage behavior deemed advantageous to society. Your
rantings are unfocused.

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

RHF wrote:
On Nov 23, 6:06 am, dave wrote:
Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:



There is no power for the Federal Government to spend on anything but
Federal Government, there is no provision to give money to "the people"..
When spending is out of jurisdiction, it is the same as taxing out of
the Federal governments jurisdiction, it's unconstitutional.
The constitution doesn't say congress may spend on what ever they want,
it prescribes the limits.
There is no Constitutional redistribution.... what ever they "talked
about" it is irrelevant if it's not in the constitution as a power
prescribed to the United States which in the constitution is actually
"the United States Government" known today as the Federal government.

- The power of taxation has traditionally been
- used to limit corporate wealth

The Abusive Power of Taxation has traditionally
been Used to Confiscate Individual Wealth.
{Using the Threat of Law and the Might of the
Government To Intimidate and Coerce the Taxed.}

- and to encourage behavior deemed advantageous
- to society.

That is NOT within the spirit of the law.... Taxes are prescribed to
pay for government NOT for social engineering.




















--

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

Heh, a few minutes ago, Paul Gallo said this weekend he is going to turn
the brain off, not going to watch Fox news.He said all weekend long he
is going to watch Sports.
Perez said that is what he is going to do too.
www.supertalkms.com
cuhulin

(OT) : Prez Obama -says- Americans Are Not Paying Enough{Unprecedented} Taxes and {Unprecedented} Higher Taxes is "All Wee-Wee'd Up!"
 

On Nov 25, 6:48*am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-Everyth...@Talk-n-
dog.com wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Nov 23, 6:06 am, dave wrote:
Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

There is no power for the Federal Government to spend on anything but
Federal Government, there is no provision to give money to "the people"..
When spending is out of jurisdiction, it is the same as taxing out of
the Federal governments jurisdiction, it's unconstitutional.
The constitution doesn't say congress may spend on what ever they want,
it prescribes the limits.
There is no Constitutional redistribution.... *what ever they "talked
about" *it is irrelevant if it's not in the constitution as a power
prescribed to the United States which in the constitution is actually
"the United States Government" known today as the Federal government.

- The power of taxation has traditionally been
- used to limit corporate wealth

The Abusive Power of Taxation has traditionally
been Used to Confiscate Individual Wealth.
{Using the Threat of Law and the Might of the
Government To Intimidate and Coerce the Taxed.}

- - and to encourage behavior deemed advantageous
- - to society.

- That is NOT within the spirit of the law....
-*Taxes are prescribed to pay for government
- NOT for social engineering.
-
- --

Prez Obama -says-
Americans Are Not Paying Enough {Unprecedented}
Taxes and {Unprecedented} Higher Taxes
is "All Wee-Wee'd Up !"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...724364f5eddd65
yeah, Yeah. YEAH ! Prez Obama the American
People Need Higher and More Taxes {Fees} : So
That They Know That They Need Government To
Do Things For Them With Their Money via Taxes.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/200...politico/29896

Good Obama-Bots© Gladly Wee-Wee'd Up Their Taxes

Prez Obama -says- Higher Taxes {Fees} are Good
* Obama-Speak© -translation-
Higher Taxes {Fees} Make People Feel Good

Prez Obama -says- More Taxes {Fees} are Better
* Obama-Speak© -translation-
More Taxes {Fees} Make People Feel Better

Prez Obama -says- A Lot More Taxes {Fees} are Great
* Obama-Speak© -translation-
A Lot More Taxes {Fees} Make People Feel Great

Prez Obama -says- I lowered your taxes {unprecedented}
before I Raised Your Taxes {Unprecedented}
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/200...politico/29896

Prez Obama -says- You had no fees {unprecedented}
I Gave You Fees {Unprecedented}
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/200...politico/29896

sometimes prez obama taxes the mind ~ RHF

(OT) : The Growing 'Minority' That Opposes The Obama-Regime's© Excessive Spending and Higher Taxes
 

On Nov 25, 11:41*am, wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:48:51 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty

wrote:
That is NOT within the spirit of the law.... *Taxes are prescribed to
pay for government NOT for social engineering.

The business of government is what it says it is.

When the electorate doesn't like what government
considers it's business----then they change it

- You just happen to be in a ****ing dinbat (tiny)
- minority of idiots whose views simply are so nutcase
- that you're nothing more than comic relief

"S..." - '****ing dinbat (tiny) minority of idiots'

That is simply Liberal-Fascist Name Calling
and NOT FACTS [.]

- - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - -
[: To Liberal-Fascist {Democrat} Name Calling :]
ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument :
When a Super-Smart 'Enlightened" Liberal Starts Name Calling*.
* They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional - rotfl ~ RHF
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...8979fbe8546cfa

* * * REALITY CHECK * * *
In the 2008 US Presidential Election Prez Obama
received 53% of the Votes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_2008

Now 1-in-5 of the Voters that Voted for Prez Obama
say that they would not Vote for BHO now if the
Election was held Now {Today}.

That translates to 10% of the Voters

Add the Remaining 47% who did NOT Voter for
Prez Obama and that Adds-Up-To 57% of the
Electorate. {The Greater Portion of 100%}

Hello Since When is 57% a 'tiny minority' ?

Ah Yes - Using Obama-Math© "The Enemy"*
-aka- Political Opposition to the Obama-Regime©
IS ALWAYS A MINORITY [.]
* Expanding & Redefining The Obama-Enemies-List©
to include Anti-American Enemies-of-the-People
like Republicans & Conservatives & Anyone Who
Opposes the Obama-Regime©
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e0ecd9724e72fc

- Boy, that must suck

To Be an Obama-Bot© and have to Preach
The Love of Higher Taxes; and Praise More
Taxes; while Worshiping A Lot More Taxes.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...399dfcf6831d67
suck, Suck. SUCK ! - - - That's the Sound
of Higher Taxes Sucking Up All of the Hard
Earned Money of American Workers.

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil
 

Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

- and to encourage behavior deemed advantageous
- to society.

That is NOT within the spirit of the law.... Taxes are prescribed to
pay for government NOT for social engineering.

They've been doing it forever. You never heard of a "sin" tax?

(OT) : The Growing 'Minority' That Opposes The Obama-Regime's© Excessive Spending and Higher Taxes
 

RHF wrote:


Now 1-in-5 of the Voters that Voted for Prez Obama
say that they would not Vote for BHO now if the
Election was held Now {Today}.

That translates to 10% of the Voters


Math weirdness aside, we have elections every so often. Those are the
polls that count. This is a snapshot with bad lighting.

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- The Root of All Evil