LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old January 23rd 10, 07:41 PM posted to alt.fan.dan-quayle,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.letterman,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 952
Default Supreme Court reinstates First Amendment


"Joe from Kokomo" wrote in message
...
"Joe from Kokomo" wrote in message
...
bpnjensen wrote:

Well, whatever else they've [the Supreme Court] done - they have handed
the elections and
thus, the lawmaking machinery, to the wealthiest corporations in
America. Extrapolate from that what you will.
Extrapolate what I will?

OK, the end of America as we know it. A BIG win for the Corporatocracy.

Joe Irvin wrote:

Your assumption is that all corporations are either evil or do not have
the interests of people they serve. As long as there is a disclaimer of
where the money comes from there is no problem unless you think Americans
are to dumb to figure things out.

To my way of thinking, getting the best politicians money can buy is
still wrong, a fine print disclaimer notwithstanding.



Joe Irvin wrote:

Money whether its from individuals or corporations/business, is necessary
for people to get elected to office. Saying that it is somehow wrong for
corporations to give money if there is a disclaimer, IMO shows a distrust
for the people.


Yes, I agree...money is necessary for people to get elected to office,
BUT...

....when you are talking millions and TENS of millions of donation
dollars with no limit nor oversight, you are creating a very dangerous
situation, ripe for abuse. Both political parties have had their share
of crooked *******s -- and even "honest" people may well be corrupted
when you dangle millions under their nose.

Want to know why you should worry about the Corporatocracy? Read
"Hoodwinked" by John Perkins, also the author of "Confessions of an
Economic Hit Man".
Is there assumption that corporations are evil/bad?

If you read the first half of the book quoted above, you wouldn't be
asking that question. We can continue this debate when you actually read
it.


Why don't you give the theme of the book.


I thought I did, but here goes again.

The book is divided in two parts, the second part being his potential
solutions -- which you may or may not agree with. The first part of the
book describes actual, real-life, documented evils of Corporatocracy.

Read at least the first half of the book and then let me know if you see
any problem.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC Diversity Chief Asked Liberal Fascists to Copy FDR, Take onLimbaugh, Murdoch, Supreme Court N∅ ∅baMa∅ Shortwave 6 August 30th 09 09:45 AM
FAUX's First Amendment rights Torture W. Shortwave 1 May 14th 09 02:25 PM
O/T OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE CHALLENGE TURNED DOWN BY SUPREME COURT [email protected] Shortwave 1 December 8th 08 08:57 PM
Ham Takes Fight for Tower to the U.S. Supreme Court Brian Kelly Policy 0 September 28th 04 08:20 PM
US senator backs amendment to bar gay marriage..Get rid of him Jerry Oxendine General 1 July 1st 03 05:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017