Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/26/10 18:11 , wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:30:10 -0600, "D. Peter Maus" wrote: On 1/26/10 13:59 , wrote: On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:00:25 -0600, "D. Peter Maus" wrote: Because "we" say so Some logic, there, Bubba. Glad you think so---it's worked very well for a couple of centuries Not the way you do it, no. Your premises are gratuitously based in the fundament that 'there are no enemies on the Left, and that there is no honor on the Right.' Gratuitously denied. That's also worked for a couple of centuries. The notion that you can simply plunder private wealth under the brand of 'fair share of expenses for running the society' flatly denies that the private wealth is already taxed at a dramatically, confiscatorily, higher rate So-how many millionaires went broke because of taxation? The same number of poor people that got rich because of taxation. That they don't go broke is not the issue. They're paying for all the services used by people who do not pay taxes. So it's not about funding the society, it's about confiscation so those who don't want to earn for themselves don't have to. If you're going to tax income, and claim 'fair share' then tax all income. Seems that conservatives and loonytarians keep ****ing it up. Yes, because, as we all know, only Conservatives can do wrong. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC Diversity Chief Asked Liberal Fascists to Copy FDR, Take onLimbaugh, Murdoch, Supreme Court | Shortwave | |||
FAUX's First Amendment rights | Shortwave | |||
O/T OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE CHALLENGE TURNED DOWN BY SUPREME COURT | Shortwave | |||
Ham Takes Fight for Tower to the U.S. Supreme Court | Policy | |||
US senator backs amendment to bar gay marriage..Get rid of him | General |