D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 1/26/10 08:13 , wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:12:19 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

THe taxes they pay are miniscule related to the amount they make.


So what?

They must, therefore, pay more.



Why?


Because they benefit more.

Joe from Kokomo wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:

Well, whatever else they've done - they have handed the elections and
thus, the lawmaking machinery, to the wealthiest corporations in America.

Wealthiest corporations in *America*???

Heard on the media last night (01/25) that this ruling also applies to
FOREIGN corporations.

Has anyone else heard this or can it be verified?

-If- it is indeed true, people on these NGs that support the ruling
are either extremely naive -- or should be in jail (along with the
Supreme Court) for supporting such a treasonous idea.

Sorry, but I don't want some Saudi or Chinese company donating millions
to support a candidate of THEIR choice in an AMERICAN election.

A little late for the outrage...

On 1/26/2010 7:14 PM, Joe from Kokomo wrote:




"D. Peter Maus" wrote:

On 1/26/10 16:55 , dxAce wrote:

-snipo-


D. Peter Maus wrote:

Sad, but true, Steve. Sad, but true.

Jeez, Mouse, can't you do better than to perpetually be a boot-licking
sycophant* for someone like Lare? It's very unbecoming of you.

*For those of you whose Funk and Wagnall's is in the shop, sycophant: a
self-seeking, servile flatterer; fawning parasite, toady, yes man,
flunky, fawner.

OK! i removed the crapy cross-posting. I just want to know if
your related to Okie-Joe?

Drifter...