Courtesy copy of another page in a book I am writing, no reply
necessary or expected, however I may consider comments before the
final edit:

What is the difference between condescending humor and satire? A big
paycheck or a little paycheck, if you get one at all? That's why I
would never use the word “punk”, because there are more interesting
ways of saying things, and of course it gets boring to just copy what
other people are doing? Condescending humor is rarely funny, and
people are not really happy?

But of course, that is the business plan of some who splice that into
their agenda, you can get into some really weird theories about the
business plans of the “competition”? Well, I am not a doctor, and
this is not a lecture. Rush Limbaugh contemplating that he retire
based on everyone agreeing with him? Is that genius in action? A lot
have tried, but there is nothing out there that approaches the
effectiveness of what Rush does in three hours? I hope he does not
retire unless he wants to, sure, there are other good radio shows out
there, but none of them come close to the performance, and personal
touch, the good manners, with the American People that Rush Limbaugh
does, and I believe he has only begun to tap into the potential he
represents?

That's saying a lot, considering that the competition is paying
hundreds of people to do the work that he and his meager staff
accomplish on a daily basis? That does not happen because Rush is
white, or who he is, it is because of what he does? Wow, such a
“progressive” thought? You would not believe the garbage I heard
today from those who claim to be “progressive” and they were stirring
up racial hate intentionally, I kid you not. They were saying that
Rush Limbaugh was feeding on people's bigotry even if he was not a
bigot. And that was the part that I could repeat without being
ashamed. Feeding on people's racial bigotry requires that you talk
about it? That's “progressive”? Or “delusional”?

Oh, and I also discovered that Martin Luther King, did not believe in
civil rights, if what I heard earlier today is true? That
“progressives” hi-jacked the Martin Luther King movement by feeding on
the emotions of those who perceived some sort of “injustice” that is
impossible to achieve in the first place, and call it “fighting for
civil rights”?

It's not progressive to say you are “fighting for civil rights” when
you don't want them people. If Billy Bob drinks beer every night,
shows up for work when he wants to, but can't get fired because of a
contract, you are violating the principals of my civil rights to take
my tax money and just give it to Billy Bob when he has not earned it?

I can expand on that one sentence to write a whole book on the
subject, couldn't I? If 60% of Shiela Jackson Lee's district has
dropped out of high school, and we know that the unemployment rate for
non-skilled workers is 30%, one out of five families in her district,
will never come out of poverty unless they work their way out of it?
Now is that a Martin Luther King explanation, or would you rather I
hypnotize you with buzz words?

Health care is private property, it is a civil right issue, you are
not entitled to other people's property. The future of the United
States hinges on this simple concept, because all other laws are based
on that law, your privacy, and a few others? And that's what the
“progressives” want to do, disguise their agenda of “regression” by
taking away your civil rights so you end up living like a slave on the
plantation Cuba?

Oh, and they don't want to call Rush Limbaugh, what he is, a
Conservative, they want to call them “right wingers”? What happens
when you “wing it”? Good chance you will fail, that's why they try to
deceive anyone who listens to them with their little “buzz words”?
One little buzz word? Environmentalism? We only have one planet? We
only have one economy people, we only have one currency. Part of what
secures your currency (a responsibility of Congress) is the
intellectual property, the concept that you understand the fiscal
mechanics of what ever it is that you propose? You want alternative
energy? It better be dirt cheap, or you won't get it, period.
People can adapt fairly easily to weather changes, we're used to it.
People do not adapt to financial chaos, do they? Progessive is not a
buzz word, it is a lie?

Which brings me to the candidate in Texas, Deborah Medina, who has not
provided the necessary details to accomplish her stated agenda? Did
Barack Obama campaign on the “Constitution”? Did Barack Obama
campaign on fiscal responsibility, and other buzz word topics? So
Bagdad Gibbs, has written on the palm of his hand, the following four
words:

Poll, Numbers, Hope, Change

So we've got to be very careful that just because you say you belong
to the “Tea Party Movement” that you don't just put some buzz words
out there, and make some speeches? You want to cut spending? Who,
What, Where, When, Why? Who is the CPA? How many? Who is the
legislative lawyer? What is going to be impacted? Why? When? For
how long? You don't want property taxes? Who has done that before,
what spending will you cut, etc., etc.

And I agree, Deborah has no clue about the danger of the job that she
is asking to perform? If 9/11 is a grey area after all these years,
how will the people who have the job to keep real killers, drugs, and
money out of the borders do their job, when everything you do will be
a question mark? Did I get fired because of x? Did so and so get
transferred because of y? Law enforcement is a community, and if you
can't trust that community, you will not be able to perform your
duties, and vice versa?

That's just the tip of the ice berg with technical questions? Lets
move on to personality? Do you have a bully personality? Are you
condescending? Can you direct the National Guard? What are the three
general orders? Do you answer questions with the same memorized
answers? Can you think on the fly? Are you too pale or look
physically ill? Should people that work in medical fields also have
ties to law enforcement in relation to the DEA vs. a candidate that
does not pose any risks in that area?

Gov. Rick Perry understands that transportation is a key element of
future concerns, both on a state and national level, and he does not
want to give rail roads a monopoly with freight? You can write a book
on transportation, do you understand the subject? When asked “who are
you” you can't just say, “Tea Party Member for 2 years, two kids, have
a big dog, speak French, and want to cut your taxes?” Was that a non-
complete sentence? Was there a noun, pro-noun, adverb, verb, or one
of those other “thingy(s)” in there?

We've got armies of speech writers out there, and that's not working,
we need armies of CPAs? When governments are telling home based
business you belong to government unions, then the problem is
government, and a band aid, the “labor union”, can not be used on deep
financial wounds in the country, we have to stitch up the skin that
was ripped apart by looters with knives? You've got to unite a nation
so that we don't need unions in the first place?

Oh, and look forward to another special guest appearance by “LaWeezie”
who will explain the benefits of how the Iraq war was a bi-partisan
accomplishment that has united the People of the United States and
that no political party would dare claim a partisan victory and no one
with their “slight of hand” technique, which also has on the palm of
that hand the following four words:

Poll
Numbers
Hope
Change

would dare say so in the “echo chamber”?

Oh, yah, we're gonna seize that moment....we're gonna lay it on ya
brotha

Inspired by

mmmm mmmm mmmm Rush Hudson Limbaugh mmmm mmmm mmmmmm


legal disclaimer:

Universal Legal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.5, dated
Nov 7th, 2009 (which supersedes all previous versions, to which this
new version applies)

The writings, views, expressions expressed by this author to include
all written and electronic forms of communication are subject to the
following disclaimer and conditions:

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived due to other
limitations incorporated into the licensed email software in use at
the time such as automated spam or virus filters. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of any type of electronic or written
communications system, including all parties, who may technically
intercept communications due to the nature of network conditions
beyond both the author's legal and physical control, unless those
communications represent violations of the law, upon which the author,
and or web site will cooperate to pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgment on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possession of the original author.

d) Any reference to copyrighted material is done in the spirit of fair
use, to illustrate the context of a discussion regarding public events
for reference purposes that adds to the conversation, for which that
discussion constitutes a new and separate piece of intellectual
property, for which the referenced copyrighted material can not convey
by itself, and that the author reserves the right to retain any
profits from the newly created intellectual property. This term also
serves to promote the referenced copyrighted material, without
necessarily endorsing the material for any particular fitness, use, or
purpose, for which the purpose of fair use referral law was created
for, through inclusion of a partial, but not whole, body of works that
the copyright fair use reference applies, for which the intent of all
terms of this disclaimer apply to that reference of a copyrighted
work.

e) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).

f) The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.

g) It is the opinion of the author that you respect people when you
consider their views, by reflecting their thoughts or actions against
your own, which may include use of language that conveys an emotional
depth that is to be imagined, but not enacted through use of language
that accurately, or inaccurately describes the situation,
circumstance, or idea, which does not imply that any action occur
other than the consideration of the thought, for which beyond the
author has no control, or liability for the action of the reader as
presented in all terms of this diclaimer, and may simply be the
venting of emotions with the intent of no consequence by the author to
an audience the author assumes will understand the message and intent,
and wishes to hear those views.

h) Since all intellectual property, discussions and other
communications this disclaimer applies to, either in written, or
electronic form, subscribe to the terms described in paragraph (e) and
(g) of this disclaimer, under no circumstances are any communications
meant to violate the terms of any electronic harassment laws which
include the word “harm”, for which the author understands to be
limited to the definition of physical harm (not self inflicted mental
harm) that requires immediate medical attention based solely or in
part by the communications of the author, regardless of whether the
author chooses to remain anonymous or not.

i) It is the intention and opinion of the author that History is full
of individuals that are not harmed by criticism, and in fact such
criticism can motivate and inspire them to prove their critics wrong.
Based on this historical evidence, any alleged mental harm amounts to
self inflicted injury not treatable by either medical or other
professionals (despite the fact that many people live from the profits
of lies through gradual illusion, without judicial interference), for
which the author has no control over the mental development of any
potential reader prior to the discovery or reading of the material for
which this disclaimer applies, as evident by the necessity that speech
is to be protected by law as determined by the founders of the United
States of America, who, in the opinion of the author, wrote the legal
framework, which was created by God, not slaves.

j) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) or advertisements may be licensed by
www.google.com, for bandwidth verification, or determination of
potential advertisement opportunities subject to all other terms
described in this disclaimer.

k) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are any electronic
links that may transport the reader to other web pages, sites, or
computers, and such links that may be provided for all or any of the
following known or unknown purposes, but not limited to,
informational, educational, and for the purpose of giving copy right
credit referral information under the terms outlined in the conditions
applied to the term "fair use" regarding conversations and print under
US Copy Right Law, and for which the author assumes no liability for
any particular use, fitness, or legality there of, any link, current,
past, or future, which the reader should use at their sole risk, with
no liability to the author, or any other party that may store,
transmit, or otherwise facilitate use of the material for which this
disclaimer applies.

l) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which has free consumer information which preclude the use and
need for excessive government regulation that burdens business with
obstacles it may sense that it can not overcome without inflicting
harm on the business plan or survival ability of the business to
provide advertised, goods and or services.

m) Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 or 1.4 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of
the author that “blogging” is another definition for a potentially
infinite number or forms of electronic communication, as such the
author will retroactively apply this version, 1.5 to all forms of
previous communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows,
in order to properly convey the intention of the author and to
demonstrate an enthusiasm to comply with the law.

n) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended.

o) This disclaimer is meant to establish the intent of the author who
may participate in message forums, or create other written or
electronic forms of communication to comply with current law, and may
be revoked without prior notice, due to circumstances beyond the
author's control, changes in the law, or for any of the purposes,
terms, or conditions that may be in effect or described by this
disclaimer, or to changes in this disclaimer that the author may
clarify in a revised version of this disclaimer.

p) This disclaimer is attached to this message, and retroactively
applies to all previous forms of communication by the author, and is
done so because there is no recognized central suppository of a public
disclaimer recognized by the Government of the United States to the
author, and as such, the legal imperative of the author is to apply
this disclaimer to all manner of correspondence as the author seems
fit or prudent, so that no misunderstandings occur, or to comply with
past, current or future revisions of the law, due to any of, but not
limited to, any or all of the terms, partial terms, or combination of
terms, of this disclaimer, which is derived from the freedom of
speech, for it appears to the author that the zeal of lawmakers to
take away free speech outweigh the providence of attaching this
disclaimer to all correspondence for which this applies, and any
inconvenience for which this presents, is the result of simply
complying with the law, and not to inconvenience the reader.



Use of this private web site or web page is at your own risk, for
which you agree not to sue the authors or anyone who may publish or
share this article (which must include this disclaimer) with or
without the consent of the author(s) if you do not agree, you are
violating the terms of conditions to view the content, and you may not
use or view the content for any purpose. Discussions, and or links to
media and (or) resources do not automatically indicate that either the
author, this web site, or anyone who discusses the material either
endorse the individuals or organizations referenced, either in part,
or in whole, and the author's ask the readers to make their own
conclusions.

No individual or organization, including CSPAN, Glenn Beck, Fox News,
Rush Limbaugh, endorses this web site or the use of their material on
this web site at this time, which may be either removed by request or
without notice. Use of the material is assumed appropriate for use
under the copy right act concerning fair use for discussion, to
include artistic expression to demonstrate a particular viewpoint, in
a single or group of discussions. Video or film footage may not
include the full context of the original publishing video or audio
clips, and therefore are not necessarily representative of any
referenced individual or organization