RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/150583-special-glen-beck-fights-rich.html)

dave March 29th 10 02:42 PM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
"What's happening right now at the global level is I have friends who
are billionaires who say I don't know what to do with their money to
preserve the wealth..."

You're not supposed to "preserve the wealth". Use it or lose it. No
family dynasties in the USA.


bpnjensen March 29th 10 03:20 PM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On Mar 29, 6:42*am, dave wrote:
"What's happening right now at the global level is I have friends who
are billionaires who say I don't know what to do with their money to
preserve the wealth..."

You're not supposed to "preserve the wealth". *Use it or lose it. *No
family dynasties in the USA.


Exactly. Like we're all supposed to feel sorry for them. Poor babies.

∅baMa∅ Tse Dung March 30th 10 12:21 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On Mar 29, 8:42*am, dave wrote:
"What's happening right now at the global level is I have friends who
are billionaires who say I don't know what to do with their money to
preserve the wealth..."

You're not supposed to "preserve the wealth". *Use it or lose it. *No
family dynasties in the USA.


It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet
mignon.

Enjoy your sop http://thepeoplescube.com

dave March 30th 10 12:50 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
?baMa? Tse Dung wrote:


It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet
mignon.

I'm a vegetarian.

bpnjensen March 30th 10 01:15 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On Mar 29, 4:50*pm, dave wrote:
?baMa? Tse Dung wrote:

It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet
mignon.


I'm a vegetarian.


Me too.

Kevin Alfred Strom March 30th 10 04:08 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
bpnjensen wrote:
On Mar 29, 4:50 pm, dave wrote:
?baMa? Tse Dung wrote:

It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet
mignon.

I'm a vegetarian.


Me too.



As am I.


Clean living,


Kevin, WB4AIO.
--
http://kevinalfredstrom.com/

bpnjensen March 30th 10 05:57 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On Mar 29, 8:08*pm, Kevin Alfred Strom
wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:
On Mar 29, 4:50 pm, dave wrote:
?baMa? Tse Dung wrote:


It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet
mignon.
I'm a vegetarian.


Me too.


As am I.

Clean living,

Kevin, WB4AIO.
--http://kevinalfredstrom.com/


Good on ya! :-)

Priest March 30th 10 06:30 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On Mar 29, 6:50*pm, dave wrote:
I'm a vegetarian.


I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision
did/does have side effects though: lost 50 lbs., energy level
quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste buds
rejuvenated, diet became much more varied, meals and cooking became
fun, interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the
spiritual benefits realized by refusing to participate in and
subsidize the cruel and inhumane meat industry have been positively
awe-inspiring and a very special bond with nature and animals emerged
that is beyond description.

Can't help adding that I find it noteworthy that four of the more
intelligent individuals in this group are all vegetarian. Interesting.

Joe from Kokomo[_2_] March 30th 10 02:00 PM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 

On Mar 29, 6:50 pm, dave wrote:
I'm a vegetarian.


Priest wrote:

I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision
did/does have side effects though: lost 50 lbs., energy level
quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste
buds rejuvenated, diet became much more varied,


*much more* varied, just eating veggies and -eliminating- meat, fish and
fowl? Sorry, but that seems contradictory.

meals and cooking became fun,


more fun? Why is it "more fun" to cook one thing than another? Cooking
is cooking, parts is parts.

interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the spiritual
benefits realized by refusing to participate in and subsidize the
cruel and inhumane meat industry...


What about that cruel and inhumane treatment of vegetables? You are
killing them (a living thing), boiling them, eating them.

Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down
in the prime of life?

If you wish to be a vegetarian, so be it. But meat is just another food
group along with fish, fowl and vegetables. Humans have been eating meat
for millenia, since the first cave man speared a woolly mammoth. Meat
has stood the human race in good stead for tens of thousands of years.
(Everything in moderation, of course. I'm not recommending you slam down
two pounds of bacon in a sitting).

Kevin Alfred Strom March 30th 10 02:40 PM

Food choices (Was: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich)
 
Joe from Kokomo wrote:

[...]
Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down
in the prime of life?

[...]


I know of no credible evidence that plants possess a consciousness.


With all good wishes,


Kevin, WB4AIO.
--
http://kevinalfredstrom.com/

bpnjensen March 30th 10 03:02 PM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On Mar 29, 10:30*pm, Priest wrote:
On Mar 29, 6:50*pm, dave wrote:

I'm a vegetarian.


I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision
did/does have side effects though: *lost 50 lbs., energy level
quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste buds
rejuvenated, diet became much more varied, meals and cooking became
fun, interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the
spiritual benefits realized by refusing to participate in and
subsidize the cruel and inhumane meat industry have been positively
awe-inspiring and a very special bond with nature and animals emerged
that is beyond description.

Can't help adding that I find it noteworthy that four of the more
intelligent individuals in this group are all vegetarian. Interesting.


Those were my reasons and results exactly - today I am 50, fit, hike
through the mountains, ride my bike daily and making love is
great! :-) Can't vouch for the intelligence part, though - I became
more of a juvenile delinquent ;-)

bpnjensen March 30th 10 03:03 PM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On Mar 30, 6:00*am, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On Mar 29, 6:50 pm, dave wrote:
I'm a vegetarian.

Priest wrote:
I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision
did/does have side effects though: *lost 50 lbs., energy level
quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste
buds rejuvenated, diet became much more varied,


*much more* varied, just eating veggies and -eliminating- meat, fish and
fowl? Sorry, but that seems contradictory.

meals and cooking became fun,


more fun? Why is it "more fun" to cook one thing than another? Cooking
is cooking, parts is parts.

interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the spiritual
benefits realized by refusing to participate in and subsidize the
cruel and inhumane meat industry...


What about that cruel and inhumane treatment of vegetables? You are
killing them (a living thing), boiling them, eating them.

Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down
in the prime of life?

If you wish to be a vegetarian, so be it. But meat is just another food
group along with fish, fowl and vegetables. Humans have been eating meat
for millenia, *since the first cave man speared a woolly mammoth. Meat
has stood the human race in good stead for tens of thousands of years.
(Everything in moderation, of course. I'm not recommending you slam down
two pounds of bacon in a sitting).


The main problem is not eating meat, although it is part of the
ethical dilemma - the bigger problem is that you cannot feed a planet
of 7 billion meat eaters and still be humane, just and not place a
hideous burden on the environment.

Bruce

dave March 30th 10 04:04 PM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
Joe from Kokomo wrote:

On Mar 29, 6:50 pm, dave wrote:
I'm a vegetarian.


Priest wrote:

I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision
did/does have side effects though: lost 50 lbs., energy level
quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste buds
rejuvenated, diet became much more varied,


*much more* varied, just eating veggies and -eliminating- meat, fish and
fowl? Sorry, but that seems contradictory.

meals and cooking became fun,


more fun? Why is it "more fun" to cook one thing than another? Cooking
is cooking, parts is parts.

interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the spiritual
benefits realized by refusing to participate in and subsidize the
cruel and inhumane meat industry...


What about that cruel and inhumane treatment of vegetables? You are
killing them (a living thing), boiling them, eating them.

Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down
in the prime of life?

If you wish to be a vegetarian, so be it. But meat is just another food
group along with fish, fowl and vegetables. Humans have been eating meat
for millenia, since the first cave man speared a woolly mammoth. Meat
has stood the human race in good stead for tens of thousands of years.
(Everything in moderation, of course. I'm not recommending you slam down
two pounds of bacon in a sitting).


It is wasteful to grow meat for food. Just "calories in" vs "calories
out" math shows how wasteful. Plus there is a lot of environmental
damage involved. The quickest way to reduce greenhouse gasses would be
for people to reduce their meat consumption. It could have a dramatic
effect in a very short time.

But we lack the courage, as always.

D. Peter Maus[_2_] March 30th 10 04:45 PM

Food choices (Was: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich)
 
On 3/30/10 08:40 , Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
Joe from Kokomo wrote:

[...]
Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed
down in the prime of life?

[...]


I know of no credible evidence that plants possess a consciousness.


With all good wishes,


Kevin, WB4AIO.


There were numerous studies released during the 60's and 70's
detailing the experiments where plants were demonstrated to respond
to kind talk, soft music, even specific genre's of music.

This was touted as evidence of consciousness. And some activist
papers were published as a result, as well as the formation of some
activist groups.

And while it may have something to do with simulation of
environmental vibrations in the audio range detectable by the plants
for reproductive purposes, it does not suggest consciousness.

Any more than Air America did. :)




Joe from Kokomo[_2_] March 30th 10 07:13 PM

Food choices (Was: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich)
 

Joe from Kokomo wrote:

[...]
Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed
down in the prime of life?

[...]


Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:


I know of no credible evidence that plants possess a consciousness.


With all good wishes,


Kevin, WB4AIO.


Well, let's try "tongue in cheek". Sorry you missed it. :-(

Maybe I should have put in a smiley face...

73 es :-)

Joe from Kokomo[_2_] March 30th 10 07:13 PM

Food choices (Was: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich)
 

On 3/30/10 08:40 , Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
Joe from Kokomo wrote:

[...]
Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed
down in the prime of life?

[...]


I know of no credible evidence that plants possess a consciousness.


With all good wishes,


Kevin, WB4AIO.


D. Peter Maus wrote:

There were numerous studies released during the 60's and 70's
detailing the experiments where plants were demonstrated to respond to
kind talk, soft music, even specific genre's of music.


I believe you are referring to the so-called (and yet to be proven)
"Backster Effect".

D. Peter Maus[_2_] March 30th 10 07:47 PM

Food choices (Was: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich)
 
On 3/30/10 13:13 , Joe from Kokomo wrote:

On 3/30/10 08:40 , Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
Joe from Kokomo wrote:

[...]
Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed
down in the prime of life?
[...]


I know of no credible evidence that plants possess a consciousness.


With all good wishes,


Kevin, WB4AIO.


D. Peter Maus wrote:

There were numerous studies released during the 60's and 70's
detailing the experiments where plants were demonstrated to respond to
kind talk, soft music, even specific genre's of music.


I believe you are referring to the so-called (and yet to be proven)
"Backster Effect".



In part. Also the work of Jagdish Chandra Bose who proposed the
concept of a plant nervous system, recording spasmodic responses to
shock taxis in plants around 1900.

We did experiments at university with some mimosa-like plants
that responded to the touch by folding their leaves. Loud and shrill
sounds also produced the same response, although not consistently.
And not in all plants under test. We attributed that to the plant's
response mechanism responding to some vibrations, in amplitude and
requency, as touch.

Bose also claimed to have found that plants grew more quickly in
the presence of soft music and more slowly when exposed to harsh
sound. From this, he posited that plants had central nervous systems
that could feel pain, perceive and return affection, and interpret
intents, and respond to them. Bose's research involved
interpretation of changes in cell membranes under various taxes.

These studies, which took place near the turn of the century,
were the bases for many of the studies which surfaced in the 60's
and 70's tha recommended corn be grown under the gentle strains of
Debussey played over huge PA systems in the fields, and the
affection of farmers walking through their fields reciting poetry.

May we live in interesting times.






D. Peter Maus[_2_] March 30th 10 08:18 PM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On 3/30/10 15:11 , m II wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:

It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet
mignon.
I'm a vegetarian.
Me too.
As am I.


Good on ya! :-)




So am I and have been for about ten years. It's really controversial,
you know...

GW has said that the French don't even HAVE a word for 'Filet mignon'





Actually, he was correct. The French don't have a word for 'Filet
Mignon' because 'Filet Mignon' is an American recipe, appearing in
the mid 1890's.

The French call their filet of tenderloin 'tournedos', and 'filet
de bœuf.'

Only in the US are these cuts sold as 'filet mignon.'


Similarly, the English have nothing known as an 'English Muffin.'


As the Italians do not have anything known as 'Italian Salad
Dressing.' All salad dressings are French.


bpnjensen March 30th 10 08:45 PM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On Mar 30, 11:50*am, Bob Dobbs wrote:
Joe from Kokomo wrote:

If you wish to be a vegetarian, so be it. But meat is just another food
group along with fish, fowl and vegetables. Humans have been eating meat
for millenia, *since the first cave man speared a woolly mammoth. Meat
has stood the human race in good stead for tens of thousands of years.
(Everything in moderation, of course. I'm not recommending you slam down
two pounds of bacon in a sitting).


Even as being carnivorous got us to the top of the food chain,
it might not sustain but instead be our undoing.

IOW:
Is the human phenomena just a short lived blink in the eons of time?

--

Operator Bob
Echo Charlie 42


No doubt - as much as the naysayers cry foul, you just *can't* stop
evolution. Even now, Nature is up to her dirty and insidious genetic
tricks...

....as evidenced by many on Usenet ;-D

Bruce

m II March 30th 10 09:11 PM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
bpnjensen wrote:

It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet
mignon.
I'm a vegetarian.
Me too.

As am I.


Good on ya! :-)




So am I and have been for about ten years. It's really controversial,
you know...

GW has said that the French don't even HAVE a word for 'Filet mignon'






mikey larue II



BobS[_3_] March 30th 10 09:46 PM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On 3/30/2010 3:26 PM, Bob Dobbs wrote:
D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 3/30/10 15:11 , m II wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:

It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet
mignon.
I'm a vegetarian.
Me too.
As am I.

Good on ya! :-)



So am I and have been for about ten years. It's really controversial,
you know...

GW has said that the French don't even HAVE a word for 'Filet mignon'





Actually, he was correct. The French don't have a word for 'Filet
Mignon' because 'Filet Mignon' is an American recipe, appearing in
the mid 1890's.

The French call their filet of tenderloin 'tournedos', and 'filet
de b½uf.'

Only in the US are these cuts sold as 'filet mignon.'


Similarly, the English have nothing known as an 'English Muffin.'


As the Italians do not have anything known as 'Italian Salad
Dressing.' All salad dressings are French.


What do the French call a 'French Kiss'?g

kiss
Also toast

Brenda Ann[_2_] March 31st 10 06:35 AM

Food choices (Was: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich)
 

"m II" wrote in message ...
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:

I know of no credible evidence that plants possess a consciousness.


Evidence for it may be found just before an Election. On both ends of the
ballot path.



mike


That's not evidence that plants have a consciousness... that's evidence that
HUMANS DON'T!



D. Peter Maus[_2_] March 31st 10 06:40 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On 3/31/10 01:06 , m II wrote:
D. Peter Maus wrote:

GW has said that the French don't even HAVE a word for 'Filet mignon'



Actually, he was correct. The French don't have a word for 'Filet
Mignon' because 'Filet Mignon' is an American recipe, appearing in the
mid 1890's.

The French call their filet of tenderloin 'tournedos', and 'filet de
bœuf.'

Only in the US are these cuts sold as 'filet mignon.'



I wonder what Entrepreneur thought that up..

You may want to re-examine your Wiki sources. The *words* first appeared
in American print at some early date. There is no mention of the
culinary creation being of American origin.



Actually, in my chef's class at the university, we studied
origins of cuts at length. The cut showed up in restaurants in the
mid 1890s. In American restaurants.



Some others credit the writings of O. Henry, circa 1906, as the original
introduction of the term to North Americans. The Oxford dictionary
claims a French origin, as do others.


Which would be after it was introduced to the menu in the 1890's.
Wow, you sound like you went to Chicago public schools.


Priest March 31st 10 06:58 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On Mar 30, 8:00*am, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On Mar 29, 6:50 pm, dave wrote:
I'm a vegetarian.

Priest wrote:
I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision
did/does have side effects though: *lost 50 lbs., energy level
quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste
buds rejuvenated, diet became much more varied,


*much more* varied, just eating veggies and -eliminating- meat, fish and
fowl? Sorry, but that seems contradictory.

meals and cooking became fun,


more fun? Why is it "more fun" to cook one thing than another? Cooking
is cooking, parts is parts.

interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the spiritual
benefits realized by refusing to participate in and subsidize the
cruel and inhumane meat industry...


What about that cruel and inhumane treatment of vegetables? You are
killing them (a living thing), boiling them, eating them.

Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down
in the prime of life?

If you wish to be a vegetarian, so be it. But meat is just another food
group along with fish, fowl and vegetables. Humans have been eating meat
for millenia, *since the first cave man speared a woolly mammoth. Meat
has stood the human race in good stead for tens of thousands of years.
(Everything in moderation, of course. I'm not recommending you slam down
two pounds of bacon in a sitting).


Breaking down my comments by sentence and critiquing each...lmao...you
really do have too much free time on your hands don't you. I'd point
out the absurdity of each of your oh so clever rejoinders but, unlike
you, I have too little time on my hands. But thank you for proving
that meat eating definately impairs the brain.

And please do enjoy your toxic dead flesh cocktail of growth hormones,
antibiotics, feces, blood and puss. Yummy!!!

D. Peter Maus[_2_] March 31st 10 07:03 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On 3/31/10 24:58 , Priest wrote:

And please do enjoy your toxic dead flesh cocktail of growth hormones,
antibiotics, feces, blood and puss.




****. Sounds like the salad bar at Wendy's.




m II March 31st 10 07:06 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
D. Peter Maus wrote:

GW has said that the French don't even HAVE a word for 'Filet mignon'



Actually, he was correct. The French don't have a word for 'Filet
Mignon' because 'Filet Mignon' is an American recipe, appearing in the
mid 1890's.

The French call their filet of tenderloin 'tournedos', and 'filet de
bœuf.'

Only in the US are these cuts sold as 'filet mignon.'



I wonder what Entrepreneur thought that up..

You may want to re-examine your Wiki sources. The *words* first appeared
in American print at some early date. There is no mention of the
culinary creation being of American origin.

Some others credit the writings of O. Henry, circa 1906, as the original
introduction of the term to North Americans. The Oxford dictionary
claims a French origin, as do others.

This is turning into a morbid dead meat fest, so with your kind
permission, I am now leaving. There are vegetables in the kitchen
awaiting an untimely chlorophyll letting.



mike





mike

bpnjensen March 31st 10 07:11 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On Mar 30, 10:58*pm, Priest wrote:
On Mar 30, 8:00*am, Joe from Kokomo wrote:





On Mar 29, 6:50 pm, dave wrote:
I'm a vegetarian.

Priest wrote:
I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision
did/does have side effects though: *lost 50 lbs., energy level
quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste
buds rejuvenated, diet became much more varied,


*much more* varied, just eating veggies and -eliminating- meat, fish and
fowl? Sorry, but that seems contradictory.


meals and cooking became fun,


more fun? Why is it "more fun" to cook one thing than another? Cooking
is cooking, parts is parts.


interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the spiritual
benefits realized by refusing to participate in and subsidize the
cruel and inhumane meat industry...


What about that cruel and inhumane treatment of vegetables? You are
killing them (a living thing), boiling them, eating them.


Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down
in the prime of life?


If you wish to be a vegetarian, so be it. But meat is just another food
group along with fish, fowl and vegetables. Humans have been eating meat
for millenia, *since the first cave man speared a woolly mammoth. Meat
has stood the human race in good stead for tens of thousands of years.
(Everything in moderation, of course. I'm not recommending you slam down
two pounds of bacon in a sitting).


Breaking down my comments by sentence and critiquing each...lmao...you
really do have too much free time on your hands don't you. I'd point
out the absurdity of each of your oh so clever rejoinders but, unlike
you, I have too little time on my hands. But thank you for proving
that meat eating definately impairs the brain.

And please do enjoy your toxic dead flesh cocktail of growth hormones,
antibiotics, feces, blood and puss. Yummy!!!


It's what's for dinner!

m II March 31st 10 07:15 AM

Food choices (Was: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich)
 
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:

I know of no credible evidence that plants possess a consciousness.


Evidence for it may be found just before an Election. On both ends of
the ballot path.



mike

Joe from Kokomo[_2_] March 31st 10 10:36 PM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 

On Mar 30, 8:00 am, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On Mar 29, 6:50 pm, dave wrote:
I'm a vegetarian.

Priest wrote:
I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision
did/does have side effects though: lost 50 lbs., energy level
quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste
buds rejuvenated, diet became much more varied,

*much more* varied, just eating veggies and -eliminating- meat, fish and
fowl? Sorry, but that seems contradictory.

meals and cooking became fun,

more fun? Why is it "more fun" to cook one thing than another? Cooking
is cooking, parts is parts.

interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the spiritual
benefits realized by refusing to participate in and subsidize the
cruel and inhumane meat industry...

What about that cruel and inhumane treatment of vegetables? You are
killing them (a living thing), boiling them, eating them.

Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down
in the prime of life?

If you wish to be a vegetarian, so be it. But meat is just another food
group along with fish, fowl and vegetables. Humans have been eating meat
for millenia, since the first cave man speared a woolly mammoth. Meat
has stood the human race in good stead for tens of thousands of years.
(Everything in moderation, of course. I'm not recommending you slam down
two pounds of bacon in a sitting).


Priest wrote:

Breaking down my comments by sentence and critiquing each...lmao...you
really do have too much free time on your hands don't you. I'd point
out the absurdity of each of your oh so clever rejoinders but, unlike
you, I have too little time on my hands. But thank you for proving
that meat eating definately impairs the brain.

And please do enjoy your toxic dead flesh cocktail of growth hormones,
antibiotics, feces, blood and puss. Yummy!!!


*Eliminating* food groups is -more- varied?

And cooking less food groups is different from cooking multiple food
groups how?

Sorry, legitimate questions all.

But nice cop-out...and keep on tap dancin'. :-)

m II April 1st 10 12:04 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
D. Peter Maus wrote:

Wow, you sound like you went to Chicago public schools.



I knew you'd be impressed...





mike

m II April 1st 10 12:12 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
bpnjensen wrote:

Can't vouch for the intelligence part, though - I became
more of a juvenile delinquent ;-)



Tell me about it.

The last 'all-veggie' picnic up at the Planetarium turned into a
switchblade fight. I'll have a chance to redeem myself tonight. There's
gonna be something called a 'chicken run' up on Thunder Road.




mikey dean II

bpnjensen April 1st 10 03:33 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On Mar 31, 4:12*pm, m II wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:
Can't vouch for the intelligence part, though - I became
more of a juvenile delinquent ;-)


Tell me about it.

The last 'all-veggie' picnic up at the Planetarium turned into a
switchblade fight. I'll have a chance to redeem myself tonight. There's
gonna be something called a 'chicken run' up on Thunder Road.

mikey dean II


REAL vegetarians only use butterknives :-P

Priest April 1st 10 06:02 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On Mar 31, 4:36*pm, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
*Eliminating* food groups is -more- varied?

And cooking less food groups is different from cooking multiple food
groups how?

Sorry, legitimate questions all.

But nice cop-out...and keep on tap dancin'. * :-)- Hide quoted text -



No cop-out involved, just dislike feeding trolls.

I stated that MY "diet became much more varied", which it most
dramatically did. If you are too slow to grasp the inference that is
your problem not mine. If you need further explanation see
http://vegetarian.about.com/od/veget...HowtogoVeg.htm or
http://vegetarian.about.com/od/veget...p/newfoods.htm or
http://vegetarian.about.com/od/veget...vegetarian.htm

Nor can I stop tap dancing lest I step into one of the copious
steaming piles of excrement you regularly dump into this group. Try
contributing something radio related more than occasionally, your
noise to signal ratio is unacceptable.

Now troll along, you've received all the attention I am going to give
you.

Priest April 1st 10 06:23 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On Mar 31, 1:03*am, "D. Peter Maus" wrote:
And please do enjoy your toxic dead flesh cocktail of growth hormones,
antibiotics, feces, blood and puss.


* *****. Sounds like the salad bar at Wendy's.


A hamburger joint, figures. Personally I haven't touched any salad
dressing since reading the Reverend Jesse Jackson's autobiography in
which he boasted of spitting and peeing into salad dressing dispensers
when he worked as a busboy at a restaurant patronized by all white
customers. It was an act of civil disobedience he crowed, a "non
violent" action he is very proud of to this day. He related in detail
how much delight he took in watching "whitey slurping up the salad
dressing" he had just desecrated with his body fluids.

In fact I don't dine out at all, I've seen too much undercover video
of what goes on in the kitchens of eating establishments. Thankfully I
am an excellent cook and enjoy doing so.

D. Peter Maus[_2_] April 1st 10 06:35 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On 3/31/10 18:04 , m II wrote:
D. Peter Maus wrote:

Wow, you sound like you went to Chicago public schools.



I knew you'd be impressed...





Not exactly.


D. Peter Maus[_2_] April 1st 10 06:37 AM

SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
 
On 3/31/10 21:33 , bpnjensen wrote:
On Mar 31, 4:12 pm, m wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:
Can't vouch for the intelligence part, though - I became
more of a juvenile delinquent ;-)


Tell me about it.

The last 'all-veggie' picnic up at the Planetarium turned into a
switchblade fight. I'll have a chance to redeem myself tonight. There's
gonna be something called a 'chicken run' up on Thunder Road.

mikey dean II


REAL vegetarians only use butterknives :-P



REAL vegetarians don't use butter.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com