![]() |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
"What's happening right now at the global level is I have friends who
are billionaires who say I don't know what to do with their money to preserve the wealth..." You're not supposed to "preserve the wealth". Use it or lose it. No family dynasties in the USA. |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 29, 6:42*am, dave wrote:
"What's happening right now at the global level is I have friends who are billionaires who say I don't know what to do with their money to preserve the wealth..." You're not supposed to "preserve the wealth". *Use it or lose it. *No family dynasties in the USA. Exactly. Like we're all supposed to feel sorry for them. Poor babies. |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 29, 8:42*am, dave wrote:
"What's happening right now at the global level is I have friends who are billionaires who say I don't know what to do with their money to preserve the wealth..." You're not supposed to "preserve the wealth". *Use it or lose it. *No family dynasties in the USA. It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet mignon. Enjoy your sop http://thepeoplescube.com |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
?baMa? Tse Dung wrote:
It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet mignon. I'm a vegetarian. |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 29, 4:50*pm, dave wrote:
?baMa? Tse Dung wrote: It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet mignon. I'm a vegetarian. Me too. |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
bpnjensen wrote:
On Mar 29, 4:50 pm, dave wrote: ?baMa? Tse Dung wrote: It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet mignon. I'm a vegetarian. Me too. As am I. Clean living, Kevin, WB4AIO. -- http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 29, 8:08*pm, Kevin Alfred Strom
wrote: bpnjensen wrote: On Mar 29, 4:50 pm, dave wrote: ?baMa? Tse Dung wrote: It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet mignon. I'm a vegetarian. Me too. As am I. Clean living, Kevin, WB4AIO. --http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ Good on ya! :-) |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 29, 6:50*pm, dave wrote:
I'm a vegetarian. I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision did/does have side effects though: lost 50 lbs., energy level quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste buds rejuvenated, diet became much more varied, meals and cooking became fun, interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the spiritual benefits realized by refusing to participate in and subsidize the cruel and inhumane meat industry have been positively awe-inspiring and a very special bond with nature and animals emerged that is beyond description. Can't help adding that I find it noteworthy that four of the more intelligent individuals in this group are all vegetarian. Interesting. |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 29, 6:50 pm, dave wrote: I'm a vegetarian. Priest wrote: I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision did/does have side effects though: lost 50 lbs., energy level quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste buds rejuvenated, diet became much more varied, *much more* varied, just eating veggies and -eliminating- meat, fish and fowl? Sorry, but that seems contradictory. meals and cooking became fun, more fun? Why is it "more fun" to cook one thing than another? Cooking is cooking, parts is parts. interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the spiritual benefits realized by refusing to participate in and subsidize the cruel and inhumane meat industry... What about that cruel and inhumane treatment of vegetables? You are killing them (a living thing), boiling them, eating them. Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down in the prime of life? If you wish to be a vegetarian, so be it. But meat is just another food group along with fish, fowl and vegetables. Humans have been eating meat for millenia, since the first cave man speared a woolly mammoth. Meat has stood the human race in good stead for tens of thousands of years. (Everything in moderation, of course. I'm not recommending you slam down two pounds of bacon in a sitting). |
Food choices (Was: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich)
Joe from Kokomo wrote:
[...] Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down in the prime of life? [...] I know of no credible evidence that plants possess a consciousness. With all good wishes, Kevin, WB4AIO. -- http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 29, 10:30*pm, Priest wrote:
On Mar 29, 6:50*pm, dave wrote: I'm a vegetarian. I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision did/does have side effects though: *lost 50 lbs., energy level quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste buds rejuvenated, diet became much more varied, meals and cooking became fun, interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the spiritual benefits realized by refusing to participate in and subsidize the cruel and inhumane meat industry have been positively awe-inspiring and a very special bond with nature and animals emerged that is beyond description. Can't help adding that I find it noteworthy that four of the more intelligent individuals in this group are all vegetarian. Interesting. Those were my reasons and results exactly - today I am 50, fit, hike through the mountains, ride my bike daily and making love is great! :-) Can't vouch for the intelligence part, though - I became more of a juvenile delinquent ;-) |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 30, 6:00*am, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On Mar 29, 6:50 pm, dave wrote: I'm a vegetarian. Priest wrote: I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision did/does have side effects though: *lost 50 lbs., energy level quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste buds rejuvenated, diet became much more varied, *much more* varied, just eating veggies and -eliminating- meat, fish and fowl? Sorry, but that seems contradictory. meals and cooking became fun, more fun? Why is it "more fun" to cook one thing than another? Cooking is cooking, parts is parts. interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the spiritual benefits realized by refusing to participate in and subsidize the cruel and inhumane meat industry... What about that cruel and inhumane treatment of vegetables? You are killing them (a living thing), boiling them, eating them. Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down in the prime of life? If you wish to be a vegetarian, so be it. But meat is just another food group along with fish, fowl and vegetables. Humans have been eating meat for millenia, *since the first cave man speared a woolly mammoth. Meat has stood the human race in good stead for tens of thousands of years. (Everything in moderation, of course. I'm not recommending you slam down two pounds of bacon in a sitting). The main problem is not eating meat, although it is part of the ethical dilemma - the bigger problem is that you cannot feed a planet of 7 billion meat eaters and still be humane, just and not place a hideous burden on the environment. Bruce |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On Mar 29, 6:50 pm, dave wrote: I'm a vegetarian. Priest wrote: I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision did/does have side effects though: lost 50 lbs., energy level quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste buds rejuvenated, diet became much more varied, *much more* varied, just eating veggies and -eliminating- meat, fish and fowl? Sorry, but that seems contradictory. meals and cooking became fun, more fun? Why is it "more fun" to cook one thing than another? Cooking is cooking, parts is parts. interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the spiritual benefits realized by refusing to participate in and subsidize the cruel and inhumane meat industry... What about that cruel and inhumane treatment of vegetables? You are killing them (a living thing), boiling them, eating them. Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down in the prime of life? If you wish to be a vegetarian, so be it. But meat is just another food group along with fish, fowl and vegetables. Humans have been eating meat for millenia, since the first cave man speared a woolly mammoth. Meat has stood the human race in good stead for tens of thousands of years. (Everything in moderation, of course. I'm not recommending you slam down two pounds of bacon in a sitting). It is wasteful to grow meat for food. Just "calories in" vs "calories out" math shows how wasteful. Plus there is a lot of environmental damage involved. The quickest way to reduce greenhouse gasses would be for people to reduce their meat consumption. It could have a dramatic effect in a very short time. But we lack the courage, as always. |
Food choices (Was: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich)
On 3/30/10 08:40 , Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
Joe from Kokomo wrote: [...] Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down in the prime of life? [...] I know of no credible evidence that plants possess a consciousness. With all good wishes, Kevin, WB4AIO. There were numerous studies released during the 60's and 70's detailing the experiments where plants were demonstrated to respond to kind talk, soft music, even specific genre's of music. This was touted as evidence of consciousness. And some activist papers were published as a result, as well as the formation of some activist groups. And while it may have something to do with simulation of environmental vibrations in the audio range detectable by the plants for reproductive purposes, it does not suggest consciousness. Any more than Air America did. :) |
Food choices (Was: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich)
Joe from Kokomo wrote: [...] Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down in the prime of life? [...] Kevin Alfred Strom wrote: I know of no credible evidence that plants possess a consciousness. With all good wishes, Kevin, WB4AIO. Well, let's try "tongue in cheek". Sorry you missed it. :-( Maybe I should have put in a smiley face... 73 es :-) |
Food choices (Was: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich)
On 3/30/10 08:40 , Kevin Alfred Strom wrote: Joe from Kokomo wrote: [...] Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down in the prime of life? [...] I know of no credible evidence that plants possess a consciousness. With all good wishes, Kevin, WB4AIO. D. Peter Maus wrote: There were numerous studies released during the 60's and 70's detailing the experiments where plants were demonstrated to respond to kind talk, soft music, even specific genre's of music. I believe you are referring to the so-called (and yet to be proven) "Backster Effect". |
Food choices (Was: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich)
On 3/30/10 13:13 , Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 3/30/10 08:40 , Kevin Alfred Strom wrote: Joe from Kokomo wrote: [...] Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down in the prime of life? [...] I know of no credible evidence that plants possess a consciousness. With all good wishes, Kevin, WB4AIO. D. Peter Maus wrote: There were numerous studies released during the 60's and 70's detailing the experiments where plants were demonstrated to respond to kind talk, soft music, even specific genre's of music. I believe you are referring to the so-called (and yet to be proven) "Backster Effect". In part. Also the work of Jagdish Chandra Bose who proposed the concept of a plant nervous system, recording spasmodic responses to shock taxis in plants around 1900. We did experiments at university with some mimosa-like plants that responded to the touch by folding their leaves. Loud and shrill sounds also produced the same response, although not consistently. And not in all plants under test. We attributed that to the plant's response mechanism responding to some vibrations, in amplitude and requency, as touch. Bose also claimed to have found that plants grew more quickly in the presence of soft music and more slowly when exposed to harsh sound. From this, he posited that plants had central nervous systems that could feel pain, perceive and return affection, and interpret intents, and respond to them. Bose's research involved interpretation of changes in cell membranes under various taxes. These studies, which took place near the turn of the century, were the bases for many of the studies which surfaced in the 60's and 70's tha recommended corn be grown under the gentle strains of Debussey played over huge PA systems in the fields, and the affection of farmers walking through their fields reciting poetry. May we live in interesting times. |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On 3/30/10 15:11 , m II wrote:
bpnjensen wrote: It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet mignon. I'm a vegetarian. Me too. As am I. Good on ya! :-) So am I and have been for about ten years. It's really controversial, you know... GW has said that the French don't even HAVE a word for 'Filet mignon' Actually, he was correct. The French don't have a word for 'Filet Mignon' because 'Filet Mignon' is an American recipe, appearing in the mid 1890's. The French call their filet of tenderloin 'tournedos', and 'filet de bœuf.' Only in the US are these cuts sold as 'filet mignon.' Similarly, the English have nothing known as an 'English Muffin.' As the Italians do not have anything known as 'Italian Salad Dressing.' All salad dressings are French. |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 30, 11:50*am, Bob Dobbs wrote:
Joe from Kokomo wrote: If you wish to be a vegetarian, so be it. But meat is just another food group along with fish, fowl and vegetables. Humans have been eating meat for millenia, *since the first cave man speared a woolly mammoth. Meat has stood the human race in good stead for tens of thousands of years. (Everything in moderation, of course. I'm not recommending you slam down two pounds of bacon in a sitting). Even as being carnivorous got us to the top of the food chain, it might not sustain but instead be our undoing. IOW: Is the human phenomena just a short lived blink in the eons of time? -- Operator Bob Echo Charlie 42 No doubt - as much as the naysayers cry foul, you just *can't* stop evolution. Even now, Nature is up to her dirty and insidious genetic tricks... ....as evidenced by many on Usenet ;-D Bruce |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
bpnjensen wrote:
It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet mignon. I'm a vegetarian. Me too. As am I. Good on ya! :-) So am I and have been for about ten years. It's really controversial, you know... GW has said that the French don't even HAVE a word for 'Filet mignon' mikey larue II |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On 3/30/2010 3:26 PM, Bob Dobbs wrote:
D. Peter Maus wrote: On 3/30/10 15:11 , m II wrote: bpnjensen wrote: It's fun teasing the lazy starving Regressive Leftist envy my filet mignon. I'm a vegetarian. Me too. As am I. Good on ya! :-) So am I and have been for about ten years. It's really controversial, you know... GW has said that the French don't even HAVE a word for 'Filet mignon' Actually, he was correct. The French don't have a word for 'Filet Mignon' because 'Filet Mignon' is an American recipe, appearing in the mid 1890's. The French call their filet of tenderloin 'tournedos', and 'filet de b½uf.' Only in the US are these cuts sold as 'filet mignon.' Similarly, the English have nothing known as an 'English Muffin.' As the Italians do not have anything known as 'Italian Salad Dressing.' All salad dressings are French. What do the French call a 'French Kiss'?g kiss Also toast |
Food choices (Was: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich)
"m II" wrote in message ... Kevin Alfred Strom wrote: I know of no credible evidence that plants possess a consciousness. Evidence for it may be found just before an Election. On both ends of the ballot path. mike That's not evidence that plants have a consciousness... that's evidence that HUMANS DON'T! |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On 3/31/10 01:06 , m II wrote:
D. Peter Maus wrote: GW has said that the French don't even HAVE a word for 'Filet mignon' Actually, he was correct. The French don't have a word for 'Filet Mignon' because 'Filet Mignon' is an American recipe, appearing in the mid 1890's. The French call their filet of tenderloin 'tournedos', and 'filet de bœuf.' Only in the US are these cuts sold as 'filet mignon.' I wonder what Entrepreneur thought that up.. You may want to re-examine your Wiki sources. The *words* first appeared in American print at some early date. There is no mention of the culinary creation being of American origin. Actually, in my chef's class at the university, we studied origins of cuts at length. The cut showed up in restaurants in the mid 1890s. In American restaurants. Some others credit the writings of O. Henry, circa 1906, as the original introduction of the term to North Americans. The Oxford dictionary claims a French origin, as do others. Which would be after it was introduced to the menu in the 1890's. Wow, you sound like you went to Chicago public schools. |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 30, 8:00*am, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On Mar 29, 6:50 pm, dave wrote: I'm a vegetarian. Priest wrote: I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision did/does have side effects though: *lost 50 lbs., energy level quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste buds rejuvenated, diet became much more varied, *much more* varied, just eating veggies and -eliminating- meat, fish and fowl? Sorry, but that seems contradictory. meals and cooking became fun, more fun? Why is it "more fun" to cook one thing than another? Cooking is cooking, parts is parts. interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the spiritual benefits realized by refusing to participate in and subsidize the cruel and inhumane meat industry... What about that cruel and inhumane treatment of vegetables? You are killing them (a living thing), boiling them, eating them. Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down in the prime of life? If you wish to be a vegetarian, so be it. But meat is just another food group along with fish, fowl and vegetables. Humans have been eating meat for millenia, *since the first cave man speared a woolly mammoth. Meat has stood the human race in good stead for tens of thousands of years. (Everything in moderation, of course. I'm not recommending you slam down two pounds of bacon in a sitting). Breaking down my comments by sentence and critiquing each...lmao...you really do have too much free time on your hands don't you. I'd point out the absurdity of each of your oh so clever rejoinders but, unlike you, I have too little time on my hands. But thank you for proving that meat eating definately impairs the brain. And please do enjoy your toxic dead flesh cocktail of growth hormones, antibiotics, feces, blood and puss. Yummy!!! |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On 3/31/10 24:58 , Priest wrote:
And please do enjoy your toxic dead flesh cocktail of growth hormones, antibiotics, feces, blood and puss. ****. Sounds like the salad bar at Wendy's. |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
D. Peter Maus wrote:
GW has said that the French don't even HAVE a word for 'Filet mignon' Actually, he was correct. The French don't have a word for 'Filet Mignon' because 'Filet Mignon' is an American recipe, appearing in the mid 1890's. The French call their filet of tenderloin 'tournedos', and 'filet de bœuf.' Only in the US are these cuts sold as 'filet mignon.' I wonder what Entrepreneur thought that up.. You may want to re-examine your Wiki sources. The *words* first appeared in American print at some early date. There is no mention of the culinary creation being of American origin. Some others credit the writings of O. Henry, circa 1906, as the original introduction of the term to North Americans. The Oxford dictionary claims a French origin, as do others. This is turning into a morbid dead meat fest, so with your kind permission, I am now leaving. There are vegetables in the kitchen awaiting an untimely chlorophyll letting. mike mike |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 30, 10:58*pm, Priest wrote:
On Mar 30, 8:00*am, Joe from Kokomo wrote: On Mar 29, 6:50 pm, dave wrote: I'm a vegetarian. Priest wrote: I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision did/does have side effects though: *lost 50 lbs., energy level quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste buds rejuvenated, diet became much more varied, *much more* varied, just eating veggies and -eliminating- meat, fish and fowl? Sorry, but that seems contradictory. meals and cooking became fun, more fun? Why is it "more fun" to cook one thing than another? Cooking is cooking, parts is parts. interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the spiritual benefits realized by refusing to participate in and subsidize the cruel and inhumane meat industry... What about that cruel and inhumane treatment of vegetables? You are killing them (a living thing), boiling them, eating them. Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down in the prime of life? If you wish to be a vegetarian, so be it. But meat is just another food group along with fish, fowl and vegetables. Humans have been eating meat for millenia, *since the first cave man speared a woolly mammoth. Meat has stood the human race in good stead for tens of thousands of years. (Everything in moderation, of course. I'm not recommending you slam down two pounds of bacon in a sitting). Breaking down my comments by sentence and critiquing each...lmao...you really do have too much free time on your hands don't you. I'd point out the absurdity of each of your oh so clever rejoinders but, unlike you, I have too little time on my hands. But thank you for proving that meat eating definately impairs the brain. And please do enjoy your toxic dead flesh cocktail of growth hormones, antibiotics, feces, blood and puss. Yummy!!! It's what's for dinner! |
Food choices (Was: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich)
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
I know of no credible evidence that plants possess a consciousness. Evidence for it may be found just before an Election. On both ends of the ballot path. mike |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 30, 8:00 am, Joe from Kokomo wrote: On Mar 29, 6:50 pm, dave wrote: I'm a vegetarian. Priest wrote: I became a vegetarian 10 years ago for ethical reasons. My decision did/does have side effects though: lost 50 lbs., energy level quadrupled, concentration and memory dramatically improved, taste buds rejuvenated, diet became much more varied, *much more* varied, just eating veggies and -eliminating- meat, fish and fowl? Sorry, but that seems contradictory. meals and cooking became fun, more fun? Why is it "more fun" to cook one thing than another? Cooking is cooking, parts is parts. interesting and a time of reflective appreciation. And the spiritual benefits realized by refusing to participate in and subsidize the cruel and inhumane meat industry... What about that cruel and inhumane treatment of vegetables? You are killing them (a living thing), boiling them, eating them. Plants have feelings too, ya know. How would -you- like to be mowed down in the prime of life? If you wish to be a vegetarian, so be it. But meat is just another food group along with fish, fowl and vegetables. Humans have been eating meat for millenia, since the first cave man speared a woolly mammoth. Meat has stood the human race in good stead for tens of thousands of years. (Everything in moderation, of course. I'm not recommending you slam down two pounds of bacon in a sitting). Priest wrote: Breaking down my comments by sentence and critiquing each...lmao...you really do have too much free time on your hands don't you. I'd point out the absurdity of each of your oh so clever rejoinders but, unlike you, I have too little time on my hands. But thank you for proving that meat eating definately impairs the brain. And please do enjoy your toxic dead flesh cocktail of growth hormones, antibiotics, feces, blood and puss. Yummy!!! *Eliminating* food groups is -more- varied? And cooking less food groups is different from cooking multiple food groups how? Sorry, legitimate questions all. But nice cop-out...and keep on tap dancin'. :-) |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
D. Peter Maus wrote:
Wow, you sound like you went to Chicago public schools. I knew you'd be impressed... mike |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
bpnjensen wrote:
Can't vouch for the intelligence part, though - I became more of a juvenile delinquent ;-) Tell me about it. The last 'all-veggie' picnic up at the Planetarium turned into a switchblade fight. I'll have a chance to redeem myself tonight. There's gonna be something called a 'chicken run' up on Thunder Road. mikey dean II |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 31, 4:12*pm, m II wrote:
bpnjensen wrote: Can't vouch for the intelligence part, though - I became more of a juvenile delinquent ;-) Tell me about it. The last 'all-veggie' picnic up at the Planetarium turned into a switchblade fight. I'll have a chance to redeem myself tonight. There's gonna be something called a 'chicken run' up on Thunder Road. mikey dean II REAL vegetarians only use butterknives :-P |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 31, 4:36*pm, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
*Eliminating* food groups is -more- varied? And cooking less food groups is different from cooking multiple food groups how? Sorry, legitimate questions all. But nice cop-out...and keep on tap dancin'. * :-)- Hide quoted text - No cop-out involved, just dislike feeding trolls. I stated that MY "diet became much more varied", which it most dramatically did. If you are too slow to grasp the inference that is your problem not mine. If you need further explanation see http://vegetarian.about.com/od/veget...HowtogoVeg.htm or http://vegetarian.about.com/od/veget...p/newfoods.htm or http://vegetarian.about.com/od/veget...vegetarian.htm Nor can I stop tap dancing lest I step into one of the copious steaming piles of excrement you regularly dump into this group. Try contributing something radio related more than occasionally, your noise to signal ratio is unacceptable. Now troll along, you've received all the attention I am going to give you. |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On Mar 31, 1:03*am, "D. Peter Maus" wrote:
And please do enjoy your toxic dead flesh cocktail of growth hormones, antibiotics, feces, blood and puss. * *****. Sounds like the salad bar at Wendy's. A hamburger joint, figures. Personally I haven't touched any salad dressing since reading the Reverend Jesse Jackson's autobiography in which he boasted of spitting and peeing into salad dressing dispensers when he worked as a busboy at a restaurant patronized by all white customers. It was an act of civil disobedience he crowed, a "non violent" action he is very proud of to this day. He related in detail how much delight he took in watching "whitey slurping up the salad dressing" he had just desecrated with his body fluids. In fact I don't dine out at all, I've seen too much undercover video of what goes on in the kitchens of eating establishments. Thankfully I am an excellent cook and enjoy doing so. |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On 3/31/10 18:04 , m II wrote:
D. Peter Maus wrote: Wow, you sound like you went to Chicago public schools. I knew you'd be impressed... Not exactly. |
SPECIAL: Glen Beck Fights for the Rich
On 3/31/10 21:33 , bpnjensen wrote:
On Mar 31, 4:12 pm, m wrote: bpnjensen wrote: Can't vouch for the intelligence part, though - I became more of a juvenile delinquent ;-) Tell me about it. The last 'all-veggie' picnic up at the Planetarium turned into a switchblade fight. I'll have a chance to redeem myself tonight. There's gonna be something called a 'chicken run' up on Thunder Road. mikey dean II REAL vegetarians only use butterknives :-P REAL vegetarians don't use butter. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com