Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/04/2010 2:00 PM, Priest wrote:
On Apr 11, 6:57 am, wrote: Just have to ask. Why do "posters" just pop in here out of the blue with no posting history on usenet whatsoever and show up in RRS and ask simple questions. All they have to do is google their answer. If this is legitimate, I 'suppose' there will be some answers. But I kind of just shake my head with questions like this, it almost makes me think it's 'someone' who has posted in here before and had not too great of a response/responses - and in a weird way - just by someone in this group conversing with them in a 'normal' manner gives them a sense of accomplishment. Almost like making small talk when they already know the answer. Just saying. {?} Get off your high horse, the man asked a legitimate question in the proper newsgroup. All your inane response did was derail the thread into a string of rubbish that only served to increase the noise to signal ratio in the group. Small wonder why so few people post here anymore. Gregg is very good at derailing legitimate threads. You should see him in action in other newsgroups where he has teamed with a bunch of trolls who already have the destruction of two newsgroups (that I know of) to their credit. He regards this newsgroup as "home turf" and has asked his troll mates to stay away so he can retain a "clean image" here. Krypsis |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 11, 10:42*pm, Krypsis wrote:
On 12/04/2010 2:00 PM, Priest wrote: On Apr 11, 6:57 am, *wrote: Just have to ask. Why do "posters" just pop in here out of the blue with no posting history on usenet whatsoever and show up in RRS and ask simple questions. All they have to do is google their answer. If this is legitimate, I 'suppose' there will be some answers. But I kind of just shake my head with questions like this, it almost makes me think it's 'someone' who has posted in here before and had not too great of a response/responses - and in a weird way - just by someone in this group conversing with them in a 'normal' manner gives them a sense of accomplishment. Almost like making small talk when they already know the answer. Just saying. *{?} Get off your high horse, the man asked a legitimate question in the proper newsgroup. All your inane response did was derail the thread into a string of rubbish that only served to increase the noise to signal ratio in the group. Small wonder why so few people post here anymore. Gregg is very good at derailing legitimate threads. You should see him in action in other newsgroups where he has teamed with a bunch of trolls who already have the destruction of two newsgroups (that I know of) to their credit. He regards this newsgroup as "home turf" and has asked his troll mates to stay away so he can retain a "clean image" here. Krypsis- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - We've no problem with that. He's been a pretty good boy here so far. Bruce |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/04/2010 11:54 PM, bpnjensen wrote:
On Apr 11, 10:42 pm, wrote: On 12/04/2010 2:00 PM, Priest wrote: On Apr 11, 6:57 am, wrote: Just have to ask. Why do "posters" just pop in here out of the blue with no posting history on usenet whatsoever and show up in RRS and ask simple questions. All they have to do is google their answer. If this is legitimate, I 'suppose' there will be some answers. But I kind of just shake my head with questions like this, it almost makes me think it's 'someone' who has posted in here before and had not too great of a response/responses - and in a weird way - just by someone in this group conversing with them in a 'normal' manner gives them a sense of accomplishment. Almost like making small talk when they already know the answer. Just saying. {?} Get off your high horse, the man asked a legitimate question in the proper newsgroup. All your inane response did was derail the thread into a string of rubbish that only served to increase the noise to signal ratio in the group. Small wonder why so few people post here anymore. Gregg is very good at derailing legitimate threads. You should see him in action in other newsgroups where he has teamed with a bunch of trolls who already have the destruction of two newsgroups (that I know of) to their credit. He regards this newsgroup as "home turf" and has asked his troll mates to stay away so he can retain a "clean image" here. Krypsis- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - We've no problem with that. He's been a pretty good boy here so far. Bruce "so far"?? You may soon have a problem with him. He has just invited his troll friends over here from rec.knives, s.c.t. and rec.scuba. You'll find your "friend" Gregg is a two faced jerk. Gregg's not real bright however as he doesn't yet realise that if he hangs around turds, soon he will smell like a turd, an inevitable consequence. Krypsis |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 12:00*am, Priest wrote:
On Apr 11, 6:57*am, Gregg wrote: Just have to ask. Why do "posters" just pop in here out of the blue with no posting history on usenet whatsoever and show up in RRS and ask simple questions. All they have to do is google their answer. If this is legitimate, I 'suppose' there will be some answers. But I kind of just shake my head with questions like this, it almost makes me think it's 'someone' who has posted in here before and had not too great of a response/responses - and in a weird way - just by someone in this group conversing with them in a 'normal' manner gives them a sense of accomplishment. Almost like making small talk when they already know the answer. Just saying. *{?} Get off your high horse, the man asked a legitimate question in the proper newsgroup. All your inane response did was derail the thread into a string of rubbish that only served to increase the noise to signal ratio in the group. Small wonder why so few people post here anymore. No. Everything was fine, I said I apologized, you looking to fight or something? I'd rather not Priest. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
sv1 wrote:
hi What is the best radio to pick up shortwave from 50-100 dollars TECSUN PL200 ETON E100 sony ICF-SW11 Grundig G6 DEGEN DE1103 ,DE1104 Or another ? Thank you for all It depends where you are. Some radios do better in certain places. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dave wrote:
sv1 wrote: hi What is the best radio to pick up shortwave from 50-100 dollars TECSUN PL200 ETON E100 sony ICF-SW11 Grundig G6 DEGEN DE1103 ,DE1104 Or another ? Thank you for all It depends where you are. Some radios do better in certain places. http://www.universal-radio.com/catal...le/chartp.html |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dave wrote:
What is the best radio to pick up shortwave from 50-100 dollars It depends where you are. Some radios do better in certain places. I agree whole heartedly. My Sony 2010 performed very poorly in the shower. First, the sound went, becoming very muffled. After a few minutes, the radio stopped working entirely. I was surprised to find there were **NO** drain holes in the bottom of the case. It's sad when Sony can't make a radio that is at least as dependable as a bar of soap. rubber duck mike II |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 11, 11:09*am, m II wrote:
dave wrote: What is the best radio to pick up shortwave from 50-100 dollars It depends where you are. *Some radios do better in certain places. I agree whole heartedly. My Sony 2010 performed very poorly in the shower. First, the sound went, becoming very muffled. After a few minutes, the radio stopped working entirely. I was surprised to find there were **NO** drain holes in the bottom of the case. It's sad when Sony can't make a radio that is at least as dependable as a bar of soap. rubber duck mike II Freeking hilarious.:-D |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Middle East
|
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
sv1 wrote:
Middle East Can you be more specific? There are a lot of countries here, and what might be a good buy in one may be unfixable or unobtainable in another. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM New word I coined 12/13/09, "Sub-Wikipedia" adj, describing knowledge or understanding, as in he has a sub-wikipedia understanding of the situation. i.e possessing less facts or information than can be found in the Wikipedia. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|