Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bpnjensen wrote:
[...] After we have a bloody revolution where the legally elected leaders by a majority of the people are ousted or killed, and where the US Constitution has been trampled upon and murdered by a minority of whiners and complainers (who were POed that someone else besides themselves had a voice in government) who did not have the patience to do things the legal way... What would you propose to replace it? You don't want a King or dictator, because he'd be a bad guy and look after his own interests only. You don't want elected officials, because they answer to more people than just those who *you* favor. A Constitution is obviously no good, because it allows things that *you* don't want to happen. What else is left? Fiefdoms? Tribes? Anarchy and lawlessness? What's your preference? You have a choice - midievel or stone age - because that's about what you'll have left to choose from. [...] How about restoring the constitution? If we to have constitutional, legal government again, restoration is necessary, because the constitution has already been trampled upon -- by having its most important provisions simply ignored or "interpreted" out of existence by politically-motivated judges appointed for that express purpose. The main defense the Founders set up to protect Americans from the tyranny of kings — and the tyranny of the majority — was the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. It says, in effect, that the central government possesses only those powers expressly granted by the Constitution and no other powers whatever. And that is how it was understood and applied until the second Roosevelt demanded and received Lenin-like economic power (“for our own good,” of course) and supine judges allowed it despite its obvious illegality. (Of course, Abraham Lincoln’s arrest of the legislature of Maryland to prevent them from “voting wrongly,” and the imposition of several pretended Amendments to the Constitution while states were under military dictatorships — so-called “Reconstruction” — and their citizens disenfranchised, were also completely illegal, among many other things.) Washington meddling in and controlling local public education? Absolutely prohibited by the Tenth Amendment. Washington telling employers who they must hire? Absolutely prohibited by the Tenth Amendment. Washington controlling your ability to sell your home or land to whomever you choose? Absolutely prohibited by the Tenth Amendment. Washington telling you what substances you can or cannot consume? Absolutely prohibited by the Tenth Amendment. Washington authorizing a consortium of private banks (like the Federal Reserve) to control all money and credit? Absolutely prohibited by the Tenth Amendment. All the other sections of the Bill of Rights prohibit the federal government from doing one thing or another, respectively. But the Tenth is like all the other Amendments on steroids. It prohibits Washington from doing anything, except those things specifically called for in the rest of the document. However, by torturing and twisting the words of the preamble (‘…yeah, we can do just about anything that “promotes the general welfare,” right?’) and by other means, the Tenth Amendment has been rendered null and void for all practical purposes. Those who did this said they needed the extra powers to do us all a lot of good. But, in the process of trying to do good (if indeed that was ever their intention), they also blatantly lied, outrageously broke the supreme law of the land, rendered almost all of their Acts and Bills totally illegal, and caused the regime in Washington, whatever party is in power, to be quite illegitimate and utterly unlawful. With all good wishes, Kevin. -- http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Homeless Man Lies Dying While 25 People Walk Past.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=288063 That wouldn't happen here in backwater hick Mississippi. cuhulin, the backwater hick |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
It says, in effect, that the central government possesses only those powers expressly granted by the Constitution and no other powers whatever. And that is how it was understood and applied until the second Roosevelt demanded and received Lenin-like economic power (“for our own good,” of course) and supine judges allowed it despite its obvious illegality. All other power to the states and to the people. The people's power is expressed via the House of Representatives. You 10th Amendment clowns are myopic. We get the govt we deserve. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tookin mee ah leetl cig anna oilso ah coffee bareque.Ahh wassa sittin
onna mah frunt poach ahwoikin onna sum fancy trim mouldin peecis dat go onna mah poach posts wayyyyy up thar.Old country boy from Edwards, one of his two sons pulled up in front of that house over there, he was driving either a new or almost new car, I think it is a Dodge car.They were standing around around and looking that car over.The front end of that car is All dented up, it is dented up real bad too! Yes Sir, he is a real Champion expert car driver! His dad (old country boy from Edwards,Mississippi) used to own a big old Pontiac car, he said he bought it from a woman, that Pontiac car was in real good condition, untill one day he got back to his house over there.The front of that Pontiac car was dented up, the hood wouldn't close all the way down either.Then, he bought a 1980's Oldsmobile car.Sure enough, it wasen't long untill the left rear of that Oldsmobile car got dented up too! South Korea raises warship, finds clues on sinking [N.K.TORPEDO!] http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=288087 What does the South Korea news say about that? Do you believe in the fairy princess Now? cuhulin |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dave wrote:
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote: It says, in effect, that the central government possesses only those powers expressly granted by the Constitution and no other powers whatever. And that is how it was understood and applied until the second Roosevelt demanded and received Lenin-like economic power (“for our own good,” of course) and supine judges allowed it despite its obvious illegality. All other power to the states and to the people. That part of what you said is true. The people's power is expressed via the House of Representatives. [...] That part isn't. That's Congress -- as in "Congress shall make no law." The amendments were meant to limit its power and leave all powers not expressly delegated to the states or the people _as individuals_. As far as I am aware, not even the most authority-worshipping writers have made the claim that the framers meant _Congress_ when they said all other powers are reserved to _the people_. Good grief! As ever, Kevin, WB4AIO. -- http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
dave wrote: Kevin Alfred Strom wrote: It says, in effect, that the central government possesses only those powers expressly granted by the Constitution and no other powers whatever. And that is how it was understood and applied until the second Roosevelt demanded and received Lenin-like economic power (“for our own good,” of course) and supine judges allowed it despite its obvious illegality. All other power to the states and to the people. That part of what you said is true. The people's power is expressed via the House of Representatives. [...] That part isn't. That's Congress -- as in "Congress shall make no law." The amendments were meant to limit its power and leave all powers not expressly delegated to the states or the people _as individuals_. As far as I am aware, not even the most authority-worshipping writers have made the claim that the framers meant _Congress_ when they said all other powers are reserved to _the people_. Good grief! As ever, Kevin, WB4AIO. Whatever. The 10th Amendment never really meant anything. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A LOT of tornado destruction in Mississippi today.It started at about
11:00 AM this morning.They say the tornado was at least 3/4 of a mile wide.A path of destruction about 200 miles long.At least nine people confirmed dead.That ''weather system'' is moving into Western Alabama right now. http://www.clarionledger.com http://www.WAPT.com http://www.WLBT.com http://www.WJTV.com http://www.severestudios.com Reed Timmer, http://www.tornadovideos.net cuhulin |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/24/2010 8:00 PM, dave wrote:
Whatever. The 10th Amendment never really meant anything. Next thing you know, you will be telling us that "the Constitution is just a piece of paper". Oh, sorry...that was George W. Bush. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That was/IS AWOL MORON Bush.
cuhulin |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 24, 1:01*pm, dave wrote:
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote: It says, in effect, that the central government possesses only those powers expressly granted by the Constitution and no other powers whatever. And that is how it was understood and applied until the second Roosevelt demanded and received Lenin-like economic power (“for our own good,” of course) and supine judges allowed it despite its obvious illegality. All other power to the states and to the people. *The people's power is expressed via the House of Representatives. *You 10th Amendment clowns are myopic. *We get the govt we deserve. That not the first time you have said that Dave "we get the gov't" etc. I don't deserve it and most others don't either. What I don't get with you is that here is Kevin, laying it out to the point that a good 5th/6th grader can understand it. I mean, I know that everything he just stated is really the truth, he didn't just make it up. I never got lower than a A in history and then later government classes, now granted that has been a long time ago but I get the gist of it. But when I mention how bad things are IMO and how worse it's going to get IMO, you call me crazy. {?} Or you will say that "it isn't that bad" - like I'm just making this stuff up for sake of entertainment. But then on another thread you will say it is bad? There has actually been one time where I checked your posting history to see if you were the same person...lol. I thought someone else was posting under Dave and now you basically called Kevin a clown, he has his faults like all of us do - but I think it's really stretching it to call him a clown or me crazy - though at times you make me crazy trying to see where you're coming from. ;-D |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|