"Kevin Alfred Strom" wrote in message
...
Cicero Venatio wrote:
S
.
.
I wonder who in AZ provides employment for a half million people?

Throw a few of these employers in jail and their fellow criminal
employers will fire all of the half million illegals.

-----------
not that easy. If you want a law suit filed against you for racial
discrimination by the state or the feds, or you could be sued by Chicanos
por la Causa or La Raza for being racist. Also all of these people have
documentation, it may be forged documentation, but how can you tell.
Simple solutions are for simpletons. The flaw in the e-verify system was
there was no picture of the individual in the database, but maybe in the
future they will have some sort of system where employers can actually
find out if the employee is illegal or not. When the feds bust an
employer, they actually have some pictures that go with the social
security numbers, something the employer had no access to. Sound unfair,
or course it is. BTW, do the feds have a picture of you, "Sid9"? If not
an illegal could have a forged a social security card with "Sid9"
"555-11-5555" or whatever your number is, and how would the employer tell
if it was you or someone else, unless there is a picture to go with it?



The answer is to go back to what America had prior to 1965: a national
origins based immigration system (wherein immigration from any country was
allowed only to the extent of that nationality's percentage of the already
existing American population), and a race-based definition of citizenship
(see the Naturalization Act of 1790, in force until the 1950s). Under such
a system, no complicated set of ID documents would be required -- just a
good pair of eyes.

Of course, Central Americans of European descent would easily be able to
sneak through -- but then, they aren't the ones causing problems, are
they?

I know that the Arizona (and other) patriots who want to stop the invasion
from the south fall all over themselves denying that they have any racial
motivation. But if all they really care about is "what's legal," they
might as well quit all their fussing and go home and watch "Dancing With
the Stars."

For "what is legal" can change in a nanosecond -- the moment the criminals
in Washington declare their "amnesty," every invader will instantaneously
become "legal."

And then what will the patriots do? Become honest, and admit that this is
a biological issue, of one people displacing another people and taking
their territory and resources? I hope so. Without honesty, no solution is
possible.



With all good wishes,



Kevin Alfred Strom.
--
http://kevinalfredstrom.com/

"...The Chinese Exclusion Act was repealed by the 1943 Magnuson Act, which
permitted Chinese nationals already residing in the country to become
naturalized citizens. It also allowed a national quota of 105 Chinese
immigrants per year, although large scale Chinese immigration did not occur
until the passage of the Immigration Act of 1965. Despite the fact that the
exclusion act was repealed in 1943, the law in California that Chinese
people were not allowed to marry whites was not repealed until 1948...."