On Tue, 18 May 2010 05:29:57 -0800, dave wrote:

RHF wrote:


More Dave 'facts'

We are a Representative Democracy [.]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_Democracy

alas you are simply 'dave' ~ RHF
.
You're just a garden variety old fart.

Liberal democracy is a form of representative democracy where elected
representatives that hold the decision power are moderated by a
constitution that emphasizes protecting individual liberties and the
rights of minorities in society, such as freedom of speech and assembly,
freedom of religion, the right to private property and privacy, as well
as equality before the law and due process under the rule of law, and
many more.

Such constitutional rights, also named liberal rights, are guaranteed
through various controlled institutions and various statutory laws.
Additionally the constitution of most of the contemporary liberal
democracies protects the rights of individuals and minorities, and
prohibits the will of majority (majoritarianism), by almost eliminating
that rule in practice.

Some would argue that liberal democracy isn't democratic or liberal at
all. They would argue that "liberal democracy" does not respect majority
rule, except when citizens are asked to vote for their representatives,
and also that its "liberty" is restricted by the constitution or
precedent decided by previous generations. They would argue that, by
prohibiting citizens the right to cast votes on all issues—especially
for serious subjects like going to war, constitutional amendments or
constitution abolishment etc.—this turns "liberal democracy" into the
precursor of oligarchy.

Others would say that only a liberal democracy can guarantee the
individual liberties of its citizens and prevent the development into a
dictatorship. Unmoderated majority rule could—in this view—lead to an
oppression of minorities.

The concept of an open society is closely related to liberal
democracies. Since many liberals see democracies with strong statist
reflections through the public choice theory as slow, dogmatic,
conservative and not too apt for change, the liberal democracy contrasts
with what could be called the "statist" democracy in that it emphasizes
the civil society as the engine of its public discourse and development
further.

The design of the US Constitution prevents mob rule by SLOWING heated
populism. The current US Senate and the unrepresentation of the common
people in the House, actually STOP any progressive actions as opposed to
slowing them down. The TwoParty rule that has emerged over the last 100
years results in bipolar government of the worst kind. It is reactionary
and vile.

Those who assert that the United States was to be the bastion of a new
nobility with inherited privilege are enemies of the people.

--
"Senate rules don't trump the Constitution" -- http://GreaterVoice.org/60