"Enough Money"
 

On May 26, 5:36*pm, Bill Baka wrote:
On 05/26/2010 05:04 PM, Day Brown wrote:

I remember a group of upscale well educated upper income people living
in a communal house in New Orleans. Since each only had to support a
room, and only their share of the commons like the kitchen & living
room, the per capita carbon footprint was low enuf, that on a global
basis, it could support 8 or more billions.

The nuclear family house is not sustainable.

Not only won't work, but silly to even think that way. 8 billion can't
be fed for very long.

They can't be fed at all right now!

"Enough Money"
 

On 05/26/2010 11:30 PM, bpnjensen wrote:
On May 26, 5:36 pm, Bill wrote:
On 05/26/2010 05:04 PM, Day Brown wrote:

I remember a group of upscale well educated upper income people living
in a communal house in New Orleans. Since each only had to support a
room, and only their share of the commons like the kitchen& living
room, the per capita carbon footprint was low enuf, that on a global
basis, it could support 8 or more billions.

The nuclear family house is not sustainable.

Not only won't work, but silly to even think that way. 8 billion can't
be fed for very long.

They can't be fed at all right now!

That is why I am pushing for birth control on a global scale. Population
reduction by way of the elders dying a natural old age death and only a
few replacements until the global population is down to 'ideally' about
1 billion. At that level we could all have a nice life.
Bill Baka

"Enough Money"
 

On May 27, 8:41*am, Bill Baka wrote:
On 05/26/2010 11:30 PM, bpnjensen wrote:

On May 26, 5:36 pm, Bill *wrote:
On 05/26/2010 05:04 PM, Day Brown wrote:

I remember a group of upscale well educated upper income people living
in a communal house in New Orleans. Since each only had to support a
room, and only their share of the commons like the kitchen& *living
room, the per capita carbon footprint was low enuf, that on a global
basis, it could support 8 or more billions.

The nuclear family house is not sustainable.

Not only won't work, but silly to even think that way. 8 billion can't
be fed for very long.

They can't be fed at all right now!

That is why I am pushing for birth control on a global scale. Population
reduction by way of the elders dying a natural old age death and only a
few replacements until the global population is down to 'ideally' about
1 billion. At that level we could all have a nice life.
Bill Baka

Let me shake your hand, Buddy. Perfecto.

"Enough Money"
 

On 05/26/2010 09:04 PM, m II wrote:
On 10-05-26 08:46 PM, Bill Baka wrote:

How about we don't send them any food at all?
Let them all starve instead?
No ethnic cleansing needed since nature will once again be the winner.


An African lady was on the radio here last month, asking for all foreign
aid to stop. She claims, rightfully so, that it's doing more harm than
good. A point made was that there is whole strata of 'aid handlers' that
are getting rich from the money flow.

The theft from the money buys a lot of Mercedes Benzes and send a lot of
corrupt slime balls' children to European Universities. If any of the
aid actually gets through, it's a miracle.

The food could be, as I have said, laced with birth control and then the
rich trash might stay clear of it. Africa is a mess right now and we
really can't do anything to help in the long term.

The aid that does get through, if in the form of merchandise, puts local
farmers and businesses out of work. It's hard to compete with 'below
cost' supplies.

The entire Middle East and communist China have to be removed from the
list too. It's a never ending money pit and a symptom of corruption at
it's finest.

Agreed.

Last year I met a man from South America. I don't want to name any
specific country. He borrowed heavily to set up a light bulb factory.
There was a market nationwide.

He got hundreds of store owners on board for this plan. The arrangement
was that the store could sell the bulbs, then pay for the sold ones at
the end of each month. There was no cash outlay up front. Good business.

Two months later he went broke. No bulbs were being sold. It seems three
American foreign aid ships had arrived, one of them filled with light
bulbs. There was a condition that these bulbs could not be sold for for
more than 30 cents a pair. There are always conditions on these 'free'
gifts.

My acquaintance was charging one dollar. That price included a twenty
percent profit. Once he was out of business, and the foreign aid bulbs
were gone, the price of foreign bulbs went up to a dollar fifty. That's
all there was, buy them or do without.

I think that is China's long term goal for the United States. So many of
our companies have been killed by the cheap Chinese alternative that we
will reach that tipping point sooner rather than later.

American foreign aid destroyed him and the country has a foreign
controlled monopoly supplying the goods. That is what foreign aid does.

Look at Haiti. Us aid has ruined it's food infrastructure.

http://tinyurl.com/36tf44b


All foreign aid makes money for the giver. It's too commonly used to
crush private enterprise so the foreigners can better control things.

So, yes. I hate foreign aid. The taxpayer is being used to assure
business opportunities for the 'not-so-altruistic' friends of Government.

Having said that, I'm not against personally helping anyone. If you feel
you should and can help somebody, all the more power to you. Personal
gifts, donations, scholarships, etc. are wonderful. Give whatever you
can, but it has to come from the heart, freely, with honest intentions.
Watch out for the Cons. They're everywhere.

As soon as any corporation or government gets involved, it's
tainted...and greatly reduced in volume. It's the handling fees, you know.


mike

(now off to watch reruns of Sally Struthers crying for the Children.
She's HOT.)



You mean 'was hot' don't you?
Bill Baka

"Enough Money"
 

On 05/27/2010 08:47 AM, bpnjensen wrote:
On May 27, 8:41 am, Bill wrote:
On 05/26/2010 11:30 PM, bpnjensen wrote:

Some snippage.

On May 26, 5:36 pm, Bill wrote:


They can't be fed at all right now!

That is why I am pushing for birth control on a global scale. Population
reduction by way of the elders dying a natural old age death and only a
few replacements until the global population is down to 'ideally' about
1 billion. At that level we could all have a nice life.
Bill Baka

Let me shake your hand, Buddy. Perfecto.

Good idea, but naturally some religious group will shoot it down.
They seem to think quantity is better than quality.
Bill Baka

"Enough Money"
 

On 10-05-27 10:11 AM, Bill Baka wrote:

(now off to watch reruns of Sally Struthers crying for the Children.
She's HOT.)

You mean 'was hot' don't you?


My eyesight must be failing. Has she changed?




mikey meathead

"Enough Money"
 

On May 27, 11:56*am, m II wrote:
On 10-05-27 10:11 AM, Bill Baka wrote:

(now off to watch reruns of Sally Struthers crying for the Children.
She's HOT.)
You mean 'was hot' don't you?

My eyesight must be failing. Has she changed?

mikey meathead

She might be hot if you are an octogenarian hippo...

"Enough Money"
 

On 10-05-27 01:32 PM, bpnjensen wrote:

She might be hot if you are an octogenarian hippo...


I find that if I float just right, the water stays out of the ears.
Keyboards are a bit more problematic....



mikopotamus

"Enough Money"
 

On 05/27/2010 11:14 AM, Bill Baka wrote:
On 05/27/2010 08:47 AM, bpnjensen wrote:
On May 27, 8:41 am, Bill wrote:
On 05/26/2010 11:30 PM, bpnjensen wrote:

Some snippage.

On May 26, 5:36 pm, Bill wrote:


They can't be fed at all right now!

That is why I am pushing for birth control on a global scale. Population
reduction by way of the elders dying a natural old age death and only a
few replacements until the global population is down to 'ideally' about
1 billion. At that level we could all have a nice life.
Bill Baka

Let me shake your hand, Buddy. Perfecto.

Good idea, but naturally some religious group will shoot it down.
They seem to think quantity is better than quality.
Bill Baka

First, were the affluent cultures to only eat a healthy amount of meat,
the extra grain left would feed everyone else. Secondly, Global Warming
is moving the grain belts of Siberia and Canada further north, vastly
exceeding the amount of farmland lost to rising ocean levels.

All that permafrost melting leaves behind fertile organic soil.

Birth control is necessary, but not sufficient. We need to vastly
increase the number of smart sociable people to be case workers, nurses,
and scientists in Alternative energy or other such problems.

Head Start just didnt cut it. The prisons are full of Head Start grads.
We need to subsidize fertility clinic services for poor women so that
they can dramatically ramp up the number of competent people the next
generation will need to deal with the mess we've already created.

And from Bouchard's longitudinal study of identical twins adopted out at
birth to different sets of parents, we see the fundamentalist religion
of the mother will not be kept by talented grown children. They wont be
suckers for demagoguery either.

"Enough Money"
 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010...nomic-collapse

When those Shamrocks over there joined the Stinking eu, I told them they
done Screwed Up, BIG TIME SCREW UP!

I just now got through with emailing back and forth with some of them
Shamrocks.Every one of them told me I am Right.
cuhulin