LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old May 21st 10, 04:30 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.politics.elections,alt.news-media,alt.community,alt.politics.economics
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2009
Posts: 29
Default "Enough Money"

On 05/20/2010 03:39 PM, Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
The best strategy for our people being among the former is, I think,
positive eugenics. This does not at all mean a society more coercive
than ours is. It just means rewarding people with high character and
intelligence and creativity for having children -- and rewarding those
with a lack of those characteristics for not having children. (This
could ultimately lead to a dramatic reduction in societal coercion,
since people of high intelligence and character and responsibility don't
need many laws or policemen or prisons, nor do they generally want them.)

I believe that the nation that adopts positive eugenics on a large
enough scale will advance and prosper at a rapid and compounding rate.
It could possibly leave the rest of us behind to the same extent that
_erectus_ was left behind once true humans emerged -- and refused to
mate with the lower types.

Aristotle:"Most men are such slaves to passion they'd do better in the
hands of a more rational master". Politics claims, but fails, to produce
that master.

Reading Cosmopolitan and Glamour to see what young women are being told,
I find raps about them giving up on ever meeting "Mr. Wright" and going
to fertility clinics. They wont have the perfect marriage, but are very
happy with the perfect baby.

Upscale white thirty something career women, no longer sexy hotties are
increasingly doing this, and no doubt, raising the first generation of
the Uberwench.

But in the name of equal opportunity, we should subsidize fertility
clinics for poor women and provide DNA analysis. If need be, provide in
vitro so these women, who have repeatedly shown us they can raise kids
on little money, would be far more rewarded for their effort later in
life as successful children will be better able to look after momma.
Even if mom's skin is darker.

There's lotsa stories from the Robber Baron era of successful men who
took very good care of their black nannies later in life. This just
moves that process up 9 months. It'd reduce the cost of premature
infants so much that alone would be justify fertility clinic services.

Make it available to illegal women. the men who think they own these
women will ship them back to the old country ASAP rather than using them
to produce anchor babies.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For the Newbie Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) : Check-Out "PopularCommunications" and "Monitoring Times" Magazines RHF Shortwave 0 February 1st 08 12:26 PM
"Sirius wins "Fastest Growing Company" in Deloitte's 2007 Technology Fast 500" [email protected] Shortwave 15 October 28th 07 10:02 AM
"Sirius wins "Fastest Growing Company" in Deloitte's 2007 Technology Fast 500" [email protected] Shortwave 0 October 24th 07 12:48 AM
"The HD Alliance throws good money after...bad?" IBOCcrock Shortwave 1 October 15th 07 11:13 PM
"meltdown in progress"..."is amy fireproof"...The Actions Of A "Man" With Three College Degrees? K4YZ Policy 6 August 28th 06 11:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017