| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 05/26/2010 11:30 PM, bpnjensen wrote:
On May 26, 5:36 pm, Bill wrote: On 05/26/2010 05:04 PM, Day Brown wrote: I remember a group of upscale well educated upper income people living in a communal house in New Orleans. Since each only had to support a room, and only their share of the commons like the kitchen& living room, the per capita carbon footprint was low enuf, that on a global basis, it could support 8 or more billions. The nuclear family house is not sustainable. Not only won't work, but silly to even think that way. 8 billion can't be fed for very long. They can't be fed at all right now! That is why I am pushing for birth control on a global scale. Population reduction by way of the elders dying a natural old age death and only a few replacements until the global population is down to 'ideally' about 1 billion. At that level we could all have a nice life. Bill Baka |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|