Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.devilfinder.com
Albert Pike Campground Arkansas At least 12 people killed in floodwaters cuhulin |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 11, 9:34*am, wrote:
Durn Tootin! Drill em Full of Lead! ~ George ''Gabby'' Hayes.http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=290913 And the way B.O.Plenty used to spit in those old Dick Tracy comic books I used to read back in the 1940s. I got an email yesterday from that married Irish woman wayyyyyyyyyy over yonder across the big pond.She said she hasen't heard didly squat from me in quite a while. I reckon I better email her. http://ingeb.org/songs/othentel.html cuhulin Well, now *we* feel special - WE hear didly squat from you every day! |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, in fact of the business, Ergo the heat and the humidity outside
(you don't know what Mississippi Summertimes are like and I am not as young and spry like I used to be) and Ergo I am still working on my house, I am taking me twice as many bareques than usual.Ergo, I Can and I Do. cuhulin |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 11, 1:40*pm, Bob Dobbs wrote:
bpnjensen wrote: Metal Halide lamps, especially unshielded, are the pits. *Brilliant, sky-obscuring, and hard to overcome with normal amateur filter equipment. I remember MHs as having a discontinuous spectrum with about five distinct resonance points so you would have to combine filtration, unlike the monochromatic LPS lights. They probably have some IR and UV too but I only looked at the visible range in my spectrographic device. -- Operator Bob Echo Charlie 42 Thanks for this, Bob. We have filters that can filter out more than one wavelength, and we can stack filters up to a point - but none that will cut all five of the spikes, and too many stacked means you also lose precious desirable light. We also have broader band filters designed to cut general LP that would probably address all five, but these filters are also weaker than the stronger line filters. You are right about LPS, it's a snap to filter - which is why it's been encouraged for cities near major observatories, such as Lick, Mt. Wilson (now pretty much useless) and Palomar. Of course, just as in radio an RF quiet area is best, so in astronomy nothing beats a good rural or wilderness *dark* sky. Bruce Jensen California |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bpnjensen wrote:
On Jun 11, 1:40 pm, Bob wrote: bpnjensen wrote: Metal Halide lamps, especially unshielded, are the pits. Brilliant, sky-obscuring, and hard to overcome with normal amateur filter equipment. I remember MHs as having a discontinuous spectrum with about five distinct resonance points so you would have to combine filtration, unlike the monochromatic LPS lights. They probably have some IR and UV too but I only looked at the visible range in my spectrographic device. -- Operator Bob Echo Charlie 42 Thanks for this, Bob. We have filters that can filter out more than one wavelength, and we can stack filters up to a point - but none that will cut all five of the spikes, and too many stacked means you also lose precious desirable light. We also have broader band filters designed to cut general LP that would probably address all five, but these filters are also weaker than the stronger line filters. You are right about LPS, it's a snap to filter - which is why it's been encouraged for cities near major observatories, such as Lick, Mt. Wilson (now pretty much useless) and Palomar. Of course, just as in radio an RF quiet area is best, so in astronomy nothing beats a good rural or wilderness *dark* sky. Bruce Jensen California As Wilson is primarily a solar observatory these days, I doubt the gas mixture in the street lamps is very important. I am 18 miles NNW of Wilson at 1,790', and I can see the Milky Way from my back yard. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 12, 5:08*am, dave wrote:
bpnjensen wrote: On Jun 11, 1:40 pm, Bob *wrote: bpnjensen wrote: Metal Halide lamps, especially unshielded, are the pits. *Brilliant, sky-obscuring, and hard to overcome with normal amateur filter equipment. I remember MHs as having a discontinuous spectrum with about five distinct resonance points so you would have to combine filtration, unlike the monochromatic LPS lights. They probably have some IR and UV too but I only looked at the visible range in my spectrographic device. -- Operator Bob Echo Charlie 42 Thanks for this, Bob. *We have filters that can filter out more than one wavelength, and we can stack filters up to a point - but none that will cut all five of the spikes, and too many stacked means you also lose precious desirable light. *We also have broader band filters designed to cut general LP that would probably address all five, but these filters are also weaker than the stronger line filters. *You are right about LPS, it's a snap to filter - which is why it's been encouraged for cities near major observatories, such as Lick, Mt. Wilson (now pretty much useless) and Palomar. Of course, just as in radio an RF quiet area is best, so in astronomy nothing beats a good rural or wilderness *dark* sky. Bruce Jensen California As Wilson is primarily a solar observatory these days, I doubt the gas mixture in the street lamps is very important. *I am 18 miles NNW of Wilson at 1,790', and I can see the Milky Way from my back yard. That's why it's primarily a solar observatory - the LP from LA has rendered it useless for dark sky astro. 18 miles can make a big difference...but it takes a REALLY dark sky for the Milky Way to throw shadows... |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() bpnjensen wrote: On Jun 12, 5:08 am, dave wrote: bpnjensen wrote: On Jun 11, 1:40 pm, Bob wrote: bpnjensen wrote: Metal Halide lamps, especially unshielded, are the pits. Brilliant, sky-obscuring, and hard to overcome with normal amateur filter equipment. I remember MHs as having a discontinuous spectrum with about five distinct resonance points so you would have to combine filtration, unlike the monochromatic LPS lights. They probably have some IR and UV too but I only looked at the visible range in my spectrographic device. -- Operator Bob Echo Charlie 42 Thanks for this, Bob. We have filters that can filter out more than one wavelength, and we can stack filters up to a point - but none that will cut all five of the spikes, and too many stacked means you also lose precious desirable light. We also have broader band filters designed to cut general LP that would probably address all five, but these filters are also weaker than the stronger line filters. You are right about LPS, it's a snap to filter - which is why it's been encouraged for cities near major observatories, such as Lick, Mt. Wilson (now pretty much useless) and Palomar. Of course, just as in radio an RF quiet area is best, so in astronomy nothing beats a good rural or wilderness *dark* sky. Bruce Jensen California As Wilson is primarily a solar observatory these days, I doubt the gas mixture in the street lamps is very important. I am 18 miles NNW of Wilson at 1,790', and I can see the Milky Way from my back yard. That's why it's primarily a solar observatory - the LP from LA has rendered it useless for dark sky astro. 18 miles can make a big difference...but it takes a REALLY dark sky for the Milky Way to throw shadows... Might it be really dark when Arizona cuts off the juice? dxAce Michigan USA |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 12, 9:32*am, dxAce wrote:
bpnjensen wrote: On Jun 12, 5:08 am, dave wrote: bpnjensen wrote: On Jun 11, 1:40 pm, Bob *wrote: bpnjensen wrote: Metal Halide lamps, especially unshielded, are the pits. *Brilliant, sky-obscuring, and hard to overcome with normal amateur filter equipment. I remember MHs as having a discontinuous spectrum with about five distinct resonance points so you would have to combine filtration, unlike the monochromatic LPS lights. They probably have some IR and UV too but I only looked at the visible range in my spectrographic device.. -- Operator Bob Echo Charlie 42 Thanks for this, Bob. *We have filters that can filter out more than one wavelength, and we can stack filters up to a point - but none that will cut all five of the spikes, and too many stacked means you also lose precious desirable light. *We also have broader band filters designed to cut general LP that would probably address all five, but these filters are also weaker than the stronger line filters. *You are right about LPS, it's a snap to filter - which is why it's been encouraged for cities near major observatories, such as Lick, Mt. Wilson (now pretty much useless) and Palomar. Of course, just as in radio an RF quiet area is best, so in astronomy nothing beats a good rural or wilderness *dark* sky. Bruce Jensen California As Wilson is primarily a solar observatory these days, I doubt the gas mixture in the street lamps is very important. *I am 18 miles NNW of Wilson at 1,790', and I can see the Milky Way from my back yard. That's why it's primarily a solar observatory - the LP from LA has rendered it useless for dark sky astro. *18 miles can make a big difference...but it takes a REALLY dark sky for the Milky Way to throw shadows... Might it be really dark when Arizona cuts off the juice? dxAce Michigan USA We can only hope - I'll move to LA if that happens! |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dxAce wrote: bpnjensen wrote: On Jun 12, 5:08 am, dave wrote: bpnjensen wrote: On Jun 11, 1:40 pm, Bob wrote: bpnjensen wrote: Metal Halide lamps, especially unshielded, are the pits. Brilliant, sky-obscuring, and hard to overcome with normal amateur filter equipment. I remember MHs as having a discontinuous spectrum with about five distinct resonance points so you would have to combine filtration, unlike the monochromatic LPS lights. They probably have some IR and UV too but I only looked at the visible range in my spectrographic device. -- Operator Bob Echo Charlie 42 Thanks for this, Bob. We have filters that can filter out more than one wavelength, and we can stack filters up to a point - but none that will cut all five of the spikes, and too many stacked means you also lose precious desirable light. We also have broader band filters designed to cut general LP that would probably address all five, but these filters are also weaker than the stronger line filters. You are right about LPS, it's a snap to filter - which is why it's been encouraged for cities near major observatories, such as Lick, Mt. Wilson (now pretty much useless) and Palomar. Of course, just as in radio an RF quiet area is best, so in astronomy nothing beats a good rural or wilderness *dark* sky. Bruce Jensen California As Wilson is primarily a solar observatory these days, I doubt the gas mixture in the street lamps is very important. I am 18 miles NNW of Wilson at 1,790', and I can see the Milky Way from my back yard. That's why it's primarily a solar observatory - the LP from LA has rendered it useless for dark sky astro. 18 miles can make a big difference...but it takes a REALLY dark sky for the Milky Way to throw shadows... Might it be really dark when Arizona cuts off the juice? Hopin' that they might teach the clown 'tards out in CA a lesson, don'tcha know. dxAce Michigan USA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(OT) Why the end of the lightbulb is a dark day for us all | Shortwave | |||
(OT) Why the end of the lightbulb is a dark day for us all | Shortwave | |||
Obamao's Death Panels to Unravel Lightbulb Savings | Shortwave | |||
how many forum members to change a lightbulb? | Antenna | |||
Grundig FR200 LED lightbulb | Shortwave |