On Aug 1, 7:28*am, dave wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Jul 31, 6:55 pm, *wrote:
In ,
says... *Yukon sure did get that one right.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=293597

- - What about that Gold toilet?
- - Did the Klintoons steal that too?
- - cuhulin

-wrt- The Clintons Stole From {Looted}
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/cover040606.htm
the White House Before they Left !

- Read the article. *There's nothing there.

Ah Dave, {Head-in-Sand}

So ABC News* was Lying and since the Clintons
admitted to their Actions -so- the Clintons themselves
must being Lying too . . .

-READ- Clintons Return White House Furniture
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121856&page=1
White House Furnishings Sent Back Following
following revelations of thief. Plus the Clintons
also paid $86K in restitutions to the US Treasury
for the many items taken from the White House.

* Note - ABC News a 'trusted' Liberal News Source.
Not Rush - Not FOX -but- ABC National News
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121856&page=1
-ps- ABC the All Bill Clinton News

RHF wrote:


-READ- Clintons Return White House Furniture
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121856&page=1
White House Furnishings Sent Back Following
following revelations of thief. Plus the Clintons
also paid $86K in restitutions to the US Treasury
for the many items taken from the White House.


That story says nothing about theft. It's about donations and gifts.
They returned the stuff, and they might get some of it back.

No trashing of the White House. No vandalism. No looting of Air
Force 1.

On Aug 1, 6:08*pm, dave wrote:
RHF wrote:

- - -READ- Clintons Return White House Furniture
- - http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121856&page=1
- - White House Furnishings Sent Back Following
- - following revelations of thief. *Plus the Clintons
- - also paid $86K in restitutions to the US Treasury
- - for the many items taken from the White House.

- That story says nothing about theft.

Oh Really . . .

-*It's about donations and gifts.

The The White House -aka- US Federal Government
NOT to the Clintons -so- What was removed was
the Property of the USA Not the Clintons

Sure Do - I Say SURE DO Sound Like 'Theft' To Me.

- They returned the stuff,

-corrrection- The return some of 'the stuff'
-hint- That would be consider a admission of GUILT.

and they might get some of it back.

? Get It Back ? - ? Legally How ?
-hint- They Could Pay For It.

Dave so when you return something
that you 'took' that did not belong to
you : THAT IS NOT THEFT !

Oops I am having a Bill Clinton Moment
pondering the definition of "is" . . .

Dave so when you pay restitution for
something that you 'took' that did not
belong to you : THAT IS NOT THEFT !

Channeling Bill again : 'is', 'Is'. "IS" !

-*No trashing of the White House.

Dave so you say . . .

-*No vandalism.

Dave so you say . . .

-*No looting of Air Force 1.

Dave so you say . . .