On 9-Aug-2010, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

So, what's your answer, Colonel? Nazi-led revolution?
Do you see yourself leading the masses with their .22s against
the Federal tanks and helicopters?


The Camel Jockeys in the desert with nearly ZERO to work with are
driving you Leftists out of Afghanistan.

It's sad but true. Your Leftist Socialist rules of engagement will make
any tanks and helicopters useless. You made an entire military, the
best in the world, absolutely useless. You Democrats are losing the
war, so why would anyone be scared of you.

Let's be accurate - Bush started the bedwetting, Obama is merely carrying on
the same meals-on-wheels absurdity. Your point that illiterate dune dwellers
are winning is right on - because the military is hobbled by bedwetters. At
this point you can only hope the humiliation of the U.S. can be overcome
some day. With all the politically correct foolhardiness going on, the U.S.
is 1) broke, 2) humiliated, 3) wringing it's hands, and 4) hoping the U.N.
will adopt what remains. The United States of only 25 years ago cannot be
reconstructed.

On 8/17/2010 6:51 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:

Let's be accurate - Bush started the bedwetting, Obama is merely
carrying on the same meals-on-wheels absurdity. Your point that
illiterate dune dwellers are winning is right on - because the
military is hobbled by bedwetters.

Well, it's just slightly possible that your half-baked theory of "the
military is hobbled by bedwetters" is true, but then how would you
explain the following?

1) In Iraq, the Sunnis, Kurds and Shiites have been warring for hundreds
of years.

They still are.

They still will be when we leave.

Were they "hobbled by bedwetters"?

2) In Afghanistan, ANY and ALL occupiers over the last THOUSAND years,
from Genghis Khan to the Russians, have been thrown out.

Were the Russkies and Genghis all hobbled by bedwetters too?

Or did that moron Bush put us in to two totally unwinnable situations?

Nice theory of yours, but it might behoove you to brush up a bit on your
world history.

On 17-Aug-2010, Joe from Kokomo wrote:

Let's be accurate - Bush started the bedwetting, Obama is merely
carrying on the same meals-on-wheels absurdity. Your point that
illiterate dune dwellers are winning is right on - because the
military is hobbled by bedwetters.

Well, it's just slightly possible that your half-baked theory of "the
military is hobbled by bedwetters" is true, but then how would you
explain the following?

1) In Iraq, the Sunnis, Kurds and Shiites have been warring for hundreds
of years.

They still are.

They still will be when we leave.

Were they "hobbled by bedwetters"?

No, that's who they are and attempting to change it was moronic. The
bedwetters sacrificed thousands of the most honorable individuals in the
U.S. to achieve futility.


2) In Afghanistan, ANY and ALL occupiers over the last THOUSAND years,
from Genghis Khan to the Russians, have been thrown out.

Were the Russkies and Genghis all hobbled by bedwetters too?

No, they tired what the U.S. ignorantly tried - to change a culture. That's
impossible, the same as it's now impossible to bring back the United States.


Or did that moron Bush put us in to two totally unwinnable situations?

Moron Bush put us in to two totally un winnable situations, and at the same
time (starting during Clinton's tenure) importing the problem at U.S.
taxpayer expense.


Nice theory of yours, but it might behoove you to brush up a bit on your
world history.

Bedwetters cannot win a war. Iraq and Afghanistan and Iraq were not wars
except for the first couple weeks. IF the U.S. wanted to overpower these
********s, they could have, but it would have taken a serious offensive
(WWII style) which the U.S. will never again have the balls to do. As much
as it may frustrate you, we agree. Neither should have happened.