Video: America’s First Marxist President?
 

http://therealbarackobama.wordpress....ist-president/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoRz-VmtjRg

Video: America's First Marxist President?
 

"?baMa? Tse Dung" wrote in message
...

WTF have you sacrified? Yeah, yeah, I know, George Bush gave his life for
you in battle, asshole.



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5349 (20100807) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

Video: America's First Marxist President?
 

On Aug 8, 11:50*am, "Colonel Kurtz" wrote:
On *8-Aug-2010, "Mama Bear Skinner" Bear wrote:

Why don't you debate what kind of cardboard box you'll be living in
soon?
You elected the *******s, you send you ****ant wages overseas and all
you
can do is blame someone else??? * Hahahhahhaaa

Suck a big one, PFC Pyle. *Why don't you debate which of your kids to
throw
into Bush's wars.

Sounds like a very frustrated agreement, while still squirming.

So, what's your answer, Colonel? Nazi-led revolution?
Do you see yourself leading the masses with their .22s against
the Federal tanks and helicopters? What's your dream of panacea?
I'm sure you'll mesmerize us all with your logic...

Video: America's First Marxist President?
 

On 8/9/2010 3:28 AM, dxAce wrote:


Mike "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:

On Aug 8, 11:50 am, "Colonel Kurtz" wrote:
On 8-Aug-2010, "Mama Bear Skinner" Bear wrote:

Why don't you debate what kind of cardboard box you'll be living in
soon?
You elected the *******s, you send you ****ant wages overseas and all
you
can do is blame someone else??? Hahahhahhaaa

Suck a big one, PFC Pyle. Why don't you debate which of your kids to
throw
into Bush's wars.

Sounds like a very frustrated agreement, while still squirming.

So, what's your answer, Colonel? Nazi-led revolution?
Do you see yourself leading the masses with their .22s against
the Federal tanks and helicopters?


The Camel Jockeys in the desert with nearly ZERO to work with are
driving you Leftists out of Afghanistan.

It's sad but true. Your Leftist Socialist rules of engagement will make
any tanks and helicopters useless. You made an entire military, the
best in the world, absolutely useless. You Democrats are losing the
war, so why would anyone be scared of you.

Video: America's First Marxist President?
 

On 8/9/2010 12:53 PM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

The Camel Jockeys in the desert with nearly ZERO to work with are
driving you Leftists out of Afghanistan.

Yeah, and they drove out everybody from Genghis Khan to the Russians
too. You'd think W would have learned something from that.

It's sad but true. Your Leftist Socialist rules of engagement will
make any tanks and helicopters useless. You made an entire military,
the best in the world, absolutely useless. You Democrats are losing
the war, so why would anyone be scared of you.

Um Scotty, you seem to be overlooking something...

The Democrats, having inherited the war, have only been there a year and
a half and you blame them for losing the war?

The Republicans were there for *EIGHT* years and did *not* win the war.
You don't blame them? You want the Dems to do in a year and a half what
the Repubs could not do in EIGHT years??? How careless of you to
overlook that.

Furthermore, the tanks and helicopters you whine about above seemed "to
be useless" against those VC guys on bicycles wearing black pyjamas.
Odd, but I don't remember those great Republicans Nixon and Ford winning
the Viet Nam war. How forgetful of you.

Other than proving yourself to be a real dip**** (IMHO) and bigot with a
short memory, what's your point?

Video: America's First Marxist President?
 

On 8-Aug-2010, Mike wrote:

Suck a big one, PFC Pyle. *Why don't you debate which of your kids to
throw
into Bush's wars.

Sounds like a very frustrated agreement, while still squirming.

So, what's your answer, Colonel? Nazi-led revolution?
Do you see yourself leading the masses with their .22s against
the Federal tanks and helicopters? What's your dream of panacea?
I'm sure you'll mesmerize us all with your logic...

You won't be mesmerized because you won't understand.

I closed 2 plants when industrial output hit the skids, in 2004 and 2005. I
now produce overseas and you clowns pay through the ass for very
inexpensively made merchandise. I cannot change the U.S. because 98% of
"Americans" don't give a flying rats ass nor are they willing to participate
in correcting the debacle. It's your, or you kids problem.

Video: America's First Marxist President?
 

On 9-Aug-2010, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

So, what's your answer, Colonel? Nazi-led revolution?
Do you see yourself leading the masses with their .22s against
the Federal tanks and helicopters?


The Camel Jockeys in the desert with nearly ZERO to work with are
driving you Leftists out of Afghanistan.

It's sad but true. Your Leftist Socialist rules of engagement will make
any tanks and helicopters useless. You made an entire military, the
best in the world, absolutely useless. You Democrats are losing the
war, so why would anyone be scared of you.

Let's be accurate - Bush started the bedwetting, Obama is merely carrying on
the same meals-on-wheels absurdity. Your point that illiterate dune dwellers
are winning is right on - because the military is hobbled by bedwetters. At
this point you can only hope the humiliation of the U.S. can be overcome
some day. With all the politically correct foolhardiness going on, the U.S.
is 1) broke, 2) humiliated, 3) wringing it's hands, and 4) hoping the U.N.
will adopt what remains. The United States of only 25 years ago cannot be
reconstructed.

Video: America's First Marxist President?
 

On 8-Aug-2010, wrote:

Suck a big one, PFC Pyle. Why don't you debate which of your kids to
throw
into Bush's wars.

Sounds like a very frustrated agreement, while still squirming.

So, what's your answer, Colonel? Nazi-led revolution?
Do you see yourself leading the masses with their .22s against
the Federal tanks and helicopters? What's your dream of panacea?
I'm sure you'll mesmerize us all with your logic...

On 8/17/2010 6:40 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:

You won't be mesmerized because you won't understand.

I closed 2 plants when industrial output hit the skids, in 2004 and 2005. I
now produce overseas and you clowns pay through the ass for very
inexpensively made merchandise. I cannot change the U.S. because 98% of
"Americans" don't give a flying rats ass nor are they willing to participate
in correcting the debacle. It's your, or you kids problem.

You may be right that we "pay through the ass for very
inexpensively made merchandise"...but that merchandise is STILL cheaper
(waaay cheaper) than stuff made in the USA.

Not so much as people "not giving a flying rat's ass" as much as it is
that people, many without jobs want, nay, need "cheap" merchandise.

If the American sheeple ever wake up and get wise, watch out! There
won't be enough tar and feathers for politicians of either stripe.

Video: America's First Marxist President?
 

On 8/17/2010 6:51 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:

Let's be accurate - Bush started the bedwetting, Obama is merely
carrying on the same meals-on-wheels absurdity. Your point that
illiterate dune dwellers are winning is right on - because the
military is hobbled by bedwetters.

Well, it's just slightly possible that your half-baked theory of "the
military is hobbled by bedwetters" is true, but then how would you
explain the following?

1) In Iraq, the Sunnis, Kurds and Shiites have been warring for hundreds
of years.

They still are.

They still will be when we leave.

Were they "hobbled by bedwetters"?

2) In Afghanistan, ANY and ALL occupiers over the last THOUSAND years,
from Genghis Khan to the Russians, have been thrown out.

Were the Russkies and Genghis all hobbled by bedwetters too?

Or did that moron Bush put us in to two totally unwinnable situations?

Nice theory of yours, but it might behoove you to brush up a bit on your
world history.

America's Marxist
 

On Aug 18, 11:08*am, dave wrote:
RHF wrote:

Dave for some/many it is just a 'feeling' that
America was better back then in the 1950s,
1960s, 1970s, 1980s and even up to the 1990s.

You can't fix the future by disrespecting it.

The '80s sucked. The '60s sucked. The '70s was probably the high water
mark for this country.


Even though the 70's brought us (shudder) disco?