Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Evans wrote:
Drewdove wrote: IMHO too many people laughed off complaints that the digital carriers would cause interference to first adjacent analogs without realizing these same adjacent would interfere with the digital carriers rendering HD useless in certain (many?) situations. As far as I'm concerned, allowing a signal to be broadcast, at a frequency that is already allocated to something else, is always going to be a bad idea (unless it is a system using very directional antennas). From what I've read in this NG. HD-Radio does just that. It ends up allowing digital signals to be transmitted on frequencies already allocated to analogue signals. Whoever thought that would be OK, obviously either doesn't understand radio, or simply doesn't give a sh*t about the consequences. Richard E. The big boys pushed IBOC because they wanted to do whatever they could to _prevent_ the creation of a new all-digital band. They feared that such a new band would level the playing field so the small broadcaster would have just as good coverage as they did. That was an intolerable and frightening idea to them. See http://www.kevinalfredstrom.com/2009...rom-the-start/ for more information. With all good wishes, Kevin, WB4AIO. -- http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HD Radio and automakers - nothing but complaints! | Shortwave | |||
"U.S. automakers not jumping into HD Radio" | Shortwave | |||
k4yz not forgot for 2005 lies and netKKKop liable | Policy |