Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Buster wrote:
Hi, i just purchased an ICOM R70 and have a question. Could someone please tell me if the 455kHz filter used in the third I.F. Needs to be the same width as the second I.F.? For example, if I put an Inrad 2.1 or even 1.8 kHz filter (third IF) with the stock 2.3 kHz second IF filter what would be the result of the PBT? Would it be better to replace both IF filters (SSB) with Inrads for better selectivity or should I just leave the stock 9 MHz filter in place? Thanks! I believe it will work fine with just one improved filter, assuming that the Inrad really has a better shape factor. Having better shape factors on both would aid in interference rejection in some situations, of course. I've never used an R70, but I couldn't recommend setting it up so that your SSB bandwidth is significantly narrower than stock at all times. Ultra-narrow audio is fatiguing to listen to and is _less_ understandable in most situations. My own preference would be to go with a wider SSB filter (for clearer audio and better intelligibility), but one with excellent shape factor and ultimate rejection. I like adjusting the carrier point so that I can get audio down below 100 Hz and have a filter significantly wider than 3 kHz for all listening except when there's very bad adjacent channel interference, in which case I'd temporarily use a narrower filter or narrow it up with bandpass tuning. Preferences vary. With every good wish, Kevin, WB4AIO. -- http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|