Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/8/2010 2:29 PM, bpnjensen wrote:
... I am primarily interested in SW listening, not amateur, and really 16 - 160 meters. Would you recommend Type 61 for this application? Bruce Jensen With SWL, the type 43 would work better at 160m and the 61 better at 17.48–17.90 MHz and above. But, the type 43 would work well on MW, which I am assuming is of interest to you also. Antenna type, inductance/performance you find necessary in rejection of CM, size of the core, number of turns, etc. all factor in, also. Mainly, I am tossing this stuff our for "nit pickers" like me ... You could get by with either material ... one will favor the top end, one the bottom ... but you can use either. Some might see the difference between performance of the two as "splitting hairs." I just go to extremes for fractions of s-unit, or db. LOL Regards, JS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Balun 1:1 with FT 240-61 toroid | Antenna | |||
Identifying Surplus Toroid Material | Homebrew | |||
"Ununs" = 'UN' to 'UN' { Unbalanced-to-Unbalanced Matching Transformer } | Shortwave | |||
Toroid! Toroid! Toroid! | Antenna | |||
Toroid ID question... | Homebrew |