Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/8/2010 11:25 PM, RHF wrote:
On Sep 8, 10:49 pm, John wrote: On 9/8/2010 2:29 PM, bpnjensen wrote: ... I am primarily interested in SW listening, not amateur, and really 16 - 160 meters. Would you recommend Type 61 for this application? Bruce Jensen With SWL, the type 43 would work better at 160m and the 61 better at 17.48–17.90 MHz and above. But, the type 43 would work well on MW, which I am assuming is of interest to you also. Antenna type, inductance/performance you find necessary in rejection of CM, size of the core, number of turns, etc. all factor in, also. Mainly, I am tossing this stuff our for "nit pickers" like me ... You could get by with either material ... one will favor the top end, one the bottom ... but you can use either. Some might see the difference between performance of the two as "splitting hairs." I just go to extremes for fractions of s-unit, or db. LOL Regards, JS JS you are right most of the ready-made SWL Antenna MLBs [UnUns] are build for and advertise 500 kHz to 30 MHz for both MW& Shortwave Bands coverage. Frequency coverage 0.1 to 30 MHz http://www.grove-ent.com/WR0130.html Unsurpassed, 1 - 55 MHz Reception http://www.grove-ent.com/ANT8.html For Receive Only: 100 kHz to 40 MHz http://www.universal-radio.com/catalog/sw_ant/1484.html Frequency Range 100kHz to 30MHz http://www.wellbrook.uk.com/pdf/UMB130m.pdf 182A Isolation Unit : 0.1 - 30 MHz http://www.iceradioproducts.com/reco...age%20Matching Coverage from 125 kHz thru 30 Mhz http://cgi.ebay.com/180556245641 -versus- FT-140-61 Ferrite Core for coverage from 100 kHz. to 150 Mhz http://cgi.ebay.com/320573201259 ~ RHF . I have always wound my own. Some of those probably work well, I just don't know. Winding all my baluns/ununs myself has given me a hands on exposure to a multitude of core materials, winding techniques, performance of the differing constructions, etc. The core material I mentioned earlier, along with the winding technique for it gave the best performance, across the widest bandwidth, of any I have wound and used ... I am forever searching new techniques and materials. Just ordered some russian toroids which look promising ... when you span 30+ Mhz, performance on one end will not match the other .... so the question simply becomes, "What is the best compromise?" Regards, JS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Balun 1:1 with FT 240-61 toroid | Antenna | |||
Identifying Surplus Toroid Material | Homebrew | |||
"Ununs" = 'UN' to 'UN' { Unbalanced-to-Unbalanced Matching Transformer } | Shortwave | |||
Toroid! Toroid! Toroid! | Antenna | |||
Toroid ID question... | Homebrew |