Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
D. Peter Maus wrote: On 9/8/10 16:29 , bpnjensen wrote: On Sep 8, 10:30 am, John wrote: For ferrites commonly used in SWL baluns/ununs: If you are using type 43 material in an RF transformer, performance will fall off shortly after 10 Mhz. If the core is wound as a true balun/TLT (Transmission Line Transformer), I have used it up to 30 Mhz. Type 61 material is much more suitable for RF transformer from .2 Mhz to 100 Mhz. If wound as a true balun/TLT, it can be pressed into even broader frequency service. This page points out the above:http://www.palomar-engineers.com/Fer...ite_cores.html With iron: Type 2, such as T106-2, when wound as an RF transformer is very satisfactory to a bit beyond 10 Mhz. Wound as a true balun, I have used it up to 30 Mhz. (it is really too lossy, for me, at 28 Mhz, 10m) Type 6 material, such as T106-6, is good from 2-30 Mhz when used as RF transformer (actually, I find the bandwidth to be larger in practice.) If wound as a balun/unun/TLT, it is quite usable from MW to ~50 Mhz. When wound as the 16:1/9:1 as I pointed out earlier, I find this to be THE KILLER BALUN/UNUN (can be used interchangeably.) This page points out the suitability of the material above:http://www.palomar-engineers.com/Iro...on_powder.html Regards, JS I am primarily interested in SW listening, not amateur, and really 16 - 160 meters. Would you recommend Type 61 for this application? Bruce Jensen Bruce, The Amidon website has a chart of ferrite materials and their applicability to various project types. Most of your questions can be answered there. Including options should you like to build something specific to your needs, deviating from the intents of an original design. And if you're using the Amidon charts, use the line giving useful frequencies for "broadband transformers". Most of the Amidon frequency spec. is for tuned circuits, but for broadband use, you're using the core at frequencies much higher than what the same material is used for in tuned use. The first longwire balun I built, inspired by the product review in a WRTH used, I think, 45 material or something around there. (Not in the mood to dig out that bag of stuff). It only worked above 15 Mhz, so was fine for CB listening, but who wants to do that. The transformers I've done since use the John Bryant recommended type 77, type 75, or type J. They're good for the range I listen to, 5-17 Mhz and probably reasonable below that. Type 77 is speced for tuned use around .1-1 Mhz (as I remember), but for using it in broadband use, you're trading off some core loss with much smaller coil windings and the benefits that gives. Not the same thing as transmitting, where you can accept a more limited frequency range and don't want your core to melt, or expode, or get saturated and go nonlinear at that power level. Mark Zenier Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Balun 1:1 with FT 240-61 toroid | Antenna | |||
Identifying Surplus Toroid Material | Homebrew | |||
"Ununs" = 'UN' to 'UN' { Unbalanced-to-Unbalanced Matching Transformer } | Shortwave | |||
Toroid! Toroid! Toroid! | Antenna | |||
Toroid ID question... | Homebrew |