Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 29, 12:56*pm, dave wrote:
SMS wrote: All the misinformation you see promulgated by those opposed to HD Radio is based _solely_ on their objection to the royalty model of iBiquity, not on any valid technological objections. Such a position is understandable since it does seem unfair that a private company profits from a monopoly of their system (though the real profits are actually made by the equipment manufacturers). Is adjacent channel interference "misinfornation"? The way I see it, this HD BS is just to crowd out LPFM (the old dreaded Class D stations from the '60s). - You talk like 'Dwardo. 'Special Dave' -that's- D'Eduardo ! When Numbers Count : You Can Count on . . . Count D'Eduardo "Grand Duke of the Arbiton" that is provided you are not one of the count-less, un-count-able, no-a-counts over the age of . . . 60 . . . a little lower please 55 . . . a little lower please 50 . . . a little lower please how low can you go . . . ~ RHF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IBOC : Oops New Book May Indirectly Predict Success of HD-Radio | Shortwave | |||
IBOC : Oops New Book May Indirectly Predict Success of HD-Radio | Shortwave | |||
IBOC : Oops New Book May Indirectly Predict Success of HD-Radio | Shortwave | |||
Unlikely Success of HD-Radio | Shortwave | |||
VHF RADIO WAVES PREDICT EARTHQUAKE | Shortwave |