![]() |
THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM
On Thanksgiving Day, Americans gather with their family and friends to
celebrate the blessings that Providence has bestowed on their beloved country. A deep appreciation of these blessings involves understanding that they were earned. It is to understand the awesome truth of how "God helps those who help themselves" applies to the Mayflower Pilgrims and their First Thanksgiving at America's birth. This is an appreciation and understanding of which those on the Left are incapable - for it would mean celebrating the capitalist freedom that made that original Thanksgiving possible. This no liberal, no Democrat, no leftie can do. Thus they must distort history instead. The distortion starts in Kindergarten, with the childish make-believe of your kid's school play portraying the noble Squanto teaching the helpless Pilgrims how to feed themselves. So let's drop the curtain on the distortion and watch the real thing. Here it is. http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/4314/2/ The Tale of the Pilgrims -- Why It Needs to Be Taught The study of the history and culture of one's own country is a vital element of education. It is important for children to understand how and why they are living the way they are now and that it is a result of what people who lived before them have done. They need to be able to connect the dots -- these prevailing thoughts led to fights, these ideas led to prosperity, this action led to that one, and so on. It is from making these kinds of connections that the child learns how to think logically. The tale of the Pilgrims who came to America to escape tyranny is a heroic and moving story. Most children have been told the basic story of Thanksgiving. Here are some more facts for your own information or that you may want to discuss with your child this holiday: http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/...ims_why_i.html |
THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM
|
THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM
To all Capitalist Pigs everywhere, Happy Capitalist Pig Thanksgiving.
cuhulin, the Capitalist Pig |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
On Nov 26, 5:01*pm, David Barts
wrote: Debunked: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/r...x-reporter-cla... Debunking the Communist Debunked OR How little "David Barts" can't read anything except Mao's Little Red Book (as if he ever could). Pay close attention to the words. Take it slow. Maybe a sentence per hour and repeat. Here we GO Komrade: THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler Thursday, 25 November 2010 http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/4314/2/ On Thanksgiving Day, Americans gather with their family and friends to celebrate the blessings that Providence has bestowed on their beloved country. A deep appreciation of these blessings involves understanding that they were earned. It is to understand the awesome truth of how "God helps those who help themselves" applies to the Mayflower Pilgrims and their First Thanksgiving at America's birth. This is an appreciation and understanding of which those on the Left are incapable - for it would mean celebrating the capitalist freedom that made that original Thanksgiving possible. This no liberal, no Democrat, no leftie can do. Thus they must distort history instead. The distortion starts in Kindergarten, with the childish make-believe of your kid's school play portraying the noble Squanto teaching the helpless Pilgrims how to feed themselves. So let's drop the curtain on the distortion and watch the real thing. Here it is. The real history of the Mayflower Pilgrims was recounted by their leader, William Bradford (1590-1657) in his book Of Plymouth Plantation, completed in 1647. It is from Bradford that we learn of Squanto, who did indeed show the Pilgrims how to "set" or plant corn (a new unfamiliar crop for them). Then we learn that the Pilgrims taught the Indians how to grow more corn than they ever had befo "The Indeans used to have nothing so much corne as they have since the English have stored them with their hoes, and seene their industrie in breaking up new grounds therwith." Reading the real history of the Pilgrims is so revelatory that I want you to see it at length. The Pilgrims landed in December 1620, suffered a horrible winter, figured out how to fish and hunt that spring and summer so that there may have been some sort of feast with friendly Indians in the fall of 1621 - although Bradford doesn't recount the incident. But by 1622 they were starving. There was no "Thanksgiving" that year. There was the next - for 1623 saw the Pilgrims in well-fed abundance, and thus was the year of the real First Thanksgiving. What made the difference? Here are Bradford's own words (albeit with modern spelling like "been" instead of "bene" - the original spelling is in the link above; the parentheses are his, the explanatory brackets are mine), describing Anno Dom.1623: It may be thought strange that these people should fall to these extremities in so short a time, being left competently provided when the ship [the Mayflower] left them, and had an addition by that moyetie [portion] of corn that was got by trade, besides much they got of the Indians where they lived, by one means and other. It must needs be their great disorder, for they spent excessively whilst they had, or could get it. And after they began to come into wants, many sold away their clothes and bed coverings; others (so base were they) became servants to the Indians, and would cut them wood and fetch them water for a cap full of corn; others fell to plain stealing, both night and day, from the Indians, of which they grievously complained. In the end, they came to that misery that some starved and died with cold and hunger... All this while no supply was heard of, neither knew they when they might expect any. So they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop than they had done, that they might not still thus languish in misery. At length, after much debate of things, the Governor [Bradford] (with the advise of the chiefest amongst them) gave way that they should set corn every man for his own particular [plant corn on his own private land], and in that regard trust to them selves; in all other things to go on in the general way as before. And so [there was] assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number for that end, only for present use (but made no division for inheritance), and ranged all boys and youth under some family. This had very good success; for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted then other wise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little- ones with them to set corn, which before they would allege weakness and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression. The experience that was had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years, and that amongst godly and sober men, may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato's and other ancients applauded by some of later times -- that the taking away of property, and bringing in communities into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing, as if they were wiser than God. For this community (so far as it was) was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For the young-men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine [complain] that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children, with out any recompense. The strong, or man of parts, had no more in division [in amount] of victails [food] and clothes, than he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and graver men to be ranked and equalized in labors, and victails, clothes, etc., with the meaner and younger sort, thought it some indignity and disrespect unto them. And for men's wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc., they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could many husbands well brook it. Upon the point all being to have alike, and all to do alike, they thought them selves in the like condition, and have as good as another; and so, if it did not cut off those relations that God hath set amongst men, yet it did at least much diminish and take of the mutual respects that should be preserved amongst them. And would have been worse if they had been men of another condition. Let none object this is men's corruption, and nothing to the course itself. I answer, seeing all men have this corruption in them, God in his wisdom saw another course fitter for them... By the time harvest was come [fall 1623], instead of famine, now God gave them plenty, and the face of things was changed, to the rejoicing of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God. And the effect of their particular planting was well seen, for all had, one way and other, pretty well to bring the year about, and some of the abler sort and more industrious had to spare, and sell to others, so as any general want or famine hath not been amongst them since to this day [1647]. That is as effective a refutation of socialism and affirmation of capitalism as there has ever been. The Pilgrims were starving, stealing and begging from the Indians under a no private property/ everybody work for the common good economy. They switch to a private property/everybody work for themselves economy, and within one season there is abundance for all. But how can Lefties and Zero-Reid-Pelosi Democrats be thankful for this? They cannot and are not. Their goal is not abundance. Their goal is deprivation - for where there is deprivation there must be victims, victims who can be manipulated to acquire power. Bradford's history - the real history of Thanksgiving - is there in plain black and white, undeniable and irrefutable for anyone to see. It is the history that should be taught to our schoolchildren but is not. It is ignored and denied. It likely is the very first time you yourself have ever seen Bradford's words. Liberals, Democrats, and members of America's Fascist Left may very well be enjoying this day - enjoying good food, good wine, good friends and family. Let's hope they are. We should not begrudge them this moment of good cheer. But what is impossible, or at least difficult for them is to enjoy being American, being thankful for America, to celebrate the abundance of America, the abundance of its material and spiritual well-being thanks to the private property capitalism that made the first Thanksgiving and all those that followed possible. Any celebration of theirs is always a yes...but thankfulness. "Yes, we have much to be thankful for on this day, but we must never forget what we did to the Indians and the slaves, that there is still too much poverty and racism in America, blah, blah, blah..." The purpose of Thanksgiving is to be thankful for being American. This is the day to celebrate the goodness of our country - the moral goodness, the moral decency of American institutions, American history, and the character of the American people. Without any buts. It's easy for conservatives to do this - it comes natural to us. It's the opposite for liberals, who relish and revel in incessant guilt- mongering - and can't celebrate a Thanksgiving with no buts. So this day, we can relish and revel in the capitalist freedom and abundance that Providence enabled the Pilgrims to choose, and create America thereby. That freedom and abundance is today being threatened as never before by a Fascist Left determined to destroy it. Now more than ever is the time to focus anew on all that we love about our country, to know that Providence has always smiled upon it - for we, like the Pilgrims have the capacity to choose capitalist freedom over socialist slavery. With that choice, the original Americans created a civilization out of the wilderness. With that choice, we Americans of today can rescue our civilization from the wilderness of the Fascist Left led by President Zero. That choice liberates us from their power-lust and make us impervious to the poison of anti-America hate that eats at all liberal souls. That is why we are what they are not: grateful for our country, for the very existence of America, for the priceless privilege of being an American. Happy Thanksgiving to you all. http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/4314/2/ |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
On Nov 27, 11:09Â*am, N∅ ∅baMa∅
wrote: On Nov 26, 5:01Â*pm, David Barts wrote: Debunked: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/r...x-reporter-cla... Debunking the Communist Debunked OR How little "David Barts" can't read anything except Mao's Little Red Book (as if he ever could). Pay close attention to the words. Â*Take it slow. Â*Maybe a sentence per hour and repeat. Â*Here we GO Komrade: THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler Thursday, 25 November 2010 http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/4314/2/ On Thanksgiving Day, Americans gather with their family and friends to celebrate the blessings that Providence has bestowed on their beloved country. A deep appreciation of these blessings involves understanding that they were earned. Â*It is to understand the awesome truth of how "God helps those who help themselves" applies to the Mayflower Pilgrims and their First Thanksgiving at America's birth. This is an appreciation and understanding of which those on the Left are incapable - for it would mean celebrating the capitalist freedom that made that original Thanksgiving possible. Â*This no liberal, no Democrat, no leftie can do. Â*Thus they must distort history instead. The distortion starts in Kindergarten, with the childish make-believe of your kid's school play portraying the noble Squanto teaching the helpless Pilgrims how to feed themselves. So let's drop the curtain on the distortion and watch the real thing. Here it is. The real history of the Mayflower Pilgrims was recounted by their leader, William Bradford (1590-1657) in his book Of Plymouth Plantation, completed in 1647. Â*It is from Bradford that we learn of Squanto, who did indeed show the Pilgrims how to "set" or plant corn (a new unfamiliar crop for them). Â*Then we learn that the Pilgrims taught the Indians how to grow more corn than they ever had befo "The Indeans used to have nothing so much corne as they have since the English have stored them with their hoes, and seene their industrie in breaking up new grounds therwith." Reading the real history of the Pilgrims is so revelatory that I want you to see it at length. Â*The Pilgrims landed in December 1620, suffered a horrible winter, figured out how to fish and hunt that spring and summer so that there may have been some sort of feast with friendly Indians in the fall of 1621 - although Bradford doesn't recount the incident. But by 1622 they were starving. Â*There was no "Thanksgiving" that year. Â*There was the next - for 1623 saw the Pilgrims in well-fed abundance, and thus was the year of the real First Thanksgiving. What made the difference? Â*Here are Bradford's own words (albeit with modern spelling like "been" instead of "bene" - the original spelling is in the link above; the parentheses are his, the explanatory brackets are mine), describing Anno Dom.1623: It may be thought strange that these people should fall to these extremities in so short a time, being left competently provided when the ship [the Mayflower] left them, and had an addition by that moyetie [portion] of corn that was got by trade, besides much they got of the Indians where they lived, by one means and other. It must needs be their great disorder, for they spent excessively whilst they had, or could get it. And after they began to come into wants, many sold away their clothes and bed coverings; others (so base were they) became servants to the Indians, and would cut them wood and fetch them water for a cap full of corn; others fell to plain stealing, both night and day, from the Indians, of which they grievously complained. In the end, they came to that misery that some starved and died with cold and hunger... All this while no supply was heard of, neither knew they when they might expect any. So they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop than they had done, that they might not still thus languish in misery. At length, after much debate of things, the Governor [Bradford] (with the advise of the chiefest amongst them) gave way that they should set corn every man for his own particular [plant corn on his own private land], and in that regard trust to them selves; in all other things to go on in the general way as before. And so [there was] assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number for that end, only for present use (but made no division for inheritance), and ranged all boys and youth under some family. This had very good success; for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted then other wise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little- ones with them to set corn, which before they would allege weakness and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression. The experience that was had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years, and that amongst godly and sober men, may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato's and other ancients applauded by some of later times -- that the taking away of property, and bringing in communities into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing, as if they were wiser than God. For this community (so far as it was) was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For the young-men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine [complain] that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children, with out any recompense. The strong, or man of parts, had no more in division [in amount] of victails [food] and clothes, than he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and graver men to be ranked and equalized in labors, and victails, clothes, etc., with the meaner and younger sort, thought it some indignity and disrespect unto them. And for men's wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc., they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could many husbands well brook it. Upon the point all being to have alike, and all to do alike, they thought them selves in the like condition, and have as good as another; and so, if it did not cut off those relations that God hath set amongst men, yet it did at least much diminish and take of the mutual respects that should be preserved amongst them. And would have been worse if they had been men of another condition. Let none object this is men's corruption, and nothing to the course itself. I answer, seeing all men have this corruption in them, God in his wisdom saw another course fitter for them... By the time harvest was come [fall 1623], instead of famine, now God gave them plenty, and the face of things was changed, to the rejoicing of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God. And the effect of their particular planting was well seen, for all had, one way and other, pretty well to bring the year about, and some of the abler sort and more industrious had to spare, and sell to others, so as any general want or famine hath not been amongst them since to this day [1647]. That is as effective a refutation of socialism and affirmation of capitalism as there has ever been. Â*The Pilgrims were starving, stealing and begging from the Indians under a no private property/ everybody work for the common good economy. Â*They switch to a private property/everybody work for themselves economy, and within one season there is abundance for all. But how can Lefties and Zero-Reid-Pelosi Democrats be thankful for this? Â*They cannot and are not. Â*Their goal is not abundance. Â*Their goal is deprivation - for where there is deprivation there must be victims, victims who can be manipulated to acquire power. Bradford's history - the real history of Thanksgiving - is there in plain black and white, undeniable and irrefutable for anyone to see. It is the history that should be taught to our schoolchildren but is not. Â*It is ignored and denied. Â*It likely is the very first time you yourself have ever seen Bradford's words. Liberals, Democrats, and members of America's Fascist Left may very well be enjoying this day - enjoying good food, good wine, good friends and family. Â*Let's hope they are. Â*We should not begrudge them this moment of good cheer. But what is impossible, or at least difficult for them is to enjoy being American, being thankful for America, to celebrate the abundance of America, the abundance of its material and spiritual well-being thanks to the private property capitalism that made the first Thanksgiving and all those that followed possible. Any celebration of theirs is always a yes...but thankfulness. Â*"Yes, we have much to be thankful for on this day, but we must never forget what we did to the Indians and the slaves, that there is still too much poverty and racism in America, blah, blah, blah..." The purpose of Thanksgiving is to be thankful for being American. This is the day to celebrate the goodness of our country - the moral goodness, the moral decency of American institutions, American history, and the character of the American people. Â*Without any buts.. It's easy for conservatives to do this - it comes natural to us. Â*It's the opposite for liberals, who relish and revel in incessant guilt- mongering - and can't celebrate a Thanksgiving with no buts. So this day, we can relish and revel in the capitalist freedom and abundance that Providence enabled the Pilgrims to choose, and create America thereby. That freedom and abundance is today being threatened as never before by a Fascist Left determined to destroy it. Now more than ever is the time to focus anew on all that we love about our country, to know that .... read more » You are a VERY confused and warped individual. |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
On Nov 27, 1:13*pm, bpnjensen wrote:
You are a VERY confused and warped individual. You are a very bankrupt and penniless Serf. |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
On Nov 27, 1:09Â*pm, N∅ ∅baMa∅
wrote: it is impossible for liberals to be fascists. fascists hate liberals, trade unionist, socialists, communists, jews(because most of them are liberal), the weak, the disabled, minorities, homosexuals. they are intolerant of other views and religions. they practice bigotry, racism, and homophobia, etc. say, i just described the modern conservative movement:) |
Serfs-R-Us : Ah... "Serfdom" in 21st Century America !
- - - From: ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung
- - - Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:09:08 -0800 (PST) - - - Local: Fri, Nov 26 2010 1:09 pm - - - Subject: THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM - - - http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...0bc142952d999d - - On Nov 27, 1:13Â*pm, bpnjensen wrote: - - You are a VERY confused and warped individual. - On Nov 27, 11:29 am, N∅ ∅baMa∅ - wrote: - You are a very bankrupt and penniless Serf. Ah . . . "Serfdom" in 21st Century America ! Yeah the Average Working American 'Serf' : * * * Serfs-R-Us * * * Owns Their Own 3-Bedroom Home -with- Gas & Electricity* -with- Clear Water & Sewerage +plus+ Garbage Pick-Up & Recycling * Winter Heating and Summer Air Conditioning Owns Two Cars -with- Good Safe Public Roads to Drive-on +plus+ Low Cost Fuel Owns Four Color TVs -with- Multi-Channel+ Cable TV a/o Satellite TV Owns Two PCs and Internet Devices -with- High Speed Internet in the Home Has Ready Access to Low Cost Food -at- The Local/Neighborhood SuperMarket Has Ready Access to Low Cost Consumer Goods -at- The Local/Town/City Shopping Mall Has Access To The Highest Full Time Employment Rates -aka- 'Open Job Market' in the Industrialized World for the Larger Populated Countries/Nations -wrt- G8/G20 plus,,, Plus... PLUS ! ! ! -drum-roll-please- We Now Have Obama-Care© :o) yeah it's real tough being a 'serf' in 21st century america ~ RHF |
Serfs-R-Us : Ah... "Serfdom" in 21st Century America !
On Nov 27, 3:18Â*pm, RHF wrote:
- - - From: ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung - - - Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:09:08 -0800 (PST) - - - Local: Fri, Nov 26 2010 1:09 pm - - - Subject: THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM - - -http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/2a0bc142952d999d - - On Nov 27, 1:13Â*pm, bpnjensen wrote: - - You are a VERY confused and warped individual. - On Nov 27, 11:29 am, N∅ ∅baMa∅- wrote: - You are a very bankrupt and penniless Serf. Ah . . . "Serfdom" in 21st Century America ! Yeah the Average Working American 'Serf' : * * * Serfs-R-Us * * * Owns Their Own 3-Bedroom Home -with- Gas & Electricity* -with- Clear Water & Sewerage +plus+ Garbage Pick-Up & Recycling * Winter Heating and Summer Air Conditioning Owns Two Cars -with- Good Safe Public Roads to Drive-on +plus+ Low Cost Fuel Owns Four Color TVs -with- Multi-Channel+ Cable TV a/o Satellite TV Owns Two PCs and Internet Devices -with- High Speed Internet in the Home Has Ready Access to Low Cost Food -at- The Local/Neighborhood SuperMarket Has Ready Access to Low Cost Consumer Goods -at- The Local/Town/City Shopping Mall Has Access To The Highest Full Time Employment Rates -aka- 'Open Job Market' in the Industrialized World for the Larger Populated Countries/Nations -wrt- G8/G20 plus,,, Plus... PLUS ! ! ! -drum-roll-please- We Now Have Obama-Care© :o) yeah it's real tough being a 'serf' in 21st century america ~ RHF Â*. Â*. You are a VERY confused and warped individual. |
Serfs-R-Us : Ah... "Serfdom" in 21st Century America !
On Nov 27, 4:46Â*pm, "Chas. Chan" wrote:
On Nov 27, 3:18Â*pm, RHF wrote: - - - From: ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung - - - Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:09:08 -0800 (PST) - - - Local: Fri, Nov 26 2010 1:09 pm - - - Subject: THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM - - -http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/2a0bc142952d999d - - On Nov 27, 1:13Â*pm, bpnjensen wrote: - - You are a VERY confused and warped individual. - On Nov 27, 11:29 am, N∅ ∅baMa∅- wrote: - You are a very bankrupt and penniless Serf. Ah . . . "Serfdom" in 21st Century America ! Yeah the Average Working American 'Serf' : * * * Serfs-R-Us * * * Owns Their Own 3-Bedroom Home -with- Gas & Electricity* -with- Clear Water & Sewerage +plus+ Garbage Pick-Up & Recycling * Winter Heating and Summer Air Conditioning Owns Two Cars -with- Good Safe Public Roads to Drive-on +plus+ Low Cost Fuel Owns Four Color TVs -with- Multi-Channel+ Cable TV a/o Satellite TV Owns Two PCs and Internet Devices -with- High Speed Internet in the Home Has Ready Access to Low Cost Food -at- The Local/Neighborhood SuperMarket Has Ready Access to Low Cost Consumer Goods -at- The Local/Town/City Shopping Mall Has Access To The Highest Full Time Employment Rates -aka- 'Open Job Market' in the Industrialized World for the Larger Populated Countries/Nations -wrt- G8/G20 plus,,, Plus... PLUS ! ! ! -drum-roll-please- We Now Have Obama-Care© :o) yeah it's real tough being a 'serf' in 21st century america ~ RHF Â*. Â*. You are a VERY confused and warped individual. very. Conservatives, sit up and take notice who is speaking for you and what is being said in your name. That is, of course, unless he's a troll. |
Capitalism is Perverse
N∅ ∅baMa∅ wrote:
With that choice, the original Americans created a civilization out of the wilderness. With that choice, we Americans of today can rescue our civilization from the wilderness of the Fascist Left led by President Zero. The original Americans were the people who were here when the crazy cultists arrived from Holland or wherever they came from. My people also killed Indians, but we've always been pro-business. To equate what happened in Plymouth to derivatives trading is ludicrous. Options traders are parasites. They are going for the crumbs. |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
On Nov 27, 3:44Â*pm, "Chas. Chan" wrote:
the fascists are righties, and everyone knows it, but low functioning, low information conservatives/libertarians/fascists. The aristocrats and gentlemen of the Right who made up the majority of Hitler's cabinet hated the concept of democracy even more than the Nazis did, All over Germany, thugs in brown shirts took possession of the streets and roughed up Communists, socialists, and Jews; they chased socialist mayors and officials out of government buildings http://www.buy.com/prod/hitler-and-h.../30426378.html Chapter 1: Financing the 1933 Elections On the cold winter weekend of January 28, 1933, Germany was officially without a government. Chancellor Kurt von Schleicher and his cabinet had resigned on Saturday afternoon, and eighty-six-year-old President von Hindenburg had not yet appointed a new chancellor. A nervous tension spread over Berlin. Everyone waited for news; most felt Germany was at an historic turning point. Who would be the next chancellor? Hitler - the leader of the largest party, the Nazis, who pledged to destroy democracy? Papen - the aristocratic horseman who had been chancellor before Schleicher, but who had no popular following? Perhaps Schleicher again, if he could persuade the Social Democrats, the second largest political party in the country, to join him in a coalition? Governing Germany in the middle of an economic depression with nine million unemployed was not an enviable task. The country had just had three different chancellors in rapid succession. By tradition, the leader of the largest party was usually appointed chancellor. But the Nazis had been the largest party for over a year, and so far intrigues and political maneuvering had succeeded in keeping Hitler out of power. Everyone guessed what a Hitler government would mean. He had not kept his militarism, anti- Semitism, and dictatorial ambitions a secret. Political intrigues were so numerous that weekend that no one really knew what was going on. Sensational rumors were being spread throughout the city. Some said an army coup was imminent, that Schleicher and the generals were about to abduct President von Hindenburg and declare martial law. There were also rumors of an armed Nazi uprising and a general strike by the socialist workers. Hitler and Hermann Goering, the second most powerful man in the Nazi party, stayed up all night on Sunday, January 29, trying to figure out what Hindenburg might do. It was not until after 10 A.M. on Monday that Hitler received a summons to the president's office. Even at that point, the Nazis were not certain whether Hitler would be appointed chancellor or Hindenburg would ask him to serve as vice-chancellor. Across the street from the Chancellery, in the Kaiserhof Hotel, Hitler's lieutenants were waiting, unsure of what was going on. Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda chief, said: In the street the crowd stands waiting between the Kaiserhof and the Chancellery. We are torn between doubt, hope, joy and despair. We have been deceived too often to be able, wholeheartedly, to believe in the great miracle. [S.A.] Chief of Staff Roehm stands at the window (with binoculars) watching the door of the Chancellery from which the Fuehrer [the leader, Hitler] must emerge. We shall be able to judge by his face if the interview was a success. Torturing hours of waiting. At last, a car draws up in front of the entrance. The crowd cheers. They seem to feel that a great change is taking place.... A few moments later, he is with us. He says nothing. His eyes are full of tears. It has come! The Fuehrer is appointed Chancellor. He has already been sworn in by the President of the Reich. All of us are dumb with emotion. Everyone clasps the Fuehrer's hand....Outside the Kaiserhof, the masses are in a wild uproar....The thousands soon become tens of thousands. Endless streams of people flood the Wilhelmstrasse. We set to work...at once. Hitler's victory was not a complete one by any means. He had been appointed chancellor in a coalition government. Papen was to be his vice-chancellor, and all the powerful cabinet posts were held by Papen's conservative allies, rather than the Nazis. But at the moment, Hitler's followers weren't worried about the details; for them the only thing that mattered was that Hitler was chancellor. They had come to power! All day, crowds gathered in the square outside the Kaiserhof Hotel and the Chancellery. At dusk Nazi storm troopers in their brown uniforms gathered in the Tiergarten park, along with men of the Stahlhelm, an ultranationalistic veterans' organization, for a torchlight victory parade through the center of Berlin. As soon as it was dark, they came marching by the thousands through the Brandenburg Gate, carrying swastika flags and the black, white, and red flags of the German empire. Bands marched between the units, beating their big drums as the men sang old German military songs. But as each band came to the Pariser Platz, where the French embassy was located, they stopped whatever they were playing and, with an introductory roll of drums, broke into the tune of the challenging war song "Victorious We Will Crush the French." The torches carried by the marchers glowed hypnotically in the darkness. To foreign witnesses, it was a frightening sight. "The river of fire flowed past the French Embassy," Ambassador François-Poncet wrote, "whence, with heavy heart and filled with foreboding, I watched this luminous wake." Liberal Germans found it an "ominous sight." It was, wrote one German reporter, "a night of deadly menace, a nightmare in...blazing torches." As the marchers came by the Chancellery, there were tumultuous cheers for Hitler, who stood in an open window saluting them. He was so excited that night, he could hardly stand still. He was raising his arm up and down heiling, smiling, and laughing so much, his eyes filled with tears. "It was an extraordinary experience," recalled Papen, who was standing behind Hitler. "The endless repetition of the triumphal cry: 'Heil, Heil, Sieg Heil!' rang in my ears like a tocsin." When Hitler turned to speak with Papen, his voice choked with emotion. "What an immense task we have set for ourselves, Herr von Papen - we must never part until our work is accomplished." Hitler and Papen were much closer allies than anyone at the time imagined. It was after midnight when the parade ended. Being too excited to sleep, Hitler, Goering, Goebbels, and a few other Nazis sat up talking for hours. They could hardly believe it had actually happened: they were in the Chancellery at last. That evening, Hitler said to Goebbels, "No one gets me out of here alive." It was one of the few promises he kept. On the morning of January 31, Hitler's storm troopers gave the German people a glimpse of what Nazi rule would be like. All over Germany, thugs in brown shirts took possession of the streets and roughed up Communists, socialists, and Jews; they chased socialist mayors and officials out of government buildings and even broke into the private homes of their political enemies. When people complained to Papen, he laughed. "Let the storm troopers have their fling." Among his friends at the Herrenklub, an exclusive gentlemens club, he boasted: "We've hired Hitler." To a skeptic he replied: "What do you want? I have Hindenburg's confidence. Within two months we will have pushed Hitler so far in the corner that he'll squeak." The facts seemed to support Papen's optimism. Not only did Papen have Hindenburg"s confidence, but in fact the old president had promised never to receive Hitler unless he was accompanied by his vice- chancellor. Papen also held the important post of minister-president of Prussia, Germany's largest and most powerful state. From the composition of the cabinet, it seemed all the real power was in the hands of the conservatives: the aristocratic General von Blomberg was minister of defense, Baron von Neurath, a career diplomat, was foreign minister, and the old archreactionary Hugenberg was both minister of economics and minister of agriculture. The Nazis were outnumbered six to two. The two Nazis in the cabinet, Wilhelm Frick and Goering, held posts that were thought to be insignificant. Frick was minister of the interior, but he did not control the police, which in Germany was under the jurisdiction of the individual state governments. Goering was made minister without portfolio, but with the promise that he would be minister of aviation as soon as Germany had an air force. He was also named minister of the interior of Prussia, an office that did not receive much notice by the public but did control the Prussian police. The aristocrats and gentlemen of the Right who made up the majority of Hitler's cabinet hated the concept of democracy even more than the Nazis did. These men belonged to the old ruling class of the kaiser's Germany. They wanted to regain their old position of supremacy, lost in 1918. They wanted to restore the monarchy, suppress the socialist unions, avenge the loss of World War I, and make Germany the dominant power in Europe. It was obvious why such reactionary nationalists helped put Hitler in power: their goals and his were very similar. Few people knew the full extent of Papen's collaboration with Hitler. Historians have said he "did more than anyone else outside the Nazi party to help Hitler to power." Papen helped Hitler because he was trying to control him and use the Nazis for his own aims. Papen was a handsome aristocratic-looking man with distinguished gray hair and an officer's mustache. From an impoverished family of the Westphalian nobility, he became a General Staff officer, a skillful horseman, and a man of great charm. After a successful marriage to the daughter of a wealthy Saar industrialist, he bought a large block of shares in the Center party's newspaper, Germania. For a short time in 1932, Papen was chancellor, but his government had no popular support. Papen believed it would be rather easy for an aristocratic officer like himself to manipulate a former corporal, like Hitler, and thus be able to use the Nazi's mass following to accomplish the aims of the upper-class conservative nationalists. Hitler immediately began to outmaneuver his conservative colleagues. He reported to the cabinet that the Center party was making impossible demands and could not be counted on to form a coalition with the Nazis and the Nationalists that would have a majority in the Reichstag. Because of this situation, Hitler argued he would have to call for new elections. The only "demand" the Center party made was that Hitler promise to govern constitutionally, but none of the other members of the cabinet bothered to check Hitler's statement. They agreed to new elections on the condition that Hitler promise that the composition of the cabinet would not change regardless of the outcome of the voting. New elections would provide Hitler with a chance to improve on the poor results the Nazis had received at the polls the past November. If the Nazis won a clear majority in the elections, they might be able to get rid of their coalition partners. Hitler had every reason to believe the election campaign would be a big success. The entire machinery of government, including the radio, was now under Nazi control and could be used for campaigning. The party had been flooded with new applicants for membership since he had become chancellor. In the cabinet meeting on February 2, Hitler discussed his preparations for the elections. Wilhelm Frick, the Nazi minister of the interior, proposed that the government set aside a million marks for the election campaign. Count von Schwerin von Krosigk, the minister of finance, rejected this suggestion. Hitler did not force the issue. He would have to get the money elsewhere. The theme of the Nazi election campaign was to be the fight against communism. Hitler opened the attack in a late-night radio broadcast to the nation on February 1. He blamed the hard times Germany had gone through since 1918 on the Social Democrats, which had been the largest party in the Reichstag during most of those years. The Social Democrats, he reminded his listeners, were actually a Marxist party. "Fourteen years of Marxism," he said, "have ruined Germany; one year of bolshevism [communism] would destroy her. The richest and fairest territories of the world would be turned into a smoking heap of ruins. Even the sufferings of the last decade and a half could not be compared to the misery of a Europe in the heart of which the red flag of destruction has been hoisted." He went on to promise to put the unemployed back to work and save the peasants from bankruptcy. 
On his fourth day in office, just after opening the election campaign, Hitler took time off to attend a very important dinner. He had been invited to the home of General von Hammerstein, chief of staff of the army, to meet the leading officers of the army and navy. In a speech that lasted almost two hours, Hitler explained his plans for rebuilding German military power. The generals were the real power in Germany during the Weimar period. After World War II, many Germans tried to cover up the role certain members of the Officer Corps had played in helping to put Hitler in power. Many historians naively accepted this view, but the real story is quite different. Traditionally, the German Army ruled from behind the scenes and had the final "power to veto" any important issue. After the loss of World War I, the Versailles Treaty severely restricted the size of the German Army. The only way the generals could maintain mass training and develop new weapons was to finance private paramilitary units, like the Free Corps, with secret army funds. Hitler not only began his career as an army agent, but even in the 1930s he was supported by a powerful faction in the army. Over several years, General von Schleicher, who was in charge of a secret informal political department of the army, funneled over ten million marks to Hitler. Why? Many military officers wanted an authoritarian government that could unify the nation. The people needed to be infused with a new spirit of patriotism because powerful interests were planning a war of revenge against the Allies. Naturally there was a division of opinion among the generals as to how much power to give Hitler. Hindenburg originally had strong reservations about appointing a man from a lower-class background, like Hitler, chancellor. However, the aggressive action the Nazis took against Communists was admired by Hindenburg, and his relationship with Hitler rapidly improved. One day, Hindenburg summoned Hitler when Papen was away from Berlin. Hitler informed the president that Papen was out of town and reminded him of the rule he (Hindenburg) had made, that the chancellor could visit him only when accompanied by the vice-chancellor. "The old gentleman [Hindenburg]," said Hitler, "replied that he wished to see me alone, and that in the future the presence of Papen could be regarded as unnecessary. Within three weeks, he had progressed so far that his attitude towards me became affectionate and paternal. Talking of the elections fixed for the 3rd of March, he said, 'What are we going to do if you fail to get a majority? We shall have the same difficulties all over again.'" At the beginning of the election campaign, Hitler and Papen persuaded old President von Hindenburg to sign an emergency decree to protect law and order. The decree gave Nazi officials the right to prohibit public meetings. Newspapers could be suppressed if they "incited" civil disobedience or published "false" reports. |
Something-To-Think-About : Forcing Our First African-American 'Black'US Prez-A-Duntz To Live In A Place Called "The White House" . . .
On Nov 26, 7:32Â*pm, RHF wrote:
On Nov 26, 1:09Â*pm, ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung wrote: On Thanksgiving Day, Americans gather with their family and friends to celebrate the blessings that Providence has bestowed on their beloved country. A deep appreciation of these blessings involves understanding that they were earned. Â*It is to understand the awesome truth of how "God helps those who help themselves" applies to the Mayflower Pilgrims and their First Thanksgiving at America's birth. This is an appreciation and understanding of which those on the Left are incapable - for it would mean celebrating the capitalist freedom that made that original Thanksgiving possible. Â*This no liberal, no Democrat, no leftie can do. Â*Thus they must distort history instead. The distortion starts in Kindergarten, with the childish make-believe of your kid's school play portraying the noble Squanto teaching the helpless Pilgrims how to feed themselves. So let's drop the curtain on the distortion and watch the real thing. Here it is. http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/4314/2/ The Tale of the Pilgrims -- Why It Needs to Be Taught The study of the history and culture of one's own country is a vital element of education. It is important for children to understand how and why they are living the way they are now and that it is a result of what people who lived before them have done. They need to be able to connect the dots -- these prevailing thoughts led to fights, these ideas led to prosperity, this action led to that one, and so on. It is from making these kinds of connections that the child learns how to think logically. The tale of the Pilgrims who came to America to escape tyranny is a heroic and moving story. Most children have been told the basic story of Thanksgiving. Here are some more facts for your own information or that you may want to discuss with your child this holiday: http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/...pilgrims_why_i... - You Mean You Did Not Get Your 'Free' Obama Turkey ! - - oh that's right 'bho' is still in the white house . . . - - now think about it . . . Having Our First African-American - 'Black' US Prez-A-Duntz having to Live in a place called - "The White House" . . . that's 'pure' racism . . . ~ RHF - Â*. - Â*. Something-To-Think-About : Forcing Our First African-American 'Black' US Prez-A-Duntz To Live In A Place Called "The White House" . . . ! ! ! NOW AIN'T THAT PURE RACISM ? ? ? Why Didn't Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats Fix This When She Was Speaker of the House, and They Controlled the House of the US Congress http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Pelosi -name-change- The People's House -or- Freedom House Why Didn't Harry Reid and the Democrats Fix This When He Was Majority Leader of the Senate, and They Controlled the Senate of the US Congress http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Reid -name-change- The House of the People -or- Great House of Freedom Matter-of-Fact : Why Ain't The Congressional 'Black' Caucus Demanded a Name Change for "The White House" with the Election of Our First African-American US Prez-A-Duntz ? -what's-up-wit-dat-cbc-?- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Black_Caucus yeah - i been thinking again - o-u-c-h-! ~ RHF |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
On Nov 27, 2:29Â*pm, N∅ ∅baMa∅
wrote: On Nov 27, 1:13Â*pm, bpnjensen wrote: You are a VERY confused and warped individual. You are a very bankrupt and penniless Serf. Poor drooling right wing scum. You voted for the Bush administration that was led by three draft dodger. You, a gutless coward, would never vote for Kerry, a man who proudly wore his nations uniform. Nope, you voted for Bush, Cheney and Rove, three pieces of human detritus who never, ever served their country in war time. They ran away from war, just like you. So who died to give us the Bush Administration? |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
On 11/27/10 23:15 , Nickname unavailable wrote:
On Nov 27, 3:44 pm, "Chas. wrote: the fascists are righties, and everyone knows it, but low functioning, low information conservatives/libertarians/fascists. The aristocrats and gentlemen of the Right who made up the majority of Hitler's cabinet hated the concept of democracy even more than the Nazis did, All over Germany, thugs in brown shirts took possession of the streets and roughed up Communists, socialists, and Jews; they chased socialist mayors and officials out of government buildings The hunger for power, and the taste for abuse, does not define and is not defined by a left/right paradigm. Similarly, the hunger for power need not be rooted in anything more than a vision of how things may/should/could/need to be. Anyone, from any point on the political contiuum, may be driven to acquire power. And not all are pathological. Some may genuinely believe such drive is of the purest altruistic motives. How many wars, purges, and acts of genocide were initiated in the name of peace? Such a person will, by default, hate democracy, and any number of groups, ethnicities, and/or political intents that become politically inconvenient. Or useful. How many times have we heard in the last half century, 'never let a crisis go to waste.' All that is required for the abuse of power, is a belief that the ends justify the means. And that belief is not limited to either the left, or the right. Anyone may have it, develop it, or evolve to it. In other words... One not need be on the right to hunger for and enjoy the abuse of power. |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
On Nov 28, 10:30*am, "D. Peter Maus" wrote:
On 11/27/10 23:15 , Nickname unavailable wrote: On Nov 27, 3:44 pm, "Chas. *wrote: * the fascists are righties, and everyone knows it, but low functioning, low information conservatives/libertarians/fascists. The aristocrats and gentlemen of the Right who made up the majority of Hitler's cabinet hated the concept of democracy even more than the Nazis did, All over Germany, thugs in brown shirts took possession of the streets and roughed up Communists, socialists, and Jews; they chased socialist mayors and officials out of government buildings * *The hunger for power, and the taste for abuse, does not define and is not defined by a left/right paradigm. Similarly, the hunger for power need not be rooted in anything more than a vision of how things may/should/could/need to be. * *Anyone, from any point on the political contiuum, may be driven to acquire power. And not all are pathological. Some may genuinely believe such drive is of the purest altruistic motives. How many wars, purges, and acts of genocide were initiated in the name of peace? * *Such a person will, by default, hate democracy, and any number of groups, ethnicities, and/or political intents that become politically inconvenient. Or useful. How many times have we heard in the last half century, 'never let a crisis go to waste.' * *All that is required for the abuse of power, is a belief that the ends justify the means. And that belief is not limited to either the left, or the right. Anyone may have it, develop it, or evolve to it. * *In other words... * *One not need be on the right to hunger for and enjoy the abuse of power. that is pretty much correct, except, the right has a much longer history of offenses against humanity than the extreme left. the extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism, which lasted for 200 years. the out of control capitalism was defeated in 1945, but its on the rise again. both extremes are bad though. i see little difference between a free market economy(fascism), or a communist economy(marxism), in either system, almost all wealth and power end up in the hands of a few. |
THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM
On 10-11-28 07:19 AM, Kevin Cunningham wrote:
The pilgrims were......SOCIALISTS!!!!!!! Oh, the horror!!!!!!!!! They held property jointly, the decided to jointly defend themselves and they held money jointly. EVIL SOCIALSIST! Every one of them! Why did we allow these socialists into America????? If the Natives had known just how evil the newcomers were, they would have killed every single one them and burned the ships down to the water line. mike |
THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM
JFK: Who Didn't Have a Motive?
http://www.cryptome.org/index.html Scroll down and check out the article about Marilyn's Tush. Pure nicotine in her anus? cuhulin |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
On 11/28/10 11:16 , Nickname unavailable wrote:
the extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism Yes. Jealousy will do that. |
THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM
On Nov 26, 3:09Â*pm, ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung wrote:
On Thanksgiving Day, Americans gather with their family and friends to celebrate the blessings that Providence has bestowed on their beloved country. http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/...ims_why_i.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66QdQErc8JQ |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
On 10-11-28 11:20 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 11/28/10 11:16 , Nickname unavailable wrote: the extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism Yes. Jealousy will do that. That's like saying you envy the rapist for all the sex they're getting. Avarice, greed, theft, fraud and dishonesty in the extreme are nothing to be jealous of. Money earned honestly and by due diligence is nothing to be ashamed of. Unfortunately, that kind of wealth seems to getting in shorter and shorter supply. mike |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
On Nov 27, 1:09Â*pm, N∅ ∅baMa∅
wrote: On Nov 26, 5:01Â*pm, David Barts wrote: Debunked: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/r...x-reporter-cla... Debunking the Communist Debunked OR How little "David Barts" can't read anything except Mao's Little Red Book (as if he ever could). Pay close attention to the words. Â*Take it slow. Â*Maybe a sentence per hour and repeat. Â*Here we GO Komrade: THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler Thursday, 25 November 2010 http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/4314/2/ Liberal Fascists can't read. Let them watch TV http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66QdQErc8JQ |
Something-To-Think-About : Forcing Our First African-American'...
James Hoban was born in a thatched cottage in County Kilkenny,
Ireland.He designed the White House (formerly known as the President's House) in D.C. The White House was painted white for one of two reasons.To cover the scortch marks because the British burnt down the White House, or to protect the sandstone. Currently, America does NOT have a President, nor a VP either.A born in Kenya! SOB! ILLEGAL! INELIGIBLE! USURPER! SQUATTER! is squatting in Our White House! cuhulin |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
On 11/28/10 13:13 , m II wrote:
On 10-11-28 11:20 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: On 11/28/10 11:16 , Nickname unavailable wrote: the extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism Yes. Jealousy will do that. That's like saying you envy the rapist for all the sex they're getting. No it's not. |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
On Nov 28, 12:20*pm, "D. Peter Maus" wrote:
On 11/28/10 11:16 , Nickname unavailable wrote: the extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism * *Yes. Jealousy will do that. i really doubt that. extremism begets extremism. |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
On Nov 28, 1:13*pm, m II wrote:
On 10-11-28 11:20 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: On 11/28/10 11:16 , Nickname unavailable wrote: the extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism Yes. Jealousy will do that. That's like saying you envy the rapist for all the sex they're getting. Avarice, greed, theft, fraud and dishonesty in the extreme are nothing to be jealous of. Money earned honestly and by due diligence is nothing to be ashamed of. Unfortunately, that kind of wealth seems to getting in shorter and shorter supply. mike so well said. me thinks the one who responded to me might be a sociopath. devoid of remorse and empathy. |
Think-About-It : Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder -and- Fascism Is It's Terminal Stage©
On Nov 28, 4:56*pm, Nickname unavailable wrote:
On Nov 28, 1:13*pm, m II wrote: On 10-11-28 11:20 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: On 11/28/10 11:16 , Nickname unavailable wrote: the extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism Yes. Jealousy will do that. That's like saying you envy the rapist for all the sex they're getting. Avarice, greed, theft, fraud and dishonesty in the extreme are nothing to be jealous of. Money earned honestly and by due diligence is nothing to be ashamed of. Unfortunately, that kind of wealth seems to getting in shorter and shorter supply. mike - so well said. me thinks the one who responded to me - might be a sociopath. devoid of remorse and empathy. NnUa, NO - Anyone Who Responds To You Fully Realizes That You Are Just What You Attributed To Others : "A Sociopath. Devoid of Remorse and Empathy." and most likely a political bi-polar 'liberal' & 'fascist' ~ RHF -hint- Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder http://www.amazon.com/dp/1595550062 -and- Fascism Is It's Terminal Stage©*** |
Think-About-It : Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder -and- Fascism Is It's Terminal Stage©
On Nov 28, 9:36*pm, RHF wrote:
On Nov 28, 4:56*pm, Nickname unavailable wrote: On Nov 28, 1:13*pm, m II wrote: On 10-11-28 11:20 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: On 11/28/10 11:16 , Nickname unavailable wrote: the extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism Yes. Jealousy will do that. That's like saying you envy the rapist for all the sex they're getting. Avarice, greed, theft, fraud and dishonesty in the extreme are nothing to be jealous of. Money earned honestly and by due diligence is nothing to be ashamed of. Unfortunately, that kind of wealth seems to getting in shorter and shorter supply. mike - so well said. me thinks the one who responded to me - might be a sociopath. devoid of remorse and empathy. NnUa, NO - Anyone Who Responds To You Fully Realizes That You Are Just What You Attributed To Others : "A Sociopath. Devoid of Remorse and Empathy." and most likely a political bi-polar 'liberal' & 'fascist' ~ RHF -hint- Liberalism Is A Mental Disorderhttp://www.amazon.com/dp/1595550062 -and- Fascism Is It's Terminal Stage©*** *. =WRT= "LIBERAL-FASCISM" : LET THERE BE A REPLY !http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...c3b4dac799e1f8 *. Is It 'Liberal Fascist' ? -or- Is It "Liberal-Fascist" ? *. The Two Words When -Hyphenated- Are Not 'Redundant' : Because the -Hyphenated- between Joins them Together into a New Evolved Meaning and Relevance for the Present Day.http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...ab049daef0659c *. Liberals-R-Us : The Liberal "Oxymoron" Rule : It Is Impossible For Liberals To Be Fascists !http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...69f5dc4b1df3c2 *. Idiot's-R-Us -proclaims- A New Evolved Concept "Liberal-Fascist" : Two Words That Are -Hyphenated- "Joined-Together" Having New Evolved Meaning !http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...ab049daef0659c *. Alas... A Self-Evident Truth "Liberal-Fascist" : Is A Self-Evident Truth : Denying that "Liberal-Fascism" Exists and the Validity of the Term "Liberal-Fascist" in the 21st Century does NOT Change the Fact or 'possibility' that "Liberal-Fascist" is Real or at least 'possible' . . .http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...455c3e209e5137 *. *. NnUa - "sociopath" NnUa - "devoid of remorse and empathy" *. - - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - - [: To Liberal-Fascist {Democrat} Name Calling :] ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument : When An Ever So Super-Smart "Enlightened" Liberal Democrat Socialist Starts Fascist Name Calling*.http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...8979fbe8546cfa * They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional + Plus They Often Snip/Delete What You Wrote : To Disguise Their Complete Inability To Carry The Argument Forward. -that-is-how-i-see-it- ~ RHF© *. *** © This is another Copy-Righted 'Brain Fart' of RHF -wrt- 'Brain Fart' -yeah- This Idea(s) Stinks -pew(pu)- *. *. it matter not how many personalities and alias's that you have. they all smell of the same thing, crap. all of your personalities are doing what conservatives/libertarians/fascists do best, project. |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
D. Peter Maus wrote:
All that is required for the abuse of power, is a belief that the ends justify the means. And that belief is not limited to either the left, or the right. Anyone may have it, develop it, or evolve to it. In other words... One not need be on the right to hunger for and enjoy the abuse of power. Power is inherently corrupt. No one is immune. People who need leaders that much are sheeple. They deserve to be slaves. |
Love of money root of many evils
D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 11/28/10 11:16 , Nickname unavailable wrote: the extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism Yes. Jealousy will do that. Only the spiritually bereft would want to throw their lives away on accumulating wealth beyond one's needs. |
Our First HALFricanTo Live In A Place Called "The White House". . .
Bob Dobbs wrote:
RHF wrote: Something-To-Think-About : Forcing Our First African-American 'Black' US Prez-A-Duntz To Live In A Place Called "The White House" . . . Didn't they have to remove the "colored" entrance sign around back of the white house just before his inauguration? And what about all those TV news trucks that were waiting back there? He's half white ya' know. Besides, wasn't Clinton the first Black president? Maybe they should do a checkered flag motif... |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
m II wrote:
Yes. Jealousy will do that. That's like saying you envy the rapist for all the sex they're getting. Avarice, greed, theft, fraud and dishonesty in the extreme are nothing to be jealous of. Money earned honestly and by due diligence is nothing to be ashamed of. Unfortunately, that kind of wealth seems to getting in shorter and shorter supply. Brother Peter listens to Citadel Broadcasting all day long, which means a right wing local morning show, Limbaugh, Hannity, either Savage or Levin, then a right wing afternoon drive local show. He listens to headlines on NPR, but it just reinforces his perception of a giant socialist media conspiracy. He cant listen to the BBC World Service anymore, because they're "in on it" too. Truthiness is French and gay. |
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
D. Peter Maus wrote:
That's like saying you envy the rapist for all the sex they're getting. No it's not. It is. Whatever capitalism used to be, today it is not. It originally provided opportunity to take a risk and maybe make some money. No guarantee, but an even playing field. The reward was proportional to the risk taken by the capitalist. Today there is much less risk but much more reward. Profits are privatized; liabilities are too often are written off, leaving the rest of us to take up the slack, essentially socializing the risk and removing it from the equation. The playing field is nowhere close to even. You support a flawed obscene institution. |
Think-About-It : Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder -and- Fascism Is It's Terminal Stage©
On Nov 28, 8:59Â*pm, Nickname unavailable wrote:
On Nov 28, 9:36Â*pm, RHF wrote: On Nov 28, 4:56Â*pm, Nickname unavailable wrote: On Nov 28, 1:13Â*pm, m II wrote: On 10-11-28 11:20 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: On 11/28/10 11:16 , Nickname unavailable wrote: the extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism Yes. Jealousy will do that. That's like saying you envy the rapist for all the sex they're getting. Avarice, greed, theft, fraud and dishonesty in the extreme are nothing to be jealous of. Money earned honestly and by due diligence is nothing to be ashamed of. Unfortunately, that kind of wealth seems to getting in shorter and shorter supply. mike - so well said. me thinks the one who responded to me - might be a sociopath. devoid of remorse and empathy. NnUa, NO - Anyone Who Responds To You Fully Realizes That You Are Just What You Attributed To Others : "A Sociopath. Devoid of Remorse and Empathy." and most likely a political bi-polar 'liberal' & 'fascist' ~ RHF -hint- Liberalism Is A Mental Disorderhttp://www.amazon.com/dp/1595550062 -and- Fascism Is It's Terminal Stage©*** Â*. =WRT= "LIBERAL-FASCISM" : LET THERE BE A REPLY !http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...c3b4dac799e1f8 Â*. Is It 'Liberal Fascist' ? -or- Is It "Liberal-Fascist" ? Â*. The Two Words When -Hyphenated- Are Not 'Redundant' : Because the -Hyphenated- between Joins them Together into a New Evolved Meaning and Relevance for the Present Day.http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...ab049daef0659c Â*. Liberals-R-Us : The Liberal "Oxymoron" Rule : It Is Impossible For Liberals To Be Fascists !http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...69f5dc4b1df3c2 Â*. Idiot's-R-Us -proclaims- A New Evolved Concept "Liberal-Fascist" : Two Words That Are -Hyphenated- "Joined-Together" Having New Evolved Meaning !http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...ab049daef0659c Â*. Alas... A Self-Evident Truth "Liberal-Fascist" : Is A Self-Evident Truth : Denying that "Liberal-Fascism" Exists and the Validity of the Term "Liberal-Fascist" in the 21st Century does NOT Change the Fact or 'possibility' that "Liberal-Fascist" is Real or at least 'possible' . . .http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...455c3e209e5137 Â*. Â*. NnUa - "sociopath" NnUa - "devoid of remorse and empathy" Â*. - - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - - [: To Liberal-Fascist {Democrat} Name Calling :] ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument : When An Ever So Super-Smart "Enlightened" Liberal Democrat Socialist Starts Fascist Name Calling*.http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...8979fbe8546cfa * They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional + Plus They Often Snip/Delete What You Wrote : To Disguise Their Complete Inability To Carry The Argument Forward. -that-is-how-i-see-it- ~ RHF© Â*. *** © This is another Copy-Righted 'Brain Fart' of RHF -wrt- 'Brain Fart' -yeah- This Idea(s) Stinks -pew(pu)- Â*. Â*. - it matter not how many personalities and alias's - that you have. I am an original one of a kind -&- I Am -who- I AM [.] -no-alias;s-required- |
Think-About-It : Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder -and- Fascism...
Macdonald's is starting a burger flipper college.You can get yourself a
burger flippin PHD. cuhulin |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com