Watching 5:00 PM WLBT 3 tee vee news.

http://www.devilfinder.com
Smith County,Mississippi has the highest risk of tornados than any other
Counties in the United States

That is what Bert Case said, he didn't say devilfinder.com though.

The three deadliest tornados in recorded history happened in
Mississippi.

Dixie Alley? First time I have heard of that before.I reckon they had to
tack some kind of a name on that.Smith County isn't far South of doggy's
couch.
cuhulin

On 01/04/2011 01:26 PM, D Peter Maus wrote:
On 1/4/11 14:57 , Joe from Kokomo wrote:

On 1/4/11 10:19 , wrote:

Sorry, but it's a philosophical statement. Federalist papers are not
law

On 1/4/2011 11:22 AM, D Peter Maus wrote:

The Constitution, however, is.

And as George W. Bush so famously put it, the Constitution is...nothing
more than a piece of paper.

Heck of a statement, Georgie!


Actually, that story was debunked years ago.

When? Where?

G.W.Bush said something to the affect/effect, Stop waving that piece of
paper in front of me!
cuhulin

On 01/04/2011 01:41 PM, RHF wrote:
-aka- The Grand Exalted AssHole [@] of the Posteri Maximus !

It's a total 180 from the DOC to the Constitution. From self-evident and
unalienable to "here's a list of some apparently not so self-evident
rights which aren't all of them."

http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin271.htm

http://www.devilfinder.com
What did G.W.Bush say about the United States Constitution?

G.W.Bush is NOT a Republican, Certainly NOT a Real Republican.He is a
Damn liberal.

I can tape a Republican card to my dog's dog collar.Would that mean she
is a card carrying Republican?
I don't think dogs think about that.
cuhulin

Fatty, proposing to Miss Crabtree ~ Our Gang on TCM.Fatty is a
smooooooth operator.
cuhulin

On 1/4/2011 9:37 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:53:19 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

On 1/4/2011 3:05 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:03:31 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

You don't have the right to broadcast things that could cause panic
(yell "fire" in a theater), that's a regulated activity

But pulling the fire alarm is OK......

No--not when there isn't a fire

Limpballs peddles fear, greed, corrupted history, and stupidity to a
segment of society least capable of using their intellect.

Hitler appealed to those kind---and innovated the means of selling it
to them

Just like Limpballs.

Hitler had power, Limbaugh has no power.

He's got the same mush-brained army of dolts that Hitler had in the
late 20's


Every day you call them stupid Limbaugh misfits, but today they are an
army that equals the one that almost took the world.....

On 1/4/11 20:38 , wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:26:02 -0600, D Peter
wrote:

On 1/4/11 14:57 , Joe from Kokomo wrote:

On 1/4/11 10:19 , wrote:

Sorry, but it's a philosophical statement. Federalist papers are not
law

On 1/4/2011 11:22 AM, D Peter Maus wrote:

The Constitution, however, is.

And as George W. Bush so famously put it, the Constitution is...nothing
more than a piece of paper.

Heck of a statement, Georgie!


Actually, that story was debunked years ago.

No---I don't think so


Yes, it was. Often. Even Mathews reported that it wasn't true. And he
was one of Bush's most outspoken opponents.

On 1/4/11 20:42 , wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:33:07 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

Read it. Read the Federalist Papers, while you're at it.

THe constittution is a rule of law.


The Constitution is a rule of law. That law limits the power of
Government, and specifically guarantees the rights of the people.

The constitution is the framework of our republic, predicated on a set
of philosophical foundations, and establishes a consistent rule of
law.

The interpretation of it related
to enacted or codified law has allowed those "right" to be terminated,
modified, or regulated.

Interpretation allows its intent to be ignored.

The belief of an interpretation like that is to deny the foundation of
the constitution and 300 Yrs of established law.


Interpretation presupposes that an intent other than the text of the
document is required.

By definition, an interpretation is an inaccurate understanding, and
allows the intent of the text to be ignored.




Submission to tyranny as inevitable is as much a crime as the
tyranny, itself.

The federalist papers are not law--they carry NO legal weight

The Supremes disagree.

There is no USSC decision that any federalist paper provides legal
foundation to.

They were cited in the recent 2nd Amendment decision.

http://www.devilfinder.com
Electromagnetic Test Soviet Test 184
cuhulin