On Dec 31 2010, 2:41Â*am, Christopher Helms
wrote:
On Dec 30, 7:32Â*pm, Sheldon Cooper wrote:

On Dec 30, 4:24Â*pm, N∅ ∅baMa∅
wrote:

State adviser, Marxist also want more FCC control of airwaves

Does it ever occurs to these yahoos that in two years we're going to
have another President, and she'll be able to control what gets on the
air?

No president has ever been able to "control" what gets on the air.
Despite being a Fascist, Marxist, Maoist, Hitler worshipping supposed
"ultra leftist," the current one can't even prevent moneyed interests
from buying control of the public airwaves until the screaming,
fanatical, right wing voice is pretty much the only one anybody is
allowed to hear. Although he wanted to bomb Al Jazeera, the previous
president probably never felt much desire to control what got on the
air, since he got an uninterrupted eight year rim job from the
"liberal media" which allegedly hated him, but did an incredible job
of completely hiding it.

It is completely unacceptable to conservatives to have their
government telling them via something like The Fairness Doctrine that
they must allow dissenting voices on the public airwaves. It is not
only acceptable but desirable to conservatives to tell the public what
the public thinks by using money to smash dissenting voices to
smithereens like Wal Mart smashes local grocery store chains.

Your idea of "fairness" and "justice" is to IMPOSE YOUR idea of
"fairness" and "justice" by way of Liberal fascist government control
instead of the populace choosing what they wish to watch or listen via
the free and unfettered marketplace.

They tried your idea in the USSR while it still exists in that model
Utopia of N.Korea and Communist China to mention a few.
Yeap! It works great when you are a Liberal Fascist dictator - Heil
Hitler!
Once the likes of you have control we will all be singing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9L3h8bMdlD8