On Jan 4, 7:22*pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
On 1/4/11 20:38 , wrote:



On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:26:02 -0600, D Peter
wrote:

On 1/4/11 14:57 , Joe from Kokomo wrote:

On 1/4/11 10:19 , wrote:

Sorry, but it's a philosophical statement. Federalist papers are not
law

On 1/4/2011 11:22 AM, D Peter Maus wrote:

The Constitution, however, is.

And as George W. Bush so famously put it, the Constitution is...nothing
more than a piece of paper.

Heck of a statement, Georgie!

* *Actually, that story was debunked years ago.

No---I don't think so

- Yes, it was.
-Often.
- Even Mathews reported that it wasn't true.
- And he was one of Bush's most outspoken opponents.

DPM,

Actually I never took it as something GWB said.

The import {meaning} that got from the 'claimed'
statement by GWB :
"George W. Bush so famously put it, the Constitution
is...nothing more than a piece of paper."
=WAS=
# 1 - GWB Was To 'Dumb' To Read It.
# 2 - GWB Was To 'Stupid' To Understand It.
# 3 - To GWB Any 'Paper' With Writing On It
-was- "nothing more than a piece of paper"
based on # 1 & # 2.

The 'Claim' Was To Add Insult To GWB [The Man]
and To Injury GWB [The President] : In An Effort To
Diminish GWB 'The Man' and Destroy GWB 'The
President'.

Now Apply The Same To Prez Obama :
To Add Insult To BHO [The Man] and To Injury BHO
[The President] : In An Effort To Diminish BHO 'The
Man' and Destroy BHO 'The President'.