| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
January 7th 11, 10:08 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
Sherwood Engineering updates receiver performance list
|
|
#2
January 8th 11, 01:36 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sherwood Engineering updates receiver performance list
|
|
#3
January 8th 11, 02:33 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sherwood Engineering updates receiver performance list
On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 18:08:18 +0800, dave wrote:
On 01/08/2011 09:36 AM, wrote: http://www.sherweng.com/table.html Interesting. Jim(MI) It costs 3 times what I paid for my K3. The Yaesu price is ridiculous. I am looking at the new Kenwood down conversion TS-590S. It has good close-in performance and excellent sensitivity for $1750. Also, I notice sensitivity values apply for full hf band and it even has sensitivity specs stated for longwave (Universal web site). Jim(MI) |
|
#5
January 8th 11, 03:04 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sherwood Engineering updates receiver performance list
On 01/07/2011 06:33 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 18:08:18 +0800, wrote: On 01/08/2011 09:36 AM, wrote: http://www.sherweng.com/table.html Interesting. Jim(MI) It costs 3 times what I paid for my K3. The Yaesu price is ridiculous. I am looking at the new Kenwood down conversion TS-590S. It has good close-in performance and excellent sensitivity for $1750. Also, I notice sensitivity values apply for full hf band and it even has sensitivity specs stated for longwave (Universal web site). Jim(MI) You want a low IF if you're going to use meaningful filters. Upconversion is only required for seamless general coverage. |
|
#6
January 8th 11, 03:31 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sherwood Engineering updates receiver performance list
On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:47:35 -0500, wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:33:32 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 18:08:18 +0800, dave wrote: On 01/08/2011 09:36 AM, wrote: http://www.sherweng.com/table.html Interesting. Jim(MI) It costs 3 times what I paid for my K3. The Yaesu price is ridiculous. I am looking at the new Kenwood down conversion TS-590S. It has good close-in performance and excellent sensitivity for $1750. Also, I notice sensitivity values apply for full hf band and it even has sensitivity specs stated for longwave (Universal web site). Jim(MI) Does state that specs are guaranteed for ham bands only at bottom. Does not say which specs they are referring to and why state specs for longwave which are out of band? We need a receiver review. Who will volunteer? Lots of reviews for amateur use at: http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/9266 |
|
#7
January 8th 11, 08:58 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sherwood Engineering updates receiver performance list
On Jan 7, 9:47*pm, wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:33:32 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 18:08:18 +0800, dave wrote: On 01/08/2011 09:36 AM, wrote: http://www.sherweng.com/table.html Interesting. Jim(MI) It costs 3 times what I paid for my K3. The Yaesu price is ridiculous. I am looking at the new Kenwood down conversion TS-590S. It has good close-in performance and excellent sensitivity for $1750. Also, I notice sensitivity values apply for full hf band and it even has sensitivity specs stated for longwave (Universal web site). Jim(MI) Does state that specs are guaranteed for ham bands only at bottom. Does not say which specs they are referring to and why state specs for longwave which are out of band? We need a receiver review. Who will volunteer?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How do we test them? |
|
#8
January 8th 11, 01:10 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sherwood Engineering updates receiver performance list
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 00:58:23 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:47*pm, wrote: On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:33:32 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 18:08:18 +0800, dave wrote: On 01/08/2011 09:36 AM, wrote: http://www.sherweng.com/table.html Interesting. Jim(MI) It costs 3 times what I paid for my K3. The Yaesu price is ridiculous. I am looking at the new Kenwood down conversion TS-590S. It has good close-in performance and excellent sensitivity for $1750. Also, I notice sensitivity values apply for full hf band and it even has sensitivity specs stated for longwave (Universal web site). Jim(MI) Does state that specs are guaranteed for ham bands only at bottom. Does not say which specs they are referring to and why state specs for longwave which are out of band? We need a receiver review. Who will volunteer?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How do we test them? A lot of amateurs are buying them. When I talk to somebody that has one I will find out what they think. Hopefully they have done at least some out of band listening. Also have to check on utube and see if anyone posts a demo. Jim |
|
#9
January 8th 11, 05:28 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
eHAM -Reviews- Receivers : General Coverage {HF & SWL}
On 01/08/2011 02:17 AM, RHF wrote:
Unless you want a ham transceiver the only choice you have for a high-performance SWL receiver is for one of the excellent black box radios that require a host PC. I think there's one for about $500 that Sherwood ranks well. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Drake filter by Sherwood Engineering | Boatanchors | |||
| What Sherwood Engineering specifications mean. | Shortwave | |||
| Shortwave (HF) Receiver Test Data -by- Sherwood Engineering Inc. - Updated 23 April 2007 | Shortwave | |||
| FA: Sherwood Engineering SE-3 HF Phase Locked Detector | Swap | |||
| Sherwood Engineering Inc | Shortwave | |||
Linear Mode
