Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/17/2011 09:49 AM, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Note that there is no recent research on the use of these devices. There is an article that has been referenced here several times. It was written 14 years ago, and commented that the need for a 9:1 transformer was lessend (and maybe eliminated) by a modern receiver. The author did mention that it was needed for a "Sky Buddy", but I'm not sure there were many of them in use then or now. Geoff. If you want to use coaxial cable with a random wire you need a transformer. The only reason some people notice no difference is because they are listening to absurdly high power transmitters. Impedance matching (or at the least proper bridging) makes a big difference when DXing weak signals like Utes and Tropical Band 50 Watters, Ham Radio, etc. If all you're trying to hear are =/ 50 thousand Watt stations it's not as critical. Good operating practice dictates you try to follow the rule whenever practicable. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
M0UKD's 9:1 Magnetic Long Wire Balun [UnUn] -A-'How-To'-In-Pictures- | Shortwave | |||
SWL Newbies : The Magnetic Long-Wire Antenna Balun - A Balun It Ain't | Shortwave | |||
Balun vs. Unun | Shortwave | |||
Long/random-wire balun and grounding Q (longish) | Antenna | |||
Long Wire Balun | Antenna |