|
Burn in Hell Ronald Reagan
"dave" wrote in message . .. On 01/26/2011 09:32 AM, MNMikew wrote: wrote in message Of course he's the writer. Favreau is on his staff. Favreau's title is speech writer. Director of Speechwriting Meaning he has more than one? Gasp! |
Burn in Hell Ronald Reagan
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:08:25 -0800, dave wrote:
On 01/26/2011 06:50 AM, MNMikew wrote: LOL! How much of last nights speech did Obama write? You might want to look up Jon Favreau. Look up? I saw a news piece yesterday about how they collaborate and how Jon Favreau starts from essentially an outline and Obama tweeks that, and so on. The editing is perfectionist, and very much Obama's work. So far you nor the other poster that agreed with you has provided an iota of anything credible to back up your stupid assumptions. You have basically stated that the previous president didn;t even know what he was going to be speaking about until his speech writer told him thus implying that the the speechwriters are really the ones that made policy. And you have proof of such idiocy where? |
Burn in Hell Ronald Reagan
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:32:08 -0600, "MNMikew"
wrote: "dave" wrote in message ... On 01/26/2011 08:21 AM, MNMikew wrote: wrote in message . .. On 01/26/2011 06:50 AM, MNMikew wrote: LOL! How much of last nights speech did Obama write? You might want to look up Jon Favreau. Look up? I saw a news piece yesterday about how they collaborate and how Jon Favreau starts from essentially an outline and Obama tweeks that, and so on. The editing is perfectionist, and very much Obama's work. So you admit Obama is merely the editor, not the writer. Of course he's the writer. Favreau is on his staff. Favreau's title is speech writer. There is a reason several posters here refer to Dave as "Special Dave". Remember, it's not nice to pick on the mentally retarded. |
Burn in Hell Ronald Reagan
On Jan 26, 4:32*pm, First Post wrote:
You have basically stated that the previous president didn;t even know what he was going to be speaking about until his speech writer told him thus implying that the the speechwriters are really the ones that made policy. And you have proof of such idiocy where? Why don't you prove that they all knew the speeches word for word, then. |
Burn in Hell Ronald Reagan
"Out of the China Blue" wrote in message
... In article , First Post wrote: On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 06:07:52 -0800, dave wrote: On 01/25/2011 05:25 AM, RHF wrote: President Barack Obama Speaks {Writes} In Praise of former president Ronald Reagan http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...gan-president- obama_N.htm . ? WHY : Simply as a 'nice' thing for President Obama to do to Commemorate the 100th Birthday of former president Ronald Reagan. Reagan can burn in Hell for selling America to the bankers and the Chinese. You can draw a straight line from everything wrong today to the black Heart of Ronald Wison Reagan. At least that's what you've been fed. And of course you can't draw any of those lines yourself so you simply believe other morons talking such trash. Reagan fired air traffic controllers leading to an immediate crisis. 20 years later they all retired at the same time creating another crisis. This should repeat every 20 years, with lessenning intensity, until retirements become better spread out. Reagan released savings+loans from investment constraints whilst keeping FSLIC guarentees in place. This allowed S+Ls to gamble freely with the government coverring their losses. They lost. S+Ls like FSLIC no longer exist, and RTC was a money losing business. This established the precedent for banks to gamble on a larger scale with the government coverring their losses. Reagan began dismantling Depression era regulation of banks. Up till then the government guarenteed their losses, but it also put heavy restrictions on their gambling; after Reagan, Bush, Bush, and a few Republican congresses, the government still guarenteed their losses, but with practically no gambling restrictions. Bush gave us TARP, which was RTC on steroids. Reagan abandonned all alternative energy projects, forcing the US to become more deeply involved in Middle East politics, leading to three expensive wars, and ongoing attrition such as Beirut, Cole, Khobar. Reagan abandonned all alternative energy projects, leaving Americans with no viable alternatives at each subsequent recurring gasoline price spike. Each spike has put the US economy into spasms. Reagan cut taxes and increased government borrowing to avoid balancing the budget. This led to a disconnect between revenue and spending, such that a whole generation has come to age being taught that taxes are punishment and have no relation whatsoever to government spending. Reagan cut taxes and increased government borrowing to avoid balancing the budget. This led to continual deficits and increasing debt. Interest on the debt acts as indirect tax; the debt ties up money unavailable to businesses; the size of debt increases the perceived risk of default and higher interest demands. Reagan began excessive, unnecessary military spending, coverring the spending with pseudopatriotism. It is now a parasite on the republic that is slowly draining away vitality, while it is politically immune from control. Reagan began SDI which to date has only served to waste revenues, **** off Russia, give Americans a false sense of security, and kept defence contractors in champagne and caviar. Reagan closed mental hospitals, to move patients to less expensive community residential facilities. Reagan didn't fund community residential facilities. This has resulted in seriously mentally ill abandonned to live on the streets until their inability to control their behaviour leads to felony convictions. Prisons have become mental hospitals, a function they perform more expensively and less competently than hospitals they replaced. The mentally ill are traumatised beyond any hope of recovery. Reagan began the attacks on public colleges and universities. These colleges had produced the professionals that transformed the economy from agarian to high tech. Now higher education is given such short shrift that centres of innovation are moving out of the US to India and China. Young adults and teenagers are simply not trained to maintain the economy they will inherit. Reagan attacked productive, salaried workers in favour nonproductive speculators. This has resulted in economy that punishes and demoralises people who are actually producing new wealth in favour of people who merely gamble with other people's productive capacity and produce nothing of value themselves. Even the ability to create new value is disappearing from the US. Reagan made it easier to acquire a prosperous company and then break it up and sell it off to pay off junk bonds. Thus publicly traded business no longer maintain a savings reserve, but rather keep their companies in perpetual debt to discourage raids. This means businesses require constant use of credit to maintain daily business. If banks suddenly stop all lending, these business found themselves suddenly unable to pay their debts, leading to an instant depression. Reagan with the Federal Reserve developped the policy of keeping most Americans as close to poverty as possible whilst still spending money to control inflation. With every rising productivity this has led to little economic growth for most Americans (even declining since 2001) whilst all the profits get funnelled into a tiny fraction of the population. This has led to an imbalance of wealth that often precedes a civil war. Reagan refused any critical introspection and disparaged any attempts by other. This created an environment against introspection and twenty years later a president so blind to his own faults that he could not admit to doing a single mistake. Critical introspection has become equated to treason; this leads to a public caught in its own illusions of perfection, caught off from reality. Reality is not kind to people who ignore it. -- Damn the living - It's a lovely life. I'm whoever you want me to be. Silver silverware - Where is the love? At least I can stay in character. Oval swimming pool - Where is the love? Annoying Usenet one post at a time. Damn the living - It's a lovely life. Like, wow. Heavy, dude. .. .. .. ==================== sid9 sez: Good work! ==================== |
Burn in Hell Ronald McDonald
On 01/26/2011 01:31 PM, MNMikew wrote:
wrote in message . .. On 01/26/2011 09:32 AM, MNMikew wrote: wrote in message Of course he's the writer. Favreau is on his staff. Favreau's title is speech writer. Director of Speechwriting Meaning he has more than one? Gasp! You need to raise you critical thinking above that of a fifth grader. |
Burn in Hell Ronald Reagan
On 01/26/2011 01:32 PM, First Post wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:08:25 -0800, wrote: On 01/26/2011 06:50 AM, MNMikew wrote: LOL! How much of last nights speech did Obama write? You might want to look up Jon Favreau. Look up? I saw a news piece yesterday about how they collaborate and how Jon Favreau starts from essentially an outline and Obama tweeks that, and so on. The editing is perfectionist, and very much Obama's work. So far you nor the other poster that agreed with you has provided an iota of anything credible to back up your stupid assumptions. You have basically stated that the previous president didn;t even know what he was going to be speaking about until his speech writer told him thus implying that the the speechwriters are really the ones that made policy. And you have proof of such idiocy where? I made no such assertions. I said I saw a feature on TV about how Favreau and Obama go back and forth when writing big speeches. |
Burn in Hell Ronald Reagan
On 01/26/2011 01:34 PM, First Post wrote:
Favreau's title is speech writer. There is a reason several posters here refer to Dave as "Special Dave". Remember, it's not nice to pick on the mentally retarded. I don't mind. |
Burn in Hell Ronald Reagan
|
Burn in Hell Ronald McDonald
"dave" wrote in message . .. On 01/26/2011 01:31 PM, MNMikew wrote: wrote in message . .. On 01/26/2011 09:32 AM, MNMikew wrote: wrote in message Of course he's the writer. Favreau is on his staff. Favreau's title is speech writer. Director of Speechwriting Meaning he has more than one? Gasp! You need to raise you critical thinking above that of a fifth grader. You need to pull your head out of Obama's ass. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com