On Mar 25, 12:17*am, wrote:
On Mar 24, 4:20*pm, RHF wrote:



On Mar 24, 11:44*am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-

wrote:
On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

Which is why some people create no wealth.....

Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from
money---they contribute nothing to society

Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that
are considered wealth, is creating wealth. *The person organizing the
production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. *Without
them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive
people to create wealth, no wealth would be created.

Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of
wealth due to a lack of ability.

- Who created the Microsoft Wealth?
-*Without Bill Gates, who would have
- created personal computing that would
- become a world wide success.

D'Oh ! Those Two Guy from Apple : Sure did
very well without BG@MS - imho ~ RHF
*.
-a-minor-historical-point-
It was the IBM PC and IBM Corp that was the
the 'creative force' that caused BG@MS and
MS Corp to become what it was in the 1990s.
*.
*.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

IBM was the main driving force of 'mini-computers' in the early 80's .
HRM BG is one lucky SOB. And the rest is history *. . .

actually it was commodore, atari and apple. ibm was a late comer into
the mini-computer race.

On Mar 27, 5:09*am, dave wrote:
On 03/26/2011 04:13 PM, RHF wrote: On Mar 26, 12:40 pm, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 12:03:19 -0700 (PDT), RHF

The EIC encourages stability among the hardest working people in America
by rewarding them for having a job and a household. Would you prefer
more beggars? Perhaps dormitories where minimum wage workers can live
while working at WalMart?

Dave -wrt-
(OT) : The Koch Brothers Inherited Their Dad's Businesses
-oh-so-you-are-once-again-servicing-two-at-once-

On 3/27/2011 1:14 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:
On Mar 25, 12:17 am, wrote:
On Mar 24, 4:20 pm, RHF wrote:



On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-

wrote:
On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

Which is why some people create no wealth.....

Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from
money---they contribute nothing to society

Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that
are considered wealth, is creating wealth. The person organizing the
production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. Without
them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive
people to create wealth, no wealth would be created.

Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of
wealth due to a lack of ability.

- Who created the Microsoft Wealth?
- Without Bill Gates, who would have
- created personal computing that would
- become a world wide success.

D'Oh ! Those Two Guy from Apple : Sure did
very well without BG@MS - imho ~ RHF
.
-a-minor-historical-point-
It was the IBM PC and IBM Corp that was the
the 'creative force' that caused BG@MS and
MS Corp to become what it was in the 1990s.
.
.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

IBM was the main driving force of 'mini-computers' in the early 80's .
HRM BG is one lucky SOB. And the rest is history . . .

actually it was commodore, atari and apple. ibm was a late comer into
the mini-computer race.


Sinclare was a tiny little computer that was affordable and you saved
programs onto a casset tape. I had one, it was among the first
affordable computers.

Sinclair.I used to have a little Sinclair TV set.Somebody stold it out
of my 1967 Plymouth Fury four door hardtop car I used to have, that was
when I used to work at a factory that manufactured auto/truck/golf
cart/lawn mower batteries in Florence,Missy Sippy.I still have my
Sinclair back light thingy for that Sinclair little bitty TV set.
cuhulin

On Mar 27, 10:41*am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote:
On 3/27/2011 1:14 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:





On Mar 25, 12:17 am, wrote:
On Mar 24, 4:20 pm, RHF wrote:

On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-

wrote:
On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

Which is why some people create no wealth.....

Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from
money---they contribute nothing to society

Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that
are considered wealth, is creating wealth. *The person organizing the
production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. *Without
them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive
people to create wealth, no wealth would be created.

Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of
wealth due to a lack of ability.

- Who created the Microsoft Wealth?
- Without Bill Gates, who would have
- created personal computing that would
- become a world wide success.

D'Oh ! Those Two Guy from Apple : Sure did
very well without BG@MS - imho ~ RHF
*.
-a-minor-historical-point-
It was the IBM PC and IBM Corp that was the
the 'creative force' that caused BG@MS and
MS Corp to become what it was in the 1990s.
*.
*.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

IBM was the main driving force of 'mini-computers' in the early 80's .
HRM BG is one lucky SOB. And the rest is history *. . .

*actually it was commodore, atari and apple. ibm was a late comer into
the mini-computer race.

Sinclare was a tiny little computer that was affordable and you saved
programs onto a casset tape. *I had one, it was among the first
affordable computers.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Until IBM entered the market it was considered a hobby for geeks.
I bought an Altair 8800. A friend already had a Mark1 but he never
put it in a box. I got a TRS-80 then TRS-80 Mod4. CP/M was
catching on. Unix was going nowhere. IBM tried to buy CP/M but
Gary Kendal would have none of it. Microsoft said they could get it
for IBM but couldn't so they told a Seattle guy that Q-DOS was only
worth $5000 even though they had already sold it to IBM for $500,000.
I quite subscribing to Computer World when the declaired the
microcoputer
was finally a reality because IBM entered the market. Computer World
stopped reporting on hobby computing and focused on DOS machines.

It wasn't until Byte decared that Clintons tax increase was going to
kill the economy that I dropped Byte. Corporate media favors
corporations
because they pay the advertising dollars where hobbyists do not.

You gonna get a FREE House!,,,,,,,,,,
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=305231

You gonna get FREE Gas!,,,,,,, You gonna get FREE Money!,,,,,,,,,, You
gonna get FREE Food!,,,,,,,, You gonna get FREE Healthcare!,,,,,,,,,
Gonna Pay Off your Mortage!,,,,,,, You gonna get FREE Anything and
Everything You Want!,,,,,,,,,
cuhulin

On Mar 27, 1:14*pm, Nickname unavailable wrote:
On Mar 25, 12:17*am, wrote:





On Mar 24, 4:20*pm, RHF wrote:

On Mar 24, 11:44*am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-

wrote:
On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

Which is why some people create no wealth.....

Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from
money---they contribute nothing to society

Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that
are considered wealth, is creating wealth. *The person organizing the
production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. *Without
them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive
people to create wealth, no wealth would be created.

Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of
wealth due to a lack of ability.

- Who created the Microsoft Wealth?
-*Without Bill Gates, who would have
- created personal computing that would
- become a world wide success.

D'Oh ! Those Two Guy from Apple : Sure did
very well without BG@MS - imho ~ RHF
*.
-a-minor-historical-point-
It was the IBM PC and IBM Corp that was the
the 'creative force' that caused BG@MS and
MS Corp to become what it was in the 1990s.
*.
*.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

IBM was the main driving force of 'mini-computers' in the early 80's .
HRM BG is one lucky SOB. And the rest is history *. . .

*actually it was commodore, atari and apple. ibm was a late comer into
the mini-computer race.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, it was a late comer, indeed . But , no other private enterprise
had had the resources or desire (on such a scale) to bet on a
relatively new market . And this was in the days when mainframes were
still ruling the world . . .

On Mar 27, 1:41*pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote:
On 3/27/2011 1:14 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:





On Mar 25, 12:17 am, wrote:
On Mar 24, 4:20 pm, RHF wrote:

On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-

wrote:
On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

Which is why some people create no wealth.....

Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from
money---they contribute nothing to society

Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that
are considered wealth, is creating wealth. *The person organizing the
production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. *Without
them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive
people to create wealth, no wealth would be created.

Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of
wealth due to a lack of ability.

- Who created the Microsoft Wealth?
- Without Bill Gates, who would have
- created personal computing that would
- become a world wide success.

D'Oh ! Those Two Guy from Apple : Sure did
very well without BG@MS - imho ~ RHF
*.
-a-minor-historical-point-
It was the IBM PC and IBM Corp that was the
the 'creative force' that caused BG@MS and
MS Corp to become what it was in the 1990s.
*.
*.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

IBM was the main driving force of 'mini-computers' in the early 80's .
HRM BG is one lucky SOB. And the rest is history *. . .

*actually it was commodore, atari and apple. ibm was a late comer into
the mini-computer race.

Sinclare was a tiny little computer that was affordable and you saved
programs onto a casset tape. *I had one, it was among the first
affordable computers.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Don't forget Heathkit !

http://www.devilfinder.com/find.php?...d+Walt+Grayson

On Mississippi Roads right now.This TV program by Walt Grayson is Good,
it is Real Good.
cuhulin

On 03/27/2011 10:41 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
On 3/27/2011 1:14 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:

IBM was the main driving force of 'mini-computers' in the early 80's .
HRM BG is one lucky SOB. And the rest is history . . .

actually it was commodore, atari and apple. ibm was a late comer into
the mini-computer race.


Sinclare was a tiny little computer that was affordable and you saved
programs onto a casset tape. I had one, it was among the first
affordable computers.

Sinclair

The IBM desktop personal computer was the first successful iteration of
what we use today. Not the first, but the first successful. Apple was
the first style over substance computer.