| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On Mar 20, 10:49*am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote: On 3/20/2011 9:46 AM, dave wrote: On 03/19/2011 05:18 PM, pyjamarama wrote: On Mar 19, 8:14 pm, wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), ?baMa? Tse Dung *wrote: Let us pledge to each other, with this Great Lady looking on, that we can, and so help us God, we will make America great again. Then within a few years---the ****ing wealth class was given billions-- Can't "give" to someone that which is theirs in the first place, ****wit.... The only way to create wealth is to take something, apply labor to it, and make it more valuable. That is the only way. to create wealth means two things, you must have work and you must have need. Both mean you must have human life..... Wealth is a human attribute. * Wealth is a unit of life that has been stored, a unit of need and a unit of work combined into a unit of value which we collect as wealth. Wealth is the same as ones and zeros in a computer, they don't exist yet we give them values. *Some ones and zeros are worth more to us than others and all are simply work that has been stored. *Their worth is only measured by our need of them. * The wealth in ones and zeros is as subjective as the wealth in a dollar. ? Creating Wealth -or- Redistributing The Wealth ! The old saying goes: One Man's Junk {Worthless} is another Man's Treasure {Profit} ;-) Something To Think About - From the Bonanza TV Series: -story-dialog-goes- Why HOSS, Business is "Where" the Man with the Money 'meets' the Man with the Experience. The Man with the Experience 'gets' the Money . . . and the Man with the Money 'gets' the Experience ! ! ! [ That's Wealth Redistribution 101 ] and that is... something to think about . . . ~ RHF |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On 3/24/2011 6:50 AM, RHF wrote:
On Mar 20, 10:49 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/20/2011 9:46 AM, dave wrote: On 03/19/2011 05:18 PM, pyjamarama wrote: On Mar 19, 8:14 pm, wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), ?baMa? Tse Dung wrote: Let us pledge to each other, with this Great Lady looking on, that we can, and so help us God, we will make America great again. Then within a few years---the ****ing wealth class was given billions-- Can't "give" to someone that which is theirs in the first place, ****wit.... The only way to create wealth is to take something, apply labor to it, and make it more valuable. That is the only way. to create wealth means two things, you must have work and you must have need. Both mean you must have human life..... Wealth is a human attribute. Wealth is a unit of life that has been stored, a unit of need and a unit of work combined into a unit of value which we collect as wealth. Wealth is the same as ones and zeros in a computer, they don't exist yet we give them values. Some ones and zeros are worth more to us than others and all are simply work that has been stored. Their worth is only measured by our need of them. The wealth in ones and zeros is as subjective as the wealth in a dollar. ? Creating Wealth -or- Redistributing The Wealth ! The old saying goes: One Man's Junk {Worthless} is another Man's Treasure {Profit} ;-) Which is why some people create no wealth..... they do work that creates every man's Junk. |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
I wood boughts ah Ginyoowine Diamond studded dog collar furr me leetle
couch buddy doggy, wit sum O' dats darr Wealth.Mannnnn,,,,, them thar Diamonds wood bee ahshinin laks crazy! outch thar enema that thar Missy Sippy Sun Light! Yesuhhhhhh,,,,,,, Jack of Diamonds,,, Jack of Diamonds,,,,,, I know you of olddd,,,,,,,, you have robbed my poor pockets of Silver and Golddddd,,,,,,, More Traces of Radiation Found in U.S.States http://www.rense.com River Red and Ohwegone, y'all hassa dun jined the Atomic Radiation list, Yapanee Nuke stuff. cuhulin |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
A few mintes ago, somebody at MDOT (Missy Sippy Department Of
Transportation) told JT (Super Talk Missy Sippy Radio talk show) the Missy Sippy River Bridge between Vicksburg and Louisiana will be closed (there are two Bridges there, one of them is the old original Bridge, used only for Railroad traffic nowadays) from Noon untill 2:00 PM today. Yeah, I know, it's backwater hick Missy Sippy, so who cares? I Care! Close a big ass Bridge anywhere else in America and it's Instant World Wide Breaking News! http://www.devilfinder.com/find.php?...te+Vicksbu rg cuhulin, Bridges R US |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
|
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On Mar 24, 11:44*am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: Which is why some people create no wealth..... Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from money---they contribute nothing to society Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that are considered wealth, is creating wealth. *The person organizing the production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. *Without them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive people to create wealth, no wealth would be created. Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of wealth due to a lack of ability. Who created the Microsoft Wealth? *Without Bill Gates, who would have created personal computing that would become a world wide success. He did not create it so much as concentrate it. Now, he's beginning to spread it around again...but still, not creating it. |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On 3/24/2011 2:48 PM, bpnjensen wrote:
On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: Which is why some people create no wealth..... Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from money---they contribute nothing to society Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that are considered wealth, is creating wealth. The person organizing the production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. Without them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive people to create wealth, no wealth would be created. Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of wealth due to a lack of ability. Who created the Microsoft Wealth? Without Bill Gates, who would have created personal computing that would become a world wide success. He did not create it so much as concentrate it. Now, he's beginning to spread it around again...but still, not creating it. What does your Operating system say? That's who created it. Others were created but they are not creating as much wealth. |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On Mar 24, 12:03*pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:48 PM, bpnjensen wrote: On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: Which is why some people create no wealth..... Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from money---they contribute nothing to society Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that are considered wealth, is creating wealth. *The person organizing the production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. *Without them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive people to create wealth, no wealth would be created. Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of wealth due to a lack of ability. Who created the Microsoft Wealth? *Without Bill Gates, who would have created personal computing that would become a world wide success. He did not create it so much as concentrate it. *Now, he's beginning to spread it around again...but still, not creating it. What does your Operating system say? That's who created it. Others were created but they are not creating as much wealth.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Again, concentrating wealth. It has nothing to do with who made the operating system, but whether or not the wealth he gained was NOT at the expense of anyone else. The only way the human race gains wealth is to mine it or harvest it from the earth - and even then, the earth loses something. The resource is finite, and only its redistribution decides who gets rich and who stays poor. You're just kididing yourself otherwise. You cannot get something from nothing. |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On Mar 24, 12:24*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:48:38 -0700 (PDT), bpnjensen wrote: Who created the Microsoft Wealth? *Without Bill Gates, who would have created personal computing that would become a world wide success. He did not create it so much as concentrate it. *Now, he's beginning to spread it around again...but still, not creating it. That's true His web of business is a job producer---but as you say concentrates wealth into his hands Gates is unique The top 400 WEalthiest familes in america own/control about 95% of all the wealth. *Since the late 90's (under GOP congresses) they have amassed hundreds of billions of dollars---yet "created" few businesses that create jobs. They were allowed to make billion by "keeping their money" (literally tax free) and using it to create more wealth on Wall street. *It's the Ideal "dick armey" goal. * Yes. Demonstrably true in every regard. Not the whole story, but a big part of it. |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On 3/24/2011 3:48 PM, bpnjensen wrote:
On Mar 24, 12:03 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:48 PM, bpnjensen wrote: On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: Which is why some people create no wealth..... Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from money---they contribute nothing to society Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that are considered wealth, is creating wealth. The person organizing the production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. Without them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive people to create wealth, no wealth would be created. Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of wealth due to a lack of ability. Who created the Microsoft Wealth? Without Bill Gates, who would have created personal computing that would become a world wide success. He did not create it so much as concentrate it. Now, he's beginning to spread it around again...but still, not creating it. What does your Operating system say? That's who created it. Others were created but they are not creating as much wealth.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Again, concentrating wealth. It has nothing to do with who made the operating system, but whether or not the wealth he gained was NOT at the expense of anyone else. The only way the human race gains wealth is to mine it or harvest it from the earth - and even then, the earth loses something. The resource is finite, and only its redistribution decides who gets rich and who stays poor. You're just kididing yourself otherwise. You cannot get something from nothing. NOT true at all.... wealth is a measure of both "need and work" wealth is stored work that has value. If the stored work becomes useless to anyone then it has zero value and is no longer wealth. Wealth can be gold or it can be a painting or it can be the copywrite ownership of Windows-7. The day Windows-8 is released, then Windows-7 will NOT represent as much wealth. Soon the U.S. dollar will NO longer be a symbol of wealth, they will have diminishing value to each of us and will not retain wealth because they are not of value to people.... while a can of soup may be of more value than all the dollars you can carry. Owning cans of soup may be real wealth while owning cash is like having a pet rock. |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On Mar 24, 12:48*pm, bpnjensen wrote:
Again, concentrating wealth. *It has nothing to do with who made the operating system, but whether or not the wealth he gained was NOT at the expense of anyone else. *The only way the human race gains wealth is to mine it or harvest it from the earth - and even then, the earth loses something. *The resource is finite, and only its redistribution decides who gets rich and who stays poor. You're just kididing yourself otherwise. *You cannot get something from nothing. In many cases the value is in the structure of the resource rather than the resource itself. We wouldn't not think to eat again today the resources we so gladly ate yesterday. If it were not for our economic structure I would say who did what was a waste of time and emotional effort. I feel we are indeed played as pawns by people who create misery for their own happiness. It is a pithetic life for which we all pay. The seven deadly sins are wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and gluttony. At times I get quite peeved by those who promote a path towards these sins. By moving towards technologies that utilize renewable resources (it's the structure that matters) we make our lives easier. This morning a woman said with pride how plentify hispanics have become in the US. I care not about the racial mix but the growth in our population to achieve it. People who buy into the notion of strife for a better life create that strife. The more of us there are the greater the need for usable resources. A move towards renewable resources doesn't make our life easier if it is offset by increased population. People have to envision the world they would like to see real before it can be achieved. If that means a world of winners and losers then that's the world we will have. |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On Mar 24, 11:44*am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: Which is why some people create no wealth..... Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from money---they contribute nothing to society Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that are considered wealth, is creating wealth. *The person organizing the production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. *Without them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive people to create wealth, no wealth would be created. Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of wealth due to a lack of ability. - Who created the Microsoft Wealth? -*Without Bill Gates, who would have - created personal computing that would - become a world wide success. D'Oh ! Those Two Guy from Apple : Sure did very well without BG@MS - imho ~ RHF |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On 3/24/2011 4:20 PM, RHF wrote:
On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: Which is why some people create no wealth..... Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from money---they contribute nothing to society Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that are considered wealth, is creating wealth. The person organizing the production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. Without them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive people to create wealth, no wealth would be created. Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of wealth due to a lack of ability. - Who created the Microsoft Wealth? - Without Bill Gates, who would have - created personal computing that would - become a world wide success. D'Oh ! Those Two Guy from Apple : Sure did very well without BG@MS - imho ~ RHF yet 8 of 10 use Windows..... Had you cornered the market and bought all the "buggy whips" 130 years ago(billions of dollars invested) and you now try to realize your fortune and cash in your wealth by selling your buggy whips..... you may find that they're no longer of any real value and you now have no wealth. In fact, depending on the chemicals used to make them, they may now be a liability rather than an asset. It may cost you to get rid of the buggy whips in an environmentally safe way. Wealth is a measure of need or value as well as a measure of stored work. |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On 3/24/2011 4:20 PM, RHF wrote:
On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: Which is why some people create no wealth..... Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from money---they contribute nothing to society Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that are considered wealth, is creating wealth. The person organizing the production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. Without them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive people to create wealth, no wealth would be created. Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of wealth due to a lack of ability. - Who created the Microsoft Wealth? - Without Bill Gates, who would have - created personal computing that would - become a world wide success. D'Oh ! Those Two Guy from Apple : Sure did very well without BG@MS - imho ~ RHF yet 8 of 10 use Windows..... Had you cornered the market and bought all the "buggy whips" 130 years ago(billions of dollars invested) and you now try to realize your fortune and cash in your wealth by selling your buggy whips..... you may find that they're no longer of any real value and you now have no wealth. In fact, depending on the chemicals used to make them, they may now be a liability rather than an asset. It may cost you to get rid of the buggy whips in an environmentally safe way. Wealth is a measure of need or value as well as a measure of stored work. Salt has been worth more than gold at times..... |
The Myth That BG@MS and MS Corp. Created Wealth
On Mar 24, 12:03*pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:48 PM, bpnjensen wrote: On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: Which is why some people create no wealth..... Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from money---they contribute nothing to society Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that are considered wealth, is creating wealth. *The person organizing the production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. *Without them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive people to create wealth, no wealth would be created. Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of wealth due to a lack of ability. Who created the Microsoft Wealth? *Without Bill Gates, who would have created personal computing that would become a world wide success. - - He did not create it so much as concentrate it. - - Now, he's beginning to spread it around again... - - but still, not creating it. - What does your Operating system say? - - That's who created it. - - Others were created but they are not creating - as much wealth. BG@MS Did NOT 'Create' The Wealth : The Wealth Existed and was Distributed more Evenly and Equability across the Customer Population {Wealth Base} BG@MS Did Promoted, Refined and Monopolized a Set of Products and Services to that Customer Population {Wealth Base} -and- Those Customers Freely Redistributed Their Wealth {by Buy/Buyers/ Buying} from&to BG@MS and MS Corp. BG@MS and MS Corp Simply Aggregated {Collected and Concentrate} the Wealth of Others {The Customer Wealth Base} to Himself and MS Corp. It Is Time For BG@MS To Give Back {Pay-Back} This Redistributed Wealth To That Very Same Customer Population {Wealth Base} * BG@MS Can Keep a Billion Dollars for Himself; Plus a Billion Dollars for Misses BG; and a Billion Dollars for each of the BG Children (3) : That's 5 Billion Dollars : But the Rest of the Billions Should Be Redistributed {Paid-Back} To The Customer Population {Wealth Base} In The Name of Economic Social Justice For All. Power {Wealth} To The Customers/Consumers ! { From Whom All Redistributed Wealth Flows } and that's the way 'i' see it ~ RHF |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On Mar 24, 12:48*pm, bpnjensen wrote:
On Mar 24, 12:03*pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:48 PM, bpnjensen wrote: On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: Which is why some people create no wealth..... Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from money---they contribute nothing to society Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that are considered wealth, is creating wealth. *The person organizing the production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. *Without them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive people to create wealth, no wealth would be created. Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of wealth due to a lack of ability. Who created the Microsoft Wealth? *Without Bill Gates, who would have created personal computing that would become a world wide success. He did not create it so much as concentrate it. *Now, he's beginning to spread it around again...but still, not creating it. What does your Operating system say? That's who created it. Others were created but they are not creating as much wealth.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - - Again, concentrating wealth. *It has nothing to do with who made the - operating system, but whether or not the wealth he gained was NOT at - the expense of anyone else. *The only way the human race gains wealth - is to mine it or harvest it from the earth - and even then, the earth - loses something. *The resource is finite, and only its redistribution - decides who gets rich and who stays poor. You're just kididing - yourself otherwise. *You cannot get something from nothing. BpnJ - In General We Agree :o) ~ RHF The Myth That BG@MS and MS Corp. Created Wealth http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...598c99e6d4de8c |
The Myth That BG@MS and MS Corp. Created Wealth
http://www.devilfinder.com/find.php?...erating+System
///Mope, are you kidding?/// No Sang, I am not kidding at all! ///Whatever you say, Mope/// cuhulin |
One New and Improved Barack Obama Dollar [$1BOD] & The-Mark-of-the-ObamaŠ = $6.66 Gasoline {This Economy Sticks !}
On Mar 24, 1:09*pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote: On 3/24/2011 3:48 PM, bpnjensen wrote: On Mar 24, 12:03 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:48 PM, bpnjensen wrote: On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: Which is why some people create no wealth..... Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from money---they contribute nothing to society Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that are considered wealth, is creating wealth. *The person organizing the production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. *Without them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive people to create wealth, no wealth would be created. Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of wealth due to a lack of ability. Who created the Microsoft Wealth? *Without Bill Gates, who would have created personal computing that would become a world wide success. He did not create it so much as concentrate it. *Now, he's beginning to spread it around again...but still, not creating it. What does your Operating system say? That's who created it. Others were created but they are not creating as much wealth.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Again, concentrating wealth. *It has nothing to do with who made the operating system, but whether or not the wealth he gained was NOT at the expense of anyone else. *The only way the human race gains wealth is to mine it or harvest it from the earth - and even then, the earth loses something. *The resource is finite, and only its redistribution decides who gets rich and who stays poor. You're just kididing yourself otherwise. *You cannot get something from nothing. NOT true at all.... wealth is a measure of both "need and work" *wealth is stored work that has value. *If the stored work becomes useless to anyone then it has zero value and is no longer wealth. Wealth can be gold or it can be a painting or it can be the copywrite ownership of Windows-7. The day Windows-8 is released, then Windows-7 will NOT represent as much wealth. Soon the U.S. dollar will NO longer be a symbol of wealth, they will have diminishing value to each of us and will not retain wealth because they are not of value to people.... *while a can of soup may be of more value than all the dollars you can carry. *Owning cans of soup may be real wealth while owning cash is like having a pet rock. Yeah Soon with One Can of Old Campbell's Soup : You Will Be Able To Buy $20 Old {Devalued} US Dollars -or- One New and Improved Barack Obama Dollar [$1BOD] -aka- One "BO" Buck -wrt- This Economy Sticks ! now is that true... 'no' ...but soon it may be ~ RHF |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On Mar 24, 1:09*pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote: On 3/24/2011 3:48 PM, bpnjensen wrote: On Mar 24, 12:03 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:48 PM, bpnjensen wrote: On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: Which is why some people create no wealth..... Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from money---they contribute nothing to society Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that are considered wealth, is creating wealth. *The person organizing the production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. *Without them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive people to create wealth, no wealth would be created. Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of wealth due to a lack of ability. Who created the Microsoft Wealth? *Without Bill Gates, who would have created personal computing that would become a world wide success. He did not create it so much as concentrate it. *Now, he's beginning to spread it around again...but still, not creating it. What does your Operating system say? That's who created it. Others were created but they are not creating as much wealth.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Again, concentrating wealth. *It has nothing to do with who made the operating system, but whether or not the wealth he gained was NOT at the expense of anyone else. *The only way the human race gains wealth is to mine it or harvest it from the earth - and even then, the earth loses something. *The resource is finite, and only its redistribution decides who gets rich and who stays poor. You're just kididing yourself otherwise. *You cannot get something from nothing. NOT true at all.... wealth is a measure of both "need and work" *wealth is stored work that has value. *If the stored work becomes useless to anyone then it has zero value and is no longer wealth. Wealth can be gold or it can be a painting or it can be the copywrite ownership of Windows-7. The day Windows-8 is released, then Windows-7 will NOT represent as much wealth. Soon the U.S. dollar will NO longer be a symbol of wealth, they will have diminishing value to each of us and will not retain wealth because they are not of value to people.... *while a can of soup may be of more value than all the dollars you can carry. *Owning cans of soup may be real wealth while owning cash is like having a pet rock.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Right - Windows 8 will grab that wealth from Windows 7, and MS will divert yet more wealth from people who might otherwise be satisfied with what they have. MS gets richer, the rest of us get poorer. Redistribution and reconcentration. It ain't new, it's just repackaged. Cans of soup are produced by the earth with human energy added (which also came from the earth). If it represents wealth, it's the wealth of the entire Earth, which then only makes up its loss when humans die and go back to it. |
The Myth That BG@MS and MS Corp. Created Wealth
Old country from Edwards,Missy Sippy! was mowing his yard a little while
ago with his pawn shop Smoking lawn mower.(smokers!!!) I mowed my front yard last Sunday.So, about an hour ago I cranked up one of my lawn mowers and I mowed my back yard.My lawn mowers do not smoke. He BROKE my chainsaw.He pushed his pawn shop over here, he said,,, Show me where that lawn mower oil drain plug is! Maybe tomorrow, I will push my lawn mower around to my front yard and clean it up and polish it.Make it Shine just like brand spankin NEW! cuhulin, my lawn mowers and my other vehicles do not smoke |
we already imagine you speak with a drawl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 "dave" wrote in message . .. On 03/24/2011 09:05 AM, wrote: I wood boughts ah Ginyoowine Diamond studded dog collar furr me leetle couch buddy doggy, wit sum O' dats darr Wealth.Mannnnn,,,,, them thar Diamonds wood bee ahshinin laks crazy! outch thar enema that thar Missy Sippy Sun Light! Yesuhhhhhh,,,,,,, Jack of Diamonds,,, Jack of Diamonds,,,,,, I know you of olddd,,,,,,,, you have robbed my poor pockets of Silver and Golddddd,,,,,,, More Traces of Radiation Found in U.S.States http://www.rense.com River Red and Ohwegone, y'all hassa dun jined the Atomic Radiation list, Yapanee Nuke stuff. cuhulin I bet he walks with a lisp also. mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNi15YAAoJEJXfKw5kUPt7Az0H/RxjMlKUBgdxro42IE6+eh76 6u3w5xqyuLl73sUwvjxoaxK8bnQxSd5XCQJTnEQTKQDiax8TUl 9oin8Z0/0e3HWa O6gjnGSex0iFtbr7AGzneQHtGxQ1qry5OmQe+9WlVcmb+UbfWw slqMUtcOSa9/LF PoW90tq8jLB28WEUrb5TIHOB3XNzrMOvzRlbXRbWB6hMzfhOKm J9Ewt+rsPSF+af G/+qap2kov6QTZfGzGP2TgkOj92NvAQQVuip7y1XyBkVNXisoS7P 0dHi+r3W58Xr Zrun3GENB+KEMbffUbbyqwYdG3xFToGNeAMmja56YgklxngpoK 2yJq0LFanx4QI= =OmBc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Absurd Political Bias/Bigotry = Liberal-Lies and Democrat-Distortions
On Mar 24, 12:24*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:48:38 -0700 (PDT), bpnjensen wrote: Who created the Microsoft Wealth? *Without Bill Gates, who would have created personal computing that would become a world wide success. He did not create it so much as concentrate it. *Now, he's beginning to spread it around again...but still, not creating it. That's true His web of business is a job producer---but as you say concentrates wealth into his hands Gates is unique - The top 400 WEalthiest familes in america own/control about 95% of all - the wealth. *Since the late 90's (under GOP congresses) they have - amassed hundreds of billions of dollars---yet "created" few businesses - that create jobs. - - They were allowed to make billion by "keeping their money" (literally - tax free) and using it to create more wealth on Wall street. *It's the - Ideal "dick armey" goal. * , ? So there were NO Democrats in the US Congress During All Those Evil Wealth Accumulation Years ! ? And the Democrats Did Not Control Either House of the US Congress Over All Those Years of Excessive Wealth Concentration ! ? Plus there were NO Democrat US Presidents To VETO All This Evil Wealth Accumulation During All Those Years ! Truth Be Told : "On-Average" It Is The Democrat$ Who Are The Wealthie$t and Riche$t Member$ of the US Congre$$ -poor-little-republi˘ans- -r-o-t-f-l- at your absurd political bias/bigotry : liberal-lies and democrat-distortions ~ RHF |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On Mar 24, 4:20*pm, RHF wrote:
On Mar 24, 11:44*am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: Which is why some people create no wealth..... Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from money---they contribute nothing to society Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that are considered wealth, is creating wealth. *The person organizing the production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. *Without them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive people to create wealth, no wealth would be created. Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of wealth due to a lack of ability. - Who created the Microsoft Wealth? -*Without Bill Gates, who would have - created personal computing that would - become a world wide success. D'Oh ! Those Two Guy from Apple : Sure did very well without BG@MS - imho ~ RHF *. -a-minor-historical-point- It was the IBM PC and IBM Corp that was the the 'creative force' that caused BG@MS and MS Corp to become what it was in the 1990s. *. *.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - IBM was the main driving force of 'mini-computers' in the early 80's . HRM BG is one lucky SOB. And the rest is history . . . |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On Mar 24, 10:17*pm, wrote:
IBM was the main driving force of 'mini-computers' in the early 80's . How quickly we forget companies like Digital Equipment Corp and Data General.... HRM BG is one lucky SOB. And the rest is history *. . . The story of how Gary Kildall and CP/M lost the IBM PC business has been told many times.... |
IBM invented the PC (and Bill Gates)
On 03/24/2011 07:53 PM, RHF wrote:
On Mar 24, 6:36 pm, Beam Me Up ScottyThen-Destroy- wrote: On 3/24/2011 6:29 PM, dave wrote: On 3/24/2011 11:48 AM, bpnjensen wrote: On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up ScottyThen-Destroy- Who created the Microsoft Wealth? Without Bill Gates, who would have created personal computing that would become a world wide success. He did not create it so much as concentrate it. Now, he's beginning to spread it around again...but still, not creating it. - Gates created a successful version. nah,,, Nah... NAH ! ! ! Not even that : IBM created to broad a ranging PC Specification for their IBM PC Hardware that enabled 'others' to "Clone" {Re-Engineer} their IBM PC Designs; at the Assembly Component Level {Kit PCs} and enter the PC Market Place. ? Remember the first few Years of the PC 'Clones' ! This caused a Separate need for a Parallel {Clone} Opperating System to Run on the PC Clones. ! Hence IBM-DOS -morphed-into- MS-DOS ! There Was a Moment-In-Time -when- All Roads Lead To BG@MS and MS Corp; and BG@MS Capitalized On That Historical Dynamic Market Point [.] -and-the-rest-is-history- -where-as- Apples History is One of Strict Hardware and Software Control Plus Licensing of it all; and a relatively 'limited' Market Share as a result. -better-ain't-good-if-it-is-not-readily-available-to-all- and that is the way 'i' see/remember it ~ RHF Look up Xerox Palo Alto Research Center |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
|
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On Mar 25, 9:10*am, dave wrote:
IBM made the first "Desktop" computer in pretty much the same form factor we use today, and with the same basic components. You are entitled to your opinion. I would have voted for any of a number of earlier personal computers from other companies. They did the world a huge favor by not fighting 3rd party hardware and software. IBM did fight and win battles against some of the early clones (but ultimately lost the clone wars). Also, remember the PS/2 and OS/2? Even subsequent ISA PCs had propiertary features that contributed to their doom (as IBM tried to regain "control" of the PC market). |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
5 enema 1 hook em up gadget furr yoar iPad erra iPad Tu. Costy $45
smackers. http://www.techchee.com You bitter hurry uppa anna gitcha wun befoe dey sail outch cuhulin |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
The way Commie fed govt SUCKS UP! to Islam Is A Cult Of Death! and
Shariah law and Israel Hell and the New World Order and the WETBACKS!,,,,,, what chance do you think Haley Barbour has being the next President of the United States of America? America does NOT! have a President, might NOT! Ever have a President, Ever Again.I reckon I will wait and See. cuhulin |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
I have some old, old, old computers.How about an old, old, old Tandy
computer? I do Believe at least two or three of my old, old, old computerys could find a place enema ah Computer Museum sumwhars.They aints ahgoin tu enema moosims, notta assa longa assa Ahh hassa enema thangy tu duz wits itta.They issa ahgoin uppa enema mah attic. http://www.devilfinder.com/find.php?q=Computer+Museums cuhulin, old, old, old computerys R ME |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On 03/25/2011 10:18 AM, wrote:
On Mar 25, 9:10 am, wrote: IBM made the first "Desktop" computer in pretty much the same form factor we use today, and with the same basic components. You are entitled to your opinion. I would have voted for any of a number of earlier personal computers from other companies. They did the world a huge favor by not fighting 3rd party hardware and software. IBM did fight and win battles against some of the early clones (but ultimately lost the clone wars). Also, remember the PS/2 and OS/2? Even subsequent ISA PCs had propiertary features that contributed to their doom (as IBM tried to regain "control" of the PC market). Sure. I remember all that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_form_factor |
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth !
On 03/25/2011 10:46 AM, wrote:
I have some old, old, old computers.How about an old, old, old Tandy computer? I do Believe at least two or three of my old, old, old computerys could find a place enema ah Computer Museum sumwhars.They aints ahgoin tu enema moosims, notta assa longa assa Ahh hassa enema thangy tu duz wits itta.They issa ahgoin uppa enema mah attic. http://www.devilfinder.com/find.php?q=Computer+Museums cuhulin, old, old, old computerys R ME I have a C64 and a tape drive somewhere. |
They are leeches
On Mar 24, 3:28*pm, dave wrote:
On 3/24/2011 11:44 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty *wrote: Which is why some people create no wealth..... Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from money---they contribute nothing to society Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that are considered wealth, is creating wealth. *The person organizing the production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. *Without them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive people to create wealth, no wealth would be created. Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of wealth due to a lack of ability. Who created the Microsoft Wealth? *Without Bill Gates, who would have created personal computing that would become a world wide success. - Why should investors receive dividends forever? - Why not allow them a certain return, - then cash them in after a few years. . So 'Special-Dave' using your NIF!* "Financial Logic" : * Nothing Is Forever ! You 'Buy' a House with a 30-Year Mortgage; and at the End of the 30-Years You Move-Out -because- You No Longer Own It + You Did Get To Live In The House For 30-Years {Free Housing} + You Did Get Your Mortgage Interest Deduction For 30-Years {Dividends} such a deal ~ RHF |
They are leeches
Whether You Rent, or whether you buy, you pay for the home you occupy.
Commie fed govt doesn't 'see' it that way though.Commie fed govt figures Americans really do not own anything.Not even the shirts on their backs. You think I am joking about that? cuhulin |
(OT) : Ensuring 'The Rich' Have True Tax Equality -by-a- Flat TaxPLUS National Tax System
On Mar 26, 6:10*am, dave wrote:
On 03/26/2011 05:13 AM, RHF wrote: There should be US Tax Benefits for Investment in the USA and American Job Creation/Maintenance -american-corporations-have-a-duty-to-invest-in-america- * Build a New US Factory and Create Jobs -american-corporations-have-a-duty-to-invest-in-america- Put huge import duties on bull**** only rich people need. Better Yet 'Special-Dave' Require All Rich People to Registrar as 'Rich People' {Evil Anti-Economic-Equality Social Elements} Rich People Must Be Track for All Financial Transactions. Each and Every Time that they Buy Something : Tax It an Extra 10%, 20% or 30% At The Point-of-Sale {Pay As You Go Taxation} Tax The Rich Into Poverty : Then We Will All Be Poor Together ...and... Only The Government Will Be Rich With All of Our Taxes ! nah,,, Nah... NAH ! ! ! : The Better Idea Is . . . |
(OT) : Ensuring 'Low-Income Working Taxpayers Pay Nothing and Get
On Mar 26, 12:40*pm, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 12:03:19 -0700 (PDT), RHF wrote: Tax The Rich Into Poverty : - How about we only tax the wealth class at a - percentage commeasurate with what a lower - 1/3rd wage earner must pay compared to his - earnings? - - Hmmm? HUMmmm There Yourself ! Actually the so-called Lower 1/3rd Wage Earners often Get Back More Than They Pay {Yes the USA has a Negative Income} =HINT= Earned Income Tax Credit is a Negative Income Tax For Many {Not All} Working Families With Children http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earned_Income_Tax_Credit More Accurate the Bottom 20% do not even File IRS Tax Forms and with their Deductions : Pay NO Withholding Taxes -but- If they did File most would get a few More Dollars Back -that's-a- Negative Income Tax ! =HINT= Negative Income Tax = Earned Income Tax Credit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_income_tax Then the Next to the Bottom 20% Do File IRS Tax Forms -because- They Do Pay Some Payroll Withholding Taxes and Want Their Money Back : This 2nd 20% Promptly Fill Their Taxes and usually Receive More Money Back Then They Paid in Income Tax Withholdings. -that's-a- Negative Income Tax ! The U.S. Earned Income Tax Credit and Its Social Effects http://harrisschool.uchicago.edu/abo...f/wp_07_20.pdf |
(OT) : Ensuring 'Low-Income Working Taxpayers Pay Nothing and...
Dublin is about 3,000 sumpin miles North East of doggy's couch.Dublin is
about 2,000 sumpin miles West of doggy's couch.Dublin is right here in Missy Sippy. cuhulin |
(OT) : Ensuring 'Low-Income Working Taxpayers Pay Nothing and...
You going to light some Candles for that Stupid Earth Hour? If anything,
I will Turn ALL of my Lights ON. http://www.libertypost.org Http://www.devilfinder.com/find.php?...Military+Jeeps Turn ON the Lights and Power cuhulin |
(OT) : The Koch Brothers Inherited Their Dad's Businesses
On 03/26/2011 04:13 PM, RHF wrote:
On Mar 26, 12:40 pm, wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 12:03:19 -0700 (PDT), RHF The EIC encourages stability among the hardest working people in America by rewarding them for having a job and a household. Would you prefer more beggars? Perhaps dormitories where minimum wage workers can live while working at WalMart? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:33 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com