On 4/4/2011 4:08 PM, Bill Shatzer wrote:
Sancho Panza wrote:

On 4/4/2011 8:57 AM, dave wrote:

On 04/03/2011 11:23 PM, Jarbidge wrote:

On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 22:02:47 -0700, Curt wrote:



I saw it too. The State Department is apparently satisfied that he's a
citz.

Curt


Low threshold of proof...again....

As they are the ones who issue passports their threshold is good enough
for me.

You don't need a U.S. birth certificate to obtain a U.S. passport.

Well, either that or a Naturalization Cerificate.

In the absense of any evidence of naturalization, I think we can safely
assume that a US birth certificate was presented.

You're making quite a presumption on blind faith (or hope). AFAIK, there
has not been a FOIA or cognate request for a check of those papers.

On Apr 4, 1:00*pm, Sancho Panza wrote:
On 4/4/2011 4:08 PM, Bill Shatzer wrote:





Sancho Panza wrote:

On 4/4/2011 8:57 AM, dave wrote:

On 04/03/2011 11:23 PM, Jarbidge wrote:

On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 22:02:47 -0700, Curt wrote:

I saw it too. The State Department is apparently satisfied that he's a
citz.

Curt

Low threshold of proof...again....

As they are the ones who issue passports their threshold is good enough
for me.

You don't need a U.S. birth certificate to obtain a U.S. passport.

Well, either that or a Naturalization Cerificate.

In the absense of any evidence of naturalization, I think we can safely
assume that a US birth certificate was presented.

You're making quite a presumption on blind faith (or hope). AFAIK, there
has not been a FOIA or cognate request for a check of those papers.-

Them guys at the State Department, see, they're better at catching
cheaters than you, and they're smarter than you.

FOIA is irrelevant, as far as you're concerned. State's already done
its job. Keep it separated, man -- they'll do the background checks,
you pump the gas. It'll all work out.

Curt