On Apr 13, 12:18*am, RHF wrote:

-fyi- Fear Mongering Would Be About the 'Possibility'
of a Japanese Nuclear Disaster and all the Global
Radioactive Contamination That It Might Bring With It.

Fearmongering takes many forms, including hyping a situation far
beyond it's worth. Stop doing it.

OOPS... TRUTH BE TOLD THE JAPANESE NUCLEAR
DISASTER DID IN-FACT HAPPEN FOUR-TIMES [4X]
OVER AND THE RADIOACTIVITY IS SPREADING
IN JAPAN TODAY AND GLOBALLY OVER THE NEXT
FEW WEEKS, MONTHS, YEARS, DECADES AND
BEYOND -fear-monger-no- TRUTH TELLER YES ~ RHF

Yes, maybe but that's NOT what you said. Your implication was that
this would be a worldwide catastrophe, when in fact the math is pretty
clear that except for the local area (like within a 100 kM radius),
the effects will likely be small or unmeasurable.

BpnJ,

So when the Japanese admit to a Math Error of
Two Orders of Magnitude -oops-
-not- 10 Million Times the Safe Levels of Radiation
-but- Only 100 Thousand Times the Safe Levels of Radiation
? ? ? YOU ARE OK WITH THAT ! ! !

Did I say that? No.

-and- The Resulting 70K Years of Global "U" and
"PU" Radioactive Toxic Waste

Yes, locally, a serious problem. Not for the world, for the Japanese.

Oops One Million Gallons of Contaminated Toxic
Radioactive Sea Water dumped into the Japanese
Coastal Waters of the Pacific Ocean -and- Oops
Each Gallon Potentially Has 100 Thousand Times
the Safe Levels of Radiation -hey- to get down to
the One-Times [1X] Safe Levels of Radiation only
requires that Japan Contaminates -doing-the-math-
1,000,000 x 100,000 = 100,000,000,000 Gallons
of World Wide {Global} Ocean Waters
? ? ? Which Part of 100 Billion Gallons of Radioactive
Contaminated Waste Waters Is Un-Clear ! ! !

Your math is fuzzier than a koala bear.

Take 100,000 and divide it by 330,000,000,000. What do you get? You
get an increase in radiation *over natural background levels* of
1/330,000, or an INCREASE of 0.0003%. Tiny. Insignificant. Probably
much less than you get from a walk in the mountains from radon gas.

-oops- 70K Years of Global Radioactive Toxic Waste

Yep Some of this Radioactivity is Multi-Generational
-reminder- 70K Years of Global Radioactive Toxic Waste

Yes, I know. Just like the stuff every nuke has been generating since
the 1950s. It's bad long-lasitng stuff. I know, I pay attention to
science and technology all the time. But it is in Japan, not the
entire globe. They have a serious cleanup problem there, if it is
even possible - but it is not a global disaster. The math just does
not support it.

If there is a global implication, it is a policy implication. This
could happen anywhere, and it is why Pu/U nukes need serious
reconsideration.

# 1 - You Move To Japan with Your Family :
Do A House Exchange With A Japanese Family
I Am Sure That There Are Plenty Who Would Want
To Swap for the Next 'Glowing' Year or too...

What is this? Where did this BS come from? Unless you were planning
on going to live in Japan, what is the point of making this scenario
up? This is fluff.

# 2 - Go On A Japanese Sea Food Diet of Local
Sea Food from Japanese Coastal Waters :
You Will Know It's Fresh When The Geiger-Counter
on the Kitchen Table Starts Ticking Wildly...

Didn't I just say this?

Are you planning on eating a bunch of Japanese seafood? I thought
not. More fluff.

# 3 - Each Time It Rains in the SF Bay Area for the
Next 100 Years : Stripe Down and Take an "Au-Natural"
Natural Rain Shower in those Glowing Rain Waters :
They Will Make You Look Positively "Radiant" ;;-}}

BS. As I began to explain, the only way you can get rain with greater
than natural levels of radiation is if a cloud of *dust* (not vapor,
dust) from the plant gets into the atmosphere and becomes the nuclei
for droplet growth. It won't happen any other way. IF this even
happens, which is unlikely on anything like a regular basis for all
kinds of reasons, you will have a few tiny specks of radioactive
material in each raindrop, and these will quickly wash to the sea. To
be perfectly honest, the mushroom cloud from a single above-ground
detonation will put more radiation into rain at one fell swoop than
this plant will put there in 70,000 years.

BpnJ : How Can You Claim To Be A "Die-Hard
Environmentalist" {Dead-and-Hard-Cold} When
You Actively Support Nuclear Power

You cannot read either. I *told you* I do not support nukes in their
present form. I never have. Pu and U-235 fission is recipe for
disaster. I do like Thorium reactors as a short term energy solution
because they avoid nearly all the problems of U/Pu and the fuel is
plentiful.

Fusion I like much better, but our shortsighted politicians have never
seen fit to support its development while all that oil money rolls
in. Thus, it's still 40-50 years away

and It's
70K Years of Global Radioactive Toxic Waste - rotfl ~ RHF

Sorry, Roy, but youre statement is a repugnant and misleading lie.
When will you stop? Is it habitual?

Just quit making stuff up and pretending it's truth.