On 04/20/2011 01:04 PM, ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung wrote:
On Apr 20, 11:28 am, wrote:
'MISSING RECORDS IN HAWAII, MISSING RECORDS IN KENYA, MISSING RECORDS
IN INDONESIA'...

"It's utterly devastating," reveals a source close to the publisher.
"Obama may learn things he didn't even know about himself!"

http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-C...-President/dp/...

IMPEACH OBAMA!

New U.S. Birth Certificate Requirement

Beginning April 1, 2011, the U.S. Department of State will require the
full names of the applicant’s parent(s) to be listed on all certified
birth certificates to be considered as primary evidence of U.S.
citizenship for all passport applicants, regardless of age. Certified
birth certificates missing this information will not be acceptable as
evidence of citizenship.


So Hawaii will issue a more in depth birth certificate along with
Pennsylvania I hope.

On 4/20/2011 3:45 PM, dave wrote:
On 04/20/2011 01:04 PM, ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung wrote:
On Apr 20, 11:28 am, wrote:
'MISSING RECORDS IN HAWAII, MISSING RECORDS IN KENYA, MISSING RECORDS
IN INDONESIA'...

"It's utterly devastating," reveals a source close to the publisher.
"Obama may learn things he didn't even know about himself!"

http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-C...-President/dp/...

IMPEACH OBAMA!

New U.S. Birth Certificate Requirement

Beginning April 1, 2011, the U.S. Department of State will require the
full names of the applicant’s parent(s) to be listed on all certified
birth certificates to be considered as primary evidence of U.S.
citizenship for all passport applicants, regardless of age. Certified
birth certificates missing this information will not be acceptable as
evidence of citizenship.


So Hawaii will issue a more in depth birth certificate along with
Pennsylvania I hope.

Hawaii's birth certificates already meet all of the new requirements.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html

On 4/20/2011 5:19 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote:

...
Hawaii's birth certificates already meet all of the new requirements.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html

Like I said, they may well indeed fill all other requirements, I'll let
courts determine that ...

However, the requirement for office of the president is aptly outlined
in the Constitution, and that has NOT been met ...

Regards,
JS

On 04/20/2011 06:21 PM, John Smith wrote:


However, the requirement for office of the president is aptly outlined
in the Constitution, and that has NOT been met ...

Regards,
JS

Obviously it has. He is "natural born" and he is a "citizen". He looks
just like his grandfather.

On 4/20/2011 6:21 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 4/20/2011 5:19 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote:

...
Hawaii's birth certificates already meet all of the new requirements.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html

Like I said, they may well indeed fill all other requirements, I'll let
courts determine that ...

The courts will not be involved.


However, the requirement for office of the president is aptly outlined
in the Constitution, and that has NOT been met ...

It has been met completely. Obama is a natural born citizen. There are
no facts to the contrary.



Regards,
JS

On Apr 21, 4:22*pm, Lamont Cranston
wrote:
On 4/20/2011 6:21 PM, John Smith wrote:

On 4/20/2011 5:19 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote:

...
Hawaii's birth certificates already meet all of the new requirements.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html

Like I said, they may well indeed fill all other requirements, I'll let
courts determine that ...

The courts will not be involved.

First the US Presidential Election is actually 50 'Separate'
State Elections -not- a single national election.
-that's-50-chances-to-disqualify-obama-from-the-ballot-

OOPS so in some US States : Yes The State Courts Will
Get Involved.

BUT in most US States : It Will Be The Individual State's
Elected Secretary of State Who Will Get Involved and
Be The First Decider in their respective States.
-some-of-these-us-states-have-republican-secretaries-of-state-
-plus-republican-governors-plus-republican-controlled-legislatures-
-that-addeds-up-to-three-strikes-for-obama-)-

AND That Is Why : US President Obama May NOT
Be On-the-Ballot in All 50 US States in 2012 . . .
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...3a74c7b3d32061

On 22/04/2011 9:22 AM, Lamont Cranston wrote:
On 4/20/2011 6:21 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 4/20/2011 5:19 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote:

...
Hawaii's birth certificates already meet all of the new requirements.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html

Like I said, they may well indeed fill all other requirements, I'll let
courts determine that ...

The courts will not be involved.


However, the requirement for office of the president is aptly outlined
in the Constitution, and that has NOT been met ...

It has been met completely. Obama is a natural born citizen. There are
no facts to the contrary.


It must have been met! Obama is presiding!

I notice that "John Smith" (not his real name) isn't even in the running
for the White House. Why is that?

No, don't answer that, it's quite obvious why he isn't in the running
for the oval office!

Krypsis