On Apr 27, 10:35*am, D Peter Maus wrote:
On 4/27/11 12:24 , John Smith wrote:









On 4/27/2011 10:05 AM, w spilman wrote:

...
The first document was all that is required to prove
American citizenship. Nobody lied, loser.

Confabulated and lying to the very end ... you go on record ...

With the real birth certificate (supposedly) we now can properly have
this issue examined. If a valid document, this fulfills the requirement
demanded by the Constitution, but only as far as birth proof.

The parents nationality, whether he ever surrendered citizenship, to
assume citizenship of another country, the legal questions of the
influence of his parents citizenship, etc. will all need to be examined
also, after this document has had time to be properly vetted ...

Just ending the lies of the false certification being proper has ended
... those nutjobs are now on record ...

Regards,
JS

* The questions raised by the statement by the Governor of Hawaii
stating that the long form certificate did not exist, aside, John, the
real issues should be defeating this guy at the polls and defeating his
agenda in the political arena.

* Put your energy there. Even if what you suspect were to be true,
there's no entity in the nation that's going to remove him from office,
nor negate his policies based on the birth issue alone.

* Put your energy into educating your opponents about policy, the
lessons of history, and strength of the founding documents in a Third
Millenium world.

* Put your energy where it can inspire action.

Prez "BO" {Obama} Proves the Original 'Birther' Charges
that the Former Document [V1.0] Was NOT an Actual
Hawaiian "Birth Certificate"
-oops-another-inconvenient-truth-oops-oops-oops-