| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 7, 3:57*pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:14 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: ... Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! Normal high-rise fires containing all that NEVER melt iron nor leave nano thermite residue. The residues of thermite are iron and aluminum oxide. *THE most common metals used in high-rise construction. -- Ray Fischer * * * * | *Mendacracy (n.) government by lying *| *The new GOP ideal- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Jon Bobble spell check that for me mine is broken TIAI;-) |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 7, 9:04*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/7/2011 5:12 PM, joeturn wrote: ... but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Jon Bobble spell check that for me mine is broken TIAI;-) The properties exhibited by thermite bear a signature which absolutely proves it to be man made. For example: *You can stack a bunch of rocks together and form a wall. Or, men can cut, polish, etc. rocks into geometric shapes and build a wall. You will NEVER be likely to confuse the two stone walls, nor lack ability to recognize the difference between the two ... Regards, JS Very true and THERMATE was the military patented grade of THERMITE used for incenterary devices in WWII super quick cutting through armor |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
"joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 9:04 pm, John Smith wrote: On 5/7/2011 5:12 PM, joeturn wrote: ... but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Jon Bobble spell check that for me mine is broken TIAI;-) The properties exhibited by thermite bear a signature which absolutely proves it to be man made. For example: You can stack a bunch of rocks together and form a wall. Or, men can cut, polish, etc. rocks into geometric shapes and build a wall. You will NEVER be likely to confuse the two stone walls, nor lack ability to recognize the difference between the two ... Regards, JS Very true and THERMATE was the military patented grade of THERMITE used for incenterary devices in WWII super quick cutting through armor So tell me, how exactly did they manage to get several tons of thermite into the building, expose the necessary girders, set the devices, and manage to control them all with absolutely no one noticing or spilling the beans later? Further, how exactly do you manage to cause the visible point of failure to be exactly the aircraft impact site, and how exactly do you manage to protect the devices from all that damage and fire while still providing 100% reliability? Sorry, but seems to me that explanation leaves a lot to be desired and based more on conjecture and supposition than actual fact. |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 8, 1:55*am, "Scout"
wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 9:04 pm, John Smith wrote: On 5/7/2011 5:12 PM, joeturn wrote: ... but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Jon Bobble spell check that for me mine is broken TIAI;-) The properties exhibited by thermite bear a signature which absolutely proves it to be man made. For example: *You can stack a bunch of rocks together and form a wall. Or, men can cut, polish, etc. rocks into geometric shapes and build a wall. You will NEVER be likely to confuse the two stone walls, nor lack ability to recognize the difference between the two ... Regards, JS Very true and THERMATE was the military patented grade of THERMITE used for incenterary devices in WWII super quick cutting through armor So tell me, how exactly did they manage to get several tons of thermite into the building, expose the necessary girders, set the devices, and manage to control them *all with absolutely no one noticing or spilling the beans later? Further, how exactly do you manage to cause the visible point of failure to be exactly the aircraft impact site, and how exactly do you manage to protect the devices from all that damage and fire while still providing 100% reliability? Sorry, but seems to me that explanation leaves a lot to be desired and based more on conjecture and supposition than actual fact.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sprayed on Asbestos was used to protect them from the elements. The girders are roof members of little consiquence. They were not worried about being noticed setting the charges,as it was common practice to do this back then so the buildings could be removed easily in a tight area,so as not to do excessible damage to the surronding structures! Actually there was no Plane hit nor Fire it was all a smoke screen.Somebody used smudge pots to create the illusion of fires and pushed dummys out of the windows to create the illusion of jumpers! How many tons of thermate would you estimate it took to burn a slot into the vertical support columns on every other floor,knowing kerosene wouldn't do it? |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
"joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 8, 1:55 am, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 9:04 pm, John Smith wrote: On 5/7/2011 5:12 PM, joeturn wrote: ... but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Jon Bobble spell check that for me mine is broken TIAI;-) The properties exhibited by thermite bear a signature which absolutely proves it to be man made. For example: You can stack a bunch of rocks together and form a wall. Or, men can cut, polish, etc. rocks into geometric shapes and build a wall. You will NEVER be likely to confuse the two stone walls, nor lack ability to recognize the difference between the two ... Regards, JS Very true and THERMATE was the military patented grade of THERMITE used for incenterary devices in WWII super quick cutting through armor So tell me, how exactly did they manage to get several tons of thermite into the building, expose the necessary girders, set the devices, and manage to control them all with absolutely no one noticing or spilling the beans later? Further, how exactly do you manage to cause the visible point of failure to be exactly the aircraft impact site, and how exactly do you manage to protect the devices from all that damage and fire while still providing 100% reliability? Sorry, but seems to me that explanation leaves a lot to be desired and based more on conjecture and supposition than actual fact.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sprayed on Asbestos was used to protect them from the elements. Sorry, but that doesn't prevent physical damage nor does it prevent heat damage given a hot enough fire and/or enough time. So once again, I ask how can you protect them against the impact of an airliner, subsequent fires and of course be utterly inconspicuous. The girders are roof members of little consiquence. I see, so your idea of how to collapse a skyscraper is to collapse the roof.....and you think the official story doesn't consider reality.... Oh, and FYI, doesn't explain why in at least one case the visible point of failure is clearly the sight of the impact from the airliner. They were not worried about being noticed setting the charges Really? People running around the building going into private spaces, ripping down the drywall, scrapping off the fireproofing, hooking massive objects to the girders, and no one is going to notice, remember and comment about it later? ROTFLMAO. ,as it was common practice to do this back then Right, way back in then Bush knew that several decades later he would be President and would need an excuse to go to war. Sheese, and you call the 9/11 commission delusionary. so the buildings could be removed easily in a tight area,so as not to do excessible damage to the surronding structures! Sorry, but it is NOT common practice, then or now to put demolition charges in a building unless you are actually in the process of demolishing the building. Actually there was no Plane hit nor Fire it was all a smoke screen. Right, that explains the eyewitness accounts and video footage of an airliner running into the building.... |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On 5/8/2011 1:55 AM, Scout wrote:
So tell me, how exactly did they manage to get several tons of thermite into the building, expose the necessary girders, set the devices, and manage to control them all with absolutely no one noticing or spilling the beans later? Further, how exactly do you manage to cause the visible point of failure to be exactly the aircraft impact site, and how exactly do you manage to protect the devices from all that damage and fire while still providing 100% reliability? Sorry, but seems to me that explanation leaves a lot to be desired and based more on conjecture and supposition than actual fact. Nah, that "explanation" is 100% based on...kooktardery. |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 8, 4:21*am, "Scout"
wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 8, 1:55 am, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message .... On May 7, 9:04 pm, John Smith wrote: On 5/7/2011 5:12 PM, joeturn wrote: ... but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Jon Bobble spell check that for me mine is broken TIAI;-) The properties exhibited by thermite bear a signature which absolutely proves it to be man made. For example: *You can stack a bunch of rocks together and form a wall. Or, men can cut, polish, etc. rocks into geometric shapes and build a wall. You will NEVER be likely to confuse the two stone walls, nor lack ability to recognize the difference between the two ... Regards, JS Very true and THERMATE was the military patented grade of THERMITE used for incenterary devices in WWII super quick cutting through armor So tell me, how exactly did they manage to get several tons of thermite into the building, expose the necessary girders, set the devices, and manage to control them *all with absolutely no one noticing or spilling the beans later? Further, how exactly do you manage to cause the visible point of failure to be exactly the aircraft impact site, and how exactly do you manage to protect the devices from all that damage and fire while still providing 100% reliability? Sorry, but seems to me that explanation leaves a lot to be desired and based more on conjecture and supposition than actual fact.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sprayed on Asbestos was used to protect them from the elements. Sorry, but that doesn't prevent physical damage nor does it prevent heat damage given a hot enough fire and/or enough time. So once again, I ask how can you protect them against the impact of an airliner, subsequent fires and of course be utterly inconspicuous. The girders are roof members of little consiquence. I see, so your idea of how to collapse a skyscraper is to collapse the roof.....and you think the official story doesn't consider reality.... No you claimed the roof members brought down the builds when you said girder. I said roof members were of little consiquence as it has to be the verticle support columns thyat has to be cut for weakoning a structure for collapse! Oh, and FYI, doesn't explain why in at least one case the visible point of failure is clearly the sight of the impact from the airliner. It was an explosion from the inside and a smoke screen to conciel any damage,which there was none! This was a farce there were preset exposives along that area of said impact with a line of piping to create the smoke scene. NO PLANES WERE USED! They were not worried about being noticed setting the charges Really? NO Loffley was told it was common practice when he asked why they were beeing set during the construction. It was compare to the las Vegas Casinos that were apt to be moved at a moments notice! People running around the building going into private spaces, ripping down the drywall, scrapping off the fireproofing, hooking massive objects to the girders, and no one is going to notice, remember and comment about it later? The only racket they made was during the stripping of the buildings of their contents.Copper plumbing ,wiring,intermidiate supports,office equiptment ,comodes.urinals,ect things that could be reused or projectiles. ROTFLMAO. This is an obvious emotion for the brain washed,if only you could think you laughter would turn to tears,you would be able to realize your Government is guilty of genocide and thinks nothing of its citizens they are collateral damage! ,as it was common practice to do this back then Right, way back in then Bush knew that several decades later he would be President and would need an excuse to go to war. No his dad entered the USA on the project paper clip he was born nazi germany and programed by Hitler to tear apart the USA from within and assure National Socialism replaced Democracy Sheese, and you call the 9/11 commission delusionary. They were a special team of Government shills set in motion to sway public opinion away from the real terrorist.your CIA. so the buildings could be removed easily in a tight area,so as not to do excessible damage to the surronding structures! Sorry, but it is NOT common practice, then or now to put demolition charges in a building unless you are actually in the process of demolishing the building. Not so it is more feasible to build them in the buildings that are expected to be removed. Actually there was no Plane hit nor Fire it was all a smoke screen. Right, that explains the eyewitness accounts and video footage of an airliner running into the building.... A closer look at your videos will show you it was a hologrammed image of a plane people can see those you know. They will be used to make people think the rature has come when they put on the Nasa Blue beam project! - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
|
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
|
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
"joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 8, 4:21 am, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 8, 1:55 am, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 9:04 pm, John Smith wrote: On 5/7/2011 5:12 PM, joeturn wrote: ... but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Jon Bobble spell check that for me mine is broken TIAI;-) The properties exhibited by thermite bear a signature which absolutely proves it to be man made. For example: You can stack a bunch of rocks together and form a wall. Or, men can cut, polish, etc. rocks into geometric shapes and build a wall. You will NEVER be likely to confuse the two stone walls, nor lack ability to recognize the difference between the two ... Regards, JS Very true and THERMATE was the military patented grade of THERMITE used for incenterary devices in WWII super quick cutting through armor So tell me, how exactly did they manage to get several tons of thermite into the building, expose the necessary girders, set the devices, and manage to control them all with absolutely no one noticing or spilling the beans later? Further, how exactly do you manage to cause the visible point of failure to be exactly the aircraft impact site, and how exactly do you manage to protect the devices from all that damage and fire while still providing 100% reliability? Sorry, but seems to me that explanation leaves a lot to be desired and based more on conjecture and supposition than actual fact.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sprayed on Asbestos was used to protect them from the elements. Sorry, but that doesn't prevent physical damage nor does it prevent heat damage given a hot enough fire and/or enough time. So once again, I ask how can you protect them against the impact of an airliner, subsequent fires and of course be utterly inconspicuous. The girders are roof members of little consiquence. I see, so your idea of how to collapse a skyscraper is to collapse the roof.....and you think the official story doesn't consider reality.... No you claimed the roof members brought down the builds when you said girder. I said roof members were of little consiquence as it has to be the verticle support columns thyat has to be cut for weakoning a structure for collapse! Hate to tell you this but girders exist in places other than the roof. Further, it's going to be quite difficult if not impossible to use thermite to cut a column since thermite tends to cut only in a downwards direction. As such, your reaction compounds would simply drip off a column as soon as you started the reaction and next to nothing would be accomplished. Oh, and FYI, doesn't explain why in at least one case the visible point of failure is clearly the sight of the impact from the airliner. It was an explosion from the inside and a smoke screen to conciel any damage,which there was none! Right, and the plane flying into that spot was just ... what? mass hypnosis and illusions captured on video? This was a farce there were preset exposives along that area of said impact with a line of piping to create the smoke scene. NO PLANES WERE USED! Right, so where did all the aircraft wreckage come from? Sorry, but you're a loon and simply not worth the time to talk to. snip |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 8, 3:06*pm, "Scout"
wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 8, 4:21 am, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message .... On May 8, 1:55 am, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 9:04 pm, John Smith wrote: On 5/7/2011 5:12 PM, joeturn wrote: ... but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Jon Bobble spell check that for me mine is broken TIAI;-) The properties exhibited by thermite bear a signature which absolutely proves it to be man made. For example: *You can stack a bunch of rocks together and form a wall. Or, men can cut, polish, etc. rocks into geometric shapes and build a wall. You will NEVER be likely to confuse the two stone walls, nor lack ability to recognize the difference between the two ... Regards, JS Very true and THERMATE was the military patented grade of THERMITE used for incenterary devices in WWII super quick cutting through armor So tell me, how exactly did they manage to get several tons of thermite into the building, expose the necessary girders, set the devices, and manage to control them *all with absolutely no one noticing or spilling the beans later? Further, how exactly do you manage to cause the visible point of failure to be exactly the aircraft impact site, and how exactly do you manage to protect the devices from all that damage and fire while still providing 100% reliability? Sorry, but seems to me that explanation leaves a lot to be desired and based more on conjecture and supposition than actual fact.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sprayed on Asbestos was used to protect them from the elements. Sorry, but that doesn't prevent physical damage nor does it prevent heat damage given a hot enough fire and/or enough time. So once again, I ask how can you protect them against the impact of an airliner, subsequent fires and of course be utterly inconspicuous. The girders are roof members of little consiquence. I see, so your idea of how to collapse a skyscraper is to collapse the roof.....and you think the official story doesn't consider reality.... No you claimed the roof members brought down the builds when you said girder. I said roof members were of little consiquence as it has to be the verticle support columns thyat has to be cut for weakoning a structure for collapse! Hate to tell you this but girders exist in places other than the roof. Further, it's going to be quite difficult if not impossible to use thermite to cut a column since thermite tends to cut only in a downwards direction.. As such, your reaction compounds would simply drip off a column as soon as you started the reaction and next to nothing would be accomplished. Oh, and FYI, doesn't explain why in at least one case the visible point of failure is clearly the sight of the impact from the airliner. It was an explosion from the inside and a smoke screen to conciel any damage,which there was none! Right, and the plane flying into that spot was just ... what? mass hypnosis and illusions captured on video? This was a farce there were preset exposives along that area of said impact with a line of piping to create the smoke scene. NO PLANES WERE USED! Right, so where did all the aircraft wreckage come from? Sorry, but you're a loon and simply not worth the time to talk to. snip- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - All the airplanes wreckage came from the scrapyard most like because none of it was identified as anypart of the said airliners mentioned! The engine found managed to miss the roof and the awning it was found under and it was from an early model jet used in the Vietnam War,not large enough for a 757 nor 727. In the construction world a girder is a solid support the roof or sheet panels not the vertical columns,thus cant be of any significance since the buildings collasped in their own foot prints. if the girts were melted it would have caused the building to sway and fall over like a tree instead of down like controlled demolition! |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 8, 7:55*pm, Jim Kale wrote:
John Smith wrote: On 5/8/2011 8:59 AM, John Smith wrote: On 5/8/2011 5:04 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: ... 1 1/4 pound in each tower, hidden in a VERY special super sekrit place. Then, 30 years later, tell the pilots to hit "just above" those specific floors, or the cause is kaput! This paper proves it was used, thermite, and much, MUCH MORE than 1.25 lbs. ROFLOL ... http://www.journalof911studies.com/v...deed_Did_the_W... Neglected the link stated ... corrected. You neglected to think, you retard! You will never be able to, you retard. You posted no proof, you retard. * Where are the receipts, you retard? Why is nobody being arrested, with your "PROOF", you retarded poofter?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It was the Government that was guilty and they seem to have diplomatic immunity from the Supreme Law of the Land.This is why noone has been charged. They are in control of all three branches of government the Excecutive,Legistlative and Judicial system. You can get a judge to try a case against their government that would be declared treason.Anything that gets excepted as a casae gets dismissed.Bush got his cousin to throw the case against him out.The lady knew she was meant to be killed at the Pentagon and also knew no plane hit the Pentagon. This is the smoking gun is the missile attack at the Pentagon and the shills are full force keeping that from the public! |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 8, 8:03*pm, Jim Kale wrote:
John Smith wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:34 AM, Jim Kale wrote: ... You really are retarded if you think that **** holds any kind of reality. So uh, who's been charged for this "crime", you retard? I mean if it's "proof", then why isn't anybody being charged, you retard? Really? Yes, really! Well, it is simple, prove what you say. I am not obligated to prove a negative, you retard. * YOU have to prove what you say is correct, and then YOU still have to answer my questions, you retard. Your "list" of "experts" are all known retards, like you. ANSWER MY QUESTION, you retard! You said YOU have proof, right? * Then WHY isn't anybody being arrested, charged, indicted, incarcerated, etc., You stump stupid retard? It was your Government that was guilty and they seem to have diplomatic immunity from the Supreme Law of the Land.This is why noone has been charged. They are in control of all three branches of government the Excecutive,Legistlative and Judicial system. You can't get a judge to try a case against their government,that would be considered treason.Anything that gets excepted as a case gets dismissed.Bush got his cousin to throw the case against him out.The lady knew she was meant to be killed at the Pentagon and also knew no plane hit the Pentagon. This is the smoking gun "the missile attack at the Pentagon" and the shills are full force keeping that from the public! |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 8, 11:11*pm, joeturn wrote:
On May 8, 8:03*pm, Jim Kale wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:34 AM, Jim Kale wrote: ... You really are retarded if you think that **** holds any kind of reality. So uh, who's been charged for this "crime", you retard? I mean if it's "proof", then why isn't anybody being charged, you retard? Really? Yes, really! Well, it is simple, prove what you say. I am not obligated to prove a negative, you retard. * YOU have to prove what you say is correct, and then YOU still have to answer my questions, you retard. Your "list" of "experts" are all known retards, like you. ANSWER MY QUESTION, you retard! You said YOU have proof, right? * Then WHY isn't anybody being arrested, charged, indicted, incarcerated, etc., You stump stupid retard? It was your Government that was guilty and they seem to have diplomatic immunity from the Supreme Law of the Land.This is why noone has been charged. They are in control of all three branches of government the Excecutive,Legistlative and Judicial system. You can't get a judge to try a case against their government,that would be considered treason.Anything that gets excepted as a case gets dismissed.Bush got his cousin to throw the case against him out.The lady knew she was meant to be killed at the Pentagon and also knew no plane hit the Pentagon. This is the smoking gun "the missile attack at the Pentagon" and the shills are full force keeping that from the public!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Example of our Kangaroo Court System http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com...feld/#more-551 http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com...ions/#more-566 |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
"joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 3:57 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:14 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: ... Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! Normal high-rise fires containing all that NEVER melt iron nor leave nano thermite residue. The residues of thermite are iron and aluminum oxide. THE most common metals used in high-rise construction. -- Ray Fischer | Mendacracy (n.) government by lying | The new GOP ideal- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Really? I've got all sorts of metal slag spheres around our burning table, and oddly enough not only do we not use thermite, there is not barrium used in the cutting process. Just good old natural gas and oxygen. So please support your claim that spheres automatically mean barrium and thermite. Oh, that's right, you don't do proof for your assertions. |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
"joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 8, 8:03 pm, Jim Kale wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:34 AM, Jim Kale wrote: ... You really are retarded if you think that **** holds any kind of reality. So uh, who's been charged for this "crime", you retard? I mean if it's "proof", then why isn't anybody being charged, you retard? Really? Yes, really! Well, it is simple, prove what you say. I am not obligated to prove a negative, you retard. YOU have to prove what you say is correct, and then YOU still have to answer my questions, you retard. Your "list" of "experts" are all known retards, like you. ANSWER MY QUESTION, you retard! You said YOU have proof, right? Then WHY isn't anybody being arrested, charged, indicted, incarcerated, etc., You stump stupid retard? It was your Government that was guilty Proof? Didn't think you had any. and they seem to have diplomatic immunity from the Supreme Law of the Land.This is why noone has been charged. They are in control of all three branches of government the Excecutive,Legistlative and Judicial system. You can't get a judge to try a case against their government,that would be considered treason.Anything that gets excepted as a case gets dismissed.Bush got his cousin to throw the case against him out.The lady knew she was meant to be killed at the Pentagon and also knew no plane hit the Pentagon. This is the smoking gun "the missile attack at the Pentagon" and the shills are full force keeping that from the public! |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 9, 7:15*pm, "Scout"
wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 3:57 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:14 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: ... Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! Normal high-rise fires containing all that NEVER melt iron nor leave nano thermite residue. The residues of thermite are iron and aluminum oxide. *THE most common metals used in high-rise construction. -- Ray Fischer * * * * | *Mendacracy (n.) government by lying *| *The new GOP ideal- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Really? I've got all sorts of metal slag spheres around our burning table, and oddly enough not only do we not use thermite, there is not barrium used in the cutting process. Just good old natural gas and oxygen. So please support your claim that spheres automatically mean barrium and thermite. Oh, that's right, you don't do proof for your assertions.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You felled to connect the dots spheres that are made from iron and sulfer that do contain barrium is the tell tell sign that Thermate was used! You cutting torch would take mega time to cut through vertical columns this is why natural gas and oxygen torches are not used for controlled demolition. During a controlled demolition the columns are fitted with a yoke that contains the thermite and holds it on the targeted column on about a 45 degree angle. This angle cut allows the top part to slip off its base and drop straight down. You can see clear pictures of these angled cuts on the columns. You would never use your torch to cut an angled cut on a beam unless it was for a specific outcome. Scot your just going to have to wake up and realize you have been dupped by your National Socialist Government! |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 9, 7:26*pm, "Scout"
wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 8, 8:03 pm, Jim Kale wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:34 AM, Jim Kale wrote: ... You really are retarded if you think that **** holds any kind of reality. So uh, who's been charged for this "crime", you retard? I mean if it's "proof", then why isn't anybody being charged, you retard? Really? Yes, really! Well, it is simple, prove what you say. I am not obligated to prove a negative, you retard. * YOU have to prove what you say is correct, and then YOU still have to answer my questions, you retard. Your "list" of "experts" are all known retards, like you. ANSWER MY QUESTION, you retard! You said YOU have proof, right? * Then WHY isn't anybody being arrested, charged, indicted, incarcerated, etc., You stump stupid retard? It was your Government that was guilty Proof? Didn't think you had any. and they seem to have diplomatic immunity from the Supreme Law of the Land.This is why noone has been charged. They are in control of all three branches of government the Excecutive,Legistlative and Judicial system. You can't get a judge to try a case against their government,that would be considered treason.Anything that gets excepted as a case gets dismissed.Bush got his cousin to throw the case against him out.The lady knew she was meant to be killed at the Pentagon and also knew no plane hit the Pentagon. This is the smoking gun "the missile attack at the Pentagon" and the shills are full force keeping that from the public!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - PS the spheres found at the WTC complex was from the Government grade of THERMITE called THERMATE only excessible from the Government inventory! |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 9, 7:26*pm, "Scout"
wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 8, 8:03 pm, Jim Kale wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:34 AM, Jim Kale wrote: ... You really are retarded if you think that **** holds any kind of reality. So uh, who's been charged for this "crime", you retard? I mean if it's "proof", then why isn't anybody being charged, you retard? Really? Yes, really! Well, it is simple, prove what you say. I am not obligated to prove a negative, you retard. * YOU have to prove what you say is correct, and then YOU still have to answer my questions, you retard. Your "list" of "experts" are all known retards, like you. ANSWER MY QUESTION, you retard! You said YOU have proof, right? * Then WHY isn't anybody being arrested, charged, indicted, incarcerated, etc., You stump stupid retard? It was your Government that was guilty Proof? Didn't think you had any. and they seem to have diplomatic immunity from the Supreme Law of the Land.This is why noone has been charged. They are in control of all three branches of government the Excecutive,Legistlative and Judicial system. You can't get a judge to try a case against their government,that would be considered treason.Anything that gets excepted as a case gets dismissed.Bush got his cousin to throw the case against him out.The lady knew she was meant to be killed at the Pentagon and also knew no plane hit the Pentagon. This is the smoking gun "the missile attack at the Pentagon" and the shills are full force keeping that from the public!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The fbi released a five frame video that shows a missile in flight.That missile has a rocket plume behind it.It all so shows the left behing explosion of the first rocket hit and another one inflight.So that release has three traces of rockets fired at the pentagram and funnything it could not display an airplane at all. Then there is another FOIA relesed by them of a helicopter video that shows the impact of a rocket but there also was no evidence of any airplane visible not even a fly over! There also is a video that shows the missing footaget of the missile attack! I'll fecth them for you.BRB |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 9, 7:26*pm, "Scout"
wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 8, 8:03 pm, Jim Kale wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:34 AM, Jim Kale wrote: ... You really are retarded if you think that **** holds any kind of reality. So uh, who's been charged for this "crime", you retard? I mean if it's "proof", then why isn't anybody being charged, you retard? Really? Yes, really! Well, it is simple, prove what you say. I am not obligated to prove a negative, you retard. * YOU have to prove what you say is correct, and then YOU still have to answer my questions, you retard. Your "list" of "experts" are all known retards, like you. ANSWER MY QUESTION, you retard! You said YOU have proof, right? * Then WHY isn't anybody being arrested, charged, indicted, incarcerated, etc., You stump stupid retard? It was your Government that was guilty Proof? Didn't think you had any. and they seem to have diplomatic immunity from the Supreme Law of the Land.This is why noone has been charged. They are in control of all three branches of government the Excecutive,Legistlative and Judicial system. You can't get a judge to try a case against their government,that would be considered treason.Anything that gets excepted as a case gets dismissed.Bush got his cousin to throw the case against him out.The lady knew she was meant to be killed at the Pentagon and also knew no plane hit the Pentagon. This is the smoking gun "the missile attack at the Pentagon" and the shills are full force keeping that from the public!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnzh-...layer_embedded http://letsrollforums.com/helicopter...licopter+pilot |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
http://www.rense.com/general94/bin.htm
12 hours to do a DNA test, including getting the result? I don't know, but isn't that Amazing? cuhulin |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 9, 8:51*pm, joeturn wrote:
On May 9, 7:26*pm, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 8, 8:03 pm, Jim Kale wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:34 AM, Jim Kale wrote: ... You really are retarded if you think that **** holds any kind of reality. So uh, who's been charged for this "crime", you retard? I mean if it's "proof", then why isn't anybody being charged, you retard? Really? Yes, really! Well, it is simple, prove what you say. I am not obligated to prove a negative, you retard. * YOU have to prove what you say is correct, and then YOU still have to answer my questions, you retard. Your "list" of "experts" are all known retards, like you. ANSWER MY QUESTION, you retard! You said YOU have proof, right? * Then WHY isn't anybody being arrested, charged, indicted, incarcerated, etc., You stump stupid retard? It was your Government that was guilty Proof? Didn't think you had any. and they seem to have diplomatic immunity from the Supreme Law of the Land.This is why noone has been charged. They are in control of all three branches of government the Excecutive,Legistlative and Judicial system. You can't get a judge to try a case against their government,that would be considered treason.Anything that gets excepted as a case gets dismissed.Bush got his cousin to throw the case against him out.The lady knew she was meant to be killed at the Pentagon and also knew no plane hit the Pentagon. This is the smoking gun "the missile attack at the Pentagon" and the shills are full force keeping that from the public!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The only thing this guy got wrong was the fuselage.It was not a fuselage it was the rocket plume the rocket is up front in plain view! Black nose,white center, black tail. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnzh-...layer_embedded Page two shows the first rocket in a wav just over and over.Did you see a plane? http://letsrollforums.com/helicopter...licopter+pilot |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
"joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 9, 7:26 pm, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 8, 8:03 pm, Jim Kale wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:34 AM, Jim Kale wrote: ... You really are retarded if you think that **** holds any kind of reality. So uh, who's been charged for this "crime", you retard? I mean if it's "proof", then why isn't anybody being charged, you retard? Really? Yes, really! Well, it is simple, prove what you say. I am not obligated to prove a negative, you retard. YOU have to prove what you say is correct, and then YOU still have to answer my questions, you retard. Your "list" of "experts" are all known retards, like you. ANSWER MY QUESTION, you retard! You said YOU have proof, right? Then WHY isn't anybody being arrested, charged, indicted, incarcerated, etc., You stump stupid retard? It was your Government that was guilty Proof? Didn't think you had any. and they seem to have diplomatic immunity from the Supreme Law of the Land.This is why noone has been charged. They are in control of all three branches of government the Excecutive,Legistlative and Judicial system. You can't get a judge to try a case against their government,that would be considered treason.Anything that gets excepted as a case gets dismissed.Bush got his cousin to throw the case against him out.The lady knew she was meant to be killed at the Pentagon and also knew no plane hit the Pentagon. This is the smoking gun "the missile attack at the Pentagon" and the shills are full force keeping that from the public!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The fbi released a five frame video that shows a missile in flight.That missile has a rocket plume behind it.It all so shows the left behing explosion of the first rocket hit and another one inflight.So that release has three traces of rockets fired at the pentagram and funnything it could not display an airplane at all. Then there is another FOIA relesed by them of a helicopter video that shows the impact of a rocket but there also was no evidence of any airplane visible not even a fly over! There also is a video that shows the missing footaget of the missile attack! I'll fecth them for you.BRB And yet STILL no proof offered, just more unsupported assertions. |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
"joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 9, 7:26 pm, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 8, 8:03 pm, Jim Kale wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:34 AM, Jim Kale wrote: ... You really are retarded if you think that **** holds any kind of reality. So uh, who's been charged for this "crime", you retard? I mean if it's "proof", then why isn't anybody being charged, you retard? Really? Yes, really! Well, it is simple, prove what you say. I am not obligated to prove a negative, you retard. YOU have to prove what you say is correct, and then YOU still have to answer my questions, you retard. Your "list" of "experts" are all known retards, like you. ANSWER MY QUESTION, you retard! You said YOU have proof, right? Then WHY isn't anybody being arrested, charged, indicted, incarcerated, etc., You stump stupid retard? It was your Government that was guilty Proof? Didn't think you had any. and they seem to have diplomatic immunity from the Supreme Law of the Land.This is why noone has been charged. They are in control of all three branches of government the Excecutive,Legistlative and Judicial system. You can't get a judge to try a case against their government,that would be considered treason.Anything that gets excepted as a case gets dismissed.Bush got his cousin to throw the case against him out.The lady knew she was meant to be killed at the Pentagon and also knew no plane hit the Pentagon. This is the smoking gun "the missile attack at the Pentagon" and the shills are full force keeping that from the public!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnzh-...layer_embedded OMG, this is your proof? Some asswipe that doesn't even understand that video is taken in a series of FRAMES (ie individual pictures) and that the apparent motion is only a result of looking at individual pictures in quick succession? That high speed movement of an object will cause it to appear to leap from place to place as you look at each individual picture in succession? That when you slow a video WAY down, what you are doing is simply looking at one individual picture for awhile and then switching to the next picture which you look at for awhile and then you look at the next picture for awhile. That what you see as slow motion in movies and so on is actually shoot at a considerably higher number of frames per second and then played back at the number rate making the motion appear slower. With this as an example of your "proof" I'm not even going to waste my time looking at the other link, or even bother looking at any of your claims of 'proof' because you don't even have enough intelligence to recognize the flaws in the assertions made by these people you rely upon for your proof. The only person who could possibly buy this sort of crap as 'proof' is someone who is a ****ing stupid moron incapable of any sort of independent evaluation of their own, but simply buy the claims of other ****ing stupid morons as "proof". http://letsrollforums.com/helicopter...licopter+pilot |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
"joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 9, 8:51 pm, joeturn wrote: On May 9, 7:26 pm, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 8, 8:03 pm, Jim Kale wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:34 AM, Jim Kale wrote: ... You really are retarded if you think that **** holds any kind of reality. So uh, who's been charged for this "crime", you retard? I mean if it's "proof", then why isn't anybody being charged, you retard? Really? Yes, really! Well, it is simple, prove what you say. I am not obligated to prove a negative, you retard. YOU have to prove what you say is correct, and then YOU still have to answer my questions, you retard. Your "list" of "experts" are all known retards, like you. ANSWER MY QUESTION, you retard! You said YOU have proof, right? Then WHY isn't anybody being arrested, charged, indicted, incarcerated, etc., You stump stupid retard? It was your Government that was guilty Proof? Didn't think you had any. and they seem to have diplomatic immunity from the Supreme Law of the Land.This is why noone has been charged. They are in control of all three branches of government the Excecutive,Legistlative and Judicial system. You can't get a judge to try a case against their government,that would be considered treason.Anything that gets excepted as a case gets dismissed.Bush got his cousin to throw the case against him out.The lady knew she was meant to be killed at the Pentagon and also knew no plane hit the Pentagon. This is the smoking gun "the missile attack at the Pentagon" and the shills are full force keeping that from the public!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The only thing this guy got wrong was EVERYTHING. Doesn't have the FIRST clue of how video works and that a video is actually just a serious of individual pictures and WOW when you slow down a video enough.....all you see is an individual picture showing NO movement until suddenly the next picture loads and the object leads across the frame. Dude, buy a ****ing clue, you're just butt ass stupid and ignorant. the fuselage.It was not a fuselage it was the rocket plume the rocket is up front in plain view! Black nose,white center, black tail. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnzh-...layer_embedded Page two shows the first rocket in a wav just over and over.Did you see a plane? http://letsrollforums.com/helicopter...licopter+pilot |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
"joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 9, 7:15 pm, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 3:57 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:14 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: ... Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! Normal high-rise fires containing all that NEVER melt iron nor leave nano thermite residue. The residues of thermite are iron and aluminum oxide. THE most common metals used in high-rise construction. -- Ray Fischer | Mendacracy (n.) government by lying | The new GOP ideal- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Really? I've got all sorts of metal slag spheres around our burning table, and oddly enough not only do we not use thermite, there is not barrium used in the cutting process. Just good old natural gas and oxygen. So please support your claim that spheres automatically mean barrium and thermite. Oh, that's right, you don't do proof for your assertions.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You felled to connect the dots spheres that are made from iron and sulfer that do contain barrium is the tell tell sign that Thermate was used! You cutting torch would take mega time to cut through vertical columns this is why natural gas and oxygen torches are not used for controlled demolition. Actually, they are. A LOT. In fact in most controlled demolition they are used. Even in explosive controlled demolition much of the prep work is done via these exact sort of cutting torches. I really suggest you need to STFU and quit simply embarrassing yourself with your stupidity and ignorance. |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
"Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On May 9, 6:17 pm, joeturn wrote: On May 9, 7:15 pm, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 3:57 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:14 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: ... Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! Normal high-rise fires containing all that NEVER melt iron nor leave nano thermite residue. The residues of thermite are iron and aluminum oxide. THE most common metals used in high-rise construction. -- Ray Fischer | Mendacracy (n.) government by lying | The new GOP ideal- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Really? I've got all sorts of metal slag spheres around our burning table, and oddly enough not only do we not use thermite, there is not barrium used in the cutting process. Just good old natural gas and oxygen. So please support your claim that spheres automatically mean barrium and thermite. Oh, that's right, you don't do proof for your assertions.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You felled to connect the dots spheres that are made from iron and sulfer that do contain barrium is the tell tell sign that Thermate was used! It is a complete physical impossibility for thermite to do what happened to those buildings. It's not possible. FULL STOP! Yep, all but impossible to cut a column with thermite. It will simply drip off and do little or nothing to the column itself. You cutting torch would take mega time to cut through vertical columns this is why natural gas and oxygen torches are not used for controlled demolition. Thermite is not used in controlled demolition, ever. Yea, and cutting torches actually are used in controlled demolition. During a controlled demolition the columns are fitted with a yoke that contains the thermite There is no thermite in controlled demolition, RockHead. and holds it on the targeted column on about a 45 degree angle. This angle cut allows the top part to slip off its base and drop straight down. You can see clear pictures of these angled cuts on the columns. You would never use your torch to cut an angled cut on a beam unless it was for a specific outcome. Those beams at Ground Zero were cut with torches AFTER the collapse by workers cleaning up the debris, kooker. There are PHOTOS and VIDEOS of them doing this. You are STUPID BEYOND BELIEF. Cut with torches? You mean like in being used in controlled demolition? Say it's not so. |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 10, 1:15*am, John Smith wrote:
On 5/9/2011 10:05 PM, joeturn wrote: *... Those beams at Ground Zero were cut with torches AFTER the collapse by workers cleaning up the debris, kooker. There are PHOTOS and VIDEOS of them doing this. You are STUPID BEYOND BELIEF.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like this one? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EO7SvhYI_0Y&NR=1 Best thing about that video, it was BEFORE the cleanup crew comes in to clean up! Those are first responder firemen on the scene in that one! *NOT demolition employees ... Regards, JS I know for a fact an Ironworker wont cut a column on an angle rather than straight through because of the time it would take.Who would want to spend soo much time in all that heat and asbestos dust,when they could cut the shortest and quicker path and move on to the next cut,a junkyard man has better since that that! |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On 5/9/2011 10:29 PM, joeturn wrote:
... I know for a fact an Ironworker wont cut a column on an angle rather than straight through because of the time it would take.Who would want to spend soo much time in all that heat and asbestos dust,when they could cut the shortest and quicker path and move on to the next cut,a junkyard man has better since that that! Ever fall a tree with a chainsaw? Same angled cut is used to control the direction of fall, else the worker cutting a long beam is likely to be endangered having to scramble out of its' way. No, people cutting beams with a torch would be just as likely to make angled cuts as demolition workers, and for the same reasons, to control the direction of movement. With the demolition expert, he is attempting to shift the building in a predetermined direction, in the case of the torch/cutter, he is attempting a fall in a predetermined direction ... neither adds nor subtracts from existing evidence and proof. But, like I said, those are first responders on the scene, those beams are cut at angles, and the cleanup crew hasn't gotten there yet ... Regards, JS |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 10, 1:34*am, John Smith wrote:
On 5/9/2011 10:29 PM, joeturn wrote: ... I know for a fact an Ironworker wont cut a column on an angle rather than straight through because of the time it would take.Who would want to spend soo much time in all that heat and asbestos dust,when they could cut the shortest and quicker path and move on to the next cut,a junkyard man has better since that that! Ever fall a tree with a chainsaw? Same angled cut is used to control the direction of fall, else the worker cutting a long beam is likely to be endangered having to scramble out of its' way. No, people cutting beams with a torch would be just as likely to make angled cuts as demolition workers, and for the same reasons, to control the direction of movement. *With the demolition expert, he is attempting to shift the building in a predetermined direction, in the case of the torch/cutter, he is attempting a fall in a predetermined direction ... neither adds nor subtracts from existing evidence and proof. But, like I said, those are first responders on the scene, those beams are cut at angles, and the cleanup crew hasn't gotten there yet ... Regards, JS Thermite was not used for its ability to cause an explosion or to blow the building apart it was used strickly because of its instantanious cutting ability in incentarary devices and very quite no loud explosions. This is what NIST tried to pull off,to explain away the level of noise needed to blow a building up. It only had to be loud enough to burn the columns into! The sheeple swallowed the loud explosion part and this fed their fancy. If you quietly cut all the vertical support columns then a minor explosion creating a jolt would set off the collapse! |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On 5/9/2011 10:53 PM, joeturn wrote:
On May 10, 1:34 am, John wrote: On 5/9/2011 10:29 PM, joeturn wrote: ... I know for a fact an Ironworker wont cut a column on an angle rather than straight through because of the time it would take.Who would want to spend soo much time in all that heat and asbestos dust,when they could cut the shortest and quicker path and move on to the next cut,a junkyard man has better since that that! Ever fall a tree with a chainsaw? Same angled cut is used to control the direction of fall, else the worker cutting a long beam is likely to be endangered having to scramble out of its' way. No, people cutting beams with a torch would be just as likely to make angled cuts as demolition workers, and for the same reasons, to control the direction of movement. With the demolition expert, he is attempting to shift the building in a predetermined direction, in the case of the torch/cutter, he is attempting a fall in a predetermined direction ... neither adds nor subtracts from existing evidence and proof. But, like I said, those are first responders on the scene, those beams are cut at angles, and the cleanup crew hasn't gotten there yet ... Regards, JS Thermite was not used for its ability to cause an explosion or to blow the building apart it was used strickly because of its instantanious cutting ability in incentarary devices and very quite no loud explosions. This is what NIST tried to pull off,to explain away the level of noise needed to blow a building up. It only had to be loud enough to burn the columns into! The sheeple swallowed the loud explosion part and this fed their fancy. If you quietly cut all the vertical support columns then a minor explosion creating a jolt would set off the collapse! Yeah, I see that has nothing to do with the angle of the cuts I was explaining ... and, we need an independent investigation, not your opinions. Regards, JS |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 10, 1:57*am, John Smith wrote:
On 5/9/2011 10:53 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 10, 1:34 am, John *wrote: On 5/9/2011 10:29 PM, joeturn wrote: ... I know for a fact an Ironworker wont cut a column on an angle rather than straight through because of the time it would take.Who would want to spend soo much time in all that heat and asbestos dust,when they could cut the shortest and quicker path and move on to the next cut,a junkyard man has better since that that! Ever fall a tree with a chainsaw? Same angled cut is used to control the direction of fall, else the worker cutting a long beam is likely to be endangered having to scramble out of its' way. No, people cutting beams with a torch would be just as likely to make angled cuts as demolition workers, and for the same reasons, to control the direction of movement. *With the demolition expert, he is attempting to shift the building in a predetermined direction, in the case of the torch/cutter, he is attempting a fall in a predetermined direction ... neither adds nor subtracts from existing evidence and proof. But, like I said, those are first responders on the scene, those beams are cut at angles, and the cleanup crew hasn't gotten there yet ... Regards, JS Thermite was not used for its ability to cause an explosion or to blow the building apart it was used strickly because of its instantanious cutting ability in incentarary devices and very quite no loud explosions. This is what NIST tried to pull off,to explain away the level of noise needed to blow a building up. It only had to be loud enough to burn the columns into! The sheeple swallowed the loud explosion part and this fed their fancy. If you quietly cut all the vertical support columns then a minor explosion creating a jolt would set off the collapse! Yeah, I see that has nothing to do with the angle of the cuts I was explaining ... and, we need an independent investigation, not your opinions. Regards, JS- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Who would you get to except a truy investigation. Your National Socialist Government is in control of what cases goes to court! Trying to get this idea of yours to declare justice against your Government is a federal offense and you would be convicted of treason! Hows that for an opinion? |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 10, 1:05*am, "Scout"
wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 9, 8:51 pm, joeturn wrote: On May 9, 7:26 pm, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message .... On May 8, 8:03 pm, Jim Kale wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/8/2011 9:34 AM, Jim Kale wrote: ... You really are retarded if you think that **** holds any kind of reality. So uh, who's been charged for this "crime", you retard? I mean if it's "proof", then why isn't anybody being charged, you retard? Really? Yes, really! Well, it is simple, prove what you say. I am not obligated to prove a negative, you retard. * YOU have to prove what you say is correct, and then YOU still have to answer my questions, you retard. Your "list" of "experts" are all known retards, like you. ANSWER MY QUESTION, you retard! You said YOU have proof, right? * Then WHY isn't anybody being arrested, charged, indicted, incarcerated, etc., You stump stupid retard? It was your Government that was guilty Proof? Didn't think you had any. and they seem to have diplomatic immunity from the Supreme Law of the Land.This is why noone has been charged. They are in control of all three branches of government the Excecutive,Legistlative and Judicial system. You can't get a judge to try a case against their government,that would be considered treason.Anything that gets excepted as a case gets dismissed.Bush got his cousin to throw the case against him out.The lady knew she was meant to be killed at the Pentagon and also knew no plane hit the Pentagon. This is the smoking gun "the missile attack at the Pentagon" and the shills are full force keeping that from the public!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The only thing this guy got wrong was EVERYTHING. Doesn't have the FIRST clue of how video works and that a video is actually just a serious of individual pictures and WOW when you slow down a video enough.....all you see is an individual picture showing NO movement until suddenly the next picture loads and the object leads across the frame. Dude, buy a ****ing clue, you're just butt ass stupid and ignorant. the fuselage.It was not a fuselage it was the rocket plume the rocket is up front in plain view! Black nose,white center, black tail. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnzh-...layer_embedded Page two shows the first rocket in a wav just over and over.Did you see a plane? http://letsrollforums.com/helicopter...l?t=24811....- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Using the FBI released five frames clearly shows a missile.They just simply did not do good enough a hachet job on it before they released it! |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 10, 1:07*am, "Scout"
wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 9, 7:15 pm, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message .... On May 7, 3:57 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:14 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: ... Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! Normal high-rise fires containing all that NEVER melt iron nor leave nano thermite residue. The residues of thermite are iron and aluminum oxide. *THE most common metals used in high-rise construction. -- Ray Fischer * * * * | *Mendacracy (n.) government by lying *| *The new GOP ideal- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Really? I've got all sorts of metal slag spheres around our burning table, and oddly enough not only do we not use thermite, there is not barrium used in the cutting process. Just good old natural gas and oxygen. So please support your claim that spheres automatically mean barrium and thermite. Oh, that's right, you don't do proof for your assertions.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You felled to connect the dots spheres that are made from iron and sulfer that do contain barrium is the tell tell sign that Thermate was used! You cutting torch would take mega time to cut through vertical columns this is why natural gas and oxygen torches are not used for controlled demolition. Actually, they are. A LOT. In fact in most controlled demolition they are used. Even in explosive controlled demolition much of the prep work is done via these exact sort of cutting torches. I really suggest you need to STFU and quit simply embarrassing yourself with your stupidity and ignorance.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I think your getting embarrist with your Government Shill training They did not program you to be able to think for yourself and getting your replys butched is flustrating you! |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On 5/9/2011 11:10 PM, joeturn wrote:
... Who would you get to except a truy investigation. Your National Socialist Government is in control of what cases goes to court! Trying to get this idea of yours to declare justice against your Government is a federal offense and you would be convicted of treason! Hire 'em. There is a whole slew of them on the 9/11 truth site, as well as many more who have already been investigating, on their own. How about making one of 'em Niels Harrit? Even toss in some people from NIST ... it'll all work out. As long as it is done with open public scrutiny and all aspects are investigated and everything is widely open to the world. You could have Stephen Hawkings review all the data, in the end! Unless you are completely stupid, you will know a true and complete investigation ... Hows that for an opinion? That one? Well, that one is particularly stupid ... Regards, JS |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 10, 1:07*am, "Scout"
wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 9, 7:15 pm, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message .... On May 7, 3:57 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:14 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: ... Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! Normal high-rise fires containing all that NEVER melt iron nor leave nano thermite residue. The residues of thermite are iron and aluminum oxide. *THE most common metals used in high-rise construction. -- Ray Fischer * * * * | *Mendacracy (n.) government by lying *| *The new GOP ideal- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Really? I've got all sorts of metal slag spheres around our burning table, and oddly enough not only do we not use thermite, there is not barrium used in the cutting process. Just good old natural gas and oxygen. So please support your claim that spheres automatically mean barrium and thermite. Oh, that's right, you don't do proof for your assertions.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You felled to connect the dots spheres that are made from iron and sulfer that do contain barrium is the tell tell sign that Thermate was used! You cutting torch would take mega time to cut through vertical columns this is why natural gas and oxygen torches are not used for controlled demolition. Actually, they are. A LOT. In fact in most controlled demolition they are used. Even in explosive controlled demolition much of the prep work is done via these exact sort of cutting torches. This brings us to the B-thing buch (Israely Art Students)they stayed in there for a year and a half rent free gutting the building or do you think they(Bushes Security Employees) took out as much support as they could while doing their mantinance.There was very little office equiptment plumbing,wiring,carpet,cell phones,ect in the debree pile! Scott my audience needs to know these things,you cant do them justise your just a simple steel worker with no knowledge of controlled demolition except that which NIST taught you! How loud does a linear cutting charge have to be to cut through a box column! Torches are used in prep work occasionally but not for cutting the support columns and they certainly dont use nap gas. |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 10, 2:32*am, John Smith wrote:
On 5/9/2011 11:10 PM, joeturn wrote: ... Who would you get to except a truy investigation. Your National Socialist Government is in control of what cases goes to court! Trying to get this idea of yours to declare justice against your Government is a federal offense and you would be convicted of treason! Hire 'em. *There is a whole slew of them on the 9/11 truth site, as well as many more who have already been investigating, on their own. *How about making one of 'em Niels Harrit? Even toss in some people from NIST ... it'll all work out. *As long as it is done with open public scrutiny and all aspects are investigated and everything is widely open to the world. You could have Stephen Hawkings review all the data, in the end! Unless you are completely stupid, you will know a true and complete investigation ... Hows that for an opinion? That one? *Well, that one is particularly stupid ... Regards, JS A lawyer oath demans him be hung for going against his Governmens Constitution! Bushes cousin threw the case againt Chenney and Rumsfeld out of court still claiming there was a plane strike at the Pentagram! Its all cut and dried,its National Socialism brought here by our 41st President straight from Nazi Germany."Curious George" Sherriff Jr that name given to him by Tesla, started the CIA. There has been too many years in the planning to bring about One World Government,to let a true investigation be presented to the sheeple! |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 10, 12:33*am, joeturn wrote:
On May 10, 1:07*am, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message .... On May 9, 7:15 pm, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 3:57 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:14 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: ... Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! Normal high-rise fires containing all that NEVER melt iron nor leave nano thermite residue. The residues of thermite are iron and aluminum oxide. *THE most common metals used in high-rise construction. -- Ray Fischer * * * * | *Mendacracy (n.) government by lying *| *The new GOP ideal- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Really? I've got all sorts of metal slag spheres around our burning table, and oddly enough not only do we not use thermite, there is not barrium used in the cutting process. Just good old natural gas and oxygen. So please support your claim that spheres automatically mean barrium and thermite. Oh, that's right, you don't do proof for your assertions.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You felled to connect the dots spheres that are made from iron and sulfer that do contain barrium is the tell tell sign that Thermate was used! You cutting torch would take mega time to cut through vertical columns this is why natural gas and oxygen torches are not used for controlled demolition. Actually, they are. A LOT. In fact in most controlled demolition they are used. Even in explosive controlled demolition much of the prep work is done via these exact sort of cutting torches. This brings us to the B-thing buch (Israely Art Students)they stayed in there for a year and a half rent free gutting the building or do you think they(Bushes Security Employees) took out as much support as they could while doing their mantinance.There was very little office equiptment plumbing,wiring,carpet,cell phones,ect in the debree pile! Scott my audience needs to know these things,you cant do them justise your just a simple steel worker with no knowledge of controlled demolition except that which NIST taught you! How loud does a linear cutting charge have to be to cut through a box column! Torches are used in prep work occasionally but not for cutting the support columns and they certainly dont use nap gas. Please stop smoking crack, WrongTurnJoe. Your poor suffering momma can't take any more! |
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 10, 12:18*am, BDK wrote:
In article 7059f16f-5fe7-497d-8c34-4baae6a612d7 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On May 9, wrote: On May 9, 6:17*pm, joeturn wrote: On May 9, 7:15*pm, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 3:57 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:14 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: ... Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! Normal high-rise fires containing all that NEVER melt iron nor leave nano thermite residue. The residues of thermite are iron and aluminum oxide. *THE most common metals used in high-rise construction. -- Ray Fischer * * * * | *Mendacracy (n.) government by lying *| *The new GOP ideal- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Really? I've got all sorts of metal slag spheres around our burning table, and oddly enough not only do we not use thermite, there is not barrium used in the cutting process. Just good old natural gas and oxygen. So please support your claim that spheres automatically mean barrium and thermite. Oh, that's right, you don't do proof for your assertions.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You felled to connect the dots spheres that are made from iron and sulfer that do contain barrium is the tell tell sign that Thermate was used! It is a complete physical impossibility for thermite to do what happened to those buildings. It's not possible. FULL STOP! You cutting torch would take mega time to cut through vertical columns this is why natural gas and oxygen torches are not used for controlled demolition. Thermite is not used in controlled demolition, ever. During a controlled demolition the columns are fitted with a yoke that contains the thermite There is no thermite in controlled demolition, RockHead. and holds it on the targeted column on about a 45 degree angle. This angle cut allows the top part to slip off its base and drop straight down. You can see clear pictures of these angled cuts on the columns. You would never use your torch to cut an angled cut on a beam unless it was for a specific outcome. Those beams at Ground Zero were cut with torches AFTER the collapse by workers cleaning up the debris, kooker. There are PHOTOS and VIDEOS of them doing this. You are STUPID BEYOND BELIEF.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like this one? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EO7SvhYI_0Y&NR=1 You really are stupid beyond belief. I love it. He IS pure Komedy Gold, innit he? He is MUCH more amusing than Johnny KQQK since WrongTurnJoe is too stupid to know he's stupid, more like an innocent child. Johnny, however, had grown dull and lost his comedic edge. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:32 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com