On 5/22/2011 12:40 AM, harry k wrote:
On May 21, 1:36 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote:
On 5/20/2011 11:35 AM, bpnjensen wrote:





On May 19, 6:57 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote:
On 5/19/2011 4:23 AM, RHF wrote:

On May 18, 6:42 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/18/2011 6:34 PM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

On 5/12/2011 3:44 AM, Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:

...
Since it's all made up, in a sense there is no original -- except in the
imaginations of the authors.

It's like asking "What did Alice _really_ say to the Red Queen?"

How deep is a rabbit hole...?

Quite shallow!

Life on earth is the only example of itself ... at least at this present
time.

Nothing in all of our view of the universe before us, earth, mars, moon,
other planets, etc. would lead one to believe that life can "just happen
by accident." "Spontaneous Generation", or life "just happening" was
tried as a theory, long ago, although it still has its' followers, it
has simply grown into a religion which would have one make a leap of
faith against all logical thought and reason to believe ... end of story.

Therefore, and borne out by occams' razor, the most likely explanation
is that an intelligence created us ...

Nothing tells us enough to have enough information for either theory and
Occums Razor needs enough information to apply it.

In this case we are short on facts for either assumption.

No one has a simple proof there is no God and no one has proof there is
a God. Leaving the same fate to the spontaneous life theory....

The question is.... if life was started when the Earth was one billion
years old, why hasn't it been started with new and different DNA again
in the last three billion years?

If Life was started "successfully" in the last 4 billion years, how many
times was it started unsuccessfully in the last 4 billion years. By that
I mean that if life was started that can and did have DNA to reproduce
how many times did life get started with different DNA that couldn't
reproduce? If it took Billions of "life creations" to start life that
could reproduce, where are the billions of failed "life" that we have
never seen because they have DNA that's different and can't reproduce?

Evolution means that there are many failed and many variations in the
many streams of DNA in life. Where are they?

What has the universe produced only one of? Einstein predicted that
there may even be multiple universes. It seems odd that there is only
one type of reproducing DNA based life all from one common start of life
three billion years ago. All the elements are still here waiting to
start new life(reproducing and NON-reproducing) and should be doing so
each new day. Where are they?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It is scientifically and logically impossible to prove that there is
no God. One of the primary tenets of logic, regardless of the topic,
is that the null hypothesis cannot be proven. The full burden of
proof rests on those who make the extraordinary claim to begin with.
Arguing about "trying to prove the existence or nonexistence of God"
is a waste of time for people who are unfamiliar with either science
or logic.

It is purely a matter of faith, and throwing around DNA arguments like
these above is just unscientific nonsense.

Bruce Jensen

Then you have a scientific explanation to the question of where all the
other forms of DNA based life that were created are at?

It's NOT logical that only one form of DNA was ever created for all of
earths history and it was able to reproduce right out of the gate.

Explain the odds of that in a scientific way... Then tell us where all
the failed DNA is at?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Survival of the fittest. The first successful 'life' ate all the late
comers.

Harry K



At least that was funny, not believable but... I get a chuckle out of
the lack of ideas on how life just happened but it never "just happened"
ever again? What happened to all the elements being available on this
planet to create life?


What were the odds?