http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/demjanjuk_declines_chance_to_make_final_statement_ to_german_trial_ahead_of_verdict/2011/05/12/AFPzY6wG_story.html?wprss=rss_homepage

How many more of these folks might still be out there? Very few I suspect.

One does wonder about the evidence presented.

On 05/12/2011 04:41 AM, dxAce wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/demjanjuk_declines_chance_to_make_final_statement_ to_german_trial_ahead_of_verdict/2011/05/12/AFPzY6wG_story.html?wprss=rss_homepage

How many more of these folks might still be out there? Very few I suspect.

One does wonder about the evidence presented.


Lave it to Steve to defend the Nazi mass murderer.

dave wrote:

On 05/12/2011 04:41 AM, dxAce wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/demjanjuk_declines_chance_to_make_final_statement_ to_german_trial_ahead_of_verdict/2011/05/12/AFPzY6wG_story.html?wprss=rss_homepage

How many more of these folks might still be out there? Very few I suspect.

One does wonder about the evidence presented.


Lave it to Steve to defend the Nazi mass murderer.

-Lave- it to Rickmers to be a total clown 'tard!

On 05/12/2011 05:11 AM, dxAce wrote:


dave wrote:

On 05/12/2011 04:41 AM, dxAce wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/demjanjuk_declines_chance_to_make_final_statement_ to_german_trial_ahead_of_verdict/2011/05/12/AFPzY6wG_story.html?wprss=rss_homepage

How many more of these folks might still be out there? Very few I suspect.

One does wonder about the evidence presented.


Lave it to Steve to defend the Nazi mass murderer.

-Lave- it to Rickmers to be a total clown 'tard!


At least I have an excuse.

ex goobernator of California Ahhhhhnold's dad was a Nazi guard in World
War Two.Was he not?
cuhulin

On 05/12/2011 10:26 AM, wrote:
ex goobernator of California Ahhhhhnold's dad was a Nazi guard in World
War Two.Was he not?
cuhulin

You're the oldest in this bunch, near as I can tell. Arnold was
Austrian, just like Shickelgruber.

On May 12, 7:32*am, dave wrote:
On 05/12/2011 05:11 AM, dxAce wrote:









dave wrote:

On 05/12/2011 04:41 AM, dxAce wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/demjanjuk_declines_chance_to_make...

How many more of these folks might still be out there? Very few I suspect.

One does wonder about the evidence presented.

Lave it to Steve to defend the Nazi mass murderer.

-Lave- it to Rickmers to be a total clown 'tard!

At least I have an excuse.

Dave You Are Your Very Own Excuse !

http://www.devilfinder.com/find.php?q=Arnold+Schwarzenegger's+Father+was+a+Na zi+Guard
cuhulin

On May 12, 7:41*am, dxAce wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/demjanjuk_declines_chance_to_make...

How many more of these folks might still be out there? Very few I suspect..

One does wonder about the evidence presented.

I also wonder about it. At one point he was convicted IN ISRAEL, but
the Israeli Supreme Court overturned his conviction because it thought
he was likely a victim of mistaken identity. If the Israeli court
refused to uphold his conviction, then I really wonder how compelling
the evidence could have been in this most recent trial.

The guy's so old at this point, he's probably happy to have the
guarantee of "3 hots and a cot" as well as free medical care for the
next five years.

Steve wrote:

On May 12, 7:41 am, dxAce wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/demjanjuk_declines_chance_to_make...

How many more of these folks might still be out there? Very few I suspect.

One does wonder about the evidence presented.

I also wonder about it. At one point he was convicted IN ISRAEL, but
the Israeli Supreme Court overturned his conviction because it thought
he was likely a victim of mistaken identity. If the Israeli court
refused to uphold his conviction, then I really wonder how compelling
the evidence could have been in this most recent trial.

The guy's so old at this point, he's probably happy to have the
guarantee of "3 hots and a cot" as well as free medical care for the
next five years.

Yeah, I guess my thought might be is that many people were 'there' in an attempt
to 'serve their country' and I cannot fault them for doing so.

My original comment concerned the article, and the feeling that prosecutors said
he was there (at Sobibor) without proof he had actually done anything wrong and
therefore guilty simply on the basis of 'being there'.

I am not supporting Nazi's, nor supporting any ideals of the Nazi regime.