|
Mexicans a Diverse People
On May 25, 12:36*pm, Red Cloud wrote:
On May 24, 11:44*am, John Smith wrote: On 5/24/2011 11:32 AM, bpnjensen wrote: ... Mexico does have a problem - a very serious one - with political corruption, as do many Latin American nations. *Their history is rife with corrupt events that make ours look paltry by comparison. *With this crap going on and the needs of the electorate ignored, can you blame them for wanting to leave? *I have a co-worker of Brazilian ancestry, a great person and proud American BTW, who left because she was sick of the Brazilian corruption. Bruce Yeah, but in reality, what happens is, they attempt to leave the problems, not realizing they are part of them, this results in them transporting the problems to a new area ... You see the above on a smaller scale when people leave the city to escape the problems and go to the smaller towns. *They end up enacting the same ordinances, rules, laws, actions, styles, mindsets, etc. which caused all the problems in the first place! *Soon, the place they left is no different that the place they are ... Regards, JS Mexican rotten problem goes back to - the Spanish colonialism era and still - ruled by the Spanish at*the top and - non-white mestizo are at the bottom. The Mexico "People" are more 'diverse' than that. Mestizo {Mixed-Race} Mexicans Note : This is the Majority of Mexicans * Indio-European * Indio-African * Tri-Racial * * Indio+Afro+Euro * * Indio+Asian+Euro {Asian from the Philippines} |
A McDonalds with all whites and NO MEXICANS?!? In California?!?
On May 25, 2:26*pm, wrote:
Des Plaines,,,,, how about French Camp,Missy Sippy and the former name of Jackson, Le Fluer's Bluff? Those are Frog names too. cuhulin My Daddy spent a few summers in French Camp, CA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Camp,_California |
A McDonalds with all whites and NO MEXICANS?!? In California?!?
On May 25, 9:18*pm, wrote:
On May 24, 2:48*pm, bpnjensen wrote: On May 24, 11:44*am, John Smith wrote: On 5/24/2011 11:32 AM, bpnjensen wrote: ... Mexico does have a problem - a very serious one - with political corruption, as do many Latin American nations. *Their history is rife with corrupt events that make ours look paltry by comparison. *With this crap going on and the needs of the electorate ignored, can you blame them for wanting to leave? *I have a co-worker of Brazilian ancestry, a great person and proud American BTW, who left because she was sick of the Brazilian corruption. Bruce Yeah, but in reality, what happens is, they attempt to leave the problems, not realizing they are part of them, this results in them transporting the problems to a new area ... You see the above on a smaller scale when people leave the city to escape the problems and go to the smaller towns. *They end up enacting the same ordinances, rules, laws, actions, styles, mindsets, etc. which caused all the problems in the first place! *Soon, the place they left is no different that the place they are ... Regards, JS Well, speaking only for my Brazilian co-worker - she's a great asset to her community, which is not Brazilian but American. *I don't think you can paint every person with the same paintbrush.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I always wondered- why did all the former Latin American Spanish Colonies broke up into separate countries , while Brazil (formerly Portuguese ) is still intact ? A Collective Oligarchy of Rich Landowners within a Geographic Region* plus Small Minded Petty Dictators {Presidents-for-Life} http://www.hispanicallyspeakingnews....in_america.gif * A 'Community of Interests' Latin American Wars of Independence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_A...f_independence The Portuguese Monarchy was 'Seated' for a number of Years in Brazil followed by an Independent {Euro-Royal} Empire of Brazil that lasted several Decades. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empire_of_Brazil |
A McDonalds with all whites and NO MEXICANS?!? In California?!?
On May 24, 11:00*am, RD Sandman wrote:
Red Cloud wrote : On May 23, 8:46*pm, John Smith wrote: On 5/23/2011 8:22 PM, Benny Fishhole wrote: ... That's right, they are now Mexican by the second definition. Now go tell your illegal bride to go cook up some tacos. As I said, today, for all practical purposes, "BEANER = INDIAN." *.... end of story ... If you doubt it, take a look at them, today the majority in my city are South American Indians ... and here from Brazil, Peru, Guatemala, etc. And, like I further said, most do not use the word "mexican" properly ... Regards, JS Well most Hispanics are Mexicans. That's why I use Mexican first before Brazilian or Peruvian or other South American National. I assume you mean most Hispanics who are in the US. *What the term means is Spanish speaking people or culture. *It also means an American whose first language is Spanish. Pwhahahah....You sound like Indian boarding school principle. You don' t know the native tongue was demonized by Anglo and Spanish? They said "Don't speak native tongue. It's devil talk." OH now you say Spanish is the first American language. You seem to deny more than 500 Indian dialects were spoken before your Spanish colonialist (now anti-Anglo American) gene arrived here... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com