| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
May 25th 11, 09:46 PM
posted to talk.politics.guns,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,rec.radio.shortwave,alt.conspiracy
|
|||
|
|||
Financial wealth, or JUST WHO SHOULD PAY FOR ALL OF THIS?
"gfn" wrote in message ... On May 25, 3:18 pm, RD Sandman wrote: gfn wrote : On May 24, 3:00 pm, RD Sandman wrote: gfn wrote innews:fafaebf4-7788-4906-a699-839c2c5dac6b@ s2g2000yql.googlegroups.com: On May 24, 2:34 pm, RD Sandman wrote: gfn wrote innews:5111f00d-80ed-4513-9bae-c9a63b5cdb40@ x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com: On May 24, 1:23 pm, RD Sandman wrote: gfn wrote in news:75946acf-fb50-4a71-9677-e0b1afec14b0 @w19g2000yql.googlegroups.com: On May 24, 11:24 am, John Smith wrote: On 5/24/2011 8:20 AM, gfn wrote: ... Where are some credible souces to back up any of that innuendo you keep attempting to push? Truth is, sure looks like the wealthiest 1% are not paying 42% of all of governments costs, and sure looks like the top 19% are not paying half of governments costs, until that happens they are NOT paying their fair share ... a flat tax can fix that ... Regards, JS I already said the tax data is at irs.gov Now, as for a flat tax I agree with you 100%. The one I advocate is the FairTax. That is not a flat tax, it is a sales tax. It's a sales tax but it is flat. It's a flat 23%. You had better spend some time learning what a flat tax is. I'm perfectly familiar with a flat tax. Not sure about that since it has nothing to do with sales. Sure I do. The "flat tax" has the government deriving its revenue from the income tax. Yep....at a flat rate for everybody. As does the FairTax. Best part is the consumer pays it only when they buy something. They decide when to pay it, not when the government decides you owe it on payday. The FairTax is related because it is a flat sales tax that generates revenue from sales. It replaces the income tax as the method of funding government. If you fully understand the FairTax you will see exactly where I am coming from. Then to keep it from becoming regressive you must drop that sales tax from certain items, like food, housing, public transportation, gasoline, etc.. or you end up with the poor paying a much larger percentage of their income on those taxes than the wealthy. Nope, There are two reasons why it's not regressive. First, people pay no net FairTax at all up to the poverty level. Every household receives a rebate that is equal to the FairTax paid on essential goods and services. Second, per my example an item that costs $100 today still costs $100 under the FairTax. If that's regressive then sign me up. The poor are always going to pay a larger percentage of their income on everything. No tax system is going to change that. Isn't that what the bulk of this thread is about? The FairTax is a replacement for the income tax. Yes....and a flat tax is another method of figuring income tax. Yeah....and they both accomplish the same thing. The FairTax is better because a flat tax still involves taxing income which then leads to exemptions, deductions, and keeps the 16th amendment in place as well as the IRS, and I can go on and on about the pitfalls of our current tax system. A flat tax on income replaces the current tax system. If properly administered it only has ONE deduction and that is poverty level wages for a family of four. Everyone gets that ONE deduction, or exemption if you prefer, and no other. You can do your tax on a postcard. Under the FairTax you don't have to worry about deductions or exemptions. You don't even have to do your taxes on a postcard because there is nothing to do. April 15 would be just another beautiful spring day. Here's the problem with the flat tax, it retains the invasive income tax administration apparatus and can easily revert to a graduated, convoluted mess, as it has many times over many years. In addition, a large part of the burden of the flat tax -- the business tax -- will remain hidden from people in the retail price of goods and services. Under a flat tax, individuals would still file an income tax return each year. Postcard or not, it's still a return. While this is a simple postcard, the record keeping requirement is still there. Under the FairTax, individuals never file a tax return again, ever! Under the flat tax, the payroll tax would be retained and income tax withholding would still be with us. Under the FairTax, the payroll tax, which is a larger and more regressive tax burden for most Americans than is the income tax, is repealed. Under the FairTax, what you earn is what you keep. No more withholding taxes; no more income tax. It uses a flat 23% as the revenue generator. Call it what you will, the FairTax is a winner. You may think so. I don't. I think it needs too many adjustments so that it does not become regressive. I don't think so, I know so. Tell me how this is regressive? Current tax system: Taxpayer earns $1000 a year. IRS takes 25%: $250. Taxpayer has $750 left to spend. Taxpayer buys a new toaster for a FINAL total of $130. Taxpayer has $620 left. Fairtax system: Taxpayer earns $1000 a year. IRS takes 0%: $0 Taxpayer has $1000 left to spend Taxpayer buys a new toaster for a FINAL total of $130. Taxpayer has $870 left. I'll go one better under the fairtax system. Taxpayer earns $1000 a year. IRS takes 0%: $0 Taxpayer has $1000 left to spend Taxpayer buys a USED toaster for a total of $100. Taxpayer pays NO fairtax sales tax. Taxpayer has $900 left. So, again, how is that regressive. Same taxpayer......buys $100 worth of groceries.....pays $123 for them. Stop right there. That's incorrect. Under the FairTax the $100 of groceries will still cost $100. There's no need to even go any further with your example. Rich guy, he eats the same, so he buys a $100 worth of groceries...pays $123 for them. Which one spent the bigger percentage of their income on a necessity? OK, let's fix it....we will not pay that tax on groceries....oooops, you just generated an exception. Three suggestions for you to find out why as well as any other questions you might have: 1) go visit fairtax.org and read it from front to back. Pay particular attention to the FAQ. 2) Buy and read "The FairTax Book" by Linder and Boortz. 3) Then buy and read "FairTax:The Truth: Answering the Critics" It will all become crystal clear. I am familiar with sales tax schemes, they have been around for years. With exemptions, they become just as convoluted as the current system. Excise luxury taxes were another attempt to soak the rich as poor poeple would never buy luxury taxed items. How did that work out? You may be familiar with sales tax schemes, but it's clear you aren't familiar with the FairTax. Instead of speculating as you have done above why not go visit the site and base your criticisms on the plan itself? You will find that many of the things you raised above are answered there. Look, I'm with you that a flat tax would be better than the current system. Problem is that it, as opposed to something like the FairTax, leaves itself open to far more manipulation than the FairTax. The tax code itself is evidence of just that. -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain. Nonsense. Stupid nonsense! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Financial wealth, or JUST WHO SHOULD PAY FOR ALL OF THIS? | Shortwave | |||
| Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth ! | Shortwave | |||
| Moving Money Around Is Clearly Wealth Redistribution {Redistributingthe Wealth} | Shortwave | |||
| iBiquity in financial mayhem | Shortwave | |||
| iBiquity's Financial Mayhem ! | Shortwave | |||
![Sid9[_3_] is offline](https://www.radiobanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Threaded Mode
