Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gray Ghost wrote in
. 97.142: RD Sandman wrote in : Somebody has to be able to adjust tax rates... If not Congress then who? Why? Why should the government need any more than say 10% of the private sector, except in case of war maybe, and probably not even then? Why should the government be entitled to any more than 10% of the private sector? Who said it should be? I said somebody has to be able to adjust the tax rates. What the if the rate needed dropped to 5%? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RD Sandman wrote in
: Gray Ghost wrote in . 97.142: RD Sandman wrote in : Somebody has to be able to adjust tax rates... If not Congress then who? Why? Why should the government need any more than say 10% of the private sector, except in case of war maybe, and probably not even then? Why should the government be entitled to any more than 10% of the private sector? Who said it should be? I said somebody has to be able to adjust the tax rates. What the if the rate needed dropped to 5%? Fine, Congress can lower the rate but not raise it. Cough-cough. Yeah -- Herman Cain for President! http://hermancain.com/ If you don't support him you are a Racist!! He beat Cancer. He'll beat Obama (who is just like cancer) Remember Desert One, Carter 0? Ain't it sad to wish that Obama had as much ambition but being glad he doesn't knowing he doesn't have THAT much competence? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gray Ghost wrote in
. 97.142: RD Sandman wrote in : Gray Ghost wrote in . 97.142: RD Sandman wrote in : Somebody has to be able to adjust tax rates... If not Congress then who? Why? Why should the government need any more than say 10% of the private sector, except in case of war maybe, and probably not even then? Why should the government be entitled to any more than 10% of the private sector? Who said it should be? I said somebody has to be able to adjust the tax rates. What the if the rate needed dropped to 5%? Fine, Congress can lower the rate but not raise it. Cough-cough. Yeah In either case, someone or some entity needs to be able to adjust those rates. -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "RD Sandman" wrote in message ... Gray Ghost wrote in . 97.142: RD Sandman wrote in : Somebody has to be able to adjust tax rates... If not Congress then who? Why? Why should the government need any more than say 10% of the private sector, except in case of war maybe, and probably not even then? Why should the government be entitled to any more than 10% of the private sector? Who said it should be? I said somebody has to be able to adjust the tax rates. What the if the rate needed dropped to 5%? Congress could drop it, or it could be brought up before the people as a referendum during a general election. Congress can only, but only the People can vote to increase it. -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Financial wealth, or JUST WHO SHOULD PAY FOR ALL OF THIS? | Shortwave | |||
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth ! | Shortwave | |||
Moving Money Around Is Clearly Wealth Redistribution {Redistributingthe Wealth} | Shortwave | |||
iBiquity in financial mayhem | Shortwave | |||
iBiquity's Financial Mayhem ! | Shortwave |