LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old May 27th 11, 03:09 PM posted to talk.politics.guns,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,rec.radio.shortwave,alt.conspiracy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2010
Posts: 83
Default Financial wealth, or JUST WHO SHOULD PAY FOR ALL OF THIS?

"gfn" wrote in message
...
On May 26, 8:03 pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"gfn" wrote in message

...









On May 26, 1:05 pm, RD Sandman wrote:
gfn wrote
:


On May 25, 5:42 pm, RD Sandman wrote:
gfn wrote
innews:7c91830c-c968-4f08-9c9e-77bc0350d428@
y19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com:


Sure I do. The "flat tax" has the government deriving its
revenue from the income tax.


Yep....at a flat rate for everybody.


As does the FairTax. Best part is the consumer pays it only when
the
y
buy something. They decide when to pay it, not when the government
decides you owe it on payday.


It looks like they are trying to mix sales tax with the old luxury
tax.


The FairTax is effectively a replacement of the compliance costs that
are already built in to every product and service you buy.


Not quite since those compliance costs are not the same revenue source
as
the income tax. For your Fair Tax to work, that revenue source from
income needs to be added.....so it isn't simply the 'before' costs
added
to the price of purchase.


No it doesn’t need to be added. It’s already part of what you are
paying anyway. Here’s a very simplified example:


Product costs $100, broken down as follows:


Under current system
- wholesale = $50
- compliance costs = $23
- sales and other taxes = $27
- Grand total = $100


Under the FairTax
- wholesale = $50
- compliance costs = - $23
- FairTax = $23
- sales and other taxes = $27
- Grand total = $100


Sorry, but how can you totally eliminate compliance costs, since there
would
still be costs to complying with the FairTax as well as the sales and
other
taxes.

As such simply saying it's not going to cost anything to comply with the
tax
laws is an utterly false assumption.

Indeed since NOTHING else has changed the compliance costs would, at
minimum, stay the same, and given that the need to comply with the FairTax
would require some expense, the compliance cost would likely increase.

So in reality, what would happen would be more like:

Under the FairTax
- wholesale = $50
- compliance costs = $26
- FairTax = $23
- sales and other taxes = $27
- Grand total = $126

#
# Let me ask you a real simple question. What cost do you incur to pay
# a sales tax at the point of purchase?

The buyer ?
The buyer is paying for the cost which is built into the sale price
The seller ?
The seller has the cost of managing and reporting the taxes that were
captured at the point of sale.
The government ?
The government has the cost of processing and verifying the reports from
the sellers. As well as running investigations/prosecutions where it's
suspected that the sellers are not reporting/paying all the captured taxes.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Financial wealth, or JUST WHO SHOULD PAY FOR ALL OF THIS? John Smith[_8_] Shortwave 14 May 25th 11 11:09 PM
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth ! RHF Shortwave 49 March 28th 11 01:52 PM
Moving Money Around Is Clearly Wealth Redistribution {Redistributingthe Wealth} RHF Shortwave 0 March 24th 11 12:15 PM
iBiquity in financial mayhem Rfburns Shortwave 18 September 12th 07 05:56 PM
iBiquity's Financial Mayhem ! [email protected] Shortwave 38 August 1st 06 12:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017